WRAP Hydro Data Model: Its Structure and application to find Input Parameters for the Water Rights Analysis Package Centre For Research In Water Resources.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydro Networks in GIS Network model Flow on Networks Hydrologic networks Linear referencing on networks Some slides in this presentation were prepared.
Advertisements

CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: Describe a Network model Identify Flow in a network model Develop a hydrologic network Perform.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Action Plan for the Development of Watershed and Sub-Watershed Boundaries for northwestern Mississippi.
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
CURVE NO. DEVELOPMENT STEP 8 Soils data, land use data, watershed data, and CN lookup table are used to develop curve numbers for use in the SCS Curve.
PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.
Arc Hydro: GIS for Water Resources David R
Hydrologic Analysis Francisco Olivera, Ph.D., P.E. Srikanth Koka
CVEN 689 Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Estimating Salt Concentration at Ungaged Locations from Parameters derived using GIS Ganesh Krishnamurthy Water.
DEM-Based Stream and Watershed Delineation
CRWR-PrePro Francisco “Paco” Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Francisco Olivera 1998 ESRI User Conference.
GIS Modeling Venkatesh Merwade, University of Texas at Austin Interdisciplinary aquatic modeling workshop, July 21, 2005.
Urban Storm-Water Management Plan Utilizing Arc View and HEC-HMS College Station, Texas Kara Corcoran CVEN 689.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
NHD Watershed: Tools and Applications
“Flood monitoring and mapping for Emergency Response in San Antonio-Texas” Part I by Silvana Alcoz Source photo Term.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey DEM Preparation Using the New England Method Streamstats Data Preparation Workshop Pete Steeves.
Frank Kenny and Bryce Matthews Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources
A Cell to Cell Routing Model A Cell to Cell Routing Model By : Rajeev Raina CVEN 689 Civil Engineering Applications of GIS Instructor : Dr. Francisco Olivera.
Flow Time Time Series Hydro FeaturesHydro Network Channel System Drainage System ArcGIS Hydro Data Model.
Topographic Maps vs DEM. Topographic Map 1:24,000 Scale 20 ft contour 100 ft contour Stream Center Line.
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation Understanding How to use Reading
StreamStats: A Web- Based Tool for Estimating Streamflow Statistics by Alan Rea and Pete Steeves.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Implementation of the U.S. Geological Survey’s StreamStats Program in Kansas— A Web Application.
Current Arc Hydro Functionality
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Processing ArcHydro Datasets with NHDPlus Version 2, Emphasizing StreamStats Data Development Webinar.
1 Center for Research in Water Resources The University of Texas at Austin Water Management Information System for the Rio Grande/Rio Bravo Basin Carlos.
Characterization of Watersheds from DEMs using Spatial Analyst/ArcHydro Robert G. Burns, P.G. Engineering Geologist DWR – Division of Safety of Dams Watershed.
ARC GIS IN THE SANTA RIVER BASIN IN PERU GIS in Water Resources Fall 2006 Professor: Dr. David Maidment Presented by Presented by Eusebio Ingol.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Loading Data into ArcHydro Building the Global GeoDatabase.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Idaho District Office (208) Data Requirements for StreamStats December 18,
Determining Watershed Parameters for Water Rights in the Cypress River Basin By: Hema Gopalan GIS in Water Resources (C E 394K) Fall 2001.
CRWR-PrePro Stream and Watershed Delineation Francisco Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Texas Department.
Building Hydrologic Information Systems David R. Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Modeling.
Watershed Parameters for Water Rights in the Trinity River Basin Melissa Figurski CE 394K.
HEC-PrePro Workshop GIS Research Group Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Francisco Olivera HEC-PrePro v. 2.0 Workshop.
Water Availability Modeling in the State of Texas CE 394 K.2 - Surface Water Hydrology University of Texas at Austin David Mason.
Section 5. Chesapeake Bay Network Generation CB watershed –~ 64,000 square miles –~ 166,000 square kilometers Constructed 3 models Version I –ERF1, ~1300.
Arc Hydro Copyright © 2003 ESRI. All rights reserved. 3-1 Arc Hydro Tools  Arc Hydro tools  Key concepts  Global delineation – scaling issues  Tools.
Bdsfbdsfb NHDPlus for Corpus Christi Bay Term Project Report Nishesh Mehta Nishesh Mehta 21 st November st November 2006.
Key Concepts from Exercise 4
National Hydro Data Programs
STREAM NETWORK DELINEATION USING ARC HYDRO AND TauDEM: A comparison of approaches using The Upper Sevier and the Little Bear River Basins Alphonce C. Guzha.
Arc Hydro for EPA Basins
Approaches to Continental Scale River Flow Routing
Watershed Analysis.
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Calculating Hydrologic Parameters for Estimating Surface Water Flow at Ungaged Locations Richard Hoffpauir Water Resources Engineering.
Introduction to Networks
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Hydro Networks in GIS Review of key concepts in Ex 4
Streams and Watersheds
There are 116 Drainage Points, Drainage lines and Catchments.
GIS FOR HYDROLOGIC DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE FACILITIES by Francisco Olivera and David Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources.
Reflections on Exercise 4
Hydro Networks in GIS Network model Flow on Networks
Overview of Exercise 4.
Hydrography for The Lower Rio Grande Valley A Comparison of Mapped versus Synthetic Streams By Jean Parcher GIS in Water Resources December 4, 2001.
Review for Midterm Exam
Provo River Watershed Modeling with WMS Ryan Murdock.
Networks in GIS Network model Flow on Networks Hydrologic networks
From GIS to HMS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center University of Texas at Austin Center for Research in Water Resources Francisco.
Arc Hydro Terrain Processing
Rainfall Runoff in the Guadalupe River Basin
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Development of a Hydrologic Model for the Wichita Falls District
Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks
Hydrologic modeling of Waller Creek
Presentation transcript:

WRAP Hydro Data Model: Its Structure and application to find Input Parameters for the Water Rights Analysis Package Centre For Research In Water Resources UT Austin

Objectives To build a hydro data model for the WRAP project called WRAPHydro from the basic Arc Hydro model. To devise a new method of defining the basin boundary to act as an analysis mask for processing grids and watersheds. To develop a new vector based method for determining watershed parameters using the WRAPHydro model. To verify the validity of dividing the basin into sub regions for parameter development. To explore the possibility of efficiently adding stream lines and control points after completing the process of developing the parameters so as to facilitate editing and updating of database.

Study Area: Guadalupe River Basin

Arc Hydro Framework A geospatial and temporal data model for water resources HydroJunction HydroEdge Watershed Arc Hydro framework Personal Geodatabase Hydro Edge Hydro Junction Watershed Network Relation Feature Dataset

Arc Hydro toolset

WRAP Hydro toolset

WRAP Hydro Model

Base Data Seamless DEM Buffered HUCs NHD network for region 12 And control points

Preprocess: Raster Buffered DEM Burn the Streams Fill the sinks Flow Direction Grid

Preprocess: Vector

Creating a Mask and flow direction grid

Delineation problems Without Surrounding streams With Surrounding streams

Delineation without burning streams

Hydro ID assignment Unique Ids for each feature 7 digit integers  WRAPJunctions prefixed with 1  WRAPEdges prefixed with 2

Watershed delineation 1) HydroIDs of Junctions to JunctionIDs of Edges 2) JunctionIDs of Edges to DrainIDs of Watershed

Parameters: Next Down ID Identifies the next downstream junction and populates the NextDownID with the HydroID of the junction downstream

Parameters: Length Down Lengths obtained in meters from the shape_length field in WRAPEdge Length converted to miles

Connectivity Diagram

Parameter: Drain Area, CN and PR

Accumulating values downstream Wshed 1Area = 2.47 CN = PR = Wshed 2 Area = 3.49 CN = PR = Wshed 3 Area = CN = PR =

Regionalization Schematic Diagram

Regional WRAPHydro model

Regional HydroIDs 7 digit integers, WRAPJunction Ids prefixed by 1 and WRAPEdge Ids prefixed by 2 Regional Ids 01 through 04

Placing outlets

Merging the Regions

Process Rasters are processed in parts A point is placed at the outlet of each sub basin Watersheds are delineated for each part The WRAPJunctions, WRAPEdges and WRAPWatersheds for all the four parts are merged and a network is built The NextDownID value for the four outlets are manually entered Rest of the processing for the parameters is done as for the whole basin

Adding new junctions This creates a new watersheds file and updates all the other parameters as well. However, both these tools do not compute the length downstream and the LengthDown field has to be populated using the ‘Find Length Downsream for Junction’ tool in ArcHydro toolset.

Removing a junction The NextDownID of the upstream junction, the JunctionID of the upstream edge and the DrainID of the Watershed the deleted junction delineated are automatically updated. Figure shows four junctions with HydroIDs 1 through 4 and the DrainIDs of the respective watersheds. If junction 2 is removed, the NextDownID of junction 1 changes from 2 to 3 [Figure 8.2 (B)] and the DrainID of watershed 2 changes to 3 [Figure 8.2 (C)]. The watersheds are dissolved based on DrainID. The rest of the parameters are determined the usual way.

Adding a stream segment Case I Case II

Results – Stream gage comparisons

Area

Length Down

Average CN and Precip