Research Degree Examining and Chair of Viva: Professor Stephen Lacey Friday 30 November 2012 A104.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rob Briner Organizational Psychology Birkbeck
Advertisements

Quality and Standards Framework – Collaborative Provision December 2008 Janet Pearce, University Quality Officer.
The Viva: before, during and after Professor Derek Colquhoun, Centre for Educational Studies, Faculty of Education
How to survive your viva Chris Park – Director, Graduate School.
External Examining at Keele University
Understanding Major & Annual Review September 2014 Donna Crighton, Cheryl Strong & Nikki Sowerby Research Section, QMD, Academic Registry.
Sharing Good Practice in Quality
Research Supervisor Training Programme Obligations of the Supervisor.
UWE Bristol External Examiner Annual Reporting Rebecca Smith, Curriculum Enhancement Manager
Introduction to PhD Code of Practice Jo FerrieInterim Director Graduate Training September 2013.
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners February 2013
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
The PhD Viva Steve Schneider 21 June This session Context on the nature of the PhD viva Two demonstration mini vivas Discussion and questions.
Recent Changes to HDR Policy and Procedures Felicity Roddick Associate Dean Research and Innovation.
Research Degree Theses and Oral Examinations John Kirby Graduate School Faculty of Medical Sciences University of Newcastle.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
Registration and Assessment There are 3 periodic assessments throughout the PhD: Assessment 1: the Research Plan (by 8 weeks) All students must complete.
1Induction for Subject External Examiners Nicola Clarke Academic Standards and Quality Assurance Manager.
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
Doctoral Training Workshops The PhD, Probation and MRes Viva Stephen Potter and John Richardson.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
How to survive your viva PhD Research Methodology Course Nov 2011
Dr C. Wilson, 2009 Surviving Vivas. PhD Vivas Dr C. Wilson, 2009 Format Conducted in a similar manner to panels but some important differences. May or.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
Preceptor Orientation
Rhona Sharpe, Head of OCSLD Liz Turner, Head of APQO 11 th April 2013 CHAIRING VALIDATION PANELS.
Research Supervisor Training Programme Regulations & Processes.
Information for External Examiners involved in Academic Collaborative Provision - 12 Nov 2014.
Research Examiner/ Independent Chair Training Programme
Preparing for a Viva Tristram Hooley Postgraduate Training Co-ordinator Student Learning Centre.
Overview of Thesis Submission and Examination Helen Buckley, Research Student Administrator, Graduate Studies Office (GSO).
Overview of Thesis Submission and Examination Helen Buckley, Research Student Administrator, Graduate Studies Office (GSO).
Independent Chairs for Research Degree Examinations.
Regulations and Procedures Please ensure you are familiar with the regulations surrounding examination as laid out in the Research Degree Regulatory Framework.
Approaching your final years of research Kate Marsh Faculty Director of Postgraduate Research, Humanities & Social Sciences.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
Responsibilities and engagement of External Examiners Graham Holden.
The Role of the Internal and External Evaluators in Student Assessment Arthur Brown Advisor to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic.
Access Grading Briefing Assessment requirements. Why these requirements? To ensure that: grades, credits and Access to HE Diplomas are awarded on an equivalent.
Dr Kate Mahoney Preparing for your Viva What is it? What can you expect?
External Examiners’ Workshop The role of the external examiner and its requirements at the University of Brighton Professor Stephen Denyer Pro-Vice-Chancellor.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Forum for New External Examiners. Enid Ashdown, Principal Administrator, Academic Quality Alan Gregg, Academic Coordinator, Academic Quality Vashti Hutton,
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
External Examining Induction Event for new Examiners February 2017
School Director of Postgraduate Research Induction
UCL Annual Student Experience Review
Quality and Standards An introduction.
External Examiners Briefing Session Wednesday 12th April 2017
Registration and Assessment
Responsibilities and engagement of an external examiner
Postgraduate Research Student Supervision
PRC Information Session
The Learning Agreement, Intellectual Property Rights and Project Approval Professor Dianne Ford Director of PhD Studies, Faculty of Medical Sciences.
Roles and Responsibilities of an External Examiner
Preparing for your Viva
Acting as Independent Chair – essential information
John Kirby Graduate School Faculty of Medical Sciences
External Examiners’ Workshop
The Independent Chair: The role and situations explored
External Examiner Reports
Compliance, Policy and Regulations
Progression and Advancement
External Examiners Induction Edge Hill University
External Examiners Briefing Session Friday 14th December 2018
Research Degree Independent Chair Workshop 4 April 2019
Validation Programme Developers
Preparation for the Doctoral Examination 11 March 2019
Brunel University Briefing for External Examiners March 2014
Presentation transcript:

Research Degree Examining and Chair of Viva: Professor Stephen Lacey Friday 30 November 2012 A104

QAA Quality Code for Higher Education Chapter B11: Research Degrees ASSESSMENT Indicator 16 Higher education providers that are research degree awarding bodies use criteria for assessing research degrees that enable them to define their academic standards and the achievements of their graduates. The criteria used to assess research degrees are clear and readily available to research students, staff and examiners. Indicator 17 Research degree final assessment procedures are clear and are operated rigorously, fairly and consistently. They include input from an external examiner and are carried out to a reasonable timescale. Assessment procedures are communicated clearly to research students, supervisors and examiners. Higher education providers…may appoint an independent, non-examining chair, who may not contribute to the assessment judgement. Such an appointment, and clear guidance on the extent of the chair's role and responsibilities, including details about the circumstances in which the chair will be used, encourages consistency between different vivas and provides an additional viewpoint if the conduct of the viva should become the subject of a research student appeal. Chapter-B11.pdf

Before the viva #1 All handbooks and forms can be found on the Research pages The committee that oversees the process is Research Programmes Sub-Group, which reports to Research Committee and, annually, to QAC Proposal of examiners and chair (submit R7 form – at least 4 months before the proposed oral examination) Appointment of examiners and chair (RPSG) How many examiners? – normally one internal and one external (although it can depend on subject expertise/examining experience etc. Staff members are required to have 1 internal and 2 external examiners) Who makes the viva arrangements? – Director of Studies/Supervision team/Nominee (admin support in Faculty)

Who can be an Examiner? Training/professional development Examination experience; normally minimum of 3 completions per examining team Subject expertise Independence Demonstrably research active

Who can be a Chair? Senior academic Research degree examining experience Knowledge of regulations Independence (can be from a different faculty)

Role of the examiner To make a judgement upon the candidate’s submission (nb. the viva is part of the submission) To ascertain that the work is the candidate’s own To ascertain that the work has met the criteria for the award To assure standards of presentation of the thesis To make a recommendation to RPSG To provide detailed feedback to the candidate, if necessary

Role of the Chair To advise the examiners on matters of procedure and regulation To ensure the viva is conducted in a fair manner according to procedures To explain the process to the candidate To advise the examiners on their deliberations To communicate the outcome to the candidate – ensure everyone is clear on the this (and what needs to be done/agreed at the time of the viva - if amendments) To act as arbiter in case of dispute (in the viva) To act as an independent witness

Before the Viva #2 Examiners Read the thesis Prepare a preliminary report (R8) – which should be submitted at least 10 days before the viva takes place Chairs Do not read the thesis

At the Viva (Examiners) Examiners’ pre-meeting (active role of Chair) Different approaches to questioning Start gently – give the candidate the opportunity to impress Allow the candidate to speak! Listen to what the candidate says and, if necessary, ask follow-up questions. Be prepared to depart from the script How long should a viva be? Be fair (allow for nerves) but thorough and robust.

At the Viva (Chairs) Introduce the candidate and examiners Explain the process to the candidate Keep quiet unless you have to intervene, but listen – takes notes on the process if necessary Be prepared to draw the examiners to a conclusion (discussions can be lengthy!) Make sure the supervisor does not interfere! Ask the candidate if they would like to add anything At the end, invite the candidate and supervisor to leave the room

After the viva Chair to lead the discussion Chair to complete Chair’s report and ensure paperwork (R9) is in order and return all documentation to the Research Office If examiners agree on changes, Chair ensures they are precise about what is required and the candidate knows this! Chair invites candidate back in and communicates the recommendation Chair asks candidate if they have any questions, but doesn’t allow a debate to take place

Examiners’ Options 1.that the candidate be awarded the degree of MPhil/PhD/DBA, Masters by Research delete as appropriate 2.that the candidate be granted the degree of MPhil/PhD/DBA, Masters by Research delete as appropriate subject to amendments and corrections being made to the submission 1 ; within………month/s to the satisfaction of the internal examiner and/or external examiner(s) delete as appropriate 3.That the candidate be permitted to re-submit for the degree of MPhil/PhD/DBA, Masters by Research delete as appropriate and be re-examined with or without delete as appropriate an oral examination. In the case of PhD candidates only: 4. that the candidate be offered the degree of MPhil subject to the presentation of the submission amended to the satisfaction of the examiners 2 5. In the case of MPhil candidates only: that the candidate be offered the University Research Diploma subject to the presentation of the submission amended to the satisfaction of the examiners. 6. the candidate not be awarded the degree of MPhil/PhD/DBA, Masters by Research delete as appropriate and not be permitted to be re-examined. 1 Please specify the period of time the amendments have to be completed eg between 1 and 6 months 2 If you are recommending the award of MPhil to candidates of PhD by publication, please indicate the exceptional circumstances

Additional points The external examiner is normally the senior examiner External examiners get paid, internal examiners don’t! The Chair is there to help the examiners Do a thorough job! The examiners are only making a recommendation to RPSG

Graduate Research Office Contacts Dr Elaine Huntley Secretary to Research Programmes Sub Group / telephone: Sally Davies Clerk to Research Programmes Sub Group / telephone:

Forms, Regulations, Guidance…