Final BMP Modeling Workshop September 29, 2011 UB Geography Department Sponsored by the Buffalo District of the US Army Corps of Engineers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Advertisements

Green Water Credits Use of quantitative tools to evaluate potential Green Water Credits options Peter Droogers Wilco Terink Johannes Hunink Sjef Kauffman.
A Model for Evaluating the Impacts of Spatial and Temporal Land Use Changes on Water Quality at Watershed Scale Jae-Pil Cho and Saied Mostaghimi 07/29/2003.
Soil Erosion Estimation TSM 352 Land and Water Management Systems.
Evaluation of Overland Flow Paths Generated from Multiresolution DEMs J.M. Shawn Hutchinson 1, Stacy L. Hutchinson 2, and I.J. Kim 2 1 Department of Geography.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
Flood Mitigation and Water Quality Iowa Department of Natural Resources.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Great Lakes Tributary Modeling Program 516(e) Landuse BMP Discussion & SWAT (Soil Water Assessment Tool) Workshop June 22,
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
M. Stone, J. Stormont, E. Epp, C. Byrne, S. Rahman, R. Powell, W
1 Technical Service Provider Training National Association of Independent Crop Consultants January 20-23, 2010 Wyndham Orlando Resort 8001 International.
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Conservation Managing the Agricultural Landscape for Environmental.
Useful Tools for Predicting Erosion from Disturbed Rangelands: Disturbed WEPP for Rangelands The Water Erosion Prediction Project in the Forest Service.
October 5, 2005, The 4th IAHR Symposium on River, Coastal and Estuarine Morphodynamics Field Observation and WEPP Application for Sediment Yield in an.
Additional Questions, Resources, and Moving Forward Science questions raised in the development of a science assessment Effect of Conservation Tillage.
GeoWEPP ArcGIS 10.1 Development Team LESAM Lab Team
Hydrologic Simulation Models
Welcome! The Topic For Today Is… Soil. SOIL TextureStructureBMPsSoil SurveySoil Forming Factors FINAL JEOPARDY.
Soil Erosion and Conservation Developed 9/15/2000 by: Brian Matchett Sara Moyer.
CURVE NO. DEVELOPMENT STEP 8 Soils data, land use data, watershed data, and CN lookup table are used to develop curve numbers for use in the SCS Curve.
PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.
CRWR-PrePro Francisco “Paco” Olivera, Ph.D. Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Francisco Olivera 1998 ESRI User Conference.
Presented by Jason Afinowicz Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department, Texas A&M University CVEN 689 Applications of GIS to Civil Engineering.
Application of GIS Tools for Hydraulic Modeling
Nancy Rogel Eddie Guadarrama
Impact of Climate Change on Flow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
USDA Process-based Tools for Estimating Runoff, Soil Loss, and Sediment Yield – The WEPP Model Dennis C. Flanagan Research Agricultural Engineer USDA-Agricultural.
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
ENVIROTHON SOILS STATION INTENT AND PURPOSE (you might want to sit up close for these) 1.
The University of MississippiNational Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering Rainfall runoff modeling in agricultural watershed using 2D.
Modeling Variable Source Area Hydrology With WEPP
GeoWEPP ArcGIS 10.1 for soil erosion project Development Team Haoyi Xiong – Application leading developer Jonathan Goergen - Application co-lead developer.
Ag. & Biological Engineering
Mokelumne Avoided Cost Analysis Technical Committee Meeting: GeoWEPP modeling 1/9/2013 Mary Ellen Miller Michigan Tech Research Institute Bill Elliot,
WEPP: A Process-Based Watershed Runoff and Erosion Model for Watershed Assessment William Conroy, Joan Wu, Shuhui Dun Dept. Biological Systems Engineering.
Sediment Retention model
August 20th, CONTENT 1. Introduction 2. Data and Characteristics 3. Flood analysis 1. MOUSE 2. SOBEK 3. ARC-SWAT 4. Conclusions and suggestions.
WEPP—A Process-Based Hydrology and Erosion Model for Watershed Assessment and Restoration Joan Q. Wu, Markus Flury, Shuhui Dun, R. Cory Greer Washington.
Stormwater 101 Ohio Lake Erie Commission Best Local Land Use Practices Kirby Date, AICP.
Temporal and spatial patterns of basin scale sediment dynamics and yield.
Forest activities and Water Quality What can we confidently say after 30 years of research?
Seifu A Tilahun School of Civil & Water Resources Engineering,BDU Storm Runoff and soil erosion processes on the Ethiopian highland.
Soil Erosion TSM 352 Land and Water Management Systems.
WUP-FIN training, 3-4 May, 2005, Bangkok Hydrological modelling of the Nam Songkhram watershed.
T18-1 Soil Science and Management, 4E Chapter 18 Soil Conservation.
Outline of the training. 6 October 2005, TNMC, Bangkok.
Price Creek Watershed Project A joint project of the Iowa & Benton County Soil and Water Conservation Districts IOWATER Meeting – November 13, 2007.
Poplar River Sediment Source Assessment John L. Nieber Bruce N. Wilson Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering University of Minnesota July.
US Army Corps of Engineers Detroit District 2012 Training Volunteer Sediment Monitoring Corps & 2-Day Introductory Sediment Course Sediment Strong !
October 12, 2015 Iowa State University Indrajeet Chaubey Purdue University Water Quality.
Erosion and Sedimentation Erosion – Detachment, movement and deposition of soil by water, wind, ice or gravity. Sediment – Particles derived from inorganic.
1 CIG Specialist Introductory Meeting Wednesday, December 20 th, 2006 Computer Lab Room 105 Farrall Agriculture Engineering Hall Michigan State University.
The Effect of Compost Application and Plowing on Phosphorus Runoff Charles S. Wortmann Department of Agronomy and Horticulture Nutrient Management for.
Soil Conservation Agriscience II. Performance Objectives 1) Explain how the major types of soil erosion affect the environment and agricultural production.
Kristina Schneider Kristi Shaw
Iowa BMPs for soil erosion prevention. BMP context BMPs needed for managed land (duh!) Strategies differ by land- use – Ag/crops (>71%) +/- CRP, etc –
1 Byung Sik, Kim Kangwon National University Advanced Hydrology and Water Resources Management.
Predicting the hydrologic implications of land use change in forested catchments Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Water Availability 1996 Texas drought –Governor Bush asks “how much water do we have? How much are we using? How much do we need?” -- Ooops. No good answers!
Great Lakes Tributary Modeling Workshop The Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPPP) [1] National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (NCGIA),
SOIL EROSION ASSESSMENT Measurement of Water Erosion Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) - predict annual soil loss by water – Wischmeier and Mannering,
Estimating Annual Sediment Yield and a Sediment Delivery Ratio for Red Creek, Utah and Wyoming Paul Grams Department of Geography and Earth Resources.
Application of soil erosion models in the Gumara-Maksegnit watershed
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS
L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller
Soil Loss Estimation. USLE – Universal Soil Loss Equation SLEMSA – Soil Loss Estimation Model for Southern Africa.
Hydrologic Simulation Models
Chapter 3 Soil Erosion and Its Controls
From GIS to HMS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center University of Texas at Austin Center for Research in Water Resources Francisco.
Presentation transcript:

Final BMP Modeling Workshop September 29, 2011 UB Geography Department Sponsored by the Buffalo District of the US Army Corps of Engineers.

Workshop Outline Intro to Baseline Models & Case Studies Overview of BMPs by Scale Large-Scale Watershed Models (ArcSWAT) Break Small –Scale Hillslope BMPs (WEPP) Lunch

Workshop Outline Medium-Scale Watershed BMPs (GeoWEPP) Break Modeling Flood Levels & BMPs (HEC-GeoRAS) Break Instructor Assisted Self-Paced Exercises Wrap-up & Closing Comments

Workshop Outline Intro to Baseline Models & Case Studies Overview of BMPs by Scale Large-Scale Watershed Models (ArcSWAT) Break Small –Scale Hillslope BMPs (WEPP) Lunch

What Have We Done? Engaged with Stakeholders Acquired / modified / refined / verified required data – DEM, soils, landuse, cross section profiles Developed verifiable baseline models (Catt Creek and Clear Creek) Conducted field trips and workshops for two-way knowledge transfer Delineated watershed and stream networks to maximize sub-basins < 5 sq km Chose BMPs to simulate Chose modeling software to match basin size and BMPs to simulate Selected sub-basins to model Tested modeling software inputs or parameters to simulate BMPs Evaluated model results Baseline Models & Case Studies

What’s Next To Do? Conduct BMP Modeling Training Workshop (today) Continue to engage with Stakeholders Acquire / modify / refine / verify required data – DEM, soils, landuse, cross section profiles Continue two-way knowledge transfer Incorporate lessons learned in classroom setting Develop and deliver a final written report Baseline Models & Case Studies

What Else Have We Done? Refined the Erie County LiDAR data to recalculate bank erosion volumes compared to IPLER/RIT LiDAR. Baseline Models & Case Studies

What Else Have We Done? Baseline Models & Case Studies Black = Strong Returns White = No Returns

What Else Have We Done? Baseline Models & Case Studies Red = Erosion Yellow = Neutral Green = Deposition

Workshop Outline Intro to Baseline Models & Case Studies Overview of BMPs by Scale Large-Scale Watershed Models (ArcSWAT) Break Small –Scale Hillslope BMPs (WEPP) Lunch

10,000 yrs 1,000 yrs 1 yr 1 mon 1 day 1 hr 1 min Log time years Log space km 10,000 km km 2 1 km 2 1 ha 100 m 2 1 cm water shed 1 dm 2 micro plot hill- slope sub- shed basin Weather / Climate VegetationManagement Unit Soil / Lithology Erosion ProcessTopographic Scale 1 m yrs 10 yrs 1MM km 2 globe sec Natural Variability & Role of Scale splash wood stand canopy buffer grass front thunder storm breeze long waves El Niño interrill rill gully fluvial infiltration / moisturestructure texture depth tillage ridge horticulture orchard forest landscape evolution catena crop climate change

BMPs by Scale John Whitney’s most important agricultural BMPs on WNY farms: Crop Rotation Conservation Tillage Nutrient Management Pest Management Buffers Other supporting practices include: Cover Crops (often part of the Conservation Tillage/Residue Management package) but also important for organic matter improvements Waste Management Contour Farming Strip Cropping BMPs by Scale

Cover Crop Rotation Patterns BMPs by Scale

Cover Crop Options BMPs by Scale

Scale Dependent Model Simulations Models can only “see”/represent features larger than the basemap grid cell size Historic DEM cell sizes range from 90 m to 10 m, but most current USGS DEM areas are 30 m or 10 m grid cell sizes Models often aggregate landuse, soil, slope for the entire sub-basin to the DEM grid spatial reference and resolution BMPs which involve small changes like riparian grass buffers can be modeled without a spatial reference 1.WEPP models hillslopes (representative and real) 2.GeoWEPP models small sub-basins (< 5 km 2 ) 3.ArcSWAT models for larger watershed (> 5 km 2 ) 4.HEC-GeoRAS models single channels and overbank area Model Scale Dependencies

WEPP Hillslope Interface Model Scale Dependencies

Watershed vs. Flowpath Method Watershed – aka offsite assessment – Measures sediment yield at the outlet point – Less memory intensive – Take less time – Identifies problem hillslopes – Uses Dominant Soil and Dominant Landuse Flowpath – aka onsite assessment – Measures soil loss at each raster cell – Memory hog – Can take some time – Identifies problem areas within a hillslope – Uses Soil and Landuse of each cell Model Scale Dependencies

Method Comparison WatershedFlowpath Model Scale Dependencies

Watershed vs. Flowpath Methods Watershed Flowpath Model Scale Dependencies

Short-term & Long-Term Processes Short-term: – Single storm events which demonstrate watershed responses to baseline conditions coupled with localized weather patterns – 5-year window (event year plus 2 yrs before and after) Long-term: – Statistically defined weather conditions based on historic patterns which operate over much longer periods – year window (models daily/hourly averages over time) – Allows return periods to be computed (100-yr, 500-yr, 1000-yr storms and floods).

Workshop Outline Intro to Baseline Models & Case Studies Overview of BMPs by Scale Large-Scale Watershed Models (ArcSWAT) Break Small –Scale Hillslope BMPs (WEPP) Lunch

Workshop Outline Intro to Baseline Models & Case Studies Overview of BMPs by Scale Large-Scale Watershed Models (ArcSWAT) Break Small –Scale Hillslope BMPs (WEPP) Lunch

Workshop Outline Intro to Baseline Models & Case Studies Overview of BMPs by Scale Large-Scale Watershed Models (ArcSWAT) Break Small –Scale Hillslope BMPs (WEPP) Lunch

Workshop Outline Intro to Baseline Models & Case Studies Overview of BMPs by Scale Large-Scale Watershed Models (ArcSWAT) Break Small –Scale Hillslope BMPs (WEPP) Lunch

Workshop Outline Medium-Scale Watershed BMPs (GeoWEPP) Break Modeling Flood Levels & BMPs (HEC-GeoRAS) Break Instructor Assisted Self-Paced Exercises Wrap-up & Closing Comments

Workshop Outline Medium-Scale Watershed BMPs (GeoWEPP) Break Modeling Flood Levels & BMPs (HEC-GeoRAS) Break Instructor Assisted Self-Paced Exercises Wrap-up & Closing Comments

Workshop Outline Medium-Scale Watershed BMPs (GeoWEPP) Break Modeling Flood Levels & BMPs (HEC-GeoRAS) Break Instructor Assisted Self-Paced Exercises Wrap-up & Closing Comments

Workshop Outline Medium-Scale Watershed BMPs (GeoWEPP) Break Modeling Flood Levels & BMPs (HEC-GeoRAS) Break Instructor Assisted Self-Paced Exercises Wrap-up & Closing Comments

Workshop Outline Medium-Scale Watershed BMPs (GeoWEPP) Break Modeling Flood Levels & BMPs (HEC-GeoRAS) Break Instructor Assisted Self-Paced Exercises Wrap-up & Closing Comments

Workshop Outline Medium-Scale Watershed BMPs (GeoWEPP) Break Modeling Flood Levels & BMPs (HEC-GeoRAS) Break Instructor Assisted Self-Paced Exercises Wrap-up & Closing Comments

What Have We Done? Engaged with Stakeholders Acquired / modified / refined / verified required data – DEM, soils, landuse, cross section profiles Developed verifiable baseline models (Catt Creek and Clear Creek) Conducted field trips and workshops for two-way knowledge transfer Delineated watershed and stream networks to maximize sub-basins < 5 sq km Chose BMPs to simulate Chose modeling software to match basin size and BMPs to simulate Selected sub-basins to model Tested modeling software inputs or parameters to simulate BMPs Evaluated model results Wrap-up & Closing Remarks

What’s Next To Do? Conduct BMP Modeling Training Workshop (today) Continue to engage with Stakeholders Acquire / modify / refine / verify required data – DEM, soils, landuse, cross section profiles Continue two-way knowledge transfer Incorporate lessons learned in classroom setting Develop and deliver a final written report Wrap-up & Closing Remarks