Theme 6. Cochrane Reviews: innovative reviews and methodology.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Wrap-up session : Global and Local Stakeholder Consultation Process 1 st Sustainable Development Mechanisms Joint Coordination Workshop Maritim Hotel Bonn.

Advertisements

Mixed methods synthesis ESRC Methods Festival 2006 James Thomas Institute of Education, University of London.

Introduction to the unit and mixed methods approaches to research Kerry Hood.

Dublin Airport Stakeholders Forum Workshop 28 November 2007.

Thematic evaluation on the contribution of UN Women to increasing women’s leadership and participation in Peace and Security and in Humanitarian Response.

© UKCIP 2011 Learning and Informing Practice: The role of knowledge exchange Roger B Street Technical Director Friday, 25 th November 2011 Crew Project.

Critical Reading VTS 22/04/09. “How to Read a Paper”. Series of articles by Trisha Greenhalgh - published in the BMJ - also available as a book from BMJ.

Leader Or Manager? Adrian Taylor St. Mary’s High School Building Leadership Capacity Setting Your Compass Middle Manager Or Middle Leader?

Potential of Public Health Systematic Reviews to Impact on Primary Research Professor Laurence Moore September 2007.

VISION STATEMENT Our vision is that healthcare decision-making throughout the world will be informed by high-quality, timely research evidence 1.RECOMMENDATION:

Funding Proposals Submitted 2010 Andrew Stripp. Contents EAHC – Midwives Project SOcial Networks to Improve Cessation Services (SONICS) Skype What next?

Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment

Data Sharing and Linking Service Overview presentation May 2013.

Creating Better Health and Care Services An overview of a Better Health and Care Review process.

Governance Advanced. Session outline Features of effective Boards and committees Needs and roles Problem and change scenarios.

Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Policy Responses and Follow-up Session 4.

NICE, medtech and evidence Mrs Mirella Marlow MA MBA Programme Director MediWales 11 December 2012.

Lean Supply Chain Action Learning Program September 2007.

HOW TO WRITE A GOOD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR FOR EVALUATION Programme Management Interest Group 19 October 2010 Pinky Mashigo.

Needs Analysis Session Scottish Community Development Centre November 2007.

From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.

Supporting urban sustainability. Terms of engagement This presentation sets out our ‘terms of engagement’ for the ‘Supporting Urban Sustainability’ (SUS)

CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE

Data Coaching Institute: Day 2 Moving Toward Action ESD 113 Equity Through Service.

Strengthening Institutional Frameworks for Sustainable Development Pre-event on Institutional Frameworks for Sustainable Development in Africa: Integrating.

Course on Data Analysis and Interpretation P Presented by B. Unmar Sponsored by GGSU PART 2 Date: 5 July

What is Triangulation? “Short-hand term” for synthesis and integrated analysis of data from multiple sources for program decision making A powerful tool.

Zoe G. Davies Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation University of Birmingham, UK Systematic Review Methodology: a brief summary.

Framework for the Future- improving public libraries Sarah Wilkie Libraries Policy Advisor Museums, Libraries and Archives Council.

A qualitative case study of innovation and student participation in school decision making Sarah Quinn, Bachelor of Education (Honours) University of South.

1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.

Methods The Cochrane Library: revolution or evolution? Shaping the future of Cochrane content Preparing for the Strategic Session Harriet MacLehose Cochrane.

Being The Best We Can Self-evaluation workshop Key results for Victoria’s public library services.

The Evaluation of Publicly Funded Research Berlin, 26/27 September 2005 Evaluation for a changing research base Paul Hubbard Head of Research Policy, HEFCE,

Collaborating across the UK- the work of ALMA Jane Robinson ALMA Co-ordinator.

Students’ and Faculty’s Perceptions of Assessment at Qassim College of Medicine Abdullah Alghasham - M. Nour-El-Din – Issam Barrimah Acknowledgment: This.

Beyond and Decisions: From Problem Formulation to Dose- Response.

WELCOME. BIENVENUE To the Strategic Session at the mid year meeting of The Cochrane Collaboration, April 2012.

Integrating DRR into the CCA/UNDAF Process Introduction of new guide.

BCO Impact Assessment Component 3 Scoping Study David Souter.

Focusing the question Janet Harris Cochrane Qualitative Research Methods Group ESQUIRE Qualitative Systematic Review Workshop University of Sheffield 6.

Performance Stories Evaluation - A Monitoring Method to Enhance Evaluation Influence Riad Naji, Catriona King, Richard Habgood.

Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch SESSION 7 - How to do Integrated Assessment Stage D: Issuing policy recommendations.

Introduction to policy briefs What is a policy brief? What should be included in a policy brief? How can policy briefs be used? Getting started.

VISION STATEMENT Our vision is that healthcare decision-making throughout the world will be informed by high-quality, timely research evidence 1.RECOMMENDATION:

Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission

VISION STATEMENT Our vision is that healthcare decision-making throughout the world will be informed by high-quality, timely research evidence 1.RECOMMENDATION:

© Crown copyright 2008 Subject Leaders’ Development Meeting Spring 2009.

Page 1 Future Strategy and Work Plan IESBA CAG Meeting September 11, 2013 New York Ken Siong, IESBA Technical Director.

Reviewing the quality of evidence – a different act of remembering David Earle Tertiary Sector Performance Analysis Ministry of Education, New Zealand.

How Empty Are Empty Reviews? The first report on the Empty Reviews Project sponsored by the Cochrane Opportunities Fund and an invitation to participate.

ESRC Research Methods Festival st July 2008 Exploring service user participation in the systematic review process Sarah Carr, Research Analyst,

EXPLORER project Elizabeth Lunt Project Manager De Montfort University.

STRATEGIC SESSION INTRODUCTION MARK WILSON 20 MARCH 2013.

Issues and challenges to scoping and focusing the question ESQUIRE Qualitative Systematic Review Workshop University of Sheffield 8 September 2011 Janet.

What is a Service Level Agreement? Service level agreements are part of a quality approach to help teams identify and agree what ‘good quality’ looks like.

Torbay Council Partnerships Review August PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Date Page 2 Torbay Council Partnerships Background The Audit Commission defines.

Evaluation Planning Checklist (1 of 2) Planning Checklist Planning is a crucial part of the evaluation process. The following checklist (based on the original.

Developing an Evaluation Strategy George Selvanera Senior Consultant Cordis Bright Ltd

Title of the Change Project

Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations

The What Works Centre for Crime Reduction: An evaluation

HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING

AXIS critical Appraisal of cross sectional Studies

Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance

Michele Hansen, Steven Graunke, Robbie Janik

Michele Hansen, Steven Graunke, Robbie Janik

Session 3 The Strategic Position

CEng progression through the IOM3

Realistic Prescribing Pathways

Presentation transcript:

Theme 6. Cochrane Reviews: innovative reviews and methodology

Theme and Session Objective To engage the Collaboration and the users of the Library in a discussion about the strategic direction in the types of reviews and questions to be undertaken by Cochrane and; ascertain the need, relevance, appropriateness and organisational capacity to expand types of systematic reviews and methods beyond the current Cochrane Review model

Theme exploration: Review Innovation Pandora’s box Why? How? Intervention Reviews Innovative reviews Prognosis Qualitative syntheses Non randomised studies Economic analyses Experiences Causation

Key points 1. There is support but no consensus for enhancing Cochrane reviews or including new review types 2. Moving forward will require: Methods development Enthusiastic authors and CRGs Technological advances 3. Enhancements and new review types should respond to real questions of uncertainty and demonstrated need 4. Preferences of external stakeholders need to be addressed

Recommendations 38. Conduct further internal and external consultation, and evaluation, to enable The Cochrane Collaboration to make a strategic decision on continuing with (1) methodological enhancements to Cochrane Reviews of interventions (e.g. qualitative syntheses), and whether to introduce (2) additional types of Cochrane Reviews addressing a broader set of questions (e.g. explanatory). 39. Move towards including non-randomised studies in Cochrane Reviews for harms and potentially where evidence for key benefits is weak; however, we do not recommend this where randomised controlled trials are feasible and would be valuable in addressing an important uncertainty.

Session Plan SESSION SCHEDULE TASK OBJECTIVE WORKSHEETS

What is the purpose of today’s meeting? TimeSession structureTask (5mins)Introduction Background to theme, recommendations findings (40mins) Split into small groups for focused work  Theme discussion of recommendations  Worksheets (30mins) Break Graffiti wall-Getting your point across (20mins) Group feedback (structured) and discussion Feedback from worksheets (10mins) Wrap up and agree theme action points Decisions on next steps