2013 Electric Rate Increases December 10, 2012. Electric Rate Comparison – Residential Highest charge Kelowna and FortisBC Lowest BC Hydro and Nelson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES – REVISIONS TO CHAPTER 30 - UTILITIES CITY COMMISSION MEETING AUGUST 20, 2014.
Advertisements

Budget Presentation 2010 Budget Presentation 2010 Tuesday, October 13 Common Council Presentations.
City of Farmersville, Texas Water and Wastewater Rate Study February 2011.
Revised FY 2007 & Proposed FY 2008 Operating & Capital Budgets Retail Rates Committee January 4, 2007.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
3/16/20001 BPA’s traditional revenue stream varies with water supply (higher water conditions, higher revenues) BPA’s revenues from Slice are independent.
January 20, 2015 City Council Meeting. Purpose Council direction on moving forward with: Housing linkage fee in short term based on 2009 Study and existing.
1 Combined Utility System Cost of Service Rate Study Presentation April 6, 2010.
Electric Restructuring- Experience in other states.
TVA Generates Power and sends it down Transmission Lines to Newport Utilities Distribution Substations TVA Newport Utilities Substations Distributes the.
Fortis’ Residential Conservation Rate (RCR) How Rural Customers Are Subsidizing Lower Rates For Urban Customers.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
2012 – 2016 FINANCIAL PLAN OVERVIEW City of Pitt Meadows DM #94656.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Example of Revenue Decoupling Utah Committee of Consumer Services Witness: David Dismukes Docket No T01 CCS Exhibit 1.1 Allowed Revenue per Customer.
Voluntary Disclosure Systems  State and City Voluntary Disclosure Procedures Should be Uniform  Procedures, Requirements, and Allowances Should be Codified.
Natural Gas Rate Study and Long-Term Financial Plan Presented November 19, 2013 Capex Consulting Group
Page: Water and Wastewater Rate Study and Financial Forecast Council Presentation City of Cottonwood July 2009.
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
Why is WPL filing a rate case?  Last Base Case Rates were set January, 2007  Cost of our utility investments must be reflected in prices our customers.
Embedded Generation Workshop SALGA Head Office 18 April 2013 THE POTENTIAL IMPACT OF EFFICIENCY MEASURES AND DISTRIBUTED GENERATION ON MUNICIPAL ELECTRICITY.
1 SB 695 Impact On Rates LIOB- March 30, Current Residential Electric Rate Structure  Multi-tiered rate structure (up to 5 Tiers) based on the.
BCTC Customer Consultation Short-term Point-to-Point Rate Design March 5, 2007.
Author name Country ID Session X – Block Y – Question Z Barcelona May Geographic information system (GIS) and their role in power utility.
Tennessee Economy and State Budget Outlook FISCAL REVIEW COMMITTEE STAFF January 20, 2010.
EV Strategy: Process for Recommendations Joan Rohlfs MWCOG January 17, 2012.
2015 Financial Plan. PROCESS Staff began work on this budget in September 4 meetings including today are scheduled – Jan 26, 28 and Feb 2 and further.
THE FOSTER GROUP TFGTFG City of Detroit Water and Sewerage Department Wholesale Customer Rates Meeting Water Supply System Meeting #3 – Allocated FY
2013 Business Planning Process. Business Planning Process Guidelines Budget Preparation Preparation of Business Plans Management Review Presentations.
Winchester Municipal Utilities 2009 Rate Plan April 9, 2009.
NARUC SUMMER COMMITTEE MEETINGS Committee on Water Agenda California Regulatory Initiatives Case History – California American Water B. Kent Turner – President.
City of Alexandria, Virginia Sanitary Sewer Master Plan February 23, 2013 City Council Public Hearing.
2016 Water and Wastewater Rates Committee of the Whole November 16, 2015 Presenter: Mike Mayes – Director, Financial Services/Treasurer.
Division of Building Safety Workload and Staffing Issues Associated Builders & Contractors Division of Building Safety January 14, 2014.
Commission Meeting November 18, 2015 WSSC Customer Use and Pricing.
Conservation Cal Water’s Approach with the California Public Utilities Commission Darin Duncan, Bear Gulch District Manager Low-Income Oversight Board.
December 2, 2008 City of Glendale - Finance Department 1 First Quarter Financial Update December 2, 2008.
2015 Fall PR-MR & Marketing Meeting October 16, 2015 Fairo Mitchell Energy Policy Director, Public Utility Division Oklahoma Corporation Commission.
1 Cross-Cutting Analytical Assumptions for the 6 th Power Plan July 1, 2008.
Demand Response
YVEA Solar Facts & Distributed Generation Requirements YVSC Talking Green November 17, 2015 Megan Moore-Kemp Key Accounts Rep.
Pasadena Water and Power Public Hearing Water Capital Improvement Charge Pasadena City Council Meeting January 11, 2016 Item #12.
Water Rates Options, Explanations & Impacts Presentation to the West Linn City Council October 5, 2009.
Presented to the City of Dover, Delaware June 6, 2006 Revenue Requirements, Cost of Service and Rate Adjustments for the Electric Utility.
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Tuesday, May 3 rd, 2016.
Presentation and public hearing review of Zoning Map Amendments pursuant to Zoning Code Rewrite Planning and Zoning Board Hearing.
Program Overview Solar resource will be built by j uwi, (pronounced “you-vee”), a developer based out of Boulder, Colorado. Solar farm will be located.
Los Angeles County Community Choice Aggregation Regional CCA Task Force Meeting October 28, 2015.
Water Rate Presentation City Council Meeting December 14, 2010.
Frank Loge, Ph.D., P.E. Center for Water-Energy Efficiency University of California, Davis Considerations for Proportionality and Equity in Water Rates.
City of La Palma The Path to Fiscal Sustainability: FY Budget Adjustments and Long-Term Response Discussion September 18, 2012.
May 31, 2016 WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY PRESENTATION 5/9/2016 City of Greenfield, California.
BC HYDRO 2 TIERED RATE STRUCTURE REVIEW PROCESS GUIDE JULY 28, 2016.
Pathways to Lasting Solutions June 9, 2009 City Council Work Session – No. 2 © 2008 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. All Rights Reserved Water and Wastewater Rate.
City of San Mateo 2016 Reach Code
Proposed Draft Financial Plan April 10, 2017
City of Petersburg Water and Wastewater Rates
Sewer Code Update (Title 13)
Time-of-Use Options.
CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO
Zoning Ordinance Update Study
Distributed Generation Chau Nguyen, Pricing & Sales Support
SEWER SERVICE FEE RATE STRUCTURE ALTERNATIVE
Springfield Utility Board Proposed 5.0%
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Municipal Electric Power Association of Virginia
Suppliers Are Not Providing Value to Individual, Residential Customers
City Council September 17, 2018 Item 16
Island Energy Advisory Committee Board
Water Rate Modification – Public Hearing
Presentation transcript:

2013 Electric Rate Increases December 10, 2012

Electric Rate Comparison – Residential Highest charge Kelowna and FortisBC Lowest BC Hydro and Nelson Penticton in the middle Highest and Lowest varies with consumption Shape of the graph illustrates the inclining block rate structure of BC Hydro, Summerland and Fortis rate structure

Electric Rate Comparison – Commercial Highest charge Grand Forks and Summerland Lowest BC Hydro Penticton in the middle to the top third Highest and Lowest varies with consumption

Electric Rate Comparison – Industrial Highest charge Nelson Lowest BC Hydro Penticton in the middle

Increases to be Addressed Increases that flow from British Columbia Utility Commission mandated increases: – FortisBC Cost of Service Increase – 1.60% – FortisBC Revenue Requirements Increase – 4.20% Increases to address Revenue differences between actual and modelled – 1.28%

Increases to be Addressed Traditionally Penticton rates have increased using three methods: – Apply the FortisBC increase at the Retail Level – Apply the FortisBC increase at the Wholesale Level – Apply the FortisBC increase at the average of the Retail and Wholesale Level

Rate Increase Alternatives Alternative 1 – Mandated BCUC increases (5.80%) at the Wholesale Power Purchase level – Revenue Loss increase (1.28%) at the Retail Power Sale level – TOTAL increase of 6.18%.

Rate Increase Alternatives Alternative 2 – Mandated BCUC increases (5.80%) at the Retail Power Sale level – Revenue Loss increase (1.28%) at the Retail Power Sale level – TOTAL increase of 7.87%.

Rate Increase Alternatives Alternative 3 – Mandated BCUC increases (5.80%) at the Average of the Wholesale and Retail levels – Revenue Loss increase (1.28%) at the Retail Power Sale – Total increase of 7.03%.

Residential Inclining Block Rate Structure Examined as part of the 2013 Review Found that the Residential Rate code would have to be split into three new Rate codes: Single Family Residential Customers using less than the median or average power use Single Family Residential Customers using more than the median or average power use Multi-Family Residential Customers Necessary to work with the Billing Software company to revise the billing process The above will take some time so the Residential Inclining Block Rate will be brought back to Council at a latter time for consideration

Impact on the Customer

Significant Projects On Bill Loan Program to help finance Residential home owners with retrofits that will save electrical energy Westminster Substation project $6,000,000

Projected Status of Electrical Reserve

Proposed Implementation Schedule December 10, 2012 – Introduction of the proposed rates December 17, 2012 – Public input session January 7, 2013 – First 3 Readings of an amending Bylaw to the Fees and Charges Bylaw January 21, 2013 – Adoption of the amending Bylaw to the Fees and Charges Bylaw February 1, 2013 – New electrical rates take effect

Staff Recommendation THAT the City of Penticton Electric Rates be revised to reflect: The 1.60% FortisBC Cost of Service Adjustment increase; The 4.20% FortisBC Revenue Requirement increase; and The 1.28% increase to cover revenue loss from modeled numbers vs. actual numbers.

Staff Recommendation AND that the following three alternatives be considered in the rate setting process: Alternative 1 – Apply the two FortisBC increases (5.80%) at the Wholesale Power Purchase Level and the Revenue Loss increase (1.28%) at the Retail Power Sale level for a Total increase of 6.18%. Alternative 2 - Apply the two FortisBC increases (5.80%) at the Retail Power Sale Level and the Revenue Loss increase (1.28%) at the Retail Power Sale level for a Total increase of 7.87%. Alternative 3 - Apply an average of the FortisBC increases from Alternative 1 and 2 and the Revenue Loss increase (1.28%) at the Retail Power Sale level for a Total increase of 7.03%.

Staff Recommendation AND THAT that the following schedule for the rate setting process be utilized: December 10, 2012 – Introduction of the proposed rates December 17, 2012 – Public input session January 7, 2013 – First 3 Readings of an amending Bylaw to the Fees and Charges Bylaw January 21, 2013 – Adoption of the amending Bylaw to the Fees and Charges Bylaw February 1, 2013 – New electrical rates take effect

Staff Recommendation AND FURTHER THAT notification advising the public of the public input session on December 17, 2012 be advertised in both local papers.

Questions