6 th May 2013 CDR Volodymyr Khilkevych, UKR N. 2 Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes? Requirement Cycle Global Programming Roles and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Migrant Education Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Advertisements

Process and Procedure Documentation. Agenda Why document processes and procedures? What is process and procedure documentation? Who creates and uses this.
Joint Worldwide Training and Scheduling Conference Can Be A Mechanism For Joint Force Development.
1 Interagency Cooperation in Crisis Management and Disaster Response Tools And Practices For Training SOFIA, BGR, Sep 2013 CAPT.
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
April 2010 Minnesota’s P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Education Data System (SLEDS) Minnesota Office of Higher Education.
PUBLIC SECTOR INTERNAL AUDIT IN THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA Mr. Jonas Vaitkevičius Head of Internal Audit and Financial Control Methodology and Monitoring.
Federation of Chiropractic Licensing Boards 77th Annual Congress Orlando, Florida Accreditation 101 & Panel Discussion Saturday May 3, :00 – 10:00.
SEM Planning Model.
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
LOCAL LEVEL ALIGNMENT UNDER WIOA Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education for NTI Conference November 12, 2014.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
Quality assurance in IVET in Romania Lucian Voinea Mihai Iacob Otilia Apostu 4 th Project Meeting Prague, 21 st -22 nd October 2010.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
“Implementation of the bottom-up approach under Axis 4. LEADER - Main conclusions and key elements from Extended report “ by Mr. Panayiotis PATRAS, ELARD.
Validation of Non-formal Adult Education courses REACTION No CP LT-GRUNDTVIG-G1.
Training Needs Analysis Report Rapid Analysis and Design (RAD)
Human Resource Development for the Central Pollution Control Board National Comprehensive Training Needs Assessment CPCB-InWEnt-GTZ/ASEM Concept for the.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
INTOSAI Public Debt Working Group Updating of the Strategic Plan Richard Domingue Office of the Auditor General of Canada June 14, 2010.
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
LAO PDR Building NOSPA’s Capacity to Support NGPES Implementation.
The African CDM Training Workshop and Preparatory UNFCCC COP9 Meeting Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, October 20 – 21, 2003 INSTITUTIONAL SET-UP FOR CDM Dr Youba.
RPPS Education Development Process Debbie Bender.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Overview of the Global Fund Procurement and Supply Management Issues Workshop for LAC Consultants th July 2009 Pharmaceutical Management Advisory.
NATO TERMINOLOGY PROGRAMME NATO UNCLASSIFIED 11 June 2009 Presented by Mr Ian P. JONES Head Linguistic Service, SHAPE ACO Terminology Coordinator
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration 14 September Human Resource Development Council for South Africa (HRDCSA)
Language Needs Analysis of NATO Posts Part 1 Julie J. Dubeau Associate BILC Secretary Chief Standards, Foreign Language Programmes, Canadian Defence Academy.
NATO UNCLASSIFIED Bi-SC Concept for Connecting NATO and National Training Capabilities IPR Angel San Jose Martin ACT Project Manager Wolfhard Schmidt.
HANDOUT 3 Middle School Reform. 2 What does it take to prepare our middle school students for the 21 st Century? They must be able to … Work in teams.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
April 2013 Command Brief. ContentContent 1.Establishment of the C2COE 2.Coe Community 3.C2COE Community of Interest 4.Summary C2COE 5.Organization.
Team Leader, Technology Policy and Strategy, UNFCCC Mr Andrew Higham THE CANCUN AGREEMENTS, THE TECHNOLOGY MECHANISM AND TECHNOLOGY NEEDS ASSESSMENTS UNFCCC.
9/4/2003 Preparing Warriors Individually through Development and Distribution of Joint Knowledge 1 Joint Knowledge Development and Distribution Capability.
ASEAN Regional Forum Strategic Guidance for Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief ARF ISM on DR Banda Aceh 5-6 December 2008.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 32 – Financial control Bilateral screening:
Shared Services and Third Party Assurance: Panel May 19, 2016.
Steps in development of action plans ITC-ILO/ACTRAV Course A3 – Trade Union Training on Information Management for Trade Union Organization, Research.
Overview MRD Enterprise MRD Process
Joint CBRN Defence Centre of Excellence
Preparing to Apply for Taught Degree Awarding Powers: Quality Assurance and Enhancement Dr Nick Holland – Academic Registrar Conservatoire for Dance and.
Quality Assurance in Egypt and the European Standards and Guidelines
Job Titles Examples Used for HISD Nonexempt Jobs
COL Timothy Dreifke, USA-AF Dean of Academics
6th May 2013 CDR Volodymyr Khilkevych, UKR N
Training processes for extension education
NTNU’s quality system for education
National Association For Court Management
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
OF2 Emanuele BARBIERI – ITA par. Carabinieri
Supreme Allied Commander Transformation
How Does a State Make an Award to Eligible Providers?
Work Plan Management GEO Work Plan Symposium 30 April – 2 May 2012
PROGRESS AND CHANGES IN
Guidelines for Self-Assessment at Program Level
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
Seats Allocation Process
By Jeff Burklo, Director
CORPORATE & ACADEMIC GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
Training & Education Branch
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
QUALITY ASSURANCE OF EDUCATION AND
“Welcome to Tirana”.
IAEA INITIATIVES TO SUPPORT MEMBER STATES TO ESTABLISH A NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR E&T IN RADIATION, TRANSPORT AND WASTE SAFETY ANDREA LUCIANI Division.
Presentation transcript:

6 th May 2013 CDR Volodymyr Khilkevych, UKR N

2 Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes? Requirement Cycle Global Programming Roles and Responsibilities (RA/DH) Content wise Structure (STP/TRA/TNA) Quality Assurance Future of English Language Training wrap-up & ? ? ?

3 Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes? Requirement Cycle Global Programming Roles and Responsibilities (RA/DH) Content wise Structure (STP/TRA/TNA) Quality Assurance Future of English Language Training wrap-up & ? ? ?

4 ACO: Requirements Education & Training ACT: Execution ACO: Evaluation

5 NSO Exer national Facility PTEC ….. COE Multiple Training- opportunities on one subject without linkage, defined interfaces, etc… ….. Training-opportunities structured by subject, each subject headed by one responsible entity (RA) and administered by his DH past future NETF RA: Shape J9 DH: CIMIC COE CIMIC RA: SHAPE GA DH: NCGMO Gender

6 Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes? Requirement Cycle Global Programming Roles and Responsibilities (RA/DH) Content wise Structure (STP/TRA/TNA) Quality Assurance Future of English Language Training wrap-up & ? ? ?

7  Structured approach towards definition of Requirements  Global Programming ◦ Defined Roles & Responsibilities (R&R) within subjects ◦ Structured content wise approach  Quality Assurance

8 Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes? Requirement Cycle Global Programming Roles and Responsibilities (RA/DH) Content wise Structure (STP/TRA/TNA) Quality Assurance Future of English Language Training wrap-up & ? ? ?

9 Requirements MC Endorse- ment & NAC Approval of Non NATO Entities’ Activities Development + Programming Approval Bi-SC Coordination NFS Coordination NFS Coordination Partner Coordination SACEUR’s Annual Guidance on ETEE NFS Coordination JULY Programming Board I Programming Board II Training Synchronization Conference (TSC) Training Synchronization Conference (TSC) Programming Board III JUNE

10 Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes? Requirement Cycle Global Programming Roles and Responsibilities (RA/DH) Content wise Structure (STP/TRA/TNA) Quality Assurance Future of English Language Training wrap-up & ? ? ?

11 Roles and Responsibilities RA-DH Content wise Structure STP- TRA-TNA International Educational Standards - QA new E&T Landscape Global Programming

12

13 Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes? Requirement Cycle Global Programming Roles and Responsibilities (RA/DH) Content wise Structure (STP/TRA/TNA) Quality Assurance Future of English Language Training wrap-up & ? ? ?

14 Roles and Responsibilities RA-DH Content wise Structure STP- TRA-TNA International Educational Standards - QA new E&T Landscape Global Programming

15  Organizational Structure RA DH Training Subject INTEL CIMIC Maritime NSO PTEC COE Gender Logistics NMIOTC nat Institute BMD

16 Requirement Authority RA SAGE Sec Gen AMS Current & Future Ops ….. NATIONS assistance Req PARTNER assistance Req NFS Req Future Ops Department Head DH COEsPTECs Nat E&T Institutions NDC NSO JWC JFTC ….. NMIOTC RequirementsE&T Solutions

17 Requirement Authority RA SAGE Sec Gen AMS Current & Future Ops NATIONS assistance Req PARTNER assistance Req NFS Req Future Ops Department Head DH COEsPTECs Nat E&T Institutions NDC NSO JWC JFTC NMIOTC RequirementsE&T Solutions JFT

18 -“there can only be one” RA (high level entity within NATO) -Depending on complexity of a subject there can be more than one DH (not limited to NATO entities, not necessarily a training facility) RA DH Training Subject X RA DH Training Subject Y

19  JFT (Joint Force Trainer) ◦ Directions and Guidance (D&G) for NATO E&T ◦ Coordinates with SHAPE to propose RAs ◦ Appoints DHs (in cooperation with RA) ◦ Receives reports from annual Discipline Conference and provides D&G in response ◦ Supports development of SAGE ◦ Reacts on recommendations from RA/DH and provides D&G if necessary ◦ Sets standards for QA-Process

20  JETE (Joint Education, Training and Exercises Division) ◦ Coordinates E&IT processes ◦ Supports developments of STPs, TRAs and TNAs ◦ Provides assistance to Nations if requested ◦ Provides experts to organize/lead the accreditation process

21  RA ◦ Gathers, defines and prioritizes the operational requirements ◦ Defines NATO’s Level of Ambitions (LoA) for his discipline ◦ Gives D&G to DH on desired end state of E&T within his area of responsibility ◦ Keeps DH updated (concepts, doctrine, policy, procedures) ◦ Reviews requirements and capabilities annually ◦ Establishes links to RA’s and DH’s where disciplines influence each other, overlap or connect closely

22  DH ◦ Supports STP and TRA with expertise ◦ Leads TNA for identified training gaps (needs to establish internal expertise to conduct TNA’s) ◦ Establishes programme within subject ◦ Conducts annual Discipline Conference ◦ Recommends changes to RA ◦ Does not need to conduct training itself ◦ Does not give directions to training institutions

23 Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes? Requirement Cycle Global Programming Roles and Responsibilities (RA/DH) Content wise Structure (STP/TRA/TNA) Quality Assurance Future of English Language Training wrap-up & ? ? ?

24 Roles and Responsibilities RA-DH Content wise Structure STP- TRA-TNA International Educational Standards - QA new E&T Landscape Global Programming

25

26  Content wise Structure Strategic Training Plan Training Requirements Analysis Training Needs Analysis STP holistic view broad and general TRA 1 st Analysis outcome: Programme TNA In Depth Analysis outcome: Course

27  STP (Strategic Training Plan) ◦ Provides an holistic overview over a subject encompassing individual training, collective training, Key Leader Training and exercises ◦ Aims to provide D&G for implementation of new capability or solution to operational shortfall ◦ Define NATO’s level of ambition for the field/discipline ◦ Link with NATO’s high level strategic objectives STP

28  TRA (Training Requirement Analysis) ◦ Based upon approved STP ◦ Aims at operationalizing the capability by identifying training gaps (Definition of the levels to be trained (pol-mil, strat, ops, tac) and matching this with the current training inventory) ◦ Outcome: a) definition of levels to be trained b) decision upon Depth of Knowledge c) Inventory of existing courses d) gap Analysis TRA

29  TNA (Training Needs Analysis) ◦ Based on result (Training gaps) of TRA ◦ Specify requirements for trainings to fill identified gaps ◦ Design and development of course ◦ Conduct and validation of course TNA

30 ElementRADHJETEJFTMCProduct STP leadsupport recommendapprove Adaptive and flexible plan to unite and synchronize training efforts TRA support Lead/ approve Academic plan including recommended solutions for identified gaps and redundancies TNA support lead / approve provide QA support and E&IT support acknowledge Defines learning and enabling objectives required to eliminate performance gaps, and systematically delivers a training opportunity Discipline Conference supportleadsupportapprove Discipline alignment plan

31 Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes? Requirement Cycle Global Programming Roles and Responsibilities (RA/DH) Content wise Structure (STP/TRA/TNA) Quality Assurance Future of English Language Training wrap-up & ? ? ?

32 Roles and Responsibilities RA-DH Content wise Structure STP- TRA-TNA International Educational Standards - QA new E&T Landscape Global Programming

33  Concept ◦ Alignment to International Educational Standards ◦ Ensuring highest possible quality in E&T institutions ◦ Autonomy and flexibility of institutions ◦ Continuous improvement of E&T quality  QA Programme covers: ◦ Institution’s QA policies and directives ◦ Curriculum Analysis, Design, Development and Implementation ◦ Evaluation, monitoring and continuous improvement

34  QA and course accreditation 2 criteria for course accreditation: 1.Course fulfills a NATO requirement 2.Institution meets QA standards

35 MC 458/2 Bi-SC 75-2 Bi-SC 75-2 MC 458/2: NATO’s Education, Training, Exercise and Evaluation (ETEE) Policy Bi-SC 75-2: Education, Training, Exercise and Evaluation Directive (E&TD) Bi-SC 75-3 Bi-SC 75-3 Bi-SC 75-3: Collective Training and Exercise Directive (CT&ED) Bi-SC 75-7: Education and Individual Training Directive (E&IT) Bi-SC 75-7 Bi-SC 75-7 CFI Concept including E&T Concept

36 Why the Change in E&T Policy What are the major changes? Requirement Cycle Global Programming Roles and Responsibilities (RA/DH) Content wise Structure (STP/TRA/TNA) Quality Assurance Future of English Language Training wrap-up & ? ? ?

37  NATO E&T vs National E&T  Focus Area (General Language – Terminology – Teacher’s Training)  RA – IS?  DH – BILC?  STP – TRA - TNA Experts’ view needed!

38 ?????? CDR Volodymyr Khilkevych UKR N   +1(757) DSN: