Measuring & Reducing administrative burdens in NL process and outcome Jeroen Nijland Warsaw March 31st, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Dutch Advisory Board on Administrative Burden (Actal) The Hague March 5, 2008.
Advertisements

REDUCING ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS Regulatory Reformgroup Istanbul 20/11/07.
WCDR Thematic Panel Governance: Institutional and Policy Frameworks for Risk Reduction Annotated Outline UNDP – UNV – ProVention Consortium – UN-Habitat.
MTEF BUDGET PROCESS – A TOOL FOR MAINSTREAMING MDGS
The New Health Reform Law and Private Insurance The Alliance for Health Reform Scott Keefer Americas Health Insurance Plans April 30, 2010.
-Customs Management- Defining capacity building and technical assistance for Customs Valuation for Customs Administrations WTO 6th November 2002.
00 Project Gates Briefing to the Capital Program Oversight Committee February 2011 Capital Program Management.
Challenging the Budget Creating Incentives for Results Rwandas Experience Elias Baingana - Budget Director.
A 2030 framework for climate and energy policies Energy.
INITIATING THE PLANNING PROCESS. CONTENT Outputs from this stage Stage general description Obtaining government commitment Raising awareness Establishing.
Liberia – Duke University Program PFM reform strategy Duncan Last Public Financial Management Division March 4, 2011.
1 Regulatory Impact Assessment: Methodology and Best Practices David Shortall INMETRO International Workshop on Conformity Assessment Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Robert Watt Secretary General Department of Public Expenditure and Reform Public Service Reform in Ireland Jordanian Government Leaders’ Forum 1 November.
The Italian Institutional Design for Administrative Simplification HIGH LEVEL REGIONAL SEMINAR ON “STRATEGIES, TOOLS AND CAPACITIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE.
Better regulation in Denmark Presentation by Flemming N. Olsen Senior Advisor, Division for Better Regulation Ministry of Finance, Denmark Conference on.
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.
Integration of Regulatory Impact Assessment into the decision making process in the Czech Republic Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public.
The Danish Approach to Simplification and Better Regulation for Business Eva Meiling, Deputy Director General Ministry of Economic and Business Affairs.
1 PMIG PUBLIC SECTOR PROCUREMENT BEST PRACTICES & LESSONS LEARNED Kevin James Barrie Kroukamp.
The SCM – main issues, advantages and challenges of quantification of administrative costs Daniel Trnka Regulatory Policy Division, Directorate for Public.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
CSI - Introduction General Understanding. What is ITSM and what is its Value? ITSM is a set of specialized organizational capabilities for providing value.
INITIATING THE PLANNING PROCESS. CONTENT Outputs from this stage Stage general description Obtaining government commitment Raising awareness Establishing.
Department: Communications The Department of Communications Parliament 27 August 2004 The Department of Communications Presentation to the Portfolio Committee.
Audit of predetermined objectives Presentation: Portfolio Committee on Economic Development March 2013.
The EU Water Initiative National Policy Dialogues in Armenia & Moldova Pierre Hecq UNDP Water-CoP Meeting Almaty, October 2007.
Federal Department of Economic Affairs FDEA State Secretariat for Economic Affairs SECO The Regulatory Checkup Estimating the cost of regulation and identifying.
Regulatory Quality & Administrative Simplification Update on developments in New Zealand Liz MacPherson Deputy Secretary NZ Ministry of Economic Development.
The EU’s Better Regulation Package Implementation of Impact Assessment Manuel Santiago European Commission DG Enterprise & Industry.
The CSO’s IT Strategy – using the GSBPM to support good governance MSIS 2010 – Daejeon April 2010 Joe Treacy Central Statistics Office.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Measuring & Reducing administrative burdens Experience from.
The Canada Border Services Agency and Coordinated Border Management Regional Conference of Customs Directors General, April 22-25, 2012.
The Commission's Impact Assessment system 18 September 2014 María Dolores Montesinos Impact Assessment unit Secretariat General 1.
Reducing regulatory burdens in the Netherlands - using the SCM- Jeroen Nijland / Jerusalem, June 28th, 2011.
PROCUREMENT IN PRSCs – Case of Uganda March 24-28, 2008 Playing a Key Role in achieving the Development Results Playing a Key Role in achieving the Development.
1 Administrative simplification in the Netherlands - Main findings by the OECD and World Bank Group “Challenges of cutting red tape” Rotterdam, 1 March.
Faisal Naru Head of Better Regulation DAI Europe Ltd November 2007 Washington London Johannesburg Ramallah RIA – An Art and not a Science.
Version 10.0  The High Performance Organisation Ltd Creating A Process Based Management System 1 Welcome Creating a Process Based Management.
Project Management Workshop James Small. Goals Understand the nature of projects Understand why Project Management is important Get an idea of the key.
PQRI Proposed Work Plan Title of Work Project Date of Submission to Steering Committee.
Fitness Check of environmental monitoring and reporting Stakeholder Workshop 19/20 Nov 2015 Joachim D'Eugenio Steve White DG Environment European Commission.
Ministry of Economic Affairs | 11 April 2013 The Mark of Good Public Services A Uniform Framework for Measuring and Improving Public Services for Businesses.
High Level Group on Administrative Burdens Thomas Bustrup 17thoct. 13 Administrative burdens and SMEs State of play and recommendations from a Danish perspective.
Examples and opportunities of harmonized communication on Resilience with stakeholders Somalia NGO Consortium, Resilience Working Group 13 October 2015.
Fitness Check of environmental monitoring and reporting MIG-P meeting 4 Dec 2015 Joachim D'Eugenio Steve White DG Environment European Commission.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Seminar on Administrative Simplification Seminar on Administrative.
1. PRESENTATION PLAN 2 Principles that we obey while developing a programProcess of Development From İdea to Program- Concretization of an idea by Development.
An overview of OECD Strategies for Improving Regulatory Performance Regulatory Reform and Building Governance Capacities – New Delhi 3 December 2009 Mr.
Swedish Risk Management System Internal management and control Aiming to Transport Administration with reasonable certainty to.
ESTABLISHING A PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM A Paper by Harry Hatry and Ritu Nayyar-Stone Presented by Joel Turkewitz.
Sustainable Community EMS Design Including Pollution Prevention Michelle M. Wyman Reed Smith Shaw & McClay LLP EMS Models and Strategies: ISO & Beyond.
SZW Balance Model Ben van den Brande Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment (SZW) EUPAN Helsinki, 11 april 2008.
Alex Ezrakhovich Process Approach for an Integrated Management System Change driven.
Action Programme for Reducing Administrative Burdens in the European Union DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission International Conference on SCM.
OWN, SCALE-UP & SUSTAIN The 16 th International Conference on AIDS & STIs in Africa 4 to 8 December 2011, Addis Ababa
DG AGRI Seminar on Simplification 16 October 2007 Simplification of the CAP Keys to future success.
Danube Water Conference 2017, Vienna
Presidency Priorities of the Czech Republic in Better Regulation
Audit of predetermined objectives
Steering Policy and Steering Systems
Administrative Simplification
Regulatory Burdens for Businesses
Species at Risk (SAR) Legislation & Program Renewal Project
Germany Thomas Nehring Better regulation unit Federal Chancellery.
Marketing and Promotion of the Project: Stakeholder Engagement
Administrative Burden Citizens - Project experiences SIRA Consulting -
Director-General: Mr. E Africa
Comprehensive Review of Expenditure
ITU-T FORUM ON IMPLEMENTATION OF WTSA-08 DECISIONS AND WORKSHOP ON BRIDGING THE STANDARDIZATION GAP (Nadi, Fiji, September 2009) The ITU-EC.
Presentation transcript:

Measuring & Reducing administrative burdens in NL process and outcome Jeroen Nijland Warsaw March 31st, 2008

Reduction of Adm. Burdens : why?  AB = element of regulatory cost  AB should be part of better regulation program  Because of the economic costs  Because of the economic benefits  AB should be part of better regulation program -25%

Where do we stand now? Net reduction of adm burden (ult = 100)  Mid 2003: start Cabinet  Mid-2003: measuring  2004/5: identifying simpliflications  Ongoing: implementation  Approx. 190 measures to reduce AB;  described in White Papers in 2004 and 2005  Package agreed by Parliament

Governance structure : 3 elements Method InfrastructureIncentives

Ingredient 1: SCM Information obligations LAW Administrative actions TimeTariffTarget groupFrequency P Costs administrative actions Q Yearly amount administrative actions Administrative burdens = P x Q € 1…12

From measurement to reduction-measures Target groupFrequency Administrative burdens = P x Q Information obligations LAW Administrative actions TimeTariff P Costs administrative actions Q Yearly amount administrative actions Information obligations Administrative actions  ?

Ingredient 2 : Incentives Reduction targets:  Timing?  Height?  Individual?  Differentiated ?  Annual?

Ingredient 3 : Infrastructure  Horizontal coordination within government  Watchdog  Dept. Satellites  Stakeholder-involvement

What are the key factors for succes ?  A method  Incentives  Ownership  Coordination  Stakeholder involvement  Project roadmapping  Project monitoring  Communication & management of expectations

Roadmapping & Milestones  Define the political window  Extract the lead time needed for  Change of regulation  Organisational measures (e.g. ‘One-Window’)  You will get the max. time available for measurement and identifying simplifications

Avoid problems: frontloading  Given the lead time you don’t want set backs just before the political window closes  You need to frontload, e.g. by:  Generic solutions  No regret solutions  Use input stakeholders  Harmonize  Think about introducing tresholds in legislation  You need to avoid set backs

Avoid setbacks: risk analysis & monitoring Risk analysis Internal risks Planning? Budget? Capacity? External risks Monitoring Timely implementation What if? Who? Steering committee Political level External Auditing Periodicity Overall : avoid the system being self-referential (validity)

1)Three ingredients 2)A political owner 3)Good projectmanagement Lessons learned Method Infrastructure Incentives 1) No targets, no efforts 2) Set individual targets 1) Balance between coordination and ownership 2) Involve outsiders/ stakeholders 1) Explain what it doesn’t do 2) Ensure quality control