AYP APPEALS PROCESS INFORMATION WORKSHOP May 15, 2008 New Hampshire Department of Education Gaye Fedorchak Gary Guzouskas Deb Wiswell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
___________________________ NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/North Carolina Testing Program North Carolina Alternate Assessment Academic Inventory.
Advertisements

Submitting An Appeal for Schools and Districts Adequate Yearly Progress NH Dept. of Education Training Series April 11, 2011.
NH DoE UPDATE: AYP and NECAP NH School Administrators Association Tuesday, September 20, 2005 Tim Kurtz, NH DoE
Preparing for Cycle III School and District Accountability Ratings and AYP Determinations Information Sessions August 26 & 27, 2004 Juliane Dow, Associate.
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Update on Data Reporting April LEAP Changes LEAP software will be released shortly. Final LEAP software will not be available before mid-July. We.
Narragansett Elementary School Report Night Gail Dandurand, Principal Lisa Monahan, Assistant Principal.
September D.I.S.H Director Information Share Hub Verification 2014 Katie Embree-Cleveland September 11, 2014.
Lessons Learned from AYP Decision Appeals Prepared for the American Educational Research Association Indiana Department of Education April 15, 2004.
Accountability Policy Update (Schools) Changes to Bulletin 111 From Sept 2003 – June 2004 Louisiana Department of Education.
Forsyth County Schools Overview of the Proposed IE 2 Partnership Contract.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Small/ASAM Schools and PI Categorical Program Director’s.
MINNEAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Instructional Core Adapted from Harvard University PELP Framework.
NH Department of Education NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan April 15, 2011 Referencing requirements for Schools in Need.
Overview of the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law NH Department of Education October 11,
WHO, WHAT, WHY, AND HOW TO COMPLETE THE APPEALS PROCESS Star Rating Appeals CONTACT: DR. TJ BLISS - DIRECTOR OF ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY.
Graduation CohortGraduation Cohort Tony PrattTony Pratt Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Data and ResearchDeputy Assistant Commissioner, Data and Research.
Selecting Students for Title I Services in a Targeted Assistance School (TAS)
Montana’s statewide longitudinal data system Project Montana’s Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
April 11,2011 NH Department of Education Understanding New Hampshire’s 2011 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Reports 11 1.
PEIMS and Accountability. Clear System of Data Quality Documentation (Enrollment, Special Program, etc.) PEIMS Data Entry Pearson Data File Answer Documents.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Verification. What is Verification? Verification is confirmation of eligibility for free and reduced price meals under NSLP and SBP. -Verification is.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
AYP/SINA/DINA Iowa Statewide Data Conference Tom Deeter IDOE Bureau of Information & Analysis Geri McMahon IDOE Bureau of School Improvement August 10,
August Accountability Gateway Training. August Who we are Greg Marcus  MDE  (651) John Lindner  Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan 
Submitting An Appeal for Schools and Districts Adequate Yearly Progress NH Dept. of Education Technical Assistance April 9, 2009.
1 Guide to Using the 2006 NECAP & NH-Alternate Reports: Companion PowerPoint Presentation February 2007 New Hampshire Alternate Assessment New Hampshire.
Adequate Yearly Progress Kansas State Department of Education 2007 Fall Assessment Conference Judi Miller,
The Initiative For School Empowerment and Excellence (i.4.see) “Empowering teachers, administrators, policy makers, and parents to increase student achievement.”
Attendance Directors Meeting April 18, 2012 Home School and Homebound.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
Overview of the School Improvement Plan Development Process Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law NH Department of Education
NH Department of Education Division of Program Support Bureau of Nutrition Programs and Services Verification Module for National School Lunch Program.
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Data Collection and Reporting System.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.
1 New Hampshire Statewide Assessment Using the 2009 NECAP Reports January, 2010.
Rev ACCOUNTABILITY TOOLS Section 1. “All effective accountability systems are dynamic.” “Accountability is not about measurement; it is about.
New Hampshire’s 2007 AYP Status Reports & Follow The Child Growth Reports August 20, 2007.
NECAP Results and Accountability A Presentation to Superintendents March 22, 2006.
1 New England Common Assessment Program Guide to Using the 2005 NECAP Reports: Companion PowerPoint Presentation March/April 2006.
Verification SY Objectives Identify the steps required for Verification. Calculate an accurate sample size and verify the correct number of applications.
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
School Accountability No Child Left Behind & Arizona Learns.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
May 20, Understanding New Hampshire’s 2008 AYP Status and Growth Reports.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
Accountability Training Review Agenda for Today: Review of calculation changes and what’s new In depth review of Closing Gaps calculations Graduation Rates.
American Education Research Association April 2004 Pete Bylsma, Director Research/Evaluation/Accountability Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
1April 6, Understanding New Hampshire’s 2009 AYP Status and Growth Reports NH Department of Education.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Illinois’ Accountability Workbook: Approved Changes in 2005
Raising the Bar: Debunking Myths About Scoring and Data Charts Dan Wiener Administrator of Inclusive Assessment Massachusetts Department of.
School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , F.A.C.
Essential Questions What are the ramifications of continued identification under the ESEA Accountability Act? What do we need to do to get our school.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Navigating the Maze of Assessment and Accountability Reporting
Adequate Yearly Progress: What’s Old, What’s New, What’s Next?
Presentation transcript:

AYP APPEALS PROCESS INFORMATION WORKSHOP May 15, 2008 New Hampshire Department of Education Gaye Fedorchak Gary Guzouskas Deb Wiswell

2 AGENDA  Introductions  Grounds for Granting Appeals Questions about Grounds for an Appeal  Walkthrough of Appeals Documents  Recreating your AYP Report  Overview of NHDOE Appeal Review  Helpful Hints  Further Assistance  Questions ????

3 APPEAL BASIS Schools and districts can appeal the current AYP determination. This appeal must be accomplished within the allowable 30 days. Once this year’s AYP determination is final, then this determination can not be appealed in future years.

4 GROUNDS for an APPEAL To support an appeal that the AYP determination has been made in error, the evidence submitted must be based on statistical or substantive reasons the AYP determination should be changed.

5 STATISTICAL reasons Technical errors or data inaccuracies that were the basis for the preliminary determination, but when corrected, the school or district would have met AYP. Examples-Errors in collection, recording or scoring of test results, test participation information or student identification.

6 SUBSTANTIVE reasons Situation that had a detrimental impact on the assessment and under normal circumstances, the school or district would have met AYP. Examples – Major natural disaster, community crisis, or unusual testing circumstances that resulted in the invalidation of test materials.

7 TIMELINE May 22 nd - Intent to Appeal form must be received by NH DOE May 22nd - Deadline for school principals to submit evidence to local district officials that AYP determination is in error. Local district officials review evidence and either approve or deny the appeal. May 30th - Deadline for all school and district appeals to be received by the NHDOE

8 TIMELINE June 4-5 th - NHDOE staff and volunteers from districts/schools reviews appeal materials submitted by schools and districts June 6 th - Commissioner communicates decision to superintendents regarding granting or denying appeals. July 3 rd - Deadline for appeals to the State Board of Education to be received by the Commissioner

WALKTHROUGH OF APPEALS DOCUMENTS Based on 2008 School and District Appeal Process Guidelines and Forms

10 APPEAL FORM Participation Rate Worksheet Grades 3-8 & 11 The appeal for a school with grades 3-8 & 11must contain: 1. Sufficient evidence that the data submitted to the Department and certified has now been determined to be in error. You can use either the Testing Year Item Analysis Report or the Grades 3-8 or Grade 11 NH NECAP AYP Students file, available on the i4see website, as the basis for demonstrating and explaining the error and identifying the students who should/should not be included in the Participation calculation. A How to use the NH NECAP AYP Student List to check your AYP data document is included with these appeals materials.

12 APPEAL FORM Participation Rate Worksheet Grades 3-8 & 11  If you use copies of your Testing Year (Grade X Students in ) Item Analysis Report (s) for the grades that were in your school during testing then you need to: Cross out students who: Were granted a state approved special exemption– coded S (i.e. medical emergency) by the NH DOE Director of Assessment Enrolled after the first day of testing-coded E Withdrew after the first day of testing (applicable to students without a score)-coded W. LEP first year in US students (applies to reading only)-coded L. Highlight students who are included in the group for which you are appealing

13 APPEAL FORM Participation Rate Worksheet Grades 3-8 & 11 If you use the Grades 3-8 or Gr 11 NH NECAP AYP Students file from i4see then you must:  Include all columns of information for each student with a data error  Insert a row under the incorrect data and show the correct data. Cover or remove the names of the students after you have finalized your work so that the photocopy of the Item Analysis Report (s) or NH NECAP AYP Student List you send the Department does/do not show names.

14 Participation Rate Worksheet (cont’d) 2. A Participation Rate Worksheet (Grades 3-8 or 11) on which you have calculated a new participation rate based on the information above. For the calculations:  A¹ = Number of students with scores  A² = Number of students with A (Alternate Assessment score)  B = Total number of students left after completing number 1 above (Adjusted Enrollment)  Participation Rate = (A¹ + A² ) B This Rate is rounded to the nearest whole percent (%). The participation rate must be 95 % or higher.

16 APPEAL FORM Performance Worksheet Grades 3-8 or 11 Performance is not calculated for groups of fewer that 11 students The appeal for a school containing grades 3-8 or 11 must contain: 1. NECAP Teaching Year (Grade X Students in ) Item Analysis Report(s) for the students that were in your school during in which you do the following: Cross out all students: without scores (A for Alternate Assessment is a score) not enrolled for a full academic year (FAY) For grades 3-8 and 11 FAY is defined as continuously enrolled (CE) in the school from October 1, 2006 through the end of the school year. who were 1st year ELL students

17 Performance Worksheet (Grades 3-8 or 11) Highlight students who are included in the group for which you are appealing. The highlighted students will be referred to as continuously enrolled (CE). Both sub-group identification and continuous enrollment can be verified by using the Grade 3-8 or Grade 11 NH NECAP AYP Student List found in i4see.  For the highlighted students record the student’s Index level for achievement levels1 and 2  Split NECAP achievement levels 1 and 2 into sub- levels (0, 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b) using the NECAP Scaled Scores at Each Index Level Table found on the Department’s website and record Index sublevels.

NH Department of Education NECAP Scaled Scores for each Index Level

NH Department of Education Raw Score to Performance Index Conversion table for NH-Alt * The lowest score any scoreable portfolio can earn is 13 raw score points. ** A raw score of 0 is only possible if the portfolio submitted was judged to be unscoreable by two trained and independent scorers. Portfolio Raw Score Points Earned Proficiency LevelPerformance Index Level Performance Index Points Assigned 47-52Proficient with Distinction Proficient Partially Proficient2b Partially Proficient2a Substantially Below Proficient1b40 13*-20Substantially Below Proficient1a20 0**Un-scoreable (SBP)00

20 Performance Worksheet (Grades 3-8 or 11)  Look up NH-Alt scores and use the NH-Alt Raw Score to Index Conversion Table found on the Department’s website and record Index sub-levels  Cover or remove the names of the students after you have finalized your work so that the photocopy you send the Department does not show names 2. A recalculated Index Report 3. A recalculated Data Report

21 Performance Worksheet (Grades 3-8 or 11) 4. a completed Performance Worksheet for Grades 3-8 or High School. Use data from steps above to check your Index score against the Index Target to determine if score meets the AMO requirement If the score does not meet the AMO requirement, check the score for that number of students in the Confidence Interval Lookup Table for NECAP to see if it meets the requirement If the score does not meet the Confidence Interval requirement, calculate the Safe Harbor. (Safe Harbor Calculations are different for Grades 3-8 and Grade 11)

22 RECREATING YOUR AYP DOCUMENTS 2008 AYP Status Results Confidence Interval

23 Safe Harbor Calculation- Grade 11 “Equi-percentile” comparison The general question is: What score on 2007 NECAP corresponds to 240 on 2006 NHEIAP? Percent of students in Grade 11 scoring Basic or above in Reading on May 2006 NHEIAP = 83% (Math: 76%) X00X80X?? Answer: 83% of students in Grade 11 score at or above 1134 in Reading and 1128 in Mathematics on Oct NECAP

24 APPEAL FORM Attendance Worksheet (Grades 3-8) The appeal must contain an Attendance Rate Worksheet (Grades 3-8 schools) that:  provides the following information from the grades 1-8 that were in your school for the school year : number of students total number of ½ days of attendance total number of ½ days of enrollment (attendance + absences)  calculates the attendance rate (AR) (rounded to the nearest 0.1%).  Attendance Rate % = Sum of ½ days of attendance Sum of ½ days of enrollment  compares the calculation to 90% requirement. if AR > 90% then the school has met the criteria. if AR is greater than AR then the school has met the criteria.

25 Graduation Rate Documentation (High School) To appeal a graduation rate the school must submit a copy of the school’s dropout reporting form and documentation supporting any changes.

26 REVIEW PROCESS  The Department will review all appeals received by the deadline for completeness and accuracy.  The reviewers (DOE staff and volunteers from schools and districts) may request additional information/evidence to assist in appeal reviews.  If the Commissioner, upon review of the evidence provided in the appeal, determines that the AYP determination was in error due to allowable statistical or additional substantive reasons, then the Commissioner shall grant the appeal and the district shall make AYP in the content area(s) for which an appeal was filed.  If the Commissioner determines that the appeal provides insufficient evidence, in the form of allowable statistical or additional substantive reasons then the Commissioner shall deny the appeal and the AYP determination shall become official.

27 APPEAL to STATE BOARD  New Hampshire statute allows a second level appeal to the State Board of Education. Appeals, based on additional or amended information and data, must be filed within 30 days (4:30 PM on July 3, 2008) of the Commissioner’s decision to deny an appeal.  If a school/district appeals the decision of the Commissioner then the original appeal materials along with the reasons for the initial denial of the appeal will be forwarded to the State Board of Education along with any new documentation.  The school/district will be scheduled for a hearing in front of the State Board to present their appeal. The burden of proof that the decision of the Commissioner was in error rests with the district officials. Presentations to the State Board must be limited to the statistical or substantive reasons permitted by No Child Left Behind Act (20 USC 6316 §1116(b)(2)(B) 2001)).

28 HELPFUL HINTS  There are only 2 grounds on which an appeal can be granted - keep your materials focused.  The individuals on the appeal review teams do not know your information - make any narrative clear and concise.  Have someone who has not been part of the development of the materials read it to insure its focus and clarity.  Too much material in the appeal submission can be just as detrimental to your case as too little material.  Be sure all parties that need information on the appeal are kept up to date.

29 FURTHER ASSSITANCE  Deb Wiswell (AYP and Assessment data)  Gaye Fedorchak (Assessment data or NH Alt)  Gary Guzouskas (Appeal process questions)  Dottie Fair (Title 1)