Retail DR and Price Response 2014 Product Headcounts Paul Wattles, ERCOT Market Design & Development DSWG Feb. 3, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Successes in Demand Response
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Results from the 2013 Survey of LSEs to Obtain Retail DR and Dynamic Pricing information Public Summary Frontier Associates LLC June
Keystone Energy Efficiency Conference 2011 September 20, 2011.
Loads in SCED v2 Subgroup
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR Workshop Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG/REP Workshop April 9, 2014.
Market Operations Presentation Board of Director’s Meeting November 18, 2003.
Loads in SCED v2 Subgroup The LMP-G Journey 1. TAC Endorsement of LMP-G TAC voted to endorse “LMP-G” rather than “Full LMP” as the mechanism to enable.
Loads in SCED v2 Subgroup Update to DSWG 3/9/
TIME OF USE RATES AT THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY Presented at: Connecticut’s Energy Future December 2, 2004 James D. Lundrigan Pricing Manager The.
Smart Metering in ERCOT: Implementation Update CCET Board of Directors Meeting August 3, 2011 Presented by Christine Wright, Competitive Markets Division.
1 SCE – Lessons Learned from Pricing Experiences July 31, 2014.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR Data Collection Project and Lessons Learned Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG March 2014.
LMP-G Policy Issues Discussion Demand Side Working Group July 9 th,
Price Responsive Load Next Steps – Data Collection Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG and RMS sub team October 16, 2012.
Retail Smart Grid Trends Paul Wattles Senior Analyst, Market Design & Development UT Energy Week: “How Smart Grids Enable Consumers” Feb. 18, 2015.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR Update to RMS Karen Farley June 3, 2014.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR Workshop Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG/REP Workshop April 2014.
Price Responsive Load Survey Draft Results Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG and RMS Aug. 22, 2012.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Introductions, Roles and Responsibilities.
0 The Basics –There are 4 POLR customer classes: Residential, Small Non-Res. (
ERCOT Demand Response Spring 2015 ERCOT Operator Seminar.
Market Operations Presentation ERCOT Board of Directors October 21, 2008 Updated as of 10/21/08 Betty Day.
Advanced Metering’s Next Frontier: Demand Response Interim Report Advanced Metering Implementation Team/ ERCOT Demand Side Working Group February 2012.
ESI IDs Retired in Error! RMS – August 10, 2005 Discussion.
Demand Response Status Report Calvin Opheim October 9, 2007.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
The Wholesale Market Subcommittee Update Prepared for the September 25th TAC meeting.
Load Participation in Real-Time Market: LMP Minus G.
Growth Initiatives Mailing Services MTAC February 18, 2010.
Final Report Weather Sensitive Emergency Response Service (WS ERS) Pilot Project Carl Raish, ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee November 7, 2013.
Background for Demand Response in PNW Pacific Northwest Demand Response Project May 2, 2007 Ken Corum.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR RMS Update Paul Wattles Carl Raish October 6, 2015.
Sept. 28, 2007 Interim Update Load Response Survey.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR Workshop Paul Wattles Carl Raish Karen Farley REP Roundtable August 5, 2015 – Updates in RED.
LMP-G Policy Issues Matrix LRISv2 Subgroup July 23 rd,
Retail DR and Price Responsive Load Next Steps – Data Collection Paul Wattles Karen Farley Updates to DSWG & RMS January 2013.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Introductions, Roles and Responsibilities.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR DSWG Update Paul Wattles Carl Raish September 17, 2015.
Demand Response Task Force. 2 2 Outline  Overview of ERCOT’s role in the CCET Pilot  Overview of Stakeholder Process – What’s been done to date?  Questions.
1 TX SET Mass Transition Project RMS Update March 15, 2006.
Price Responsive Load / Retail Demand Response 2013 Analysis Report Overview ERCOT Staff & Frontier Associates RMS Meeting August 5, 2014.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
ERCOT Public 1 Project Panel 1 Dan Woodfin Director, System Operations August 15, 2014.
Status Report on DSWG Task 11: Retail DR/Dynamic Pricing Project Presentation to the ERCOT Demand Side Working Group Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates LLC.
LMP-G Update to DSWG LRISv2 Subgroup Aug. 20,
Building Blocks for Premise Level Load Reduction Estimates ERCOT Loads in SCED v2 Subgroup July 21, 2014.
AMIT/DSWG Workshop ERCOT Demand Side Working Group Meeting September 30, 2011 Jay Zarnikau, Frontier Associates.
Third Party DR Self-Deployment Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Sept. 18, 2015.
Update: 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS) Pilot Project Mark Patterson, ERCOT October 7, 2013.
Load Participation in Nodal Training Session Update DSWG December 7, 2007.
1 Market Operations Presentation Board of Director’s Meeting December 13, 2005.
Proxy $G and other Loads in SCED 2 Litmus Tests Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Dec. 2, 2014.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR RMS Update Paul Wattles Carl Raish September 1, 2015.
PWG Long Term Strategy How do we maximize scarce resources?
Demand Response Options Review Carl Raish November 27, 2007.
Demand Response 2010 and Beyond April 28, 2011 Pete Pengilly.
Thoughts on DER Aggregations ERCOT Staff DREAM TF Sept. 28, DER Aggregations.
Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Proposal March 7, 2013 TAC Meeting.
Draft NPRR Weather Sensitive ERS Loads December 2012.
AMIT-DSWG Workshop ‘AMI’s Next Frontier: Demand Response Part 2’
EILS Update Paul Wattles, ERCOT Staff DSWG Meeting April 29, 2011.
Principal Load Profiling and Modeling
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC
Alternative Approach for Loads in SCED v.2
Load Participation in Real-Time Market: Loads in SCED version 2
Paul Wattles, Sai Moorty ERCOT Market Design & Development
CEO Report Thomas F. Schrader ERCOT Board of Directors May 17, 2005
Presentation transcript:

Retail DR and Price Response 2014 Product Headcounts Paul Wattles, ERCOT Market Design & Development DSWG Feb. 3, 2015

2 Background ERCOT has been working with LSEs (REPs and NOIEs) to begin tracking growth of retail product offerings for dynamic pricing and other retail demand response incentives REPs have now provided lists of ESI IDs enrolled in various product types on two snapshot dates: –June 15, 2013 –Sept. 30, 2014 After 2013 experience and dialogue with market participants, we concluded end-of-summer snapshot had more value than early summer snapshot This presentation provides an update on those REP headcounts –Additional analysis, including responses to price events (such as they are) and shifts in behavior by TOU customers, is under way now DSWGFeb. 3, 2015

3 Product types & REP-reported enrollment Feb. 3, 2015DSWG Notes: –170-fold increase in residential Peak Rebate –115% increase in residential Time of Use –123% increase in C&I Real-time Pricing –72% decline in C&I Block & Index Pricing

4 Product enrollment changes vs 2014 Feb. 3, 2015DSWG Enrollment changes are independent of reporting REP and 2013 Product Some ESI IDs participating in both 2013 and 2014 changed to a new REP and/or to different product(s) Examples: An ESI ID on REP A’s TOU product who switched to REP B’s PR product would show up in the middle columns An ESI ID that rolled off of all retail DR products by 9/30/14 would show up in left columns An ESI ID new to retail DR products in 2014 would show up in right columns

5 Parting thoughts This is not a pure science; many lines are blurred –As hard as we worked on developing the product definitions, there is still some confusion –REP offerings not necessarily easy to match to the ERCOT categories –REP databases may not be built to track product types through a customer’s history This helps to explain some of the transitions, but makes year-to-year headcount tracking an inexact science Escalates the challenge of assigning product types to ESI IDs in real time under Loads in SCED v2 Proxy $G (if we go that route) DSWGFeb. 3, 2015

6 DSWGFeb. 3, 2015 ON OFF Questions?