APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Sue Sears Sally Spencer Nancy Burstein OSEP Directors’ Conference 2013
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
PORTFOLIO.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System 0 August 2012.
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
0 Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits This sample lesson and accompanying documentation are.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 7: Preparing for My Mid-Year Conversation.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC Simulation 2 – High School Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits Documenting.
7/14/20151 Effective Teaching and Evaluation The Pathwise System By David M. Agnew Associate Professor Agricultural Education.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
What should be the basis of
1 SESSION 1 using The New Performance Standards and New VDOE Requirements
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Interim Evaluation Documents evidence of meeting standards
IES e-PATT Grant e-PATT: Parents and Teachers Together.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Document Review STANDARDEVIDENCE Standard 1 - Professional KnowledgeDocumentation and Observation Standard 2 - Instructional PlanningDocumentation and.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
Delaware Professional Teaching Standards 3.0 Content Knowledge 4.0 Human Development and Learning 5.0 Diverse Learners 6.0 Communication 7.0 Learning Environment.
DISTRICT CFASST MEETING #2
Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits Simulation.
APS Teacher Evaluation
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Supporting and Coaching Classroom Facilitators Oudete Taylor August 13, 2015.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 10: Interim and Summative Evaluations.
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 8: Standard 2- Instructional Planning Please sit in groups with teachers NOT from your school.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part A: Observation Data for the Summative Rating.
Teacher Performance Evaluation System (TPES) AASSA Association of American Schools in South America.
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
Teacher Performance Evaluation System (Summary)
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Identifying Assessments
SAS What is a coach to do? Classrooms for the Future/21st Century Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Strategic Teaching: Literacy Across All Contents ARI Strategic Teaching: Literacy Across All Contents Every Child a Graduate – Every Graduate Prepared.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
APS Teacher Evaluation A Process for Student and Teacher Growth Sign in and create your name tent. Welcome!
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Explicit Instruction: “I Do, We Do, You Do” Frank Little Assistant Principal #157 Professional Development November 3, 2008.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Simulation 1 – Elementary School Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Presented by: Jenni DelVecchio, Renee Mathis, and Kevin Powell
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings

APS Teacher Evaluation Process Overview Lesson Plans Writes SMART Goal Document Log ObservationsMid-YearEvaluation Monitors Lesson Plans WritesCompilesParticipates ApprovesReviewsConductsFacilitates Annual Cycle

Multiple Data Sources Summative ratings are based on multiple data sources. Observation Announced unannounced Documentation Required Artifacts Teacher-Selected Artifacts Other Sources

In the last module we collected evidence on Teacher A through classroom observation. Today we will add to that through evidence – submitted in the document log – collected by the evaluator Observation Data

The document log is an additional source of evidence. Review the documentation log. Note evidence to include for each standard. – Tool: Summary of Evidence Document Log

Evaluators may have data from additional sources (i.e. communications with the teacher, parents, and other interactions with the teacher) This data can also be considered when making summative ratings. Additional Data Sources

What evidence did you collect from the document log? Each group will share out on one standard. Reviewing the Data

8 May Professional Knowledge – Specific Evidence Content knowledge is appropriate for the lesson (Observation and Documentation) Exhibits pedagogical skills relevant to the subject area(s) taught and best practice based on current research (Observation) Bases instruction on goals that reflect high expectations for all students and a clear understanding of the curriculum (Observation)

9 May Professional Knowledge – Specific Evidence (continued) Addresses appropriate curriculum standards and integrates key content elements (Observation and Documentation) Facilitates students’ use of higher-level thinking skills in instruction (Observation) Links present content with past and future learning experiences, other subject areas, and real-world experiences and applications (Observation)

10 May Instructional Planning – Specific Evidence Arrays lesson is aligned to lesson objectives and curriculum (Documentation) Uses a variety of resources for the mathematics lesson to include a storybook and SMARTBoard (Documentation) Builds in important components of lesson - direct instruction, modeling, student practice, student sharing, metacognition (Documentation) Integrates literacy into mathematics instruction (Documentation)

15 May Instructional Planning – Specific Evidence (continued) Arrays lesson is coherent, sequenced, and aligned to curriculum standards (Documentation) Requires deep, critical, and creative thinking and understanding of concepts (Documentation) Ensures relevancy of instructional strategies and practices to content area (Documentation)

12 May Instructional Delivery – Specific Evidence Engages and interests students during the whole group portion of the lesson (Observation) Builds on prior knowledge about columns and rows, but many children were confused (Observation) Uses a variety of instructional strategies and materials to promote learning (Observation) Reinforces learning goals consistently throughout the lesson (Observation) Communicates and presents material clearly and checks for understanding – needs to use that information dynamically (Observation)

13 May Assessment of and for Student Learning Uses Math Arrays Quick Check to assess student learning (Observation and Documentation) Asks questions of students throughout lesson to ascertain understanding – formative assessment (Observation) Periodically has students complete student reflections for teacher’s knowledge and students’ knowledge (Documentation)

14 May Learning Environment – Specific Evidence Actively listens and pays attention to students’ needs and responses (Observation) Creates a warm, attractive, inviting, and supportive classroom environment (Observation) Arranges the classroom materials and resources to facilitate group and individual activities (Observation)

15 May Learning Environment – Specific Evidence (continued) Little inappropriate behavior observed (Observation) Posts and clearly follows expectations for classroom rules, routines, and procedures (Observation and Documentation) Models caring, fairness, respect, and enthusiasm for learning (Observation) Promotes a climate of trust and teamwork within the classroom (Observation)

16 May Professionalism – Specific Evidence Demonstrates professionalism in dress, speech, and manner with students and adult in classroom (Observation) Participates in professional development - “Inquiry- Based Learning” PD (Other data sources) Communicates with parents on a regular basis (Other data sources)

Using the data that you collected today, rate Teacher A for each performance standard and overall. Draw an X on the chart paper around the room to represent that rating that your gave for each performance standard and as an overall rating Making a Summative Rating

Debrief on the Summative Ratings

“Arlington Public Schools will provide every student with highly effective educators that have the necessary tools to positively impact student learning and growth.” APS Teacher Evaluation Vision Since 1999

APS Teacher Evaluation A Process for Student and Teacher Growth