Communicating Archival Metadata conference and workshops in Stockholm 28 - 30 June 2011 METS Karin Bredenberg / 30 – 6 - 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
METS: Metadata Encoding & Transmission Standard Merrilee Proffitt Society of American Archivists August 2002.
Advertisements

METS Awareness Training An Introduction to METS Digital libraries – where are we now? Digitisation technology now well established and well-understood.
Putting together a METS profile. Questions to ask when setting down the METS path Should you design your own profile? Should you use someone elses off.
Introduction to METS (Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard) Jerome McDonough New York University
October 28, 2003Copyright MIT, 2003 METS repositories: DSpace MacKenzie Smith Associate Director for Technology MIT Libraries.
Standards showcase: MODS, METS, MARCXML ALA Annual 2006 Rebecca Guenther and Jackie Radebaugh Network Development and MARC Standards Office Library of.
METS: An Introduction Towards a Digital Object Standard Rick Beaubien Library Systems Office U.C. Berkeley.
METS: An Introduction Structuring Digital Content.
Digital Preservation - Its all about the metadata right? “Metadata and Digital Preservation: How Much Do We Really Need?” SAA 2014 Panel Saturday, August.
Interoperability and Preservation with the Hub and Spoke (HandS) Matt Cordial, Tom Habing, Bill Ingram, Robert Manaster University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
Interoperability and Preservation with the Hub and Spoke (HandS) Tom Habing, Bill Ingram, Robert Manaster University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
METS In order to reconstruct the archive, we will need to understand the METS files. METS is schema that provides a flexible mechanism for encoding descriptive,
METS Dr. Heike Neuroth EMANI – Project Meeting February 14 th - 16 th, 2002 Springer-Verlag Heidelberg Göttingen State and University Library (SUB)
Fedora 3.0 and METS: A Partnership for the Organization, Presentation and Preservation of Digital Objects Open Repositories Georgia Tech, Atlanta,
1 Extending the Implementation of PREMIS to Geospatial Resources in the Stanford Digital Repository: An Exploration By Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich Metadata.
Joachim Bauer Senior System Engineer, CCS
From EAD to METS An overview and history of METS Rick Beaubien UC Berkeley.
Mark Evans, Tessella Digital Preservation Boot Camp – PASIG meeting, Washington DC, 22 nd May 2013 PREMIS Practical Strategies For Preservation Metadata.
3. Technical and administrative metadata standards Metadata Standards and Applications.
US GPO AIP Independence Test CS 496A – Senior Design Team members: Antonio Castillo, Johnny Ng, Aram Weintraub, Tin-Shuk Wong Faculty advisor: Dr. Russ.
Merrilee Proffitt e(X)literature / Digital Cultures Project April 2003 News from the Digital Library The Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard; the.
METS What is METS ? What is METS ? A schema that provides a flexible mechanism for encoding descriptive, administrative, and structural metadata for a.
Keeping the pieces together: The Role of METS in the Preservation of Digital Content Robin Wendler Harvard University Library January 16, 2005 [Men in.
DigiTool METS Profile DigiTool Version 3.0. DigiTool METS Profile 2 What is METS? A Digital Library Federation initiative built upon the work of MOA2.
US GPO AIP Independence Test CS 496A – Senior Design Fall 2010 Team members: Antonio Castillo, Johnny Ng, Aram Weintraub, Tin-Shuk Wong.
PREMIS What is PREMIS? o Preservation Metadata Implementation Strategies When is PREMIS use? o PREMIS is used for “repository design, evaluation, and archived.
PAWN: A Novel Ingestion Workflow Technology for Digital Preservation
AIP Archival Information Package – Defines how digital objects and its associated metadata are packaged using XML based files. METS (binding file) MODS.
Metadata: use of METS with Fedora Marie Lagerwall Technical Officer Centre for Learning Technology London School of Economics and.
METS: An Introduction Part III METS and MOA2. MOA2: A Brief History Digital Library Federation project started in 1997 Main goal was to create a digital.
A Workshop Organized by the Mets Editorial Board DL2014 Workshops City University London September 11-12, 2014.
US GPO AIP Independence Test CS 496A – Senior Design Team members: Antonio Castillo, Johnny Ng, Aram Weintraub, Tin-Shuk Wong Faculty advisor: Dr. Russ.
Presented by Karen W. Gwynn LS – Metadata University of Alabama Prof. Steven MacCall Spring 2011.
Incompatible or Interoperable? A METS bridge for a small gap between two digital preservation software packages Lucas Mak Metadata & CatalogLibrarian
Metadata: Its Functions in Knowledge Representation for Digital Collections 1 Summary.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center OCLC’s Digital Archive – Disseminating with METS Jay Goodkin Software Engineer Digital Collection and Preservation.
Metadata Standards and Applications 4. Metadata Syntaxes and Containers.
By Carrie Moran. To examine the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) metadata scheme to determine its utility based on structure, interoperability.
METS Intro & Overview Mets Opening Day Germany May 7, 2007 Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich Stanford University Libraries.
METS-Based Cataloging Toolkit for Digital Library Management System Dong, Li Tsinghua University Library
3. Technical and administrative metadata standards Metadata Standards and Applications Workshop.
1 The Universal Object Format - A METS Profile for an archiving and exchange format for digital objects.
Implementing an Integrated Digital Asset Management System: FEDORA and OAIS in Context Paul Bevan DAMS Implementation Manager
The Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) NISO Metadata Workshop May 20, 2004 Rebecca Guenther Network Development and MARC Standards Office Library.
TEXT ENCODING INITIATIVE (TEI) Inf 384C Block II, Module C.
Metadata: Essential Standards for Management of Digital Libraries ALI Digital Library Workshop Linda Cantara, Metadata Librarian Indiana University, Bloomington.
An Introduction to METS Morgan Cundiff Network Development and MARC Standards Office Library of Congress Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard.
JENN RILEY METADATA LIBRARIAN IU DIGITAL LIBRARY PROGRAM Introduction to Metadata.
Archival Information Packages for NASA HDF-EOS Data R. Duerr, Kent Yang, Azhar Sikander.
PREMIS Rathachai Chawuthai Information Management CSIM / AIT.
Creating Archive Information Packages for Data Sets: Early Experiments with Digital Library Standards Ruth Duerr, NSIDC MiQun Yang, THG Azhar Sikander,
Implementor’s Panel: BL’s eJournal Archiving solution using METS, MODS and PREMIS Markus Enders, British Library DC2008, Berlin.
Implementation of PREMIS in METS Rebecca Guenther Sr. Networking & Standards Specialist, Library of Congress PREMIS Implementation Fair San.
Evolving MARC 21 for the future Rebecca Guenther CCS Forum, ALA Annual July 10, 2009.
Cataloging Compound Digital Objects: Using METS for Digitized Sanborn Maps Christopher Cronin Head of Digital Resources Cataloging University of Colorado.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Preservation Metadata Standards PREMIS & METS Taylor Surface, OCLC.
METS: Implementing a metadata standard in the digital library Richard Gartner Oxford University Library Services
Introduction to metadata
METS Application Profiles Morgan Cundiff Network Development and MARC Standards Office Library of Congress.
PREMIS Implementation Fair, San Francisco, CA October 7, Stanford Digital Repository PREMIS & Geospatial Resources Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich Knowledge.
Introduction to Metadata Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program.
Interoperability and Collection of Preservation Metadata for Digital Repository Content Matt Cordial, Tom Habing, Bill Ingram, Robert Manaster University.
5. Applying metadata standards: Application profiles Metadata Standards and Applications Workshop.
Metadata “Data about data” Describes various aspects of a digital file or group of files Identifies the parts of a digital object and documents their content,
Differences and distinctions: metadata types and their uses Stephen Winch Information Architecture Officer, SLIC.
Lifecycle Metadata for Digital Objects November 15, 2004 Preservation Metadata.
NLW. Object Classes Class 1  1 MARC Record  1 Image  No METS Class 2  1 MARC Record  Many images  No METS Class 3  1 MARC Record  Many.
Digitizing Historical Newspapers South Carolina Digital Newspaper Program's participation with the Library of Congress' Chronicling America: Historic American.
Introduction to Metadata
Introduction to METS (Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard)
Presentation transcript:

Communicating Archival Metadata conference and workshops in Stockholm June 2011 METS Karin Bredenberg / 30 –

Page 2 Content METS History METS Overview METS Schema and Sections METS Profiles Validation Redundancy Additional information

Page 3 What is METS? METS = Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard Maintained by the METS Editorial Board Schema is hosted at the Library of Congress Current version 1.9

Page 4 What is METS? (cont’d) An XML schema-based specification for encoding “hub” documents for materials whose content is digital. –Hub doc draws together dispersed but related files –METS uses XML to provide a vocabulary and syntax for identifying the digital pieces that together comprise a digital entity, for specifying the location of these pieces, and for expressing the structural relationships between them. Content files Descriptive metadata Administrative metadata

Page 5 METS Editorial Board The METS Editorial Board is an international group of volunteers committed to maintaining editorial control over METS, its XML Schema, the METS Profile XML Schema, and official METS documentation. The Board promotes the use of the METS specification, maintains a registry of METS Profiles, and endorses best practices in the use of METS as they emerge. Members represent important communities of interest for METS, including members of the Digital Library Federation, its initial sponsor, and the Library of Congress, its maintenance agency.

Page 6 METS History Originates in Making of America II initiative –Making of America II (MOA2) was a Digital Library Federation sponsored initiative that started in Participants included UCB (lead), Stanford, Penn State, Cornell, and NYPL. –GOAL: to create a digital object standard for encoding structural, descriptive and administrative metadata along with primary content –RESULT: MOA2.DTD (an XML DTD)

Page 7 METS History (cont’d) UCB Library and CDL adopt MOA2 Other institutions (LC, Harvard) consider Additional needs emerge –Support for time-based content –More flexibility in Descriptive and Administrative metadata MOA2 revised : –Starting in February 2001 concerned parties meet to review and revise MOA2 –Outcome: mets.xsd

Page 8 Main Provisions of METS schema 1.Identifying the files or parts of files that comprise the content of a digital entity, and expressing the structure or structures of this content 2.Linking Descriptive metadata with digital content 3.Linking Administrative metadata with digital content 4.Linking behavior definitions and program code with digital content and with associated descriptive and administrative metadata 5.Wrapping digital content, and associated descriptive and administrative metadata as binary data. 6.Wrapping digital content, and associated descriptive and administrative metadata as XML data.

Page 9 1. Identifying Content and Expressing Its Structure METS provides for specifying –What files constitute the content of a digital object –How these fit together into a structured whole What content files? Answer: any: –Image: jpeg, gif, tiff, sid, etc –Text/encoded text: txt, sgml, html, xml –Audio/Video: avi, mpeg, wav, midi What content structure? Answer: any hierarchical structure (physical, logical) but also web structure

Page Linking Descriptive Metadata with Digital Content METS does not itself provide a vocabulary and syntax for encoding descriptive metadata (no descriptive metadata elements defined in METS) METS does provide a means for pointing to external descriptive metadata and/or for including descriptive metadata internally. METS provides a means for linking this metadata to the digital content of the entity.

Page Linking Administrative Metadata with Digital Content METS does not itself provide a vocabulary and syntax for encoding administrative metadata (no administrative metadata elements defined in METS) METS does provide a means for pointing to external administrative metadata and/or for including administrative metadata internally. METS provides for linking this metadata to the digital content.

Page Coordinating Dissemination Behaviors with Digital Content METS provides a means for linking digital content with –an interface that defines the available disseminations and the required parameters for each –dissemination software that implements this interface

Page Wrapping Binary Content A METS object can wrap the content of a digital entity as binary data, as well as all associated descriptive and administrative metadata. This capability of METS gives it great potential for archiving purposes.

Page Wrapping XML Content A METS object can wrap the content of a digital entity as XML data, as well as all associated descriptive and administrative metadata. This capability of METS gives it great potential for archiving purposes.

Page 15 Uses of METS Transfer syntax –standard for transmitting/ exchanging digital objects. –SIP (Open Archival Information Systems Reference Model) –DSpace SIP Toolkit uses a mandatory METS document –Fedora supports METS as a ingest package Functional syntax: –basis for providing end users with the ability to view and navigate digital content and its associated metadata –DIP Archiving syntax –standard for archiving digital objects. –combine with PREMIS (PREservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies) –AIP

Page 16 Overview of schema and sections

Page 17 METS first level elements

Page 18 METS first level elements

Page 19 METS Header Records administrative metadata about the METS document itself such as: –Author/agent and role –Alternative identifiers for the METS document –Creation and update date and times –Status

Page 20 METS Header

Page 21 Descriptive Metadata Can record all of the units of descriptive metadata pertaining to the digital entity represented by METS document –Descriptive metadata could take any form including MARC record, Finding Aid, Dublin Core record –Descriptive Metadata may be External to the METS document Internal to the METS document Both external and internal

Page 22 External Descriptive Metadata Descriptive metadata element in a METS document may simply identify the type of descriptive metadata it represents (MARC, EAD, etc), and point to this metadata in its external location via a URI Descriptive Metadata

Page 23 External Descriptive Metadata

Page 24 Internal Descriptive Metadata Descriptive metadata may be recorded internally in a METS document in one of two ways –As XML data using vocabulary and syntax specified in external XML standard. For example, Dublin Core, MARC, MODS. –As binary data. For example, a standard MARC record could simply be incorporated as binary data into METS document.

Page 25 Internal Descriptive Metadata External XML Standard

Page 26 Internal Descriptive Metadata Binary data

Page 27 Administrative metadata Can record all of the units of administrative metadata pertinent to the METS object or its parts

Page 28 Administrative metadata Flavors Administrative metadata elements come in 4 flavors 1.Technical metadata 2.Source Metadata 3.Rights Metadata 4.Digital Provenance Metadata You choose which to use –All –Just one –Any self-chosen number There are some recommendations of which flavor to use to which type of administrative metadata

Page 29 Administrative metadata Technical metadata Technical metadata about the content files Can take any form including MIX, textMD or a locally produced XML schema etc.

Page 30 Administrative metadata Source metadata Descriptive, technical or rights information about an analog source document used to generate the digital object Can take any form including audioMD, videoMD, AES (Audio Engineering Society) metadata schemas or a locally produced XML schema etc.

Page 31 Administrative metadata Rights metadata Intellectual property rights information Can take any form including CopyrightMD, rightsDeclarationMD or a locally produced XML schema

Page 32 Administrative metadata Digital Provenance metadata Digital preservation information, such as information about the digital object’s lifecycle and history Can take any form including PREMIS (see the guidelines at premismets.pdf) or a locally produced XML schema etc. premismets.pdf

Page 33 Administrative metadata Administrative metadata may be –External to the METS document –Internal to the METS document –Both external and internal

Page 34 External Administrative metadata Administrative metadata element in a METS document may simply identify the type of administrative metadata it represents (NISOIMG, LC-AV, etc), and point to this metadata in its external location via a URI.

Page 35 External Administrative metadata

Page 36 Internal Administrative metadata Administrative metadata may be recorded internally in a METS document in one of two ways –As XML data using vocabulary and syntax specified in external XML standard. –As binary data.

Page 37 Internal Administrative metadata External XML Standard

Page 38 Internal Administrative metadata External XML Standard

Page 39 Internal Administrative metadata External XML Standard

Page 40 Internal Administrative metadata Binary data

Page 41 File Section Records all of the files that together comprise the content of the digital entity represented by the METS document

Page 42 File Section Filegroups Files are organized into File Groups based on the grouping you would like to do. One way is to group by format (tiff, hi-res jpeg, med-res jpeg, gif, etc)

Page 43 File Section File A file element can record this metadata. –Required: ID –Optional: SEQ, OWNERID, ADMID, DMDID, GROUPID, USE, BEGIN, END, BETYPE, MIMETYPE, SIZE, CREATED, CHECKSUM, CHECKSUMTYPE Makes it possible to easily check if the file is corrupt

Page 44 File Section TransformFile A file element can include a transformFile-element The transform file element provides a means to access any subsidiary files listed below a element by indicating the steps required to "unpack" or transform the subsidiary files. This element is repeatable and might provide a link to a in the that performs the transformation.

Page 45 File Section A file element may refer to an external content file, or itself contain the file contents, or both. –External content file. File element may point to an external content file via a URI. –Internal content file. File element may itself contain the file contents as binary data or XML data.

Page 46 File Section External content file

Page 47 File Section External content file and transformation example The following example describes a *.tar.gz file which has two embedded files within it, one a TIFF file and the other a JPEG file of the same image. To use the to describe these files, you could use the element in the following way:

Page 48 File Section Internal content file as binary data

Page 49 File Section Internal content file as XML data

Page 50 Linking Files with Administrative Metadata Files and File Groups may point to pertinent administrative metadata elements in the Administrative Metadata Section of the METS document. File or file group might point to: –Technical Metadata element: technical information –Rights Metadata element: access restrictions, etc –Source Metadata element: info about original –Digital Provenance metadata element: transformations that produced the file

Page 51 Linking Files with Administrative Metadata

Page 52 Linking Files with Descriptive Metadata Files may point to pertinent decriptive metadata elements in the Descriptive Metadata Section of the METS document.

Page 53 Linking Files with Descriptive Metadata

Page 54 Structural Map Section Specifies the (hierarchical) structure of the digital entity represented by the METS document. Specifies how the content files (the files listed in the Files Section) fit into this structure. More than one structure may be specified. For example: a logical structure and a physical structure, a Webpage structure

Page 55 Expressing the Structure The structural map analyzes a digital object into a hierarchy of Division (div) elements: Division (type=“photoalbum”) Division (type=“page”) Division (type=“photo”) Division (type=“page”) Division (type=“photo”)

Page 56 Structural Map Section Simple content: –Content is simple when the various manifestations of a division are each represented by a single, whole file. Example: page manifested by a thumbnail, med-res jpeg, and hi-res jpeg. –Division simply contains a pointer to each file element in the file list that represents a manifestation of the Division

Page 57 Structural Map Section Simple content

Page 58 Structural Map Section Complex content. METS accommodates various types of complex content. –Content expressed by subsection of file. Division points not just to a file represented in a file list, but to a particular area within in that file. –Text (transcriptions): references Begin/End ids within structured text. –A/V: references a BeginTime and EndTime or Extent –Image/2-D: Internal shape and coordinates

Page 59 Structural Map Section Complex content (cont’d): –Content expressed by files that must be “played/displayed” in sequence Division points to a sequence of files or sections of files –Content expressed by files that must be “played/displayed” at same time Division points to set of parallel files or section of files

Page 60 Structural Map Section Complex content

Page 61 Structural Map Section Links to Administrative and Descriptive Metadata A Division at any level can point to a Administrative Metadata elements within the METS document that contain or point to pertinent administrative metadata. –Example: the root Division in a METS object that represents a photoalbum, might point to a Rights metadata element that contains copyright and access restrictions for the entire photoalbum. A Division at any level can point to one or more Descriptive Metadata elements within the METS document that contain or point to the pertinent descriptive metadata. Links to both in the same div can be done

Page 62 Structural Map Section Links to Administrative and Descriptive Metadata

Page 63 Structural Link Section Specification for hyperlinks between the different components of a METS structure that are delineated in a structural map. Used to note the existence of hypertext links between web pages, if you wished to record those links within METS.

Page 64 Structural Link Section

Page 65 Behavior Section Can record all of the dissemination behaviors that pertain to a digital entity or its parts. A behavior unit may contain: –A reference to an external interface definition that defines a set of related behaviors –A reference to an external executable that implements these behaviors –A reference to the Division or Divisions of the object structure to which the behaviors apply.

Page 66 Behavior Section

Page 67 Behavior Section The following example illustrates how a METS object will call executable code to 1) display an Encoded Archival Description (EAD) finding aid, and 2) authenticate public access to the finding aid. Pertinent sections of the are included in the example.

Page 68 Behavior Section

Page 69 Using METS Profiles Profile registration Validating Redundancy

Page 70 Profiles An XML document Defines the rules of how METS is used One profile can extend another profile

Page 71 Profiles Profiles schema version 2.0 General information about who to contact regarding the profile and so on Element showing if its registered or not All the rules regarding the use of METS

Page 72 Profiles Registration Registration at the METS Editorial Board June registered profiles Review period at/by the METS-list Can be used by others Others can make an new profile extending an existing profile with their use

Page 73 Validating The original schema has just the rules originally in METS For validating own rules you must edit the schema and add your restrictions

Page 74 Redundancy Using METS and other standards sometimes causes redundancy Same elements in several standards Same elements mandatory in several standards Own descisions regarding redundancy in cases when not mandatory in both standards. Regarding PREMIS and METS see the document mentioned earlier

Page 75 Additional information METS official site: METS listserv: OAIS PREMIS

Page 76 This presentation compiled with the help of: Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich, Knowledge Motifs LLC Rick Beaubien, Library Systems Office, U.C. Berkeley Joachim Bauer, Senior System Engineer, CCS Content Conversion Specialists GmbH Jerome McDonough, Asst. Professor, Graduate School of Library & Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign