Wason’s selection task

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Deductive Reasoning. Are the following syllogism valid? A syllogism is valid if the conclusion follows from the premises All soldiers are sadistic Some.
Advertisements

Descriptive Approach Pragmatic Reasoning Schemas (Cheng & Holyoak)
Probability Theory. Validity A bar is obeying the law when it has the following property: If any of the patrons are below the age of 18, then that person.
Chapter Two Symbolizing in Sentential Logic This chapter is a preliminary to the project of building a model of validity for sentential arguments. We.
04 March 2009Instructor: Tasneem Darwish1 University of Palestine Faculty of Applied Engineering and Urban Planning Software Engineering Department Introduction.
Semantics of SL and Review Part 1: What you need to know for test 2 Part 2: The structure of definitions of truth functional notions Part 3: Rules when.
Goals Determine the true value of statements with AND, OR, IF..THEN. Negate statements with the connectives above Construct truth tables Understand when.
Symbolic Logic: Conjunction • , Negation ~, Disjunction v
Logical Reasoning: Deduction. Logic A domain-general system of reasoning Deductive reasoning System for constructing proofs –What must be true given certain.
Symbolic Logic. Objectives Determine if a sentence or question is a statement or not. Write a sentence that represents the negation of a given statement.
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning.
An Introduction to Propositional Logic Translations: Ordinary Language to Propositional Form.
1 Section 1.1 Logic. 2 Proposition Statement that is either true or false –can’t be both –in English, must contain a form of “to be” Examples: –Cate Sheller.
Knoweldge Representation & Reasoning
SYMBOLIC LOGIC Section 1.2. Statements This section we will study symbolic logic which was developed in the late 17 th century. All logical reasoning.
Logical and Rule-Based Reasoning Part I. Logical Models and Reasoning Big Question: Do people think logically?
Statements and Quantifiers
Conditional Statements. This is VERY IMPORTANT! We will show the failure of the fairness criteria by showing the first part of the conditional is true.
UMBC  CSEE   1 Inference in First-Order Logic Chapter 9 Some material adopted from notes by.
CH1 – 3 REVIEW Summary. CHAPTER 1: 1A RECOGNIZING FALLACIES KEY TERMS AND KEY IDEAS AND SKILLS  Key Terms  Logic  Argument – premises, conclusions.
Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications
Conditional Statements and Material Implication. The Conditional: The Fourth Connective Conditional statement: when two statements are combined by placing.
MATH 102 Contemporary Math S. Rook
Deductive versus Inductive Reasoning Consider the following two passages: Argument #1 Mr. Jones is a member of the Academy of Scholarly Fellows and only.
Evolution of Logical Reasoning
Reasoning.
LOGIC Lesson 2.1. What is an on-the-spot Quiz  This quiz is defined by me.  While I’m having my lectures, you have to be alert.  Because there are.
1 DISJUNCTIVE AND HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISMS DISJUNCTIVE PROPOSITIONS: E.G EITHER WHALES ARE MAMMALS OR THEY ARE VERY LARGE FISH. DISJUNCTS: WHALES ARE MAMMALS.(P)
Chapter 3: Introduction to Logic. Logic Main goal: use logic to analyze arguments (claims) to see if they are valid or invalid. This is useful for math.
MLS 570 Critical Thinking Reading Notes for Fogelin: Propositional Logic Fall Term 2006 North Central College.
HOW TO CRITIQUE AN ARGUMENT
PSY 323 – Cognition Chapter 13: Judgment, Decisions & Reasoning.
Chapter 1: The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
REVIEW : Quantifiers A key to predicate logic we have been ignoring is the inclusion of quantifiers You should recall from discrete that you can also write.
Prior Knowledge. Each card has a letter on one side and a number on the other. Rule: If a card has a vowel on one side, it should have an even number.
Lesson 1.4 Equations and Inequalities Goal: To learn how to solve equations and check solutions of equations and inequalities.
Deduction biases and content effects bias = whenever there is a systematic deviation in performance from the normative approach.
9.2 Compound Sentences Standard 5.0, 24.0 Standard 5.0, 24.0 Two Key Terms Two Key Terms.
Chapter 7 Evaluating Deductive Arguments II: Truth Functional Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning.
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 7 Lecture Notes Chapter 7.
1 Georgia Tech, IIC, GVU, 2006 MAGIC Lab Rossignac Lecture 01: Boolean Logic Sections 1.1 and 1.2 Jarek Rossignac.
Cognitive Adaptations for Social Exchange Leda Cosmides and John Tooby presented by Nat Twarog.
CS104 The Foundations: Logic and Proof 1. 2 What is Discrete Structure?  Discrete Objects  Separated from each other (Opposite of continuous)  e.g.,
Discrete Math by R.S. Chang, Dept. CSIE, NDHU1 Fundamentals of Logic 1. What is a valid argument or proof? 2. Study system of logic 3. In proving theorems.
How do we reason and solve problems? Psychological factors in solving problems Varieties of problems Algorithms and heuristics Barriers and strategies.
Scientific/Mathematical Thinking and Human Nature Uri Leron Technion – Israel Institute of Technology Submitted to The Journal of Half-Baked Ideas.
AND.
DISCRETE MATHEMATICS CHAPTER I.
Truth Tables for Negation, Conjunction, and Disjunction
Chapter 3: Introduction to Logic
Algebra Bell-work 9/13/17 Turn in your HW! 1.) 7x – 6 = 2x + 9
Truth Tables – Logic (Continued)
Discrete Mathematics Lecture # 6.
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Principles of Computing – UFCFA3-30-1
Chapter 8 Logic Topics
(1.4) An Introduction to Logic
1 Chapter An Introduction to Problem Solving
Logic Math Studies IB Propositions, truth tables, logic symbols, negation, conjunction, disjunction.
The Logic of Declarative Statements
1 Chapter An Introduction to Problem Solving
MAT 3100 Introduction to Proof
Wason and Johnson-Laird (1972)
CHAPTER 3 Logic.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Statements and Logical Connectives
Logical and Rule-Based Reasoning Part I
8A, 8B Propositions Unit 7: Logic and Sets 8A, 8B 6/1/ :59 AM.
Presentation transcript:

Wason’s selection task E K 4 7 <- four cards Each card in a deck of cards has a letter on one side and a number on the other Claim: If there is an even number one side, then there is a vowel on the other side

problem and solution E K 4 7 If there is an even number on one side, then there is a vowel on the other side. Determine which cards need to be turned over to verify that the rule or claim holds answer: “4,” “K,” but not “E,” “7” only ~10% of population gets the right answer

another selection problem You serve drinks in a bar. Every patron of the bar has an age and a beverage. 16 22 beer water If you are drinking alcohol, then you have to be at least 21 years of age. Which patrons do you need to know more about to see if the law is being observed? Answer: check out 16-year old and the beer drinker; leave others alone most of the population gets the answer right

differences in problems connection to everyday life EK47 version has no connection to everyday life; whereas, the bar problem does difference in content: abstract version (EK47) and the realistic version (bar version)

logical structure of bar problem 16 22 beer water If someone is drinking alcohol, then they must be 21 years or older. “p” = drinking alcohol “q” = being 21 years or older If p, then q

replace content with terms 16 22 beer water If p, then q (p = drinking alcohol; q = 21 years or older) 16  “not q” beer  “p” 22  “q” water  “not p”

logical structure not q q p not p If p, then q exactly the same logical structure with EK47 version

conditions of naturally good critically thinking skills more likely when we have realistic content in the problem explanation: minds have a natural ability to solve logic problems, but only in situations of realistic content deontic content: situations involving social rules (laws, detecting cheaters, etc.)

Implicit statements If Michael Jackson is a normal guy, then I’m a monkey’s uncle. (I’m not a monkey’s uncle.) (Michael Jackson is not a normal guy.) Implicit = unstated (indicate implicit statements by using parentheses)

logical structure of implicit statements If Michael Jackson is a normal guy, then I’m a monkey’s uncle. If p, then q (p = MJ normal guy, q = monkey’s uncle) not q (I’m not a monkey’s uncle.) not p (MJ is not a normal guy.)  denial of the consequent (modus tollens)

realistic vs. abstract versions If p, then q <- alone, no particular implications If MJ is a normal guy, then I’m a monkey’s uncle <- adding words, particular implication is that MJ is not a normal guy

logical operators If…then (conditional) = if p, then q  under the condition that p is true, q is true not (negation) “~” = not p  p is not true and (conjunction) = p and q  both p and q are true

Disjunction OR (disjunction) = p or q  either p or q is true logical operators allow you to combine information (premises) into logical statements

Interpretation of disjunction p OR q  either p or q is true but what about “I am male or female.”  you are one or the other but not both (exclusive OR) excludes both (XOR) what about “I am happy or smart.”  you are one or the other or both (inclusive OR) includes both

Interpretation of OR p or q could mean, p is true or q is true but not both alternatively, could mean, p is true or q is true or both unless specifically stated, either interpretation is possible

Disjunctive Reasoning doing reasoning or critical thinking involving the word “or” Start paying attention to me or I’ll kick you out of the class. (p or q) disjunction means, If you don’t pay attention to me, then I’ll kick you out of the class. (If p, then q) conditional