An Update on the Activities of the Western Regional Air Partnership ‘WRAP v2.0’ Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rider 8 Technical Workgroup Development. Introduction - Rider 8 Program for Ozone 74 th State Legislative Session authorized and budgeted to assist areas.
Advertisements

Technical Support System Review / / RPO Monitoring/Data Analysis Workgroup Conference.
Technical Support System Review Board Meeting March 8, 2007.
ADEQ Uses of ICF Modeling Analysis Tony Davis, Branch Manager – Air Planning Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Criteria Pollutant Modeling Analysis.
Department of the Environment The State Implementation Plan Process – Our Next Steps Brian Hug Division Chief, Air Quality Planning and Policy Division.
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31, 2011.
WRAP Status + Fire Emissions Inventory Protocol for Regional Air Quality Analysis and Planning Support in the WRAP regionWRAP Tom Moore WRAP/Western Governors’
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
West-wide Jumpstart Air Quality Modeling Study Modeling Results November 7, 2013 Technical Project Team ENVIRON, Alpine Geophysics, Univ. of North Carolina.
WRAP Status Report EPA/RPO Meeting Durham, NC February 6, 2002.
WRAP Decision and Data Support Systems Tom Moore | Western Governors’ Association Shawn McClure | Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere.
WRAP Strategic Plan WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT February 20, 2008.
The Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP) WRAP formed in 1997 as the successor organization to Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission (GCVTC) –
Fire Emissions Joint Forum –Section 308 Strategies for Fire Coordinating efforts of states changing or developing smoke management strategies for regional.
Oil and Gas Workgroup Summary October 21-23, 2009 Denver.
Ozone and Nitrogen Concerns in NM WRAP Ozone and NOx in the West November 11, 2009.
IS THERE LIFE AFTER 2007?. WHERE DO TRIBES WANT TO GO WITH THE WRAP?
The National Ambient Air Monitoring Strategy and Network Design Westar Spring 2007 Business Meeting April 4, 2007 Bruce Louks, Idaho Department of Environmental.
November 7, 2013 WRAP Membership Meeting Denver, CO Tom Moore WRAP Air Quality Program Manager WESTAR Council.
WESTAR Technical Committee Report WESTAR Spring Business Meeting 22 – 23 May 2013, San Francisco, CA Clint Bowman & Phil Allen, Co-Chairs.
WRAP Committee and Forum Updates WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
October 29, 2012 Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western Governors’ Association WESTAR Council Meeting.
Next Steps in Regional Haze Planning in the Western U.S. Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31,
WRAP Update WESTAR Meeting San Francisco April 25, 2011.
Colorado Perspective on Nitrogen Oxides Paul Tourangeau Director Colorado APCD November 11, 2009.
Response to WRAP Air Managers Committee Memo “Request for Cost Estimates” April 6, 2009 WESTAR Council.
October 8, 2014 Tom Moore WRAP Air Quality Program Manager WESTAR Council California Desert Air Working Group Pala, CA 1.
April 14, 2015 Tom Moore WRAP Air Quality Program Manager WESTAR Council EPA 2015 International Emission Inventory Conference "Air Quality Challenges:
Conceptual Description – Next Generation of Regional Modeling & Analysis Center Workshop on Regional Emissions & Air Quality Modeling Studies July 30,
§309 Technical Support Document “Table of Contents” First Draft Tom Moore WESTAR Fall Technical Conference September 19, 2002.
Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality WRAP Technical Analysis.
Fugitive Dust Project Phase One The WRAP Emissions Forum contracted with a team of contractors lead by ENVIRON to produce regional PM 10 and PM 2.5 emissions.
WRAP Workshop July 29-30, 2008 Potential Future Regional Modeling Center Cumulative Analysis Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation Novato, California.
2005 WRAP Work Plan WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS Phase II -- Task Source Apportionment Modeling Study Design University.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS/3SDW Progress Review to the 3SAQS Technical Committee University of North.
Overview of WRAP FEJF Work Products WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 23-24, 2006 Sacramento, CA Darla Potter (WDEQ) & Mark Fitch (USFS)
WRAP Regional Modeling Center, Attribution of Haze Meeting, Denver CO 7/22/04 Introduction to the the RMC Source Apportionment Modeling Effort Gail Tonnesen,
The West is different August 14, 2013 OAQPS. Aerosols causing Worst Visibility Days – East vs. West 2.
May 23, 2013 Don Arkell WESTAR Staff WESTAR Council Meeting Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western Governors’ Association.
Western Air Quality Issues and Photochemical Modeling - An Industrial Perspective Doug Blewitt, CCM AQRM Dana Wood, PE BP.
2005 Progress on Emissions Inventories Attribution of Haze Workgroup Meeting January 24, 2006.
Western Regional Technical Air Quality Studies: support for Ozone and other Air Quality Planning in the West Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western.
Funding of Regional Planning Organizations May, 2006.
Strategic Plan Development Status Technical Analysis Forum meeting October 11, 2007.
OAQPS Update WESTAR April 3,  On March 12, 2008, EPA significantly strengthened the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ground-level.
Technical Support System Review Board Meeting March 8, 2007.
April 17, 2012 Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western Governors’ Association WESTAR Council Meeting.
WRAP Overview Established in 1997 as successor to Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Commission. Develop technical and policy tools needed by western states.
Key Findings from May & July 2008 WRAP Technical Workshops September 30, 2008 Steve Arnold, Colorado DPHE & Bob Kotchenruther, EPA R10 (Co-Chairs, WRAP.
Reaching New Heights Tools and Data for air quality planning in the Intermountain West Intermountain West Data Warehouse Presenter: Agency: Contact Information:
Informed NPS Air Quality Management Decisions in Response to a Changing Climate.
Revised EPA Ozone Standard – Effects in the West May 15, 2008.
Western Regional Technical Projects 2011 through 2013
Alternative title slide
Western Ozone Issues WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Salt Lake City, UT
Western Regional Air Partnership 2003 Technical Workplan Elements
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States
2012 Spring Business Meeting Seattle, Washington
2013 Fall Business Meeting Denver, Colorado
Western Regional Haze Planning and
WRAP Overview and Role of Dust Forum
Scorecards.
Air Resource Specialists, Inc. July 23, 2004
Oil and Gas Emission Inventories and Applications for Estimating Impacts to Health and Welfare Tom Moore, WESTAR-WRAP John Grant and Amnon Bar-Ilan, Ramboll.
WESTAR (State Caucus) Recommendations
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
EPA’s Roadmap for the Second Planning Period
Presentation transcript:

An Update on the Activities of the Western Regional Air Partnership ‘WRAP v2.0’ Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011

What is the WRAP? History of the Western Regional Air Partnership: Formed in 1997 One of five Regional Planning Organizations in the U.S. created to assist States & Tribes in understanding the sources of man made visibility impairment in National Parks as per the Regional Haze Rule of the Clean Air Act. From 2000 to 2010 WRAP spent over $20 million for:  monitoring data analyses  emissions inventory development  pollutant transport modeling (SMOKE, MM5, CMAQ, CAMx)  source apportionment analyses  planning & coordination of activities among the western States (web data servers, meetings, trainings)

What is the WRAP? (cont.) WRAP Geographic Coverage: State and Tribal Areas

What is the WRAP? (cont.) That’s where WRAP has been, where’s it going? With Regional Haze SIPs due ~2008, between 2007–2009 WRAP was winding down activities. However, many saw the benefits of continued regional-scale air quality planning and technical analysis, e.g.  cross-state consistency in emissions projections  centralized modeling center  assessing regional scale transport To broaden its relevance and funding possibilities, in 2009 WRAP revised its charter to have:  a much broader one-atmosphere, multi-pollutant approach  a stronger emphasis on technical than policy work

What is the WRAP? (cont.) Specifically, the areas of emphasis in WRAP’s revised charter:  Continue regional haze work and assessing sources of visibility impairment  Broaden mission to include current and evolving regional air issues like, potentially  ozone  PM2.5 and PM10  nitrogen transport, deposition, and critical loads  mercury and other hazardous air pollutant deposition  climate change  A recognition that source apportionment tools add significant value, so where possible, identify the impacts of regionally significant emission sources like  mobile  fire  traditional and alternative energy development/extraction  windblown dust  electricity generation  Continue to develop and maintain web-based databases for regional and sub-regional technical analyses

What are WRAP’s Planned Activities in

EPA has proposed a new 8-HR ozone standard between 60 – 70 ppb as well as possibly a new secondary standard for ecosystem protection. Any new standard within the proposed range will result in multiple new ozone nonattainment areas in the west including rural and winter violations. !! New Regional Modeling Effort for Ozone - Motivation HR Design Values (source: WRAP 2010) -Monitors that would violate a new ozone standard in the WRAP between ppb (colored circles) based on data. -Regional transport expected to play an increased role.

The project is called the ‘West-wide Jumpstart Air Quality Modeling Study’ (WestJumpAQMS) Funded at $715,000, 1 year, May Spring 2012  $215k from a consortium of NM BLM, NM AQB, EPA R6, BP  $500k was added just recently from BLM headquarters in DC Contract issued to ENVIRON Main Goals  Conduct ozone modeling for a base year in the west at 36 & 12 km, with selected 4 km domains.  Perform a comprehensive model performance evaluation.  Perform a source apportionment analysis to evaluate local, regional, international, and natural source impacts on elevated ozone concentrations (both rural and urban) across the west  Develop a modeling platform that can be used to as a starting point for (1) ozone SIP analyses, and (2) regional air quality planning and NEPA (EIS – Environmental Impact Statement) analyses in the west (reason for BLM funding)  Provide a framework for performing future analysis to address ozone, PM, visibility, and deposition issues in the western U.S. !! New Regional Modeling Effort for Ozone – Details

Scope of Modeling For base year (? 2008) Meteorology & Emissions processed at 36, 12, and 4 km Ozone and PM source apportionment at 12km Ozone and PM source apportionment at 4km high res. windows BLM may add additional 4km high res. windows within larger 4 km window Proposed 36, 12, and 4 km domains with inset 4 km high res. source apportionment domains New Regional Modeling Effort for Ozone: WestJumpAQMS

Goals & Scope to determine the contributions of prescribed fire and wildfire events to elevated Ozone to quantify fire impacts at monitoring sites as well as assess the degree of regional transport the project will start with existing WRAP FETS data and will build a 2008 nationwide fire inventory for modeling and analysis the 2008 fire inventory will be an emissions input into the WestJumpAQMS modeling project will leverage the WestJumpAQMS project for source apportionment of fire impacts WRAP’s Fire & Ozone Analysis Project: (July 2011 – Dec 2012) A separately funded project by FLM Joint Fire Sciences Program The WestJumpAQMS project will be leveraged by....

Goals and scope The goal is to update & improve exiting biogenic emissions models and model inputs for the western US In particular, the project will incorporate improved land use & land cover data and emission factors for vegetation The project will feed better biogenic emissions into the WestJumpAQMP project and look at ozone sensitivity The project will leverage results from existing and current projects:  Clark County, NV biogenics’ studies  Other studies by western local and state air agencies  Current EPA ORD project  BLM air quality modeling studies WRAP’s Biogenic Emissions Inventory Improvement Project (June 2011 – Oct. 2011) Funded by WESTAR (~$130k) The WestJumpAQMS project will also be leveraged by....

The WRAP will Continue Support of Web- based Data Systems Data & Analysis Tools Planning & Decision Support Tool Haze & other monitoring data State & Tribal Emissions data Fire Activity & Emissions data Experience with these regional technical systems will be applied in transition to multi-pollutant analysis and WestJumpAQMS

Thank you! Robert Kotchenruther EPA Region

WRAP 2011 Activities: Ozone Development of an Ozone Conceptual Model for the West 2011 project to help prepare WRAP members for the analysis and planning effort needed under more stringent Ozone NAAQS Guidance documents from EPA suggest preparation of such a report when Ozone nonattainment has not previously existed, as will likely be the case across the West, particularly in remote Class I areas as well as for a number of urban areas Project work to address themes such as: Source sectors Topographical influences Temporal variation International, state-to-state, and other inter-jurisdiction transport of Ozone and precursors Contribution of natural versus anthropogenic sources Budgeted for $55,000 Status: No RFP issued. WRAP is considering an alternate model to get this work done. i.e., not hiring a contractor but organizing a workgroup of states and locals to summarize existing knowledge for each airshed/area.