Secondary Payloads Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A GenCorp Company High Thrust In-Space Propulsion Technology Development R. Joseph Cassady Aerojet 22 March 2011.
Advertisements

Innovation You Can Count On™ 1 Payload Integration Wendi Otto Systems Engineer, Pegasus and Taurus Launch Vehicles October 4, 2007 All Information Approved.
Ares V RFI Point of Departure Information Package
GSFC/Wallops Flight Facility 1 Small Satellite Opportunities at Wallops Flight Facility Dr. John Campbell Director, Wallops Flight Facility.
Solid Rocket Boosters Overview Two solid rocket boosters provide the main thrust to lift the Space Shuttle off the pad. They are the largest solid- propellant.
Launch Vehicles. LAUNCH SYSTEM CONCEPTS SHROUD PROTECTS THE SPACECRAFT SHROUD PROTECTS THE SPACECRAFT MAIN VEHICLE PRIMARY LIQUID OR SOLID ROCKET PROPELLANT.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
SPACECRAFT ACCIDENTS: EXAMINING THE PAST, IMPROVING THE FUTURE Intelsat VI Recovery with STS-49 (Endeavour) Bryan Palaszewski working with the Digital.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Crew Initiative Overview and Status to the COMSTAC Philip McAlister NASA Exploration Systems Mission.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Centennial Challenges Program Space Technology Mission Directorate Cube Quest Challenge Lunar Derby and Deep.
Flying, Hopping and Perching Microbots for Extreme Environment Exploration Deployed Using CubeSats Jekan Thanga 1, Jim Bell 1 Space and Terrestrial Robotic.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
Launch System Launch Vehicle Launch Complex Orbit Insertion Orbit Maneuvers.
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
“Fly me to the Moon”. Few can argue there is a more exciting vehicle than the Saturn V One of the most successful craft ever built by NASA, no payload.
Comprehend why the shuttle was developed Comprehend the space shuttle’s main features Comprehend the shuttle’s legacy The Space Shuttle Program.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Integration and Test Joanne Baker GSFC Code 568 August 16-17, 2005.
Chapter 24 Space Vehicular Systems. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Identify.
A3 Altitude Test Facility
Satellites and Launch Vehicles. “Gee Whiz” Facts Number of satellites currently in orbit is over 900 Satellites orbit at altitudes from 100 miles (Low.
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP February 23, 2012 NES: Engineering Design Challenge: Spacecraft Structures Presented by: Jordan Snyder.
Dynamic Design: Launch and Propulsion Genesis Launch Vehicle: The Delta Rocket Student Text Supplement.
GSFC 5 Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today” ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 Launch Vehicle Services Section 18.0 Clyde Woodall Launch Vehicle Manager.
© Lavochkin Association, 2013 Ganymede Lander mission overview.
Philip Luers NASA/GSFC Code 561 August 16-17, 2005
PROGRAM UPDATE March 2012.
Vibration Isolation Box Design a system for dampening out the vibrations associated with launch and landing for a box that will fit inside a middeck locker.
AAE 450- Propulsion LV Stephen Hanna Critical Design Review 02/27/01.
Space Shuttles By Frederick. Launching Space Shuttles To lift the 4.5 million pound (2.05 million kg) shuttle from the pad to orbit (115 to 400 miles/185.
 Space Shuttles allowed astronauts to live in space for up to two weeks to complete experiments or repairs on space equipment.  It lands like an airplane.
Mars Today 1 An immediate and inexpensive program for manned Mars visitation.
Introduction to the Altair Project
The Shuttle Transportation System Produced by Loren Fletcher (click picture)
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
1 AAE 450 Spring 2008 Jerald A. Balta February 21, 2008 Propulsion Team / Cad Cost Modifier – Launch Site.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
UNITY IV Critical Design Review Hill Air Force Base 13 April 2000 Phase II First Launch.
CRICOS No J a university for the world real R ENB443: Launcher Systems Image Credit: ESA Caption: The generic Ariane-5 (Ariane Flight 162) lifting.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
Judges Score Card Overview Mark Turner NASA Ames Research Center.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Marshall Space Flight Center Launching the Future of Exploration and Science Robert Lightfoot.
20c - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Propulsion Chuck Zakrwski NASA/GSFC Code 597 August 16-17, 2005.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Launch System Phase I Safety Review Preparation for GT #2 Topic: Phase I Safety Review.
LEO Propellant Depot: A Commercial Opportunity? LEAG Private Sector Involvement October 1 - 5, 2007 Houston, Texas LEAG Private Sector Involvement October.
Monday November 14, 2011 (Major Divisions of the Geologic Time Scale; Complete Activity – Make Your Own Geologic Time Scale)
Approved For Public Release © The Aerospace Corporation 2009 June 17, 2009 Initial Summary of Human Rated Delta IV Heavy Study Briefing to the Review of.
Final Version Gary Davis Robert Estes Scott Glubke Propulsion May 13-17, 2002 Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer NASA / DOE National Aeronautics and Space Administration AMS-02 ROAD TO COFR Mike Fohey July 15, 2004.
Launch Structure Challenge - Background Humans landed on the moon in 1969 – Apollo 11 space flight. In 2003, NASA started a new program (Ares) to send.
Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mechanical George Roach Dave Peters 17 May 2002 “Technological progress is like an axe in the.
Flight Hardware. Flight Profile - STS Flight Profile - SLS Earth Mars 34,600,000 mi International Space Station 220 mi Near-Earth Asteroid ~3,100,000.
An Earth – Moon Transportation System Patrick Zeitouni Space Technology.
AAE 450 Spring 2010 AAE 450 2/11/2010 Kathy Brumbaugh Chris Spreen
EDGE™ Preliminary Project Plan P09102 – METEOR Stage Separation System JJ Guerrette (ME)
Workshop on Science Associated with the Lunar Exploration Architecture - Earth Science Subcommittee Theme: A Lunar-Based Earth Observatory Science Observations.
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP October 17, 2011 Engineering Design Challenge: Spacecraft Structures Presented by: Kristy Hill.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 System Design Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
Mark Beckman NASA/GSFC Code 595 August 16-17, 2005
Shape Memory Alloy Reusable Deployment Mechanism
Rockets AND PROJECTILE MOTION.
Technical Resource Allocations
Integrated Thermal Analysis of the Iodine Satellite (iSAT) from Preliminary to Critical Design Review October 20th 2016 Stephanie Mauro NASA Marshall Space.
Stephan Shurn 28 February 2008 Propulsion Thrust Vector Control
Development and Principles of Rocketry
Space Travel Present & Future
Attitude, Lunar Transfer Phase
Ares I System Requirements Review (SRR)
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Presentation transcript:

Secondary Payloads Overview George Norris NASA Marshall Space Flight Center

Background NASA has taken steps to increase the scientific and exploration capability of SLS by providing accommodations for Cubesat Class payloads on EM-1 Requirements for Secondary Payload Accommodations on Exploration Missions were approved January 2014 Large support base for this capability across the agency, government and the international community NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) will provide unprecedented capability to further advances in science and exploration. The capability to deploy small satellites allows SLS to fully utilize excess capability on the planned exploration missions. With the planned mission trajectories, cubesat payload developers will have an opportunity to operate in deep space, a capability not realized to this point. Thank the audience and organizers. There should be time for questions and answers.

SLS Configuration Orion: Carries astronauts into deep space Stage Adapter: The Orion MPCV Stage Adapter will be the first new SLS hardware to fly. Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage: Based on the Delta IV Heavy upper stage; the power to leave Earth Core Stage: Newly developed for SLS, the Core Stage towers more than 200 feet tall 1) The Block 1 SLS leverages heritage hardware and technology to support affordable development and reduce risk. 2) The SLS Program is finding ways to upgrade those systems to improve performance. 3) SLS is designed with an approach that will enable evolution into the most powerful launch vehicle ever flown. Solid Rocket Boosters: Built on Space Shuttle hardware; more powerful for a new era of exploration RS-25 Engines: Space Shuttle engines for the first four flights are already in inventory

SLS Configuration MSA Diaphragm MPCV Stage Adapter (MSA) Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage (ICPS) Launch Vehicle Adapter (LVSA) Core Stage

SLS Secondary Payload Accommodations Eleven 6U/12U payload locations 6U volume/mass is the current standard (14 kg payload mass) Payloads will be “powered off” from turnover through Orion separation and payload deployment Payload Deployment System Sequencer; payload deployment will begin with pre-loaded sequence following MPCV separation and ICPS disposal burn Payload requirements captured in Interface Definition and Requirements Document ~56° ~22° ~21° ~Ø156” ~8° 6U mass of 14kg with expected deployer 5

SLS Secondary Payload Accommodations Payloads will provide deployers per NASA provided specifications No resources or telemetry provided by launch vehicle once installed State vector data at deployment will be provided to ground operators for predictions Payloads responsible for acquiring communication and telemetry bandwidth The MPCV-to-Stage Adapter produced at MSFC will fly with Orion on EFT-1 next year. Drove design of brackets and available resources Trickle charge may be available while in VAB and access to MSA is available

Secondary Payload Deployment System (SPDS)

Selected Deployer 6U (PSC) Deployer is COTS w/modifications COTS Features Externally accessible separation connector Redundant signal for door activation Accommodates 14 kg payloads Spring jettison rate of 4.6 ft/sec Access for battery charging, once integrated No pyrotechnic devices Existing GSE attachment/handling points External conductive surface, chassis grounding Modifications Addition of captive fasteners for mounting Possible addition of vibration isolators Possible addition of thermal blanket Note: Last two modifications are payload driven based on their designs.

Payload Deployment EM-1 launch window is typically 7 days each Month Lunar Transfer Time varies within the launch window but has a 3.5 to 8.5 day bound. The provided state is in the middle of the launch window and ~ 6 days. Payload deployment window starts approx L+4.5 hours Allows time for safe distance after Orion separation, disposal manuevers including transverse spin, ICPS blow down All payloads must be deployed prior to the expiration of the sequencer battery life. No TLM will be available through the ICPS system May choose to cluster ejections for some instruments while others may be deployed at variable intervals.

Animation

Mission Integration SLS Secondary Payload Mission Integration Team will be responsible for end-to-end integration and coordination between SLS Vehicle and secondary payloads MI Function will integrate all phases of the lifecycle including Engineering Integration, Operations Integration, S&MA, and Ground Processing Payloads will be assigned a Secondary Payload Integration Manager (SPIM) to guide payload through integration lifecycle SPIM will develop ICD’s to capture mission-specific, payload-specific requirements and verification plan MI team will CoFR integrated payload complement to SLS/SPIE to facilitate ISPE CoFR and verification NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) will provide unprecedented capability to further advances in science and exploration. The capability to deploy small satellites allows SLS to fully utilize excess capability on the planned exploration missions. With the planned mission trajectories, cubesat payload developers will have an opportunity to operate in deep space, a capability not realized to this point. Thank the audience and organizers. There should be time for questions and answers.

Secondary Payloads Concept of Operations ICD developed for each payload detailing interface and safety requirements and applicable verification requirements Phased Safety Reviews conducted Phase 0/I (at PDR level design maturity) Phase II (at CDR level design maturity) Phase III (prior to payload delivery to KSC) Cubesat integrated into dispenser and final testing performed Final verifications complete Integrated Payload (dispenser/cubesat) delivered to NASA Payload Integrated in MSA Final Battery charging prior to first rollout to pad

Secondary Payloads Key Documentation Secondary Payloads User’s Guide General capabilities, interfaces and processes Publicly Releasable SLS EM-1 Safety Requirements for Secondary Payloads Safety Requirements for EM-1 MSA Secondary Payloads SLS EM-1 PSRP Process Document Defines Phased Review approach Outlines Safety Panel details Increment Definition and Requirements Document Direct requirements flow down, interface requirements, safety requirements Generic Payload Verification Plan included Controlled Document

NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) will provide unprecedented capability to further advances in science and exploration. Questions? NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) will provide unprecedented capability to further advances in science and exploration. The capability to deploy small satellites allows SLS to fully utilize excess capability on the planned exploration missions. With the planned mission trajectories, cubesat payload developers will have an opportunity to operate in deep space, a capability not realized to this point. Thank the audience and organizers. There should be time for questions and answers. www.nasa.gov/sls

BACKUP Thank the audience and organizers. NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS) will provide unprecedented capability to further advances in science and exploration. The capability to deploy small satellites allows SLS to fully utilize excess capability on the planned exploration missions. With the planned mission trajectories, cubesat payload developers will have an opportunity to operate in deep space, a capability not realized to this point. Thank the audience and organizers. There should be time for questions and answers.

Orient for Disposal Maneuver, minutes long EM-1 DRO Trajectory and Timeline Plan Time End of TLI burn. T-0-3Hrs Grd launch window up to 2 Hrs long (depends on launch day in weekly window) DRO Mission Scenario— Weekly Launch Window with Lunar Arrival ~3.5 to 8.5 days..early in window is longest trip time End of the disposal maneuver, the ICPS is at 26,750 km Earth Radius inertial velocity of 5.279 km/s ICPS/MPCV Separation 10 minutes after end of TLI burn ICPS attitude hold for 5 minutes 25 minutes Passive Thermal Control (BBQ Roll 0.5 deg/sec), oriented Sun Normal, attitude transitions not shown Blowdown while in a transverse spin to minimize delta V. Starts 30 minutes after separation. Highly variable, tank propellant driven, 0-30 minutes Orient for Disposal Maneuver, minutes long Post-disposal, duration dependent on ACS propellant usage, battery life, and mission requirements. ACS fuel driven, low thrust. Engine bell forward in line of velocity vector. X T0+8 hrs ICPS Batt dies Deployment Window Opens, app 4-5 hours post T-O Disposal Maneuver, start time dependent on duration of blowdown, 5-10 minutes Disposal Maneuver, start time dependent on duration of blow down, 5-10 minutes No BBQ roll after disposal maneuver complete. 16