Joe Cruz Williams College Philosophy & Cognitive Science

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The value of certainty. Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis offer.
Advertisements

What is it like to be me? Trying to understand consciousness.
The Cogito. The Story So Far! Descartes’ search for certainty has him using extreme sceptical arguments in order to finally arrive at knowledge. He has.
Cartesian Dualism. Real Distinction Argument P1.Whatever can be clearly and distinctly conceived apart can exist apart. P2.Whatever can exist apart are.
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ rationalism
Philosophy of Mind Matthew Soteriou. Functionalism and Qualia Critics of functionalist accounts of the mental often appeal to thought experiments in which.
Meditations on First Philosophy
Introduction to the philosophy of mind. epistemology episteme knowledge.
Is There Reason for Skepticism? Joe Cruz Williams College Philosophy and Cognitive Science Thanks to Jonathan Vogel, Melissa Barry, Alan White, Will Dudley,
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
Meditation One What is the objective of the Meditations? Hint: look at second sentence of Med. I.
Descartes on scepticism
Knowledge empiricism Michael Lacewing
McGinn’s Mysterianism. This Week’s Visits  Tuesday, April 6: Robinson, Theisen, Tierney, Weiland  And: Those who missed earlier visits. You know who.
Meditation Two Cogito Ergo Sum. Cogito #1 Cogito as Inference □ (Ti→Ei). Not: □ (Ei)
Error theory Michael Lacewing
Descartes’ Epistemology
Philosophy of Mind Week 3: Objections to Dualism Logical Behaviorism
Descartes’ First Meditation
 According to philosophical skepticism, we can’t have knowledge of the external world.
Matter is Not the Object of Our Perceptions (1)Sensible things are just those that are perceived by the senses. (2)The senses perceive nothing that they.
Descartes & Rationalism
MICHAELA PORUBANOVA PSY 270 Consciousness. “How it is that anything so remarkable as a state of consciousness comes about as a result of irritating nervous.
Philosophy of Mind Week 2: Descartes and Dualism
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
Rene Descartes 1596—1650. Some dates 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1543: publication of Copernicus’s De Revolutionibus 1633: Galileo.
Epistemology Section 1 What is knowledge?
PHL105Y November 1, 2004 For Wednesday, read Descartes’s Third Meditation. Brace yourself: it is very hard. The final version of your first essay is due.
Descartes. Descartes - b.1596 d.1650 ❑ Not a skeptic – “there really is a world, that men have bodies, and the like (things which no one of sound mind.
Descartes’ Meditations
Descartes Meditations. Knowledge needs a foundation Descartes knows he has false beliefs, but he does not know which ones are false So, we need a method.
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism.
Classical Rationalism The fundamental source of knowledge is reason. Knowledge should be of the essential properties of things. Such knowledge is knowledge.
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp ) Revised, 8/20/15.
Reduction Nomological Reduction –1-1 relations –Many-1 relations (supervenience) Functions & mechanisms? Emergence –The problem of epiphenomenalism Attribute.
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Descates Meditations II A starting point for reconstructing the world.
 The value of certainty.  Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis.
Epistemology ► Area of Philosophy that deals with questions concerning knowledge ► Philosophy of Knowledge.
KNOWLEDGE IS A PRIORI AND A POSTERIORI By: Fatima Fuad Azeem.
DUALISM: CAUSAL INTERACTIONISM Philosophy of Mind.
Meditation 2. The Cogito Like a drowning man – head sinks below water and yet cannot put feet on river bed. Panic! Needs an Archimedean Point – a sure.
René Descartes (1596–1650) Cartesian Substance Dualism.
Certainty and ErrorCertainty and Error One thing Russell seems right about is that we don’t need certainty in order to know something. In fact, even Descartes.
A posteriori Knowledge A priori knowledge A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A posteriori knowledge is based on experience. A priori knowledge.
Chapter 3: Knowledge The Rationalist’s Confidence: Descartes Introducing Philosophy, 10th edition Robert C. Solomon, Kathleen Higgins, and Clancy Martin.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
Rene Descartes The Father of Modern Philosophy
Rene Descartes: March – February Father of Modern Philosophy Attempts to reconcile the new scientific method with traditional metaphysics.
Knowledge and Skepticism
Michael Lacewing Ethical naturalism Michael Lacewing
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
Michael Lacewing Mackie’s error theory Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Philosophy of Mathematics 1: Geometry
Descartes’ proof of the external world
The zombie argument: responses
Descartes, Meditations 1 and 2
Major Periods of Western Philosophy
On your whiteboard: What is empiricism? Arguments/evidence for it?
Get Yourself Thinking…
Descartes -- Meditations Four
Descartes -- Meditations Three
Philosophy Sept 28th Objective Opener 10 minutes
Introduction to Epistemology
Dualism.
Meditation 2: The Nature of the Mind, which is Better Known than the Body Descartes Meditation I.
Epistemology “Episteme” = knowledge “Logos” = words / study of
Presentation transcript:

Joe Cruz Williams College Philosophy & Cognitive Science Knowing One’s Mind Joe Cruz Williams College Philosophy & Cognitive Science

“Is there any knowledge in the world that is so certain that no reasonable man could doubt it?” — Bertrand Russell The Problems of Philosophy (1912)

The question of certainty What is certainty?

The question of certainty What is certainty? A claim is certain if it is inconceivable for it to be false.

The question of certainty What is certainty? A claim is certain if it is inconceivable for it to be false. (This is not the same as a claim being necessarily true.)

The question of certainty Certainty is a reflective, conceptual state.

The question of certainty Certainty is a reflective, conceptual state. Are there any plausible candidates for certainty?

“I am— I exist: this is certain; but how often? As often as I think...” — René Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy (1614)

Thinking as having explicit ideas What is thinking?

Thinking as having explicit ideas “…what is a thinking thing? It is a thing that doubts, understands, conceives, affirms, denies, wills, refuses…”

Thinking as having explicit ideas — “The cat is on the mat”

Thinking as having explicit ideas — “The cat is on the mat” Not:

Thinking as having explicit ideas — “The cat is on the mat” (As purely a thought, or, pure intellection.)

Thinking as having explicit ideas — “The cat is on the mat” — “Does utilitarianism lead to injustice?” — “I want chocolate” — “The sunset is lovely”

Thinking as having explicit ideas I.e., having an idea the content of which is explicit, articulate and clear in your mind.

Thinking as having explicit ideas I.e., having an idea the content of which is explicit, articulate and clear in your mind. (Plus some reflective attitude toward that content)

Thinking as having explicit ideas Argument for Pure Intellection: Vs. Chiliogon (a thousand-sided figure)

Thinking as having explicit ideas Can you be wrong about the explicit ideas you are having?

Thinking as having explicit ideas Can you be wrong about the explicit ideas you are having? Or, could an evil genius deceive you with respect to your explicit ideas?

Uncertainty about having explicit ideas Of course, you cannot be certain that the cat is on the mat

I am certain that I am now thinking: Uncertainty about having explicit ideas How about I am certain that I am now thinking: “The cat is on the mat”

I am certain that I am now thinking: Uncertainty about having explicit ideas But this is not true, let alone certain I am certain that I am now thinking: “The cat is on the mat” Because you are actually thinking “I am now certain that I am thinking: The cat is on the mat.”

“I am now certain I am thinking: Uncertainty about having explicit ideas So how about “I am now certain I am thinking: The cat is on the mat”

“I am now certain that I am thinking: Uncertainty about having explicit ideas But this is not true, let alone certain “I am now certain that I am thinking: The cat is on the mat” Because you are actually thinking “I am now certain that I am certain that I am thinking: The cat is on the mat.”

Uncertainty about having explicit ideas Certainty is elusive because pure intellection lags one step behind its object.

Uncertainty about having explicit ideas Certainty is elusive because pure intellection lags one step behind its object. There is a gap between two acts of thought, and in that gap lies the possibility of error.

Uncertainty about having explicit ideas What about being certain that you have thoughts (even if you cannot be certain which thought you are having)?

Uncertainty about having explicit ideas What about being certain that you have thoughts (even if you cannot be certain which thought you are having)? But if you can’t be certain which thought you are having, then how can you be certain that you having one?

Uncertainty about having explicit ideas Descartes claims that he is certain that he exists, as often as he (explicitly) thinks.

Uncertainty about having explicit ideas Descartes claims that he is certain that he exists, as often as he (explicitly) thinks. But he cannot be certain how often that is, so he cannot be certain that he exists.

Thinking as consciousness What is consciousness?

Thinking as consciousness “…it is certain that I seem to see light, hear a noise, and feel heat; this cannot be false, and this is what in me is properly called perceiving, which is nothing else than thinking.”

Thinking as consciousness — Tasting chocolate

Thinking as consciousness — Tasting chocolate — Seeing the color red — Feeling envy — Experiencing pain

Thinking as consciousness I.e., the felt experience of your present sensations.

Thinking as consciousness Can you be wrong about how your sensations feel to you?

Thinking as consciousness Can you be wrong about how your sensations feel to you? (Not about the words you use, but about the sensations themselves.)

Thinking as consciousness Can you be wrong about how your sensations feel to you? Or, could an evil genius deceive you with respect to the way that your sensations feel?

Uncertainty about consciousness Being conscious is a (glorious, wondrous, mysterious) capacity that you have.

Uncertainty about consciousness Being conscious is a (glorious, wondrous, mysterious) capacity that you have. (And it is likely shared with many non-human animals.)

Uncertainty about consciousness Reflecting on your consciousness is a different (glorious, wondrous, mysterious) capacity that you have.

Uncertainty about consciousness Reflecting on your consciousness is a different (glorious, wondrous, mysterious) capacity that you have. (And it is likely not shared by many non-human animals.)

Uncertainty about consciousness But if consciousness and reflection on consciousness are two different capacities, then an evil genius could ‘enter the gap’ to mislead you.

Uncertainty about consciousness

Uncertainty about consciousness “I am certain I am now seeing red”

Uncertainty about consciousness What about being certain that you are conscious (even if you can’t be certain what you are conscious of)?

Uncertainty about consciousness What about being certain that you are conscious (even if you can’t be certain what you are conscious of)? But if you can’t be certain what you are conscious of, then how can you be certain that you are conscious?

Uncertainty about consciousness There is no other marker for the activity of consciousness than consciousness of something.

Uncertainty about consciousness Certainty is elusive because conceptual reflection lags one step behind consciousness.

Uncertainty about consciousness Certainty is elusive because conceptual reflection lags one step behind consciousness. There is a gap between an act of thought and consciousness, and in that gap lies the possibility of error.

Uncertainty about consciousness Descartes claims that he is certain that he exists, as often as he (consciously) thinks. But he cannot be certain how often that is, so he cannot be certain that he exists.

Uncertainty about consciousness Descartes claims that he is certain that he exists, as often as he (consciously) thinks. But he cannot be certain how often that is, so he cannot be certain that he exists.

Nothing is certain You cannot be certain of your explicit thoughts

Nothing is certain You cannot be certain of your explicit thoughts You cannot be certain of your conscious states

Nothing is certain So, the best candidates for certainty fail

Nothing is certain So what?

“How it is that anything so remarkable as a state of consciousness comes about as a result of irritating nervous tissue, is just as unaccountable as the appearance of Djin when Aladdin rubbed his lamp.” — T.H. Huxley Lessons in Elementary Psychology (1866)

Certainty and consciousness The alleged hard problem of consciousness: The problem of experience, or the something-it-is-like-to-be problem

Certainty and consciousness Why is the something-it-is-like-to-be problem hard?

Certainty and consciousness Why is the something-it-is-like-to-be problem hard? Consciousness is alleged to have scientifically intractable properties

Certainty and consciousness — Epistemically unique (Descartes, sixth meditation)

Certainty and consciousness — Epistemically unique — Private

Certainty and consciousness — Epistemically unique — Private But there is a gap between your reflection and the object, just as there is a gap between someone else and the object.

Certainty and consciousness — Epistemically unique — Private — Perspectival

Certainty and consciousness — Epistemically unique — Private — Perspectival But understanding is conceptual and reflective, and that is not perspectival (in this sense)

Certainty and consciousness — Epistemically unique — Private — Perspectival

Certainty and consciousness The properties allegedly had by consciousness are the result of a fallible inference based on particular evidence

Nothing is certain Philosophy as continuous with science

Nothing is certain Philosophy as continuous with science (I.e., as preparation for empirical inquiry.)

“Epistemology, or something like it, simply falls into place as a chapter of psychology and hence of natural science. It studies a natural phenomenon, viz., a physical human subject.” — W.V.O Quine “Epistemology Naturalized” (1969)

Knowing One’s Mind Special thanks to: Melissa Barry, Michelle Donnelly ‘08, Will Dudley ‘89, Young Hahn ‘07, Kris Kirby, Adriann Mintzmyer ‘09, Kathleen Monahan, Craig Robertson, and Julianne Shelby ‘06.