REDUCTION OF HIGHLY REACTIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS & VARIABLE EMISSIONS IN HOUSTON/GALVESTON: MONITORING, MODELING, MEASURING, RULEMAKING David Allen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving the Emissions Inventory Brad Toups, Manager Industrial Emissions Assessment August 12, 2004 Regulatory Forum.
Advertisements

November 06, 2003 Doug Deason ExxonMobil Chemical Engineering and Manufacturing Support Houston Area Ozone Air Quality Overview of Tools, Techniques, Communications.
Modeling Guidance and Examples for Commonly Asked Questions (Part II) Reece Parker and Justin Cherry, P.E. Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental.
Garry Kaufman Deputy Director Colorado Air Pollution Control Division June 6, 2014.
Status of 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Program in Clark County Presentation to Air Quality Forum May 10, 2005.
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Highlights of Colorado’s New Oil and Gas Hydrocarbon Emission Reduction Rules - Adopted February 2014 Presentation to WESTAR May 2014 Will Allison Colorado.
Template Summary of FY12-13 Work Plan Technical Activities Sue Kemball-Cook and Greg Yarwood NETAC Technical Committee Meeting April 22, 2014.
Houston Regional Monitoring HRM Houston Regional Monitoring Network Overview.
Clark County Regional Ozone and Precursor Study (CCROPS) Robert A. Baxter, CCM T&B Systems Clark County Air Quality Forum – 03/14/06.
Ozone in Colorado: Issues and Reduction Strategies Presentation to the Colorado Environmental Health Association October 2,
Integration of CMAQ into the Western Macedonia environmental management system A. Sfetsos 1,2, J. Bartzis 2 1 Environmental Research Laboratory, NCSR Demokritos.
Better Air Quality in Asian and Pacific Rim Cities (BAQ 2002) December 2002, Hong Kong SAR The Trend of Acid Rain in China W. Wang 1,3, T. Wang 2,
Preserving air quality in Texas Professor David Allen Department of Chemical Engineering Center for Energy and Environmental Resources University of Texas.
How will Current Regulations be Revised to Improve Air Quality? Randy Wood October 21, 2003 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Air Quality Challenges In South Central Texas Issues and Demand to Infrastructure in the Eagle Ford Region Eagle Ford Consortium Peter Bella, Natural Resources.
Texas Rural Air Monitoring Sites Sonia Uribe November 16, 2004.
Simulation of Houston-Galveston Airshed Ozone Episode with EPA’s CMAQ Daewon Byun: PI Soontae Kim, Beata Czader, Seungbum Kim Emissions input Chemical.
Improving Emission Inventories in North America NERAM V October 16, 2006 William T. Pennell NARSTO Management Coordinator.
CENRAP’s RPO Meeting Ileana Isern-Flecha, et.al March 31, 2004 Technical Analysis Division Texas Air Quality Study (TexAQS) II ( )
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC SO 2 Data Requirements Rule – A Proactive Compliance Approach Mark Wenclawiak, CCM |
STUDY OF SOURCE ATTRIBUTION OF UNSATURATED HYDROCARBONS FOR OZONE PRODUCTION IN THE HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA WITH THE EXTENDED SAPRC99 CHEMICAL MECHANISM.
EPA’s Related Programs and Coordination with NASA Presentation to the NASA Environmental Compatibility IV Workshop, August 12-13, Colorado Springs, CO.
Development, implementation, and application of an improved model performance evaluation and diagnostics approach Byeong-Uk Kim *, William Vizuete, and.
Emission Update Verifiable Cost Task Force August 21, 2008.
Preparation of Control Strategies October 18, 2007 NAAQS RIA Workshop Darryl Weatherhead, Kevin Culligan, Serpil Kayin, David Misenheimer, Larry Sorrels.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
Modeling Compliance with the 8-Hour Standard Jay Olaguer Houston Advanced Research Center 10/06/04.
Area Source Emissions Inventory Improvement Update Michael Ege, Emissions Inventory Specialist Air Quality Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Central States May 2013.
HRM Houston Regional Monitoring 1 Hazardous Air Pollutants Ambient Air Monitoring Data Review Air Toxics: What We Know, What We Don’t Know, and What We.
Houston Air Quality Challenges John D. Wilson Galveston-Houston Association for Smog Prevention
1 Conducting Reasonable Progress Determinations under the Regional Haze Rule Kathy Kaufman EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards January 11,
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
Emissions Banking and Trading (EBT) Overview/Update Melissa Ruano Air Quality Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Advanced Air Permitting.
Air Quality Division HRVOC Stakeholder Meeting July 23, 2007 Page 1 HRVOC Stakeholder Group Meeting July 23, 2007 Air Quality Planning Section Air Quality.
National and Regional Programs to Reduce Ozone Transport Metropolitan Washington Air Quality Committee April 27, 2005.
Effects of Emission Adjustments on Peak Ground-Level Ozone Concentration in Southeast Texas Jerry Lin, Thomas Ho, Hsing-wei Chu, Heng Yang, Santosh Chandru,
1. How is model predicted O3 sensitive to day type emission variability and morning Planetary Boundary Layer rise? Hypothesis 2.
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
1 Prakash Karamchandani 1, David Parrish 2, Lynsey Parker 1, Thomas Ryerson 3, Paul O. Wennberg 4, Alex Teng 4, John D. Crounse 4, Greg Yarwood 1 1 Ramboll.
Template Summary of FY12-13 Work Plan Technical Activities Sue Kemball-Cook and Greg Yarwood NETAC Policy Committee Meeting April 22, 2014.
Air Quality in Texas Birnur Guven Houston Advanced Research Center June 23, 2010 – Johnson Space Center.
CALGRID Modeling Overview A First Look A Modeling Effort by the OTC Modeling Committee Presented by: Jeffrey Underhill, Ph.D. NHDES OTC/MANE-VU Annual.
Breakout Session 1 Air Quality Jack Fishman, Randy Kawa August 18.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
EPA’s White Paper and Workshop on Background Ozone NASA AQAST 10 th Semiannual Meeting – 1/6/16.
Presentation to the Air Quality Forum – August 9, 2005 C lark C ounty R egional O zone and P recursors S tudy (CCROPS) Robert A. Baxter, CCM T & B Systems,
Garry Kaufman Air Pollution Control Division.  Background on Oil and Gas Air Regulation in Colorado  Basis for Additional Air Quality Requirements for.
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
Emerging Science EPA’s ORD Supports Regional Haze Program
Big, Beautiful Sky: The State and Future of Texas’ Air
Kenneth Craig, Garnet Erdakos, Lynn Baringer, and Stephen Reid
Photochemical Modeling of Industrial Flare Plumes with SCICHEM 3.1
Shell Center for Sustainable Development Seminar
17th Annual CMAS Conference
Methane Emission Standards for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities
WORKING BETWEEN THE LINES: ONE CITY’S APPROACH TO REDUCING AIR TOXICS
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Planning to Achieve the 8-Hour Ozone Standard
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
Air Quality Research at the University of Texas
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
Biogenic Emissions in Southeast Texas
Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)
WRAP Overview and Role of Dust Forum
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Presentation transcript:

REDUCTION OF HIGHLY REACTIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS & VARIABLE EMISSIONS IN HOUSTON/GALVESTON: MONITORING, MODELING, MEASURING, RULEMAKING David Allen Department of Chemical Engineering, and Center for Energy and Environmental Resources University of Texas ( ;

The Houston-Galveston area is a severe ozone non- attainment area; costs and benefits of controls have been estimated to be ~$5 billion/yr The current EPA approved State Implementation Plan (SIP, approved in 2000) calls for significant NOx emission reductions (approximately 70% of the 2007 inventory; 90+% for point sources); SIP also called for some VOC emission reductions Proposed new plan adds emission reductions for highly reactive VOCs from industrial facilities and applies 80%, rather than 90% industrial NOx emission reductions

Outline n Why focus on Highly Reactive Volatile Organic Compounds (HRVOCs)? Why are we considering variability in emissions? This presentation will provide an overview of the scientific basis for decision-making n Impact of scientific findings on air quality policy and current direction of technical analyses impacting policy decisions

Focus on HRVOCs emerged out of the Texas Air Quality Study (TEXAQS ) ( (

TEXAQS : Study overview n Study conducted from approximately August 15 - September 15 n Approximately 300 investigators n 5 aircraft n 5 major ground chemistry sites n Coordinated with Houston fine particulate matter Supersite sampling intensive

TexAQS and other research programs address key areas of uncertainty n Emission inventories n Chemical and physical processes in the atmosphere, particularly those leading to rapid and efficient ozone formation (a.k.a. ozone “spikes”) n Regional air quality modeling/air quality policies

Chemical and physical processes in the atmosphere: Rapid ozone formation events

TexAQS data have played a crucial role in understanding these events: Physical insights

Hydrocarbon Reactivities Top 10% of samples exhibit reactivities that are 4x the mean value. For the most part the highest reactivities are geographically associated with industries in the Ship Channel.

Apportionment of reactivity for high reactivity samples For the high reactivity samples, low molecular weight alkenes (propene, ethene and butenes) are a major source of hydrocarbon reactivity for ozone formation. Twin Otter VOC Samples Average for 26 samples with k>10 s -1

TexAQS showed us that HRVOCs are important, but what is relative importance of short, episodic releases vs. continuous, steady emissions?

HRVOC emissions n HRVOCs defined as ethylene, propylene, butylenes and 1,3-butadiene n Continuous emissions – to be addressed with a CAP (and trade?) program n Emission events to be handled through a short term cap

Conceptual issue In most of US, industrial emissions are relatively constant or are small enough that meteorology is cause of “worst conditions” In Houston, both meteorology and emissions are cause of “worst conditions”

Conceptual issue

Estimating variability for continuous emissions

Event Emissions and their impact on ozone formation in the Houston Galveston Area

Key Questions n Are the magnitudes of emission events, singularly and collectively, significant relative to routine emissions? n What are the characteristics of the events in terms of time, space, and composition? n How do the events influence ozone formation?

TCEQ event database, established in early 2003 First 11 Months of reporting: n NOx emission event emissions are small compared to annual average emissions n At specific times and locations, VOC and HRVOC emissions can be large relative to annual average emissions Average hourly emissions of all point sources

n Total mass of over 4 millions pounds (2000 tons) contributes 4% to the 45,000 tons of VOC emitted over a single year from point sources in the four counties. n 14 times (18 hours) during the eleven-month period, event emissions exceed the annual average for all facilities in the region. VOCs 4,000,000 lb

n Total mass of over 1.6 millions pounds (830 tons) is ~12% of the 6800 tons of HRVOC emitted over a single year from point sources in the four counties. n 29 times (115 hours) during the eleven-month period, event emissions exceed the annual average. HRVOCs 1,650,000 lb

1,3-Butadiene ~50,000 lb Butenes ~100,000 lb Propene ~500,000 lb Ethene ~1,000,000 lb

What are the characteristics of the events in terms of time, space, and composition? Most HRVOC events last less than a day, many last less than an hour Largest number of events is from events of lb, but most of the mass is associated with events greater than 1000 lb, which occur, on average, several times per week 2-3 times per week Daily Less than 24 hours

Conceptual model n Events with emissions of more than 1000 pounds of HRVOCs occur several times per week, on average; events with emissions of more than 10,000 pounds of HRVOCs occur several times per month, on average n Many are relatively short (well under one hour in duration) n Among the HRVOCs, ethene and propene dominate n Events occur primarily in Harris and Brazoria counties at chemical manufacturing facilities

What are the consequences for ozone formation? n Example of worst case scenario: Monitoring data from a 6700 lb, 30 minute ethylene release at LaPorte

10,000+ lb ethylene release at LaPorte, (6700 lb between 11 and 11:25 AM) 3/27/2002

Short term ozone enhancements of up to 100 ppb

Add Event to Air Quality Model (most recent version with 1-km resolution) Without EventWith Event Layer One ppb vs ppb

Outline n Why Highly Reactive Volatile Organic Compounds (HRVOCs)? Why are we considering variability in emissions? An overview of the scientific basis for decision- making n Impact of scientific findings on air quality policy and current direction of technical analyses impacting policy decisions

Actions taken by the TCEQ and current technical analyses n Based on the data from TexAQS, which indicate that VOC emissions from industrial facilities are responsible for rapid and efficient ozone formation, new rules have been proposed for emissions of highly reactive volatile organic compounds (HRVOCs) from flares, cooling towers and fugitive sources n Balance between NOx and HRVOC emission controls reevaluated, balance between short term and annual HRVOC emissions being evaluated; focus of work at UT is on short term releases and on characterizing scientific uncertainties

Summary n Overview of major findings from TexAQS Shift in focus to reactive hydrocarbons n Impact of findings on air quality policy Shift in focus to reactive hydrocarbons with a focus on most reactive hydrocarbons – caps on HRVOC emissions n Current direction of technical analyses impacting policy decisions (Highly Reactive Volatile Organic Compounds, HRVOCs) Relative importance of annual and short term limits on HRVOC emissions