Aerosol-Precipitation Responses Deduced from Ship Tracks as Observed by CloudSat Matthew W. Christensen 1 and Graeme L. Stephens 2 Department of Atmospheric.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R. Forbes, 17 Nov 09 ECMWF Clouds and Radiation University of Reading ECMWF Cloud and Radiation Parametrization: Recent Activities Richard Forbes, Maike.
Advertisements

Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds
Marc Schröder et al., FUB BBC2 Workshop, De Bilt, 10.´04 Problems related to absorption dependent retrievals and their validation Marc Schröder 1, Rene.
Boundary Layer Clouds & Sea Spray Steve Siems, Yi (Vivian) Huang, Luke Hande, Mike Manton & Thom Chubb.
Impacts of Large-scale Controls and Internal Processes on Low Clouds
1 An initial CALIPSO cloud climatology ISCCP Anniversary, July 2008, New York Dave Winker NASA LaRC.
1 A First Look at Mid-Level Clouds Using CloudSat, CALIPSO, and MODIS Data Stanley Q. Kidder, J. Adam Kankiewicz, Thomas H. Vonder Haar Cooperative Institute.
A Cloud Resolving Model with an Adaptive Vertical Grid Roger Marchand and Thomas Ackerman - University of Washington, Joint Institute for the Study of.
Semi-direct effect of biomass burning on cloud and rainfall over Amazon Yan Zhang, Hongbin Yu, Rong Fu & Robert E. Dickinson School of Earth & Atmospheric.
Wesley Berg, Tristan L’Ecuyer, and Sue van den Heever Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Evaluating the impact of aerosols on.
Clouds and Climate: Forced Changes to Clouds SOEE3410 Ken Carslaw Lecture 4 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds.
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology The Effect of Turbulence on Cloud Microstructure,
NASA Satellites Help Lift Cloud of Uncertainty on Climate Change 2007 American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting Panelists Dr. Graeme Stephens, principal.
Relationships between wind speed, humidity and precipitating shallow cumulus convection Louise Nuijens and Bjorn Stevens* UCLA - Department of Atmospheric.
ON THE RESPONSE OF HAILSTORMS TO ENHANCED CCN CONCENTRATIONS William R. Cotton Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University.
Direct Radiative Effect of aerosols over clouds and clear skies determined using CALIPSO and the A-Train Robert Wood with Duli Chand, Tad Anderson, Bob.
Cyclone composites in the real world and ACCESS Pallavi Govekar, Christian Jakob, Michael Reeder and Jennifer Catto.
Large-Eddy Simulation of a stratocumulus to cumulus transition as observed during the First Lagrangian of ASTEX Stephan de Roode and Johan van der Dussen.
The Arctic Climate Paquita Zuidema, RSMAS/MPO, MSC 118, Feb, 29, 2008.
Monterey Area Ship Track (MAST) Experiment Virendra P. Ghate MPO 531.
Precipitation and albedo variability in marine low clouds
ISCCP at 30. Influence of aerosols on mesoscale convective systems inferred from ISCCP and A-Train datasets Rong Fu & Sudip Chakraborty Jackson School.
Clouds, Aerosols and Precipitation GRP Meeting August 2011 Susan C van den Heever Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins,
Estimation of Cloud and Precipitation From Warm Clouds in Support of the ABI: A Pre-launch Study with A-Train Zhanqing Li, R. Chen, R. Kuligowski, R. Ferraro,
The ASTEX Lagrangian model intercomparison case Stephan de Roode and Johan van der Dussen TU Delft, Netherlands.
Aerosol-Cloud Interactions and Radiative Forcing: Modeling and Observations Graham Feingold 1, K. S. Schmidt 2, H. Jiang 3, P. Zuidema 4, H. Xue 5, P.
The Relation Between SST, Clouds, Precipitation and Wave Structures Across the Equatorial Pacific Anita D. Rapp and Chris Kummerow 14 July 2008 AMSR Science.
Evaluating forecasts of the evolution of the cloudy boundary layer using radar and lidar observations Andrew Barrett, Robin Hogan and Ewan O’Connor Submitted.
Control of Cloud Droplet Concentration in Marine Stratocumulus Clouds
RICO Modeling Studies Group interests RICO data in support of studies.
Group proposal Aerosol, Cloud, and Climate ( EAS 8802) April 24 th, 2006 Does Asian dust play a role as CCN? Gill-Ran Jeong, Lance Giles, Matthew Widlansky.
Matthew Shupe Ola Persson Paul Johnston Duane Hazen Clouds during ASCOS U. of Colorado and NOAA.
Goal: “What are the sources and physical mechanisms that contribute to high ozone concentrations aloft that have been observed in Central and Southern.
April Hansen et al. [1997] proposed that absorbing aerosol may reduce cloudiness by modifying the heating rate profiles of the atmosphere. Absorbing.
Fog- and cloud-induced aerosol modification observed by the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Thomas F. Eck (Code 618 NASA GSFC) and Brent N. Holben (Code.
Yuying Zhang, Jim Boyle, and Steve Klein Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Jay Mace University.
Using Ship Tracks to Characterize the Effects of Haze on Cloud Properties Matthew W. Christensen, James A. Coakley, Jr., Matthew S. Segrin, William R.
Boundary Layer Clouds.
Radiative Impacts of Cirrus on the Properties of Marine Stratocumulus M. Christensen 1,2, G. Carrió 1, G. Stephens 2, W. Cotton 1 Department of Atmospheric.
Robert Wood, Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington The importance of precipitation in marine boundary layer cloud.
Regional analysis of multi- year aerosol indirect effects Dr. Thomas Jones University of Alabama in Huntsville January 13, th Annual AMS Conference,
Thomas Ackerman Roger Marchand University of Washington.
Hurricane Karl’s landfall as seen by high-resolution radar data and WRF Jennifer DeHart and Robert Houze Cyclone Workshop NASA grants: NNX13AG71G.
Towards a Characterization of Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds Matthew D. Shupe a, Pavlos Kollias b, Ed Luke b a Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental.
Modeling Mesoscale Cellular Structures and Drizzle in Marine Stratocumulus Wang and Feingold, JAS, 2009 Part I,II Wang et al, ACP, 2010 Feingold et al,
Relationship Between Cloud Droplet Effective Radius and Cloud Top Height for Deep Convective Clouds in CloudSat Data Product Satoshi Suzuki, Shinta Seto,
Horizontal Variability In Microphysical Properties of Mixed-Phase Arctic Clouds David Brown, Michael Poellot – University of North Dakota Clouds are strong.
On the instantaneous linkages between cloud vertical structure and large-scale climate Ying Li Colorado State University.
Atmospheric profile and precipitation properties derived from radar and radiosondes during RICO Louise Nuijens With thanks to: Bjorn Stevens (UCLA) Margreet.
PAPERSPECIFICS OF STUDYFINDINGS Kohler, 1936 (“The nucleus in and the growth of hygroscopic droplets”) Evaporate 2kg of hoar-frost and determined Cl content;
THE INFLUENCE OF WIND SPEED ON SHALLOW CUMULUS CONVECTION from LES and bulk theory Louise Nuijens and Bjorn Stevens University of California, Los Angeles.
Parameterization of cloud droplet formation and autoconversion in large-scale models Wei-Chun Hsieh Advisor: Athanasios Nenes 10,Nov 2006 EAS Graduate.
Large Eddy Simulations of Entrainment and Inversion Structure Alison Fowler (MRes Physics of Earth and Atmosphere) Supervisor: Ian Brooks Entrainment Zone.
Vertically resolved CALIPSO-CloudSat aerosol extinction coefficient in the marine boundary layer and its co-variability with MODIS cloud retrievals David.
W. Smith, D. Spangenberg, S. Sun-Mack, P.Minnis
Matthew Christensen and Graeme Stephens
Stratocumulus cloud thickening beneath layers of absorbing smoke aerosol – Wilcox, 2010 The semi-direct aerosol effect: Impact of absorbing aerosols.
GOES-R Risk Reduction Research on Satellite-Derived Overshooting Tops
Using A-train observations to evaluate clouds in CAM
Cloud Property Retrievals over the Arctic from the NASA A-Train Satellites Aqua, CloudSat and CALIPSO Douglas Spangenberg1, Patrick Minnis2, Michele L.
Understanding warm rain formation using CloudSat and the A-Train
Boundary layer depth, entrainment, decoupling, and clouds over the eastern Pacific Ocean Robert Wood, Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington.
Cloudsat and Drizzle: What can we learn
Group interests RICO data required
Dept. of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
VOCALS Open Ocean: Science and Logistics
Cloudsat and Drizzle: What can we learn
Cloudsat and Drizzle: What can we learn
Group interests RICO data in support of studies
Presentation transcript:

Aerosol-Precipitation Responses Deduced from Ship Tracks as Observed by CloudSat Matthew W. Christensen 1 and Graeme L. Stephens 2 Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Colorado State University 1 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology 2 Cloud Top Altitude Response Influence of Ship Plumes on Precipitation Objective Determine how clouds respond to aerosol plumes from ships. In particular, how does pollution affect cloud top altitude and rainfall? Each track was logged by hand using MODIS 2.1 and 3.7-μm imagery. Four regions were selected as hunting grounds for ship tracks. Example of ship track analysis 1)Identify ship tracks in MODIS 2.1-μm imagery. 2)Determine cloud type subjectively as closed or open cell. 3)Obtain polluted and unpolluted pixel locations using an automated detection method based on the contrast in the MODIS 2.1-μm radiances. 4)Collocate CALIPSO and CloudSat observations to the ship track domain. Ship Track Database Rain Rate Rain rates were averaged over raining and non-raining clouds. Open cells have heavier mean rainfall than closed cell clouds. Both the intensity and the spatial coverage of the rainfall (rain cover fraction) change according to the cloud type. Main Result: Aerosol suppresses rainfall in closed cellular clouds (-63%). Aerosol enhances rainfall in open cellular clouds (+88%). Rain Cover Fraction Rain cover fraction = # Raining Profiles / # Cloudy Profiles Open cell clouds have a higher likelihood of raining than closed cell clouds. The response to aerosol primarily depends on the stratocumulus regime. Main Result: Aerosol reduces the spatial extent of rainfall in closed cellular clouds (-55%). Aerosol enhances rain cover fraction in open cellular clouds (+22%). Radar Reflectivity Reflectivity was binned vertically and normalized by the cloud top height (ztop) over the polluted (Ship) and unpolluted (Cons) clouds. Larger reflectivities were observed in open cell clouds compared to closed cells. Aerosol plumes reduced mean reflectivity throughout the cloud layer by ~3dBZ in the closed cell regime resulting in a 50% reduction of the received power. Differences in reflectivity were insignificant in the open cell regime. MODIS cloud properties averaged over 20-pixel long segments positioned at the CALIPSO/CloudSat ship track overpass. Segments had to have at least: twenty MODIS 1-km cloudy pixels (MYD06), five CALIOP cloud top height observations (CALIPSO version 3), and four CloudSat profiles (raining/non-raining  2C-PRECIP-COLUMN) identified as polluted and as unpolluted from either side of ship tracks. Segments analyzed: 367 closed cell and 109 open cell cases. Closed Cell Regime Precipitation (2C-PRECIP-COLUMN) red: Non-raining Open Cell Regime Closed Open Summary Acknowledgements: This work was supported through the NASA grants NNX07AR11G, NAS , and NNX09AK02G. Data from MODIS, CALIPSO, and CloudSat provide evidence that aerosol plumes from ships modify the microphysical and dynamical properties of marine boundary layer clouds. The extent of the dynamical response depends primarily on the mesoscale structure of the stratocumulus cloud field. For regions of closed cells, aerosol plumes decrease liquid water amounts, drizzle, and have no affect on cloud top height. Departures in rainfall were largely due reductions in rain cover fraction Ship plumes ingested into open cells result in deeper and brighter clouds with higher liquid water amounts and rain rates. The local aerosol indirect forcing was more than five times larger for ship tracks observed in the open cell regime (-59 W m -2 ) compared to those identified in the closed cell regime (-12 W m -2 ). Details describing this research can be found here: Christensen, M. W., and G. L. Stephens (2011), Microphysical and macrophysical responses of marine stratocumulus polluted by underlying ships: Evidence of cloud deepening, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D03201, doi: /2010JD Droplet RadiusOptical Depth Liquid Water Path Evidence of Cloud Deepening Dynamical Effect Not Observed Ship tracks are elevated by ~15% in regions of open cells. Changes in cloud top height are negligible in regions of closed cells. June 2006 – December 2009 A11B-0063 Lower troposphere stability (LTS = Θ 700 -Θ sfc ) is the difference in potential temperature between 700 hpa and the surface (ECMWF-AUX). Open cells are typically associated with lower stability, higher moisture, and lower cloud fraction than closed cells. Ship plumes ingested into an unstable atmosphere have a higher likelihood of increasing the cloud top height. Cloud Top Height (Differences) Difference (Ship – Cons) mean standard deviation mean standard error Unpolluted Clouds (Cons) Difference (Ship – Cons) mean standard deviation mean standard error Unpolluted Clouds (Cons) MODIS Cloud Properties Droplet growth is inhibited in polluted clouds. Closed cell regime: ship tracks lose liquid water  Enhanced entrainment of sufficiently dry air brought about by smaller droplets leads to the drying of the polluted clouds as suggested by the results of a large eddy simulation (LES) model (Ackerman et al., Nature, 432, 2004). Open cell regime: ship tracks thicken and gain liquid water  Enhanced entrainment in polluted clouds residing under a diffuse temperature inversion with sufficient moisture enables the ship track to deepen, accumulate liquid water, and produce heavier drizzle over time compared to the unpolluted clouds. Differences (Ship – Cons) MODIS: 2.1-μm CALIPSO Orbit Total Attenuated Backscatter (CALIPSO) Radar Reflectivity (CloudSat) grey: Ground Clutter Precipitation (2C-PRECIP-COLUMN) Total Attenuated Backscatter (CALIPSO) Radar Reflectivity (CloudSat) 532 nm mean standard error