CONSEQUENCES OF PROPOSED EU LEGISLATION ON THRESHOLDS FOR THE ADVENTITIOUS PRESENCE OF GENETICALLY ENGINEERED (GE) SEEDS. Janet Cotter, Greenpeace Science.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Economic and Social Committee Brussels 29 June 2011
Advertisements

GMs in Europe: Reflections on the Economic Consequences Julian Park, Ian McFarlane.
The impact of the EU regulatory constraint of transgenic crops on farm income Julian Park, Ian McFarlane, Richard Phippsand Graziano Ceddia New Biotechnology.
Genetically modified food Renata Zdanowska & Anna Zalewska Siedlce, 2011.
Biofuels. Potential for biomass use ► Total Global Primary Energy Supply (in ExaJoules (10 18 )) EJ EJ EJ ► Actual use of biomass.
THE DEBATE ABOUT GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD. WHAT IS GM FOOD? GM food is made with ingredients such as soya or maize, with genes from other plants or animals.
SOURCE: “Co-existence project kicked-off”, European Biotechnology News, Vol. 4, 2005 European Commission project aimed at co- existence of GE and non-GE.
GMO Study Committee Iowa State Legislature December 13, 2005 Coexistence and Legal Liability Drew L. Kershen Earl Sneed Centennial Professor University.
Genetically modified foods and their impact on stakeholders in Virginia University of Richmond Environmental Studies Senior Seminar Spring 2005 Jessica.
Genetically Modified Foods. Introduction What is it Genetic modification is the altering of a species genome to produce a desired result. This can be.
TRANSGENIC:HOW THEY AFFECT ORGANIC AGRICULTURE IN NORTH DAKOTA Brad Brummond NDSU Extension Service/ Walsh County 2002.
GMOs CGW4U.
Current Status of Food Traceability in European Union Willy De Greef IBRS.
NDSU Agriculture TRENDS IN THE USE OF CROPS DEVELOPED THROUGH BIOTECHNOLOGY IN THE USA AND THE WORLD BY: Dr. Duane R. Berglund Professor of Plant Science.
GMO. What are GMOs? GMOs are plants or animals whose cells have been inserted with a gene from an unrelated species in order to take on specific characteristics.
GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM PRESENTATION 13 September 2013 By Department of Trade and Industry.
Labeling of Genetically Engineered Foods Pat Byrne Department of Soil & Crop Sciences Colorado State University.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Ex-ante assessment of the potential economic and environmental impacts.
1 BIOFUELS FROM A FOOD INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE Willem-Jan Laan European Director External Affairs Unilever N.V.
« Biofuels » (Enlarged Advisory Group on Pigmeat, 1st April 2011) Andreas Pilzecker, European Commission (Directorate-General for Agriculture, Unit H4)
GMOs GMOs IOPD IX San Francisco June 16—17, 2006 GMOs: CURRENT STATUS.
EU Regulatory framework on GMOs
Luc Hendrickx Sofia 20 February 2006 Successful representation of SMEs at EU level - best practices - TAIEX Workshop on Competitive Power © ueapme2006.
Geneticaly modified Food and Feed – current situation in EU Petr Beneš Food Safety Department Prague, 9 October 2009.
Evaluating GM crops and foods in the UK Sue Mayer GeneWatch UK
Human Food Supply We wish to know: is the world food supply keeping pace with population growth? What are the means of increasing the world food supply?
North Dakota Wheat Commission State Meeting December 2010.
Biotechnology Objectives for October 21, 2010  We will consider the nature and issues of food biotechnology  We will answer some questions about food.
GM crops in the EU Campaigning opportunities and challenges FoEE and Greenpeace.
SOURCE: European Commission also adopted today three decisions on the placing on the.
The case against GM crops Alissa Cook policy officer Soil Association.
P1 The implementation of virtual water within the European water policy : the basics for a legal and political analysis Teresa Elola Calderón Research.
Ecological impacts of genetically engineered crops: a case study of the Farm Scale Evaluations L. LaReesa Wolfenbarger University of Nebraska.
The Organic Research Centre © The Organic Research Centre Welsh GM Co-existence proposals. June 2009.
March Against Monsanto. Genes & DNA – life’s code.
WHO, Almaty 2002 Food Legislation of the European Union and its effect on Slovak legislation1 Food legislation of the European Union and its effect on.
A Brief History of Agricultural Technology Senate District Forum on GMO’s & GMO Labeling Senate District Forum on GMO’s & GMO Labeling Watertown, MA October.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
Soy in Brazil: Social Effects on Small Farms & Rural Communities Soy farming in Brazil was traditionally dominated by small farms producing several crops.
 To increase crop yields, we can mix the genes of similar types of organisms and mix the genes of different organisms. Artificial selection has been.
Genetic Modification (Genetic Engineering) This process describes the removal of genes from one organism/species and insertion into another organism.
GMO Fact or Fiction?. Fact or Fiction? GMOs are created by injecting chemicals into food AFTER it is harvested Fiction GMOs are developed through genetic.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 11 – Agriculture and rural development.
A Plateful of Promises. Crops whose DNA has been modified to produce certain traits. Such as:  Resistance to insects and herbicides  Protecting itself.
What do these labels mean to you?. Have you seen these labels? Are there any food labels that could be misleading or meaningless?
EU legislation on GMOs: Overview and challenges Alberto Volpato, Counsellor for Health, Consumers, Agriculture Presented by Guy Van den Eede, Adviser for.
17 June 2008IOPD XI 2008Chart 1 IOPD XI 2008 Berlin, 17 June 2008 GMO Policies in the EU – Consequences for the International Trade in Oilseeds and Feedstuffs.
GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM (GMO) TECHNOHOLICS.
Agricultural Biotechnology in Turkey
13 September 2013 By Department of Trade and Industry
Genetic Modification of Food
Biotech Plants Two Different Visions and their Implications in Global Trading Carlos Moreira “Plants for Life” International PhD Program – 2017 (course.
GMO and agriculture: pest management and how the landscape has changed Midwest and MidContinental Chapter of the Medical Library Association Micheal D.K.
WORKSHOP ON CULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS ISSUES SURROUNDING GMO’S
What do these labels mean to you?
Coexistence Coexistence of GM and non-GM cultivations
What do these labels mean to you?
How have humans been altering the gene pool of crops?
What do these labels mean to you?
EU REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO CONTAMINATED LAND
What do these labels mean to you?
Soil, Agriculture, and the Future of Food
Legal basis classification
GMO Fact or Fiction?.
GMO Fact or Fiction?.
What do these labels mean to you?
Revision of Decision 2010/477/EU
What do these labels mean to you?
GMO Fact or Fiction?.
Presentation transcript:

CONSEQUENCES OF PROPOSED EU LEGISLATION ON THRESHOLDS FOR THE ADVENTITIOUS PRESENCE OF GENETICALLY ENGINEERED (GE) SEEDS. Janet Cotter, Greenpeace Science Unit, Exeter University, Exeter, UK, EX4 4PS Introduction The EC has proposed legislation 1 to establish thresholds for the adventitious presence of EU approved genetically engineered (GE) seeds in conventional seed lots. These thresholds are: oilseed rape %; maize, beet, cotton % and soya %. These thresholds were chosen to give a GE content in the food product within the labelling limit (assumed to be 1 %) 2. However, there are concerns that these proposed thresholds will result in an immediate, unprecedented release of GE plants in the EU and, in the future, the accession countries. Method Land acreage for oil seed rape, beet, maize, soybean and cotton were obtained for 2000 from annual statistics 3 for EU countries, those for Accession countries from EUROSTAT 4. Data for silage/ forage maize are not given in the EU annual statistics, nor available from EUROSTAT for Accession countries. Data for silage/forage maize were reported only for those countries where data was readily available from national statistics and, as such, are likely to be an underestimate of the actual acreage of silage/ forage maize. Data for cotton is either not available or zero for all Accession countries. Plant densities were supplied by ADAS, UK, personal communication for mid- range target established plant populations in the UK. Planting densities for silage maize were assumed to be the same as grain maize. The total area of arable land in the EU was calculated from annual statistics 3 as the sum of main crops in 1999 and excluding land used as pasture. Using average plant densities, the number of GE plants grown at these thresholds were calculated for the EU and Accession countries. The effective acreage of GE plants and the % of EU arable area affected were also calculated. Discussion The results demonstrate that the proposed thresholds lead to a large quantity of GE plants in Europe – million at the best case scenario (oilseed rape and maize in the EU only) to million in the worst case scenario (soy, sugarbeet, cotton, maize and oilseed rape across and enlarged EU). These GE plants will be unregulated, e.g. separation distances and segregation will not apply. Therefore, these plants will be able to freely cross with non-GE crops and also feral and wild relatives, especially of beet and oilseed rape. The appearance of herbicide resistant “weeds” could necessitate the widespread use more environmentally damaging herbicides. These numbers of unregulated GE plants will be allowed annually. Thus, the numbers of unregulated GE plants will increase annually. The values of 0.3%, 0.5% and 0.7% are not a reflection of how low it is possible to keep GE contamination nor do they take into consideration the environmental and agronomic impact of such contamination. It has been acknowledged that, by choosing such high levels, the amount of contamination in the final product would creep up over the long term - especially in oilseed rape 2. Therefore, it is vital to keep GE contamination to a minimum and keep to that minimum. GE-free seed production and supply can and is being achieved by major seed suppliers at a threshold of 0.1% (the effective detection limit). In over seed samples analysed so far by EU governments less than 5% show any detectable GE contamination. In other words over 95% of all seed lots tested in the EU, including imported seeds, are already produced under the zero tolerance threshold of 0.1% GE contamination 5. Conclusion : A threshold level of 0.1 % is achievable and vital to protect the environment. References 1 Draft COMMISSION DIRECTIVE../…/Ecof … amending Council Directives 66/400/EEC, 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC, 66/403/EEC, 69/208/EEC, 70/458/EEC and Decision 95/232/EEC as regards additional conditions and requirements concerning the presence of genetically modified seed in seed lots of non-genetically modified varieties and the details of the information required for labeling in the case of seeds of genetically modified varieties Brussels, , P./secr/doc2001 /va/1542en02july European Commission Scientific Committee on Plants. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Plants concerning the adventitious presence of GM seeds in conventional seeds. SCP/GMO-SEED-CONT/002-FINAL 13 March European Union, Directorate-General for Agriculture. Agriculture in the European Union: Statistical and Economic Information (Jan 2002) eu. int/ omm/ agriculture/ agrista/ 2001/ table_ en/ index. Htm 4 EUROSTAT: Statistics for crop acreage in Accession countries were purchased from Data Shop Newport, UK. Details from 5 Greenpeace (2002) Save Our Seeds! Agriculture and environment threatened by GE seed contamination law. October