© 2003 by the AICPA SAS 99: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Advertisements

Obtaining Clients Submit a proposal
SAS 99 – Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit
Learning Objectives LO1 Differentiate among frauds, errors, and illegal acts that might occur in an organization. LO2 Explain the auditing standards related.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Fraud Auditing Chapter 11.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Materiality and Risk Chapter 9.
Obtaining Clients Submit a proposal
AUDITING CHAPTER 7 Audit Process & Detecting Fraud By David N. Ricchiute.
Profession Under Pressure
©2006 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 11/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Fraud Auditing Chapter 11.
Fraud Auditing Chapter 11.
Fraud Auditing Chapter 11 By arens et.al.,.
1 Fraud Management’s Responsibility Auditor’s Consideration.
BA 427 – Assurance and Attestation Services Lecture 15 The Accounting Profession’s Response to Fraud.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2007 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Management Fraud and Audit Risk "It takes 20 years to build a.
Management Fraud and Audit Risk
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates, and Related Disclosures ISA Implementation.
Planning the Audit; Linking Audit Procedures to Risk
Assurance and Attestation Services BA 427 Winter 2007 Substantive Procedures Glenn Lovett, Shareholder.
Review of Introduction to Auditing
SAS 99: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit Based upon AICPA 2003 overview available at
Auditing A Risk-Based Approach To Conducting A Quality Audit
The Baptist Foundation of Arizona
Professional Standards. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 2-2 Generally Accepted Auditing Standards-- General.
©2008 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 12/e, Arens/Beasley/Elder Fraud Auditing Chapter 11.
Slide 6- 1 © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2006 Chapter 6 Audit Planning, Understanding the Client, Assessing Risks, and Responding.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Learning Objectives LO1 Describe the role of professional judgment in achieving the overall objectives of the independent auditor in conducting an audit.
Chapter 4 Risk Assessment.
AUDIT RESPONSIBILITIES AND OBJECTIVES
Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin 3-1 Chapter Three Risk Assessment and Materiality Chapter Three.
©2010 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 13/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Fraud Auditing Chapter 11.
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Materiality and Risk Chapter 9.
New Auditing Standards Laurie Ball, CPA Swenson Advisors, LLP (Murrieta) Audit Director Accounting Day May 12, 2008.
Chapter 9 Auditing for Fraud
Understanding Audit Risk Assessment
IT Auditing & Assurance, 2e, Hall & Singleton C hapter 12: Fraud Schemes & Fraud Detection.
Case 6.3 WorldCom Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill.
SAS Update GFOA Western Pa – January 2008 Presented by Rob Lent, CPA, CGFM.
Chapter 4 Risk Assessment McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Chapter 3 Audit Planning, Types of Audit Tests, and Materiality McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
© 2011 Grant Thornton International Ltd. All rights reserved Presented by Mr. Yuvraj THACOOR, FCA Chairman of the Financial Reporting Monitoring Panel.
IT Auditing & Assurance, 2e, Hall & Singleton Chapter 12: Fraud Schemes & Fraud Detection IT Auditing & Assurance, 2e, Hall & Singleton.
A presentation: Ram Mohan Johri Principal Accountant General ( Audit) Himachal Pradesh 1.
Learning Objectives LO5 Document an accounting system to identify key controls and weaknesses in order to assess control risk. LO6 Write key control tests.
Chapter 06 Audit Planning, Understanding the Client, Assessing Risks, and Responding McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
OVERVIEW THE AUDIT PROCESS Overview of the Audit Process.
Chapter 5 Evidence and Documentation McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Case 6.2 Waste Management Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
Chapter 02 Professional Standards McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada 1 Chapter 10: Fraud Auditing.
Considering the Risk of Fraud
© 2003 by the AICPA SAS 99: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit.
Audit Planning. Decide whether or not to accept the prospective client Obtain knowledge of client’s business and industry Make preliminary arrangements.
SAS 99: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit.
Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Chapter
©2005 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 10/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Fraud Auditing Chapter 11.
SAS 99: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit.
Internal Control Chapter 7. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 7-2 Summary of Internal Control Definition.
Audit Planning, Understanding the Client, Assessing Risks and Responding Chapter 6.
Define risk in AUDITING
Types of fraud Fraudulent Financial Reporting—An intentional misstatement or omission of amounts or disclosures with the intent to deceive users. Most.
PLANNING, MATERIALITY AND ASSESSING THE RISK OF MISSTATEMENT
Chapter 06 Audit Planning, Understanding the Client,
Management Fraud and Audit Risk
Professional Standards
Fraud Auditing Chapter 11.
Modern Auditing: Assurance Services and the Integrity of Financial Reporting, 8th Edition William C. Boynton California Polytechnic State University at.
Management Fraud and Audit Risk
AU-C Section 240 Consideration of fraud in a financial statement
Presentation transcript:

© 2003 by the AICPA SAS 99: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit

This presentation is intended for use in higher education for instructional purposes only, and is not for application in practice. Permission is granted to classroom instructors to photocopy this document for classroom teaching purposes only. All other rights are reserved. Copyright © 2003 by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc., New York, New York.

© 2003 by the AICPA Overall Requirement An audit should be planned and performed to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatements, whether caused by error or fraud. An audit requires due professional care, which in turn requires that the auditor exercise professional skepticism.

© 2003 by the AICPA Causes of Misstatements Causes Fraud Errors Misappropriation of Assets Financial Reporting

© 2003 by the AICPA Two Types of Fraud Considered in an Audit Fraudulent financial reporting (“cooking the books”)--examples Falsification of accounting records Omissions of transactions Misappropriation of assets--examples: Theft of assets Fraudulent expenditures

© 2003 by the AICPA Professional Skepticism An attitude that includes a questioning mind and a critical assessment of audit evidence The engagement should be conducted recognizing possibility of material misstatement due to fraud An auditor should not be satisfied with less than persuasive evidence

© 2003 by the AICPA Terminology Simplification To simplify the display, we will abbreviate the term used in the standard “risk of material misstatement due to fraud” as follows: Risk of material misstatement= Risk of fraud due to fraud

© 2003 by the AICPA Fraud Conditions (“Fraud Triangle) Incentive (Pressure) Opportunity Rationalization (Attitude)

© 2003 by the AICPA Steps involved in Considering the Risk of Fraud 1. Staff discussion 2. Obtain information needed to identify risks 3. Identify risks 4. Assess identified risks 5. Respond to results of assessment 6. Evaluate audit evidence 7. Communicate about fraud 8. Document consideration of fraud

© 2003 by the AICPA Step 1—Staff Discussion of the Risk of Fraud Brainstorm Consider how and where financial statements might be susceptible to fraud Exercise professional skepticism

© 2003 by the AICPA Step 2—Obtain information needed to identify risk of fraud Inquiries of management, the audit committee, internal auditors and others Consider results of analytical procedures Consider fraud risk factors Consider other information

© 2003 by the AICPA Step 3—Identify Risks that may Result in Fraud and Consider Type of risk Significance of risk (magnitude) Likelihood of Risk Pervasiveness of risk

© 2003 by the AICPA Step 4—Assess the identified risks after considering programs and controls Consider understanding of internal control Evaluate whether programs and controls address the identified risks Assess risks taking into account this evaluation

© 2003 by the AICPA Step 5—Respond to Results of the Assessment As risk increases Overall responses More experienced staff More attention to accounting policies Less predictable procedures Specific responses Consider need to increase evidence by altering the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures

© 2003 by the AICPA Step 5—Respond to Results of the Assessment (concluded) On all audits, the auditor should consider the possibility of management override of controls and examine: Adjusting journal entries Accounting estimates Unusual significant transactions

© 2003 by the AICPA Step 6—Evaluate Audit Evidence Assess risk of fraud throughout the audit Evaluate analytical procedures performed as substantive tests and at overall review stage Evaluate risk of fraud near completion of fieldwork Respond to misstatements

© 2003 by the AICPA Step 7—Communicate about Fraud Communicate All fraud to an appropriate level of management All management fraud to audit committee All material fraud to management and audit committee Determine if reportable conditions related to internal control have been identified; communicate them to the audit committee

© 2003 by the AICPA Document Consideration of Fraud Document steps 1 -7 Staff discussion Information used to identify risk of fraud Fraud risks identified Assessed risks after considering programs and controls Results of assessment of fraud risk Evaluation of audit evidence Communications requirements If improper revenue recognition was not considered a risk, why it wasn’t

© 2003 by the AICPA Question Number 1 What type of assurance is an audit planned and performed to obtain?

© 2003 by the AICPA Question Number 2 What is professional skepticism?

© 2003 by the AICPA Question Number 3 What are the two types of fraud addressed in an audit? Provide an example of each.

© 2003 by the AICPA Question Number 4 What 3 conditions are ordinarily present when individuals commit fraud?

© 2003 by the AICPA Question Number 5 In what area are analytical procedures required while planning the audit?

© 2003 by the AICPA Question Number 6 What is “management override?”

© 2003 by the AICPA Question Number 7 What are the required audit procedures in response to the possibility of management override?

© 2003 by the AICPA Question Number 8 What responsibility does an auditor have for communicating fraud to management and the audit committee?