Supplement A Decision Making.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lesson 04 Decision Making
Advertisements

To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Seventh Edition © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Decision.
© 2007 Pearson Education Decision Making Supplement A.
Decision Theory.
Chapter 3 Decision Analysis.
Decision Analysis Chapter 3
Module 16 – Decision Theory
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 5S Decision Theory.
Introduction to Decision Analysis
Decision Theory.
Decision Process Identify the Problem
Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Beni Asllani University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Operations Management - 6 th Edition Chapter 1 Supplement Roberta.
Operations Management
Chapter 3 Decision Analysis.
1 IES 303 Supplement A: Decision making Week 3 Nov 24, 2005 Objective: - Amazon.com Case discussion: competitive advantage - Understand practical techniques.
Managerial Decision Modeling with Spreadsheets
2000 by Prentice-Hall, Inc1 Supplement 2 – Decision Analysis A set of quantitative decision-making techniques for decision situations where uncertainty.
Decision Theory Chapter 5 Supplement June 26, 2012.
A – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Decision Making A For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.
DECISION THEORY Decision theory is an analytical and systematic way to tackle problems A good decision is based on logic.
Topic 2. DECISION-MAKING TOOLS
5s-1Decision Theory McGraw-Hill/Irwin Operations Management, Eighth Edition, by William J. Stevenson Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
ISMT 161: Introduction to Operations Management
To Accompany Ritzman & Krajewski Foundations of Operations Management, © 2003 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Supplement A Decision Making.
Decision Analysis Chapter 3
Decision Making Under Uncertainty and Under Risk
IES 303 Supplement A: Decision making Week 3 Nov 24, 2005 Objective:
Operations Management Decision-Making Tools Module A
5s-1 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Operations Management, 2 nd Canadian Edition, by Stevenson & Hojati Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Operations Management For Competitive Advantage © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2001 C HASE A QUILANO J ACOBS ninth edition 1 Decision Trees  Used.
To Accompany Krajewski & Ritzman Operations Management: Strategy and Analysis, Sixth Edition © 2002 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Supplement.
Decision Analysis A. A. Elimam College of Business San Francisco State University.
8-1 CHAPTER 8 Decision Analysis. 8-2 LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1.List the steps of the decision-making process and describe the different types of decision-making.
A – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Decision Making A For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.
To Accompany Russell and Taylor, Operations Management, 4th Edition,  2003 Prentice-Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Supplement S2 Decision Analysis To.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 5 Capacity Planning For Products and Services.
© 2007 Pearson Education Decision Making Supplement A.
Breakeven Analysis Improving Productivity. Break-Even Analysis Break-even analysis has TWO forms: – A. CVP (cost-volume-profit): to determine the volume.
Decision Analysis Mary Whiteside. Decision Analysis Definitions Actions – alternative choices for a course of action Actions – alternative choices for.
Welcome Unit 4 Seminar MM305 Wednesday 8:00 PM ET Quantitative Analysis for Management Delfina Isaac.
Decision Theory McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Lecture 6 Decision Making.
Models for Strategic Marketing Decision Making. Market Entry Decisions To enter first or to wait Sources of First-Mover Advantages –Technological leadership.
Decision Theory Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill.
1-1 Steps to Good Decisions  Define problem and influencing factors  Establish decision criteria  Select decision-making tool (model)  Identify and.
Decision Analysis. Basic Terms Decision Alternatives (eg. Production quantities) States of Nature (eg. Condition of economy) Payoffs ($ outcome of a choice.
BUAD306 Chapter 5S – Decision Theory. Why DM is Important The act of selecting a preferred course of action among alternatives A KEY responsibility of.
Decision Theory McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Decision Analysis.
SUPPLEMENT TO CHAPTER TWO Irwin/McGraw-Hill © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999 DECISION MAKING 2S-1 Chapter 2 Supplement Decision Making.
Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Pay Off Table and Decision Tree.
5s-1Decision Theory CHAPTER 5s Decision Theory McGraw-Hill/Irwin Operations Management, Eighth Edition, by William J. Stevenson Copyright © 2005 by The.
Decision Theory Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill.
DECISION MODELS. Decision models The types of decision models: – Decision making under certainty The future state of nature is assumed known. – Decision.
A – 1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Decision Making A For Operations Management, 9e by Krajewski/Ritzman/Malhotra.
DECISION THEORY & DECISION TREE
Chapter 5 Supplement Decision Theory.
Decisions under uncertainty and risk
Welcome to MM305 Unit 4 Seminar Larry Musolino
Chapter 5S – Decision Theory
Determinants of Effective Capacity
Steps to Good Decisions
Supplement: Decision Making
نظام التعليم المطور للانتساب
نظام التعليم المطور للانتساب
Decision Analysis Support Tools and Processes
Decision Analysis.
Decision Making Supplement A
Presentation transcript:

Supplement A Decision Making

Objectives Apply break-even analysis, using both the graphic and algebraic approaches, to evaluate new products and services and different process methods. evaluate decision alternatives with a preference matrix for multiple criteria. Construct a payoff table and then select the best alternative by using a decision rule such as maximin, maximax, Laplace, minimax regret, or expected value. Calculate the value of perfect information. Draw and analyze a decision tree.

Break-Even Analysis Quantity Total Annual Total Annual (patients) Cost ($) Revenue ($) (Q) (100,000 + 100Q) (200Q) 0 100,000 0 2000 300,000 400,000 Total Cost = Fixed Cost + Variable Cost * Volume sold Total Revenue = Revenue per unit * Volume Sold Revenue = Cost = pQ = F + cQ Break Even Point = Fixed Cost / (revenue – variable cost)

Break-Even Analysis 400 – 300 – (2000, 400) 200 – 100 – Total annual revenues Patients (Q) Dollars (in thousands) | | | | 500 1000 1500 2000 (2000, 400) Quantity Total Annual Total Annual (patients) Cost ($) Revenue ($) (Q) (100,000 + 100Q) (200Q) 0 100,000 0 2000 300,000 400,000

Break-Even Analysis (0, 100) (0, 0) 400 – 300 – (2000, 400) 200 – 100 – 0 – (2000, 400) Total annual revenues (2000, 300) Total annual costs Dollars (in thousands) (0, 100) Fixed costs (0, 0) | | | | 500 1000 1500 2000 Patients (Q)

Break-Even Analysis Break-even quantity 400 – 300 – (2000, 400) 200 – Total annual revenues Total annual costs Patients (Q) Dollars (in thousands) 400 – 300 – 200 – 100 – 0 – | | | | 500 1000 1500 2000 Fixed costs Break-even quantity (2000, 400) (2000, 300) Profits Loss

Sensitivity Analysis Forecast = 1,500 400 – 300 – 200 – 100 – 0 – Example A.2 Total annual revenues Total annual costs Patients (Q) Dollars (in thousands) | | | | 500 1000 1500 2000 Fixed costs Profits Loss Forecast = 1,500

Sensitivity Analysis Forecast = 1,500 pQ – (F + cQ) 400 – 300 – 200 – 100 – 0 – Total annual revenues Total annual costs Patients (Q) Dollars (in thousands) | | | | 500 1000 1500 2000 Fixed costs Profits Loss Forecast = 1,500 pQ – (F + cQ) 200(1500) – [100,000 + 100(1500)] = $50,000

Preference Matrix Threshold score = 800 Performance Weight Score Weighted Score Criterion (A) (B) (A x B) Market potential 30 8 240 Unit profit margin 20 10 200 Operations compatibility 20 6 120 Competitive advantage 15 10 150 Investment requirement 10 2 20 Project risk 5 4 20 Weighted score = 750 Threshold score = 800 Example A.4

Not At This Time Preference Matrix Threshold score = 800 Performance Weight Score Weighted Score Criterion (A) (B) (A x B) Market potential 30 8 240 Unit profit margin 20 10 200 Operations compatibility 20 6 120 Competitive advantage 15 10 150 Investment requirement 10 2 20 Project risk 5 4 20 Weighted score = 750 Threshold score = 800 Example A.4 Not At This Time

Decision Theory: Under Certainty Alternative Low High Small facility 200 270 Large facility 160 800 Do nothing 0 0 Possible Future Demand If future demand will be low—Choose the small facility. Example A.5

Under Uncertainty Possible Future Demand Alternative Low High Small facility 200 270 Large facility 160 800 Do nothing 0 0 Possible Future Demand Example A.6

Under Uncertainty Best of the worst Possible Future Demand Alternative Low High Small facility 200 270 Large facility 160 800 Do nothing 0 0 Possible Future Demand Maximin—Small Best of the worst Example A.6

Under Uncertainty Best of the best Possible Future Demand Alternative Low High Small facility 200 270 Large facility 160 800 Do nothing 0 0 Possible Future Demand Maximin—Small Maximax—Large Best of the best Example A.6

Under Uncertainty Best weighted payoff Possible Future Demand Alternative Low High Small facility 200 270 Large facility 160 800 Do nothing 0 0 Possible Future Demand Maximin—Small Maximax—Large Laplace—Large Best weighted payoff Small facility 0.5(200) + 0.5(270) = 235 Large facility 0.5(160) + 0.5(800) = 480 Example A.6

Under Uncertainty Best worst regret Possible Future Demand Alternative Low High Small facility 200 270 Large facility 160 800 Do nothing 0 0 Possible Future Demand Example A.6 Maximin—Small Maximax—Large Laplace—Large Minimax Regret—Large Best worst regret Regret Low Demand High Demand Small facility 200 – 200 = 0 800 – 270 = 530 Large facility 200 – 160 = 40 800 – 800 = 0

Under Uncertainty Possible Future Demand Alternative Low High Small facility 200 270 Large facility 160 800 Do nothing 0 0 Possible Future Demand Maximin—Small Maximax—Large Laplace—Large Minimax Regret—Large Example A.6

Under Risk Possible Future Demand Alternative Low High Small facility 200 270 Large facility 160 800 Do nothing 0 0 Possible Future Demand Psmall = 0.4 Plarge = 0.6 Example A.7 Alternative Expected Value Small facility 0.4(200) + 0.6(270) = 242 Large facility 0.4(160) + 0.6(800) = 544

Under Risk Highest Expected Value Possible Future Demand Alternative Low High Small facility 200 270 Large facility 160 800 Do nothing 0 0 Possible Future Demand Psmall = 0.4 Plarge = 0.6 Example A.7 Alternative Expected Value Small facility 0.4(200) + 0.6(270) = 242 Large facility 0.4(160) + 0.6(800) = 544 Highest Expected Value

Under Risk Figure A.4

Perfect Information Possible Future Demand Alternative Low High Small facility 200 270 Large facility 160 800 Do nothing 0 0 Possible Future Demand Psmall = 0.4 Plarge = 0.6 Example A.8 Event Best Payoff Low demand 200 High demand 800

Perfect Information Possible Future Demand Alternative Low High Small facility 200 270 Large facility 160 800 Do nothing 0 0 Possible Future Demand Psmall = 0.4 Plarge = 0.6 Example A.8 Event Best Payoff Low demand 200 EVperfect = 200(0.4) + 800(0.6) = 560 High demand 800 EVimperfect = 160(0.4) + 800(0.6) = 544

Perfect Information Possible Future Demand Alternative Low High Small facility 200 270 Large facility 160 800 Do nothing 0 0 Possible Future Demand Psmall = 0.4 Plarge = 0.6 Example A.8 Event Best Payoff Low demand 200 EVperfect = 200(0.4) + 800(0.6) = 560 High demand 800 EVimperfect = 160(0.4) + 800(0.6) = 544 Value of perfect information = $560,000 - $544,000

Decision Trees 1 2 Figure A.5 = Event node = Decision node Ei = Event i P(Ei) = Probability of event i 1st decision Possible 2nd decision Payoff 1 Payoff 2 Payoff 3 Alternative 3 Alternative 4 Alternative 5 E1 [P(E1)] E2 [P(E2)] E3 [P(E3)] Alternative 1 Alternative 2 1 2 Figure A.5

Decision Trees 2 1 3 Example A.9 Low demand [0.4] $200 $223 Small facility Large facility Low demand [0.4] Don’t expand Expand Do nothing Advertise $200 $223 $270 $40 $800 Modest response [0.3] Sizable response [0.7] $20 $220 High demand [0.6] 1 2 3 Example A.9

Decision Trees 0.3(20) + 0.7(220) 2 1 3 Example A.9 Low demand [0.4] Small facility Large facility Low demand [0.4] Don’t expand Expand Do nothing Advertise $200 $223 $270 $40 $800 Modest response [0.3] Sizable response [0.7] $20 $220 High demand [0.6] 1 2 3 0.3(20) + 0.7(220) Example A.9

Decision Trees 0.3(20) + 0.7(220) 2 1 3 $160 Example A.9 Low demand [0.4] Small facility Large facility Low demand [0.4] Don’t expand Expand Do nothing Advertise $200 $223 $270 $40 $800 Modest response [0.3] Sizable response [0.7] $20 $220 High demand [0.6] 1 2 3 0.3(20) + 0.7(220) Example A.9

Decision Trees 2 1 3 $160 Example A.9 Low demand [0.4] $200 $223 Small facility Large facility Low demand [0.4] Don’t expand Expand Do nothing Advertise $200 $223 $270 $40 $800 Modest response [0.3] Sizable response [0.7] $20 $220 High demand [0.6] 1 2 3 Example A.9

Decision Trees 0.4(200) + 0.6(270) 0.4(160) + 0.6(800) 2 $270 1 3 $160 ($160) Low demand [0.4] $270 $160 Small facility Large facility Low demand [0.4] Don’t expand Expand Do nothing Advertise $200 $223 $40 $800 Modest response [0.3] Sizable response [0.7] $20 $220 High demand [0.6] 1 2 3 0.4(200) + 0.6(270) 0.4(160) + 0.6(800) Example A.9

Decision Trees 0.4(200) + 0.6(270) 0.4(160) + 0.6(800) $242 2 $270 1 3 ($160) Low demand [0.4] $270 $160 Small facility Large facility $242 $544 Low demand [0.4] Don’t expand Expand Do nothing Advertise $200 $223 $40 $800 Modest response [0.3] Sizable response [0.7] $20 $220 High demand [0.6] 1 2 3 Example A.9 0.4(200) + 0.6(270) 0.4(160) + 0.6(800)

Decision Trees $242 2 $270 1 $544 3 $160 Example A.9 Low demand [0.4] Small facility Large facility $544 $242 Low demand [0.4] Don’t expand Expand Do nothing Advertise $200 $223 $40 $800 Modest response [0.3] Sizable response [0.7] $20 $220 High demand [0.6] 1 2 3 Example A.9

Solved Problem 1 BE Revenue = pQ Revenue = 25*3111 Revenue = $77,775 250 – 200 – 150 – 100 – 50 – 0 – Total revenues Total costs Units (in thousands) Dollars (in thousands) | | | | | | | | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Break-even quantity 3.1 $77.7 BE Revenue = pQ Revenue = 25*3111 Revenue = $77,775

Solved Problem 3 To determine the payoff amounts: Payoff Scenarios 1: 2: 3: Event 1 Event 2 Event 3 Probabilities----> Low Medium High Order 25 dozen 625 Order 60 dozen 100 1500 Order 130dozen -950 450 3250 Do nothing Buy roses for $15 dozen Sell roses for $40 dozen Sell 25, Order 25, = pQ – cQ = 40(25) – 15(25) =625 Sell 60, Order 130 = pQ – cQ = 40(60) – 15(130) = 450

Solved Problem 3 Maximin – best of the worst. If demand is Low, the best alternative is to order 25 dozen. Maximax – best of the best. If demand is high, the best alternative is to order 130 dozen. Laplace – Best weighted payoff. 25 dozen: 625(.33) + 625(.33) +625(.33) = 625 60 dozen: 100(.33) + 1500(.33) + 1500(.33) = 1023 130 dozen: -950(.33) + 450(.33) + 3250(.33) = 907

Solved Problem 3 Best Payoff: 625 1500 3250 Payoffs Event 1 Event 2 Probabilities----> Low Regret Medium High Max Regret Order 25 dozen 625 875 2625 Order 60 dozen 100 525 1500 1750 Order 130dozen -950 1575 450 1050 3250 Do nothing Best Payoff: 625 1500 3250

Solved Problem Minimax Regret –best “worst regret” Maximum regret of 25 dozen occurs if demand is high: $3250 – $625 = $2625 Maximum regret of 60 dozen occurs if demand is high: $3250 - $1500 = $1750 Maximum regret of 130 dozen occurs if demand is low: $625 - -$950 = $1575 The minimum of regrets is ordering 130 dozen!

Solved Problem 4 Bad times [0.3] $191 Normal times [0.5] $240 One lift Figure A.8 Bad times [0.3] Normal times [0.5] Good times [0.2] One lift Two lifts $256.0 $225.3 $191 $240 $151 $245 $441