SPC Faculty Publications 2003-2007 Prepared by the SPC Office of Faculty Research and Sponsored Programs.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Non-Academic References

Advertisements

Chapter Nine Communications and Networks. Objective ONE Discuss the components required for successful communications.

QU Academic Promotion Policies Prof. Nitham M. Hindi November 26, 2008.

Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.

Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.

Methods to weigh the outcome of the use of electronic resources Highlights of two studies among Doctoral Candidates and PhDs worldwide Mr. Boe Horton Senior.

SPC Faculty Scholarship and 2011 Study Data on SPC faculty scholarship were obtained during two studies. A study conducted in 2008 covered.

GETTING PUBLISHED Chapter 18.

Research Integrity in ASHA: Scientific Publication Practices 2006 ORI Research on Research Integrity Conference University of South Florida Safety Harbor.

Prof. Robert Morrell, UCT Research Office Presentation to North West University 28 February 2014.

Retention, Tenure, and Promotion and Faculty Workload This fall the College of Business and Economics’ FAC will be considering going quantitative to remove.

Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities Peer Review Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities.

Today we will: Be introduced to the Unit 3 assignment sequence;

About Journals What is a “journal”?

Senior Appointments Committee J. M. Friedman, MD, PhD.

Researching Book Reviews. What is a Scholarly Book Review? A scholarly book review is a critical assessment of a book.

Packaging Yourself As An Extension Professional Reginal M. Harrell, Roger G. Adams, Deborah J. Maddy, and Daniel J. Weigel.

Mission-Based Management June 2007 Electronic CV System Users Group.

Secondary Sources What historians write…. Definitions Secondary sources are accounts of the past created by people who did not experience the event/time.

Characteristics of Scholarly Writing and Evaluating Secondary Sources.

Secondary Sources What historians write…. Definitions A secondary source is a work that interprets or analyzes an historical event or phenomenon. Secondary.

English Milieu in Tomsk State University: Infrastructural Issues into Academic Breakthrough Artyom RYKUN Vice-President for International Affairs November,

Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Journals

Research Plan and Curriculum Vitae – What to Take into Account? Prof. Kaisa Miettinen

Library Research Skills Arts Library Services Team | University Library Karen Chilcott | Faculty Liaison Librarian.

College of Agriculture and Life Sciences WELCOME Associate Professor P&T Workshop Transitioning from Associate to Full Professor April 23, 2015.

Academic Writing for Publication and Academic English at National Research Tomsk State University November 2014/February 2015.

PUBLIC SCHOLARSHIP EXPLORED: FORMS & POSSIBILITIES Julie Plaut, ,

Lecture Five: Searching for Articles INST 250/4.  What are LCSH? ◦ Why should one hyperlink on the LCSH in the Library catalogue search?  Subject vs.

IL Step 1: Sources of Information Information Literacy 1.

What Counts for Tenure? Preliminary Survey Results Kathleen A. Terry-Sharp Director of Academic Relations American Anthropological Association Analysis.

Chapter 6 Researching Your Subject. In academic research, your goal is to find information that will help you answer a scholarly question. In workplace.

Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Locating and Reviewing Related Literature Chapter 3 This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright.

Chapter 3 Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Locating and Reviewing Related Literature This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright.

Discovering Resources at Friedsam Memorial Library.

Discovering Resources at Friedsam Memorial Library UNIV 101 Presentation developed by Cathy Maldonado Mary Ellen AshCathy Maldonado Theresa ShafferAnn.

Gaining and Maintaining Supported Researcher Status Knowing the Rules of the Game June 2007.

Paul-François Tremlett, Lecturer in Religious Studies & Director of Research Degrees, Arts.

+ Meeting of Assistant Professors June 29, Faculty and Academic Affairs Leadership Steven Abramson, M.D., Vice Dean for Education, Faculty and.

DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #4 June 23, 2015  CV and Summary Statements (feedback)  Review Teaching Statement of Endeavors and Supporting.

Career Field Research Project 3 points => Journal Articles Word document submitted on Moodle 1 Point => Independent Reflection Word document submitted.

CM 445: Technical Writing for the Professions Unit 1: Audience, Purpose, Context Christine Danelski, Ph.D.

Research Cycle When and How Information Gets Published.

Making Applications: Research Plan, Curriculum Vitae, List of Publications etc. Prof. Kaisa Miettinen

Page 1 Improving Research Publication Quality at GCU Professor John Marshall Director Academic Research Development.

UNIT 4-5 SEMINAR (NO SEMINAR FOR UNIT 5) LS504: Applied Research in Legal Studies.

CH 42 DEVELOPING A RESEARCH PLAN CH 43 FINDING SOURCES CH 44 EVALUATING SOURCES CH 45 SYNTHESIZING IDEAS Research!

Post-Tenure Review.  Section 7a of the Regents Policy on Faculty Tenure  Rules and Procedures for Annual and Special Post-Tenure Review.

Cite! Books, pictures, pamphlets, artwork, websites, advertisement, personal interviews, magazines, journals, s, CD ROMs, DVDs, maps, newspapers,

Writing Describe a problem in education. What is the significance of this issue? What would you like to know about this problem? Who else is interested.

Publications Dr Sarah Wendt. Context PhD conferred Oct 2005, fulltime lecturer in 2006 at UniSA (40/40/20). Promoted to Senior Lecturer (2010). Social.

CITATION / BIBLIOGRAPHY Moazzam Ali. CITATION DEFINED  A citation is a reference to a published or unpublished source (not always the original source)

Notes Label Notes: Types of Research plus the date. How do you know if a source is credible? – Look at the date it was published – Look at the author,

Managing Promotion Timelines Anita L. Allen, JD, PhD Vice Provost for Faculty Henry R. Silverman Professor of Law and Philosophy.

DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #3 June 17, 2014  CV and Summary Statements (feedback)  Review Teaching Statement of Endeavors and Supporting.

What literature and where?

QU Academic Promotion Policies Prof. Nitham M. Hindi December 20, 2010.

SCHOLARSHIP Teaching Faculty members are responsible for teaching effectively by employing useful methods and approaches that facilitate learning. Faculty.

Chapter 7 Researching Your Speech. Researching your speech: Introduction Researching your topic and providing strong evidence for your claims can make.

Scientists and public communication: A survey of popular science publishing across 15 countries EMA Thematic Conference, Bordeaux March 29-30, 2010 Peter.

Abstract  An abstract is a concise summary of a larger project (a thesis, research report, performance, service project, etc.) that concisely describes.

Promotion and Tenure. Quick overview of P&T Requirements Each of these areas has a defined standard/benchmark that faculty are expected to achieve (below-meet-exceed)

PSY 428 Week 2 Individual Productive and Counterproductive Behaviors Paper To purchase this material click on below link

Associate Professor P&T Workshop Associate to Full Professor

DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM

CARE Grants 101 Grants and Sponsored Programs Cindy Bell:

The Role of the Editor Maria J Grant

Heather Brod, Executive Director of Faculty Affairs and FAME

Associate Professor P&T Workshop Associate to Full Professor

Tenure and Promotion: Crossing the Finish Line

Presentation transcript:

SPC Faculty Publications Prepared by the SPC Office of Faculty Research and Sponsored Programs

The study In 2007 a study addressing faculty scholarship was conducted. All full-time teaching faculty were probed.

The purpose To ascertain what kinds of things the faculty have been doing in the last five years. To reveal any trends in faculty scholarship. Is scholarship increasing? Decreasing? Staying the same? Collect data that might be helpful for various reports (Middle States, etc).

The process A letter requesting information on scholarly activities was sent to all full-time faculty in November, The letter requested that scholarly activities be classified into categories. Information was requested by February 1, After February 1, reminder s and telephone calls were made. Collected data are now being analyzed.

Categories Peer-reviewed journal articles Books Book chapters Edited books Grants Published peer-reviewed abstracts Other publications- These could include, but were not limited to: newspaper articles, book reviews, magazine articles, monographs, essays, and screenplays. Conference presentations Other outcomes- These could include but were not limited to: works of art, art shows, and multimedia productions.

Categories Peer-reviewed journal articles Books Book chapters Edited books Grants Published peer-reviewed abstracts Other publications- These could include, but were not limited to: newspaper articles, book reviews, magazine articles, monographs, essays, and screenplays. Conference presentations Other outcomes- These could include but were not limited to: works of art, art shows, and multimedia productions.

The response A total of 104 full-time faculty responded from a total of 107 members. This resulted in a 97.2% response rate. That’s very good.

Number of faculty per study year Not all current full-time faculty members have been here for the entire five years probed. The number ranges from 76 in 2003 to 104 in Hence, averages for each year are plotted in order to take the number of faculty for each year into account. number of faculty

Total publications Total publications include (but are not limited to) books, book chapters, edited books, peer- reviewed journal articles, book reviews, newspaper articles, magazine articles, and encyclopedia entries. Overall, publications have increased from an average of 0.30 to 1.24 publications per year for each full-time faculty member who responded. Average publications/FT faculty member

Books Books in this analysis do not include test banks, instructor manuals, and dissertations. Book publishing has fluctuated over the last five years. Six books were published in 2007 compared to one in Books/FT faculty member

Book chapters There is an increasing trend regarding book chapters. One book chapter was reported for 2003 compared to nine for Chapters per full-time faculty member

Journal articles (refereed) Refereed (or peer-reviewed) refers to articles that are evaluated for publication by experts in a field in addition to an editor. There is an increasing trend regarding journal articles. Ten articles were reported for 2003 compared to 36 for Articles/FT faculty member

Other publications Other publications include essays, monographs, book reviews, encyclopedia entries, instructor manuals, test banks, newspaper articles (and columns), magazine articles, and others. There is an increasing trend regarding other publications. Eleven items were reported for 2003 compared to 72 for Other publications/FT faculty member

Some other considerations No significant difference among ranks for total publications. No significant correlation between years at SPC and publications in any of the five study years. Hence, increases are largely across the board.

Summary Publishing is on the increase at SPC. This increase is occurring across ranks. Both newer and more senior faculty are contributing to this increase.