Presented by PUCO Chairman Todd A. Snitchler 21 st Century Manufacturing Task Force November 26, 2012 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DEREGULATION 1. BEFORE DEREGULATION 2. AFTER DEREGULATION Local
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
EMIG Electricity Market Investment Group Presentation to the Ontario Energy Board February 17, 2004.
NIST MEP Green Suppliers Network E3: Columbus (E nergy, E conomy, E nvironment )
Rate Plan. Value Story When asked, our customers identify the following topics as ways MidAmerican Energy provides value – Emergency Response.
20 Years After More suppliers More innovation More choice.
The Auction & the SSO What It Means for Columbia and Its Customers Ken Stammen April 13, 2010.
© 2010 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC Columbus Southern’s Electric Rate Increase Proposals Marietta, Ohio June 2,
Citizens League Electrical Energy: Affordability and Competitive Pricing Working Team Electric Transmission.
FIRM TRANSPORTATION GAS SUPPLIER PRESENTATIONS CUSTOMER INFORMATION LIST.
How the Electric Energy Landscape Has Changed Since the Enactment of SB 221 Changes in the Marketplace and Unforeseen Impacts of Implementation Ohio Chamber.
Organization of the electricity supply industry © 2012 D. Kirschen & University of Washington 0.
Pricing the Components of Electric Service in Illinois Scott A. Struck, CPA Financial Analysis Division Public Utilities Bureau Illinois Commerce Commission.
Jeffrey A. Murphy Managing Director, Commercial Operations Dominion East Ohio June 5, 2009.
Economic Analyses of FPL’s New Nuclear Projects: An Overview Dr. Steven Sim Senior Manager, Resource Assessment & Planning Florida Power & Light Company.
ASSOCIATION OF ENERGY ENGINEERS – SW OHIO PJM AND OHIO REGULATORY CHANGES HOWARD PETRICOFF VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR & PEASE LLP 1.
California Energy Commission, May, 1999 California Incentives For Renewable Markets Timothy N. Tutt California Energy Commission (916)
M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION. The mission of the Michigan Public Service Commission is to grow Michigan's economy and enhance the quality of.
1 Enhancing the Role of Renewable Energy in California Robert A. Laurie Commissioner California Energy Commission Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting.
The California energy crisis Introduction (Wolak March ‘01) –Wholesale: averaged $33 MWH in 1999, $116 MWH in 2000, $310MWH Jan –Natural gas $3-$4.
ISO New England Regional Update Wholesale Electricity Markets & State Energy Policy Seminar Connecticut Business & Industry Association December 14, 2010.
November 13, 2007 The Evolving Roles and Responsibilities of Gas Utilities In Today’s Markets: Giving Customers More Choices.
Partnering with Our Customers in Demand Side Management Mark Wallenrod Director DSM Program Operations Southern California Edison Southern California Energy.
Electric Restructuring In Pennsylvania Sonny Popowsky Pennsylvania Consumer Advocate May 10, 2007 Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Transforming.
Regulatory Flexibility Committee Strategies for Procuring New Generation September 18, 2013 INDIANA POWER OF WIND COALITION.
Retail Competition: Managing a Difficult Transition David L. O’Connor Commissioner Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources (DOER) Presentation to National.
Electric vehicle integration into transmission system
WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Gale Klappa Chairman and Chief Executive.
Natural Gas Data Systems Conceptual Framework Measurement and Distribution Current Developments and Changes Roy Kass Energy Information Administration.
MODULE ? CUSTOMER CHOICE PROGRAM. The opportunity for a retail electric or natural gas customer to choose who supplies their electric or natural gas.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Navigate Power Electricity and Natural Gas. COMPANY OVERVIEW Navigate Power is a leading energy and natural gas consulting firm with offices in Chicago,
Business Strategy and E-Commerce Spring 2000 Business to Business Electricity Isnezawati Azali Chad Carter Connie Chen Emily Coyle Jawe Cheatum.
A Retailer’s Perspective On Canada’s Natural Gas Market Deryk King Chairman and CEO, Direct Energy September 26, 2006.
WCOAEE Meeting: Natural Gas & Electric Update April 16, 2015.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Outline The key findings What the SGA Summit did Smart City Amsterdam Some more detail on the disrupters – Ecosystem of the Grid – Distributed Generation.
2015 Mace Advocacy alliance policy conference
Making the Internal Energy Market work Tudor Constantinescu DG Energy
Musings of a Midwest Non-Utility Guy Greg Collins Vectren Retail, LLC Marketing Executives Conference San Antonio, Texas October 19, 2009.
Presented to Mid-America Chamber Executives Regional Policy Conference November 2015 Presented by Doug Fredrickson, Vice President Blattner Energy, Inc.
MODULE 7 WHO IS OUR COMPETITION?. WHAT IS SUPPLIER COMPETITION? OTHER SUPPLIERS In a deregulated market, fair competition is important! This means IGS.
Slide 1 Overview of Conservation in the Pacific Northwest Energy Efficiency Options in the Northwest Post-2011Meeting March 4, 2008.
- DISCOVER THE DIFFERENCE - Florida’s Natural Energy - DISCOVER THE DIFFERENCE -
1 Dr. Ahmed Kaloko Chief Economist Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Transition from Public Service to Competitive Markets.
Women In Energy Conference Kingston, Jamaica March 10, 2016.
Japanese Electricity Market M. Hossein Javidi Iran Electricity Market Regulatory Organization & Administrative Department for Electricity Market Regulatory.
Chairman of the Board and CEO,
Ohio – Electricity JUNE 2018 MARKET INFORMATION AEP Ohio
Ohio – Electricity NOVEMBER 2018 MARKET INFORMATION AEP Ohio
Ohio – Electricity OCTOBER 2018 MARKET INFORMATION AEP Ohio
Ohio – Electricity MARCH 2018 MARKET INFORMATION AEP Ohio
Ohio – Electricity FEBRUARY 2018 MARKET INFORMATION AEP Ohio
Ohio – Electricity DECEMBER 2018 MARKET INFORMATION AEP Ohio
Ohio – Electricity & Natural Gas
Ohio – Electricity JANUARY 2018 MARKET INFORMATION AEP Ohio
Ohio – Electricity With the SteadyLock 12 Plan, residential customers get unlimited electricity for one flat monthly price that starts as low as $29.99 for.
Ohio – Electricity & Natural Gas
Ohio – Electricity & Natural Gas
New England Economic Partnership James Daly Vice President Energy Supply Energy Market Perspectives Reliable Energy, Competitive Prices and.
Ohio – Electricity & Natural Gas
Ohio – Electricity SEPTEMBER 2018 MARKET INFORMATION AEP Ohio
Tom Clark Vice President, Customer Service & Service Area Development
Ohio – Electricity AUGUST 2018 MARKET INFORMATION AEP Ohio
Ohio – Electricity MAY 2019 MARKET INFORMATION AEP Ohio
Ohio – Electricity JUNE 2019 MARKET INFORMATION AEP Ohio
Ohio – Electricity SEPTEMBER 2019 MARKET INFORMATION AEP Ohio
XENERGY Executive Forum May 18, 2001 Irene Prezelj
Presentation transcript:

Presented by PUCO Chairman Todd A. Snitchler 21 st Century Manufacturing Task Force November 26,

Before electric restructuring Prior to restructuring, electricity was generated and supplied to most of Ohio from four electric distribution utilities (EDU’s): AEP Ohio Columbus Southern Power Ohio Power Dayton Power & Light Duke Energy FirstEnergy Cleveland Illuminating Ohio Edison Toledo Power 2

Electric Service Area Map 3 Note: FirstEnergy includes Cleveland Illuminating Co., Ohio Edison, and Toledo Edison

4 Step 1: In 1999, Am. Sub. SB 3, the Ohio Electric Restructuring Act, was passed. It authorized the restructuring of the electric industry in Ohio. At the same time, 23 other states also restructured their electric utility markets. First Step: Market development period. A five year period from 2001 through 2005 during which it was expected that the retail markets would emerge. Current electric rates were frozen during this period. Second Step: Rate stabilization period. A three year period from 2006 – 2009 resulting from the failure of the retail markets to develop. History of Ohio Electric Restructuring

5 Step 2: In 2008, Am. Sub. SB 221 was passed. It authorized the restructuring of the electric industry in Ohio and included an energy efficiency requirement and a renewable portfolio standard. SB 221 outlined alternative paths for electric utilities to implement different forms of market-based pricing. The law required electric utilities to file either an Electric Security Plan (ESP) or a Market Rate Option (MRO) to supply energy to customers. The ESP is akin to a traditional rate plan for the supply and pricing of electric generation service. An MRO is a rate plan that utilizes a competitive bidding process to set generation prices and gradually transition customers to full market-based pricing. History of Ohio Electric Restructuring

6 In March 2011 the electric utility landscape looked like: 3 vertically integrated utilities 1 competitive utility As of November 2012 the landscape currently looks like: 3 competitive utilities 1 pending ESP filed for remaining utility Where is Ohio’s electricity market today?

The benefit of low RPM capacity prices Low auction prices, such as those in Duke Energy’s recent SSO Auction  Duke’s 2011 SSO supply auction price dropped 17.5% More entrants into the Ohio marketplace  More jobs and economic growth in Ohio  73 total CRES – 42 since March 2011  202 total aggregators – 152 since March 2011 Greater customer control over their utility spending. Driving the need for suppliers to differentiate themselves in the marketplace, by offering more benefits and better products Electric choice puts the power in customer’s hands to choose the supplier that best meets their needs Generation related investments are borne by shareholders, not ratepayers 7 What are the benefits of competition?

What rates are regulated states seeing? Duke Indiana’s construction cost overrun totals more than $1.4 billion – some of which will be passed on to ratepayers. Progress Energy customers in Florida could potentially be on the hook for $326 million in nuke plant repairs. Florida ratepayers have paid over $1 billion for two nuke plants not expected to be online until 2022 – if they get built at all. 8

9

Today’s competitive marketplace Examples of the three typical types of offers on the market today: AEP Energy offers a flat $.0649 per kwh  Offers such as these have purported savings as high as 30%, depending on a customer’s price to compare Dominion Energy Solutions offers $ per kwh to AEP’s customers currently paying $.0800 under regulated pricing, a savings of more than 20% IGS Energy offers 10% off AEP’s price to compare FES offers a 7 year long term Price Control Offer in all territories at a fixed price of $ Public Power LLC offers 100% wind product  Other 100% renewable  e product offers, other than wind products, are also available 10 * This information is readily available on the PUCO’s Apples to Apples Chart at

What is the PUCO doing to help? Creation of the Office of Retail Competition The mission of the Office of Retail Competition is to improve awareness, trust and understanding of market-based utility service in Ohio. More than 240 presentations and meetings have been conducted by PUCO staff across the state. Our public information officers have visited 72 of Ohio’s 88 counties educating Ohioans on energy choice in Ohio. 11

Where is Ohio’s market headed? More suppliers entering Ohio with competitive offers. These offers will be more than just X% off the SSO price, for example: Free nights and weekends Non-utility related savings and deals Utility and non-utility bundling Residential dynamic pricing Seasonal plans 12

PUCO assistance for large customers The PUCO works closely with large load consumers who provide significant employment in Ohio to ensure the company is able to manage its utility costs. For those large load companies that consume high amounts of energy, the PUCO works with the company and utilities to create what are known as reasonable rate arrangements. While these arrangements are not common, they do currently exist. In my* view, reasonable arrangements will not be needed as competition grows in Ohio and additional changes to the developing market occur. *The view expressed above is mine and does not necessarily reflect the views of the PUCO or the Kasich administration. 13

What does the shale play mean to electric rates for manufacturing facilities? The existence of Marcellus and Utica shale gas have already impacted the cost of natural gas and forward projections show low gas prices for at least 3-5 years.  In fact, the oversupply of gas and infrastructure needed to move it to market are essentially creating in-field storage as wells are drilled and completed, but not put into production.  One analysis said if the existing drilled but non-producing wells in PA were turned on and no new wells were drilled, there would be no impact to supply for at least 9 months. Further, the midstream gathering system needs to be enhanced to allow movement of the commodity from the production site to market. Ohio’s steel industry has seen a dramatic increase as a result of the shale industry (e.g. Timken, US Steel, V&M Starr, Republic and others). 14

Questions Chairman Todd A. Snitchler Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (614)