MOOC-Eds: The Potential of MOOCs for Educators Professional Development Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Mary Ann Wolf, Director of Digital Learning Initiatives,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
When Students Can’t Read…
Advertisements

NAF Online Professional Development eCollege: How Does It Work?
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Southeast Curriculum Supervisors 30 January 2015.
Holyoke Public Schools Professional Development By, Judy Taylor
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel and Intel Education are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its.
Intel Teach Program Shelley Shott Intel Corporation April 2010.
What is a blog? “Web log” In simple terms, a blog is a web page where what you write goes in chronological order on the front page Author can write, viewers.
A Mathematics Specialist Program: Its Structure and Impact on Practicing Elementary Teachers Nadine Bezuk & Susan Nickerson.
Localizing & Learning Educating Educators within Open Learning Environments.
Secondary Intensive Reading Block Evan Lefsky, Ph.D. Reading Specialist, 6-12.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Copyright © 2011 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of Intel.
Formative Assessment in Idaho Idaho is committed to the idea that a system of assessment will yield far better information about teaching and learning.
Learning Development and Innovation Overview and Updates Steve Wyn Williams March 2013.
EDUCATIONAL NETWORKING at Work in the Classroom By Allison Sproles 1.
Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.
Classroom Literacy Artifacts as a Vehicle for Collaborative Mentoring in Special Education Michelle Parker-Katz Marie Tejero Hughes University of Illinois.
NCGE Workshop: Training Teachers for Success in Single-Gender Classrooms February 2012 Patty Carver, Online School for Girls & The Holton-Arms School Cathy.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
MCCWDTA Sharing Blended Learning Strategies Barbara Treacy January 15, 2014 Massachusetts Community Colleges and Workforce Development Transformation Agenda.
Models of Online Learning – Identifying Components Week 3 Introduction to Web-Based Mentoring and Distance Education.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel and Intel Education are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Aims of Workshop Introduce more effective school/University partnerships for the initial training of teachers through developing mentorship training Encourage.
The Evaluation of IMPACT V Jeni Corn, Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College of Education.
Essential Standards Implementation Science 6-12 Nash Central Middle School August 23, 2012 Melissa Butts, STEM Educational Specialist Ensuring bright and.
Programs of the Intel Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation. Copyright © 2007 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Moodling in Ontario: A Professional Learning Approach Anita Drossis Nathalie Rudner ABEL Professional Learning Lead ABEL School Lead Science and Math Teacher.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Facilitating Learning in Professional Experience: Mentoring for Success Module 1 - An Introduction.
Students perceptions on using Web 2.0 technologies in a
Essential Conditions for Implementation of... Local Professional Development Programming.
March 5th, 2015, SITE 2015, Las Vegas, NV, USA
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
Bricks and Clicks: Training Teachers Online Barbara Treacy, Director, EdTech Leaders Online OSEP Project Directors Meeting July 20, 2010.
Educational Networks What are they and why are they important?
Intel ® Education Programs Intel ® Teach Elements Compelling, Convenient, Online Professional Development for Educators.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Identifying Assessments
SAS What is a coach to do? Classrooms for the Future/21st Century Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Smarter Balanced Interim and Formative Assessment PTE Summer Conference June 17, 2014 Nancy Thomas Price, Comprehensive Assessment Coordinator.
Online Professional Development within Comprehensive Programs Glenn Kleiman EDC Center for Online Professional Education (COPE)
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
Personalized Learning: HISD’s Path to College and Career Readiness.
Programs of the Intel® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation. Copyright © 2007 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
Web Tools for Professional Development: A Focus on the Pedagogy Barbara Treacy Director, EdTech Leaders Online (ETLO) Education Development Center (EDC)
MOOC for Educators: Exploring a personalized and scalable approach to professional development Glenn Kleiman & Mary Ann Wolf Friday Institute for Educational.
For the Students Students in elementary school right now have always used technology, classes seem outdated and boring to most because of the lack of.
The Big Interview Amy Fouts EDU 650 Teaching, Learning, and Leading in the 21 st Century Instructor Richard Newman.
Lesson Study Lesson study is a particular form of job-embedded professional development that involves collaborative discourse among teachers over an extended.
Blended Learning in Brazil: personalization and technology in the classroom Adolfo Tanzi Neto Lilian Bacich.
MCCWDTA Sharing Blended Learning Strategies Barbara Treacy January 15, 2014 Massachusetts Community Colleges and Workforce Development Transformation Agenda.
Professional Development: Lessons Learned Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University January 29,
Move Education Forward Name of School District | Date | Presenter’s Name | Presenter’s Title.
Course Work 2: Critical Reflection GERALDINE DORAN B
Cell Phones Restrooms Please turn off or place phones on silent.
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Education Transform Resources
The Friday Institute MOOCs for Educators Initiative Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College of Education.
Partner Readiness Guide Cloud Application Development
The Mentoring Process Martha Majors.
The Home Base Professional Development Tool
Collaborative Leadership
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Presentation transcript:

MOOC-Eds: The Potential of MOOCs for Educators Professional Development Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Mary Ann Wolf, Director of Digital Learning Initiatives, Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University CoSN Conference Washington, C.D. March 20, 2014

Why MOOCs for Educators? So many changes Curriculum standards, student assessments, digital literacies, data system, teacher evaluation systems, technologies, fiscal constraints… Large education workforce 3.8+ million teachers, 250,000+ administrators, teaching almost 50 million students. Changing workforce 16% teacher turnover per year (about half changing schools, half leaving teaching) Drives a need for large-scale, widely accessible, cost- effective PD

Principles of Effective PD Deepens subject matter knowledge, understanding of learning, and appreciation of students’ needs. Centers around critical professional activities Builds on problems of practice that lead to reflection and professional discourse Provides educators with opportunities to learn in the ways they will be expected to teach Is personalized to meet individual needs Cultivates a culture of collegiality Is ongoing, intensive and woven into professional work.

The Big Question Can MOOC-like approaches be adapted to: Address educators’ PD needs? Follow the principles of effective PD? Provide scalable, accessible and effective PD?

Four MOOC-Ed Design Principles

Self Directed Learning

Peer Supported Learning

Case studies and Authentic Projects

Enable Integration into Blended Learning Programs

An Overview of the Digital Learning Transition MOOC-Ed Offered through a collaboration of:

Goals for Participants 1.Understand the impact of technology and the global information age on both what students need to learn and how learning can take place. 2.Learn about best practices and lessons learned from schools and districts that have digital learning transitions well underway. 3.Develop a set of goals for digital learning for your own school or district. 4.Learn the elements of a successful digital learning transition and effective strategies for addressing each element. 5.Learn about processes and tools that help support planning, implementing and evaluating a digital learning transition. 6.Develop an action plan to meet your school or district digital learning transition goals. 7.Contribute to the learning of others who participate in the course.

Two Parts of the DLT MOOC-Ed Part I: Where Are We Heading? Goals for the Digital Learning Transition: Envisioning the future of schools Changing the culture of teaching and learning Digital learning transitions in some exemplary schools & districts. Part II: How Do We Get There? Planning for a Digital Learning Transition Addressing the planning cycle and elements of successful initiatives (see next slide)

DLT MOOC-Ed Units 1.Envisioning Schools in the Year Changing the Culture of Teaching and Learning 3.Digital Learning Transitions: Goals & Challenges 4.Wrap up of Part I 5.Teaching and Professional Learning 6.Planning for Selected DLT Elements 7.Leading a Successful Digital Learning Initiative 8.Wrap Up and Next Steps

MOOC-Ed Design Elements

MOOC-Ed Design Elements I DLT Unit 3 example DLT Unit 3 Unit introduction video Also Podcast and audio versions (transcripts in progress) Discussion forum Groups Quotes, ratings Participant projects Individual or team Class, school, district or other plans Peer reviews for constructive feedback Peer reviews Allow for interactions

MOOC-Ed Design Elements II Video and text resources Unit 1: Resources about the Digital Learning Transition Unit 2: Readings on Changing the Culture of Schools Unit 2: Lessons from Four Digital Learning Transitions Unit 3: School & District Digital Learning Transitions Expert panels Unit 3: School and District Learning Transitions Unit 3: Curriculum and Instruction Questions index Podcast and audio versions

MOOC-Ed Design Elements III Crowdsourcing Unit 7: Leadership Resources Results from Unit 1 Participant recommended resources Planning tools Project 24 School and District Self Assessment (Metiri Group) School Technology Needs Assessment Survey (Friday Institute) School Technology Needs Assessment Survey Participant surveys Registration, midpoint, finalfinal Certificates of completion for CEUs

Other MOOC-Eds Current Coaching Digital Learning: Cultivating a Culture of Change World Class Teaching (with Institute of Emerging Issues) In development Supporting Common Core State Standards in Mathematics Series Supporting Students’ Development of Disciplinary Literacy More information at

Additional Design Elements for Other MOOC-Eds Clinical interviews with students Classroom-based projects Analyses of students’ work Developing a personal plan Connecting with other educators Professional practice tips Twitter chats

The MOOC-Ed Platform A cloud-based platform of course management, asynchronous discussion, survey, multimedia, and collaborative tools Google Course Builder Google App Engine Vanilla Forums Vimeo Survey Gizmo Google Hangouts Google Documents & Spreadsheets Google, Course Builder, Vimeo and other analytics

MOOC-Ed Data Sources Pre-registration survey: demographics, roles, goals. Overall web analytics: visitors, visits, visit duration, pages viewed. Detailed “click logs” of each user’s access to each unit Discussion forum views, discussions started and comments Discussion content for various forms of discourse analyses Projects submitted and peer reviews Vimeo site analytics: total views and average times by video Crowdsourcing of resources Course surveys Open-ended responses from participants

Some Things We’ve Learned So Far

Educators are Interested in MOOC-Eds 4,456 registered in two DLT MOOC-Eds, from all 50 states

and more than 80 other countries

Educators in a Variety of Roles

From a Variety of Types of Schools Public non-charter schools or districts (66%) Private schools (15%) Public charter schools (5%) Not employed by a school or district (14%)

DLT Participants 61% female, 39% male Average of 15.9 years of experience, with a range of 0 to 48 years 66% listed a master’s degree as their highest degree earned 11% reported having doctoral degrees. *Data from 2 nd DLT MOOC-Ed

Participants Goals Vary (up to 3 goals each) Prepare to lead change in my school or district 44.0% Understand the potential of digital learning40.5% Learn about best practices for DLT transitions37.6% Plan more effective professional development 30.1% Become a better coach or mentor for other teachers20.8% Understand the benefits and risks of technology17.7% Improve my own classroom teaching16.0% Experience a MOOC 15.1% Engage my community in supporting digital learning14.8% Connect with other educators who lead DLT initiatives14.6% Learn about K-12 infrastructures and devices13.8% Organize and inform the work of our local team12.7%

Most are experienced with online learning Almost all experienced in using productivity tools and online networking 86% reported some experience with online learning 43% reported some experience teaching online 25% reported prior experience taking a MOOC *Data from 2 nd DLT MOOC-Ed

Participation is Active: In two DLT MOOC-Eds 45,000+ page views 5,000+ hours on course site 11,000+ views of course videos 1,800 participants in the discussions 6,000+ messages posted 116,000+ views of postings

Enrollment Participation DLT2: 1,791 enrolled Participation by unit ≠

Available Time Spent Per Week is Limited Hours per unit% participants % % % 7 or more3.6%

Schedule Flexibility is Essential *Data from 2 nd DLT MOOC-Ed

What Does it Mean to Complete a MOOC-Ed? 907 actively participated in DLT2 139 completed final survey (in weeks 7 or 8) 111 participated in the final unit (12.2%) CEU Certification, 69 participants (7.6%) Ratio of enrollees to completers is increasing across MOOC-Eds.

Survey results: Goals and Value of DLT2 92% made progress on their personal goals 90% were engaged in the MOOC-Ed experience 93% developed new insights to further digital learning 95% feel more motivated for their digital learning transition 92% would recommend future DLT courses to colleagues Based on DLT2 final survey, n=139

MOOC-Ed ComponentBeneficialDidn’t Use Introductory Video Presentations85%3% Video Resources91%1% Text Resources95%2% Group Discussion85%4% Expert Panel Videos91%2% Goals & Challenges Project86%11% Feedback from Other Participants80%13% Crowd-sourced Resources81%15% Twitter Chats28%62% All the Design Elements are Beneficial

Voices of Participants I found it engaging and "walking the talk" - one could proceed at their own pace and with their own choices, but were put on track with many resources to assist learning. I particularly benefited from the case study presentations, which gave lots of insight into the successes and challenges of districts that are ahead of our implementation schedule. Creating the plan after seeing how others had done it was a great inspiration

Types of Discussion Postings

Knowledge Construction in Discussions

Voices of Participants I loved seeing others from all different locations talking about the same thing - passion for the students, for the schools and for digital learning. Everyone has such great ideas and opinions and to pool them all together like this was amazing. Just received all the "tools” at our school to begin a 1:1 program. Although, I am as excited as a kid a Christmas, I have stayed awake many nights stressing about starting the program. However, the discussion and the many insightful comments that I have read have given me some confidence to dive in and start the transformation at my school.

55% of participants planned to participate with colleagues: 35% with a school or district planning team 20% with other colleagues in their school or organization 55% of participants planned to participate with colleagues: 35% with a school or district planning team 20% with other colleagues in their school or organization “The most beneficial aspect of this course was actually the F2F conversations informed and occasioned by the MOOC with the other members of my school team.” “This course helped members of our DLT team see the possibilities and open their minds beyond the traditional 45-minute class periods” “[The most valuable part was] meeting as a team at my school weekly to create our self-assessment and the discussions we have had around our goals and what we are learning in the MOOC-Ed.” “I am happy that we took part as a school team, which in turn was part of a greater District team. It is these group conversations that I found to be most helpful” Participation with a local group was beneficial

Blended Learning Explorations Distinguished Leadership Program in Digital Learning As the core of a year-long statewide Principal PD program Special Topics Graduate Course: Digital Learning Transition in K-12 Schools A wrap-around to the DLT MOOC, allowing students to engage in the MOOC as part of a graduate course World Class Teaching As follow up to large-scale workshop

Future Research Questions I How can participants best be placed in groups to foster productive discussions? What is the optimal size for discussion groups? How can discussions be initiated, facilitated, and connected to resources and activities in order to encourage high levels of engagement and exchanges that involve reflection and co-construction? How can we best balance having participants move through the units on a common schedule so they can engage in peer-supported learning with providing flexible scheduling to meet educators’ needs?

Future Research Questions II Can we identify characteristics of participants and preferred self-directed paths through the MOOC-Ed? What types of case studies and projects are most engaging and beneficial for participants? What guidance and structures lead to productive peer feedback? Can participation be further incentivized by the use of badges or other forms of recognition? What impact do MOOC-Eds have on professional knowledge, skills and practices? How can MOOC-Eds best be integrated with other professional development activities?

Conclusions MOOC-Eds can provide personalized, accessible, effective, scalable PD for motivated professionals Our design principles provide a foundation for MOOC- Eds The important question is not Do MOOC-Eds work? but rather: How can we optimize the value of MOOC-Eds? What professional development needs do they best serve? How are they effectively blended with other PD approaches?

Thanks to our Funders Hewlett Foundation National Science Foundation Oak Foundation Gates Foundation Lenovo Google NC Department of Public Instruction NC Principals and Assistant Principals Association Institute for Emerging Issues, NC State University

For More Information To visit a MOOC-Ed Link from User: Password: moocguest