RR vs OR Bandit Thinkhamrop, PhD (Statistics)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inferential Statistics and t - tests
Advertisements

1 Epidemiologic Measures of Association Saeed Akhtar, PhD Associate Professor, Epidemiology Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Aga Khan University,
KRUSKAL-WALIS ANOVA BY RANK (Nonparametric test)
The strength of the association Measures of association FETP India.
 It is defined as the ratio of the odds of an event occurring in one group to the odds of it occurring in another group, or to a sample-based estimate.
What role should probabilistic sensitivity analysis play in SMC decision making? Andrew Briggs, DPhil University of Oxford.
Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Harm and Etiology.
Find the Joy in Stats ? ! ? Walt Senterfitt, Ph.D., PWA Los Angeles County Department of Public Health and CHAMP.
Categorical Data. To identify any association between two categorical data. Example: 1,073 subjects of both genders were recruited for a study where the.
Understanding real research 3. Assessment of risk.
Measures of Disease Association Measuring occurrence of new outcome events can be an aim by itself, but usually we want to look at the relationship between.
Chapter 11 Survival Analysis Part 2. 2 Survival Analysis and Regression Combine lots of information Combine lots of information Look at several variables.
1 The Odds Ratio (Relative Odds) In a case-control study, we do not know the incidence in the exposed population or the incidence in the nonexposed population.
BIOSTATISTICS 5.5 MEASURES OF FREQUENCY BIOSTATISTICS TERMINAL OBJECTIVE: 5.5 Prepare a Food Specific Attack Rate Table IAW PEF 5.5.
Relative Risk, Increased Risk, and Odds Ratios Measures that allow us to compare two groups...
Understanding study designs through examples Manish Chaudhary MPH (BPKIHS)
Are exposures associated with disease?
Study Design and Analysis in Epidemiology: Where does modeling fit? Meaningful Modeling of Epidemiologic Data, 2010 AIMS, Muizenberg, South Africa Steve.
Analytic Epidemiology
Are the results valid? Was the validity of the included studies appraised?
Absolute, Relative and Attributable Risks. Outcomes or differences that we are interested in:  Differences in means or proportions  Odds ratio (OR)
Lesson 9.8: Relative Risk Module 9: Epidemiology
1 Bandit Thinkhamrop, PhD.(Statistics) Dept. of Biostatistics & Demography Faculty of Public Health Khon Kaen University Critical Appraisal For Health.
Measuring Associations Between Exposure and Outcomes.
1 Bandit Thinkhamrop, PhD.(Statistics) Dept. of Biostatistics & Demography Faculty of Public Health Khon Kaen University Formulation of a research Using.
Biostatistics Case Studies 2005 Peter D. Christenson Biostatistician Session 4: Taking Risks and Playing the Odds: OR vs.
Estimation of Various Population Parameters Point Estimation and Confidence Intervals Dr. M. H. Rahbar Professor of Biostatistics Department of Epidemiology.
Evidence-Based Medicine 3 More Knowledge and Skills for Critical Reading Karen E. Schetzina, MD, MPH.
Hypothesis Testing Field Epidemiology. Hypothesis Hypothesis testing is conducted in etiologic study designs such as the case-control or cohort as well.
Logistic Regression Bandit Thinkhamrop, PhD. (Statistics) Department of Biostatistics and Demography Faculty of Public Health, Khon Kaen University.
Measures of Association
Risk Concepts and Glossary. Cross-sectional study The observation of a defined population at a single point in time or time interval. Exposure and outcome.
Understanding real research 4. Randomised controlled trials.
Limited Dependent Variables Ciaran S. Phibbs May 30, 2012.
MEASURES OF TEST ACCURACY AND ASSOCIATIONS DR ODIFE, U.B SR, EDM DIVISION.
The binomial applied: absolute and relative risks, chi-square.
VSM CHAPTER 6: HARM Evidence-Based Medicine How to Practice and Teach EMB.
MBP1010 – Lecture 8: March 1, Odds Ratio/Relative Risk Logistic Regression Survival Analysis Reading: papers on OR and survival analysis (Resources)
Measures of Association and Impact Michael O’Reilly, MD, MPH FETP Thailand Introductory Course.
1 EPI 5240: Introduction to Epidemiology Measures used to compare groups October 5, 2009 Dr. N. Birkett, Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine,
Please turn off cell phones, pagers, etc. The lecture will begin shortly.
Limited Dependent Variables Ciaran S. Phibbs. Limited Dependent Variables 0-1, small number of options, small counts, etc. 0-1, small number of options,
Describing the risk of an event and identifying risk factors Caroline Sabin Professor of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Research Department of Infection.
Case Control Study : Analysis. Odds and Probability.
1 Basic epidemiological study designs and its role in measuring disease exposure association M. A. Yushuf Sharker Assistant Scientist Center for Communicable.
Measuring Associations Between Exposure and Outcomes Chapter 3, Szklo and Nieto.
1 Multivariable Modeling. 2 nAdjustment by statistical model for the relationships of predictors to the outcome. nRepresents the frequency or magnitude.
Overview and Common Pitfalls in Statistics and How to Avoid Them
BC Jung A Brief Introduction to Epidemiology - XIII (Critiquing the Research: Statistical Considerations) Betty C. Jung, RN, MPH, CHES.
Risks & Odds Professor Kate O’Donnell. When talking about the chance of something happening, e.g. death, hip fracture, we can talk about: risk and relative.
Biostatistics Case Studies 2014 Youngju Pak Biostatistician Session 5: Survival Analysis Fundamentals.
Statistical inference Statistical inference Its application for health science research Bandit Thinkhamrop, Ph.D.(Statistics) Department of Biostatistics.
Instrument design Essential concept behind the design Bandit Thinkhamrop, Ph.D.(Statistics) Department of Biostatistics and Demography Faculty of Public.
1 Bandit Thinkhamrop, PhD.(Statistics) Dept. of Biostatistics & Demography Faculty of Public Health Khon Kaen University Overview and Common Pitfalls in.
Introduction to Biostatistics, Harvard Extension School, Fall, 2005 © Scott Evans, Ph.D.1 Contingency Tables.
PTP 560 Research Methods Week 12 Thomas Ruediger, PT.
Biostatistics Board Review Parul Chaudhri, DO Family Medicine Faculty Development Fellow, UPMC St Margaret March 5, 2016.
2 3 انواع مطالعات توصيفي (Descriptive) تحليلي (Analytic) مداخله اي (Interventional) مشاهده اي ( Observational ) كارآزمايي باليني كارآزمايي اجتماعي كارآزمايي.
Epidemiologic Measures of Association
Measures of Association
Class session 13 Case-control studies
Examples and SAS introduction: -Violations of the rare disease assumption -Use of Fisher’s exact test January 14, 2004.
Biostatistics Critical Appraisal for
Interpreting Basic Statistics
What is it and how do we calculate it?
Helen Barraclough, MSc, Ramaswamy Govindan, MD 
Measures of Disease Occurrence
Research Techniques Made Simple: Interpreting Measures of Association in Clinical Research Michelle Roberts PhD,1,2 Sepideh Ashrafzadeh,1,2 Maryam Asgari.
Ob/Gyn Journal Club Notes
Risk Ratio A risk ratio, or relative risk, compares the risk of some health-related event such as disease or death in two groups. The two groups are typically.
Presentation transcript:

RR vs OR Bandit Thinkhamrop, PhD (Statistics) Department of Biostatistics and Demography Faculty of Public Health Khon Kaen University

Absolute vs Relative effect Risk of event among group A = 4% vs B = 2% Which one is correct? A is 2% points greater than B (A มากกว่า B อยู่ 2%) A is one time greater than B (A มากกว่า B หนึ่งเท่า) A is two times greater than B (A มากกว่า B สองเท่า) A is two times as much as B (A เป็นสองเท่าของ B) Ans: 1, 2, 4 are correct

Relative risk (RR) RR = P1/P2 RR = Risk of event in group A RR = a/(a+b) Risk of event in group B Disease Normal Total Exposed a b a+b Non-exposed c d c+d a+c b+d a+b+c+d c/(c+d)

Odds ratio (OR) OR = [P1/(1-P1)] / [P2/(1-P2)] OR = Odds of Exposed group having event OR = [a/(a+b)/(1-(a/(a+b)))] = a/b = ad Odds of Non-exposed group having event Disease Normal Total Exposed a b a+b Non-exposed c d c+d a+c b+d a+b+c+d [c/(c+d)/(1-(c/(c+d)))] c/d bc

OR approximate RR if event is rare (Rule of thumb: P < 0.1 or 10%) RR = P1/P2 RR = Risk of event in group A RR = [a/(a+b)] / [c/(c+d)] Risk of event in group B Disease Normal Total Exposed a b a+b Non-exposed c d c+d a+c b+d a+b+c+d a d = b c rare -> (a+b)  b ; (c+d)  d

Interpretation of relative risk (RR) RR = 1 means there is no difference in risk between the two groups. RR < 1 means the event is less likely to occur in the experimental group than in the control group. RR > 1 means the event is more likely to occur in the experimental group than in the control group.

Forest plot for RR or OR  0.25 0.33 0.50 1 2 3 4 Minimum meaningful level Low BMI of mother (3.20; 2.50 to 4.50) Received ANC (1.60; 1.02 to 2.18) Protective effect Risk effect  0.25 0.33 0.50 1 2 3 4

Risk vs Protective effect for RR Risk of event among group A = 4% vs B = 2% Then, RR (A/B)= 2; RR (B/A) = 0.5 or taking reciprocal 1/2 = 0.5 vs 1/0.5 = 2 Which one is correct? A is 2 times risk as much as B A is 100% more likely to develop the event than B B is 0.5 times risk as much as B B is 50% less likely to develop the event than A Ans: All are correct, but 3 could mislead

Comparing between Risk and Odds Risk Odds 0.05 or 5% 0.053 0.1 or 10% 0.11 0.2 or 20% 0.25 0.3 or 30% 0.43 0.4 or 40% 0.67 0.5 or 50% 1 0.6 or 60% 1.5 0.7 or 70% 2.3 0.8 or 80% 4 0.9 or 90% 9 0.95 or 95% 19

Risk vs Protective effect for OR Rare event Probability of event among group A = 4% vs B = 2% Then, odds of finding group A having event = 0.04/0.96 = 0.04 vs B = 0.02/0.98 = 0.02 OR (A/B)= 2; OR (B/A) = 0.5 or taking reciprocal 1/2 = 0.5 vs 1/0.5 = 2 Which one is correct? A is 2 times risk as much as B Odds of finding group A having the event is 2 times that of the corresponding odds of group B Odds of group A having the event is 100% more than … B Odds of group B having the event is 50% less than … A Ans: All are correct; Note that RR = 2

Risk vs Protective effect for OR Common event Probability of event among group A = 80% vs B = 40% Then, odds of finding group A having event = 0.8/0.2 = 4 vs B = 0.4/0.6 = 0.67 OR (A/B)= 6; OR (B/A) = 0.17 or taking reciprocal 1/6 = 0.17 vs 1/0.17 = 6 Which one is correct? A is 6 times risk as much as B Odds of finding group A having the event is 6 times that of the corresponding odds of group B Odds of group A having the event is 600% more than … B Odds of group B having the event is 83% less than … A Ans: 2, 3, and 4 are correct ; Note that RR = 2

Comparing between Risk ratio and Odds ratio Pm = Risk of dead in male; Pf = Risk of dead in female; Pm Pf RR OR 0.5 0.25 2 3 0.75 0.25 3 9 0.80 0.20 4 16 0.90 0.10 9 81

RR very much depends of baseline risk but the OR does not A: Risk of dead = 1% vs Risk of survival = 99% A: Odds of dead = 0.01 vs Odds of survival = 99 B: Risk of dead = 2% vs Risk of survival = 98% B: Odds of dead = 0.02 vs Odds of survival = 49 B-A: Absolute increase = 1% vs decrease 1% B-A: Absolute increase = 0.01 vs decrease 50 (B-A)/B: Relative increase = 100% vs decrease 10.1% (B-A/B: Relative increase = 100% vs decrease 50.5% B/A: Risk ratio of dead = 2 vs Risk ratio of survival = 0.99 B/A: Odds ratio of dead = 2 vs Odds ratio of survival = 0.49 Reciprocal of RR = 0.5 vs Reciprocal of RR = 1.01 Reciprocal of OR = 0.5 vs Reciprocal of OR = 2.04

RR vs OR by Incidence of the outcome

When can odds ratios mislead When can odds ratios mislead? Huw Talfryn Oakley Davies, Iain Kinloch Crombie, Manouche Tavakoli BMJ VOLUME 316 28 MARCH 1998 page 989 The difference between the odds ratio and the relative risk depends on the risks (or odds) in both groups. Odds ratios may be non­intuitive in interpretation, but in almost all realistic cases interpreting them as though they were relative risks is unlikely to change any qualitative assessment of the study findings. The odds ratio will always overstate the case when interpreted as a relative risk, and the degree of overstatement will increase as both the initial risk increases and the size of any treatment effect increases. However, there is no point at which the degree of over­ statement is likely to lead to qualitatively different judgments about the study. Substantial discrepancies between the odds ratio and the relative risk are seen only when the effect sizes are large and the initial risk is high. Whether a large increase or a large decrease in risk is indicated, our judgments are likely to be the same—they are important effects.

Zhang & Yu methods    

Zhang & Yu methods Several authors argued the methods: Over simplifications and error in some situation Invalid when presentation of interaction effect [Louise-Anne McNutt, Jean-Paul Hafner, Xiaonan Xue. JAMA. 1999;282(6):529] Invalid in high incidence [Louise-Anne McNutt, Chuntao Wu, Xiaonan Xue, and Jean Paul Hafner. AJE 157, No.10, P.940-943 ] Solution -> Adjusted RR using log-binomial regression, or Poisson regression with robust variance

Remarks RR has a more natural interpretation but cannot be calculated from a cross-sectional and case-control study For any research, there are two ways to calculate RR The OR treats both side of event symmetrically and suitable for any study designs Interpretation OR requires cautions, in particular, a study involving common event