Patent or Perish? Presented By: John F. Letchford Archer & Greiner, P.C. October 19, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intellectual Property Protection – Critical Issues to Consider in Business Ventures John F. Letchford, Esquire Archer & Greiner, P.C.
Advertisements

COMMERCIALIZATION RESOURCES FOR RESEARCH AT UIC UIC Office of Technology Management and IllinoisVENTURES NANCY SULLIVAN CEO & Managing Director, IllinoisVENTURES.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION OFFICE OF PATENT COUNSEL March 16, 2001.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
2004 Utah Changed Jon Huntsman became Governor USTAR concept formulated Utah’s President Michael Young.
IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.
LICENSING “One Way of Putting Your I.P. to Work for Your Organization” Inventing and Patenting Seminar May 16, 2001.
North Carolina State University © 2014 Technology Transfer Outcomes February 27, 2014 Research Retreat Kelly B. Sexton, Ph.D. Director Office of Technology.
South Carolina Research Universities An Assessment of Commercialization and Entrepreneurial Activities.
University Technology Transfer Presentation to Legislative Biotechnology Task Force 29 September 2005 Gene A. Merrell Assistant Vice President - Research.
So you’ve invented something? A Guide for UMass Faculty, Researchers and Students.
Technology Transfer University of Colorado Denver Rick Silva, Ph.D., M.B.A. -- Director Senior Licensing Managers David Poticha, M.S., J.D. Paul Tabor,
Universities and Patents From Open Science to Open Innovation Gilles Capart Chairman of ProTon Europe.
Copyright P.B.Bottino All rights reserved Paul Bottino, Executive Director (617) Mini-MBA in Entrepreneurship.
Green Manufacturing Industrial Consortium Western Michigan University David Meade, PhD., Associate Director.
1 University Based Technology Transfer Steve Bauer Director, RERC on Technology Transfer State of the Science Conference RERC on Advancing Cognitive Technologies.
1 Intellectual Property Basics Peggy Wade, Ph.D. Director, Division of Engineering Research, College of Engineering Michigan State University
Intellectual Property
Welcome P&P Topics for GFY 2002 Patent Awards Tech Transfer Cycle: Part III FOOD!!!! PATENTS & PIZZA June 4, 2001.
Title here Taking Discoveries from Lab Bench to the Marketplace Technology Transfer 101:
Vilnius Lithuania BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Introduction to University Tech Transfer Fall Columbia Technology Ventures
Wyoming Research Products Center Intellectual Property and Licensing Services Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 12, 2008 Davona K. Douglass, Acting.
Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.
The use of patents by a university spin-off. Sub-module BThe use of patents by a university spin-off 2/21 Structure of the case study University technology.
WIPO Dispute Resolution in International Science & Technology April 25, 2005 Ann M. Hammersla Senior Counsel, Intellectual Property Massachusetts Institute.
University Intellectual Property Transfer Mechanisms: Adaptation and Learning Maryann P. Feldman Johns Hopkins University.
Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.
Wisconsin Idea… “The boundaries of the University are the boundaries of the State”
I DENTIFYING AND P ROTECTING I NTELLECTUAL P ROPERTY Tyson Benson
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
Technology Transfer and Assessment of Intellectual Assets Gerald J. Siuta, Ph.D. President Siuta Consulting, Inc. ( Vice President.
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System Margaret Sampson Partner, Vinson & Elkins LLP U. T. System Board of Regents’ Meeting Technology.
Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.
Introduction to IP Ellen Monson Director Intellectual Property Office University of Cincinnati.
1 Knowledge | Innovation | Technology Overview of Risk Management in University Technology Transfer David N. Allen, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for.
+ Faculty Orientation UAMS BioVentures September 23, 2015 Christopher A. Fasel Associate Director of Licensing Patent Attorney UAMS BioVentures.
Technology-Business-Legal Some Critical Intersections Getting Started Legally IP Protection Licensing Mark J. Sever, Jr., Esquire Deborah A. Hays, Esquire.
Tech Transfer at the University of Florida Presented by Bruce Clary Assistant Director University of Florida Office of Technology Licensing.
Managing Inventor Expectations & Encouraging Invention Disclosures Dr. David K. Potter 2005 FPTT Annual Meeting and Awards Ceremony June 1, 2005.
1 Rutgers Sponsored Research and Technology Transfer Michael Breton, Ph.D Associate Vice President for Research.
“IP Universities” Istanbul, April 14 to 15, 2011 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY The U.S. Bayh- Dole Act Av. Uğur Aktekin The U.S. Bayh-
Academic Technology Transfer Operations and Practice Knowledge Economy Forum IV Istanbul, Turkey March 22-25, 2005 Alistair Brett Oxford Innovation.
Wyoming Research Products Center Technology Transfer and Licensing Senator Enzi’s Inventors Conference April 20, 2013 Phillip Wulf, Intellectual Property.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 101 CHASE KASPER, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
Intellectual Property at USC October 27, 2003 Dr. Michael Muthig.
Vermont's 21st Century Economy: Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Dr. Corine Farewell Director, Office of Technology Commercialization University of.
US University Patenting and Licensing: Historical Evolution and Recent Trends David C. Mowery Haas School of Business U.C. Berkeley.
University of Iowa Research Foundation We help you identify, protect and commercialize your discoveries. We can help you start a company. We will help.
Boston New York San Francisco Washington, DC Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute Understanding Intellectual Property June 4, 2008.
OTC FELLOWS PROGRAM INFORMATION SESSION Fall 2016.
Technology Transfer Office
Taking Discoveries from Lab to the Market
So you’ve invented something?
Technology Transfer Office
Intellectual Property 101
Cleantech to Market Technology Transfer at Berkeley Lab
Universities and the Commercial World
Taking Discoveries from Lab to Marketplace
Intellectual Property 101
Partnering with Business and Industry
Protection of Intellectual Property Resulting from STCU Projects
University of Iowa Research Foundation
MSU’s place for connecting to the private sector
MSU’s place for connecting to the private sector
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System
Prof. Kiran Kalia, Director NIPER Ahmedabad
Presentation transcript:

Patent or Perish? Presented By: John F. Letchford Archer & Greiner, P.C. October 19, 2006

Academia historically has held publication in a scholarly journal the premier way to establish credibility and gain prestige.

What is Intellectual Property? Patent Patent Trademark Trademark Copyright Copyright

Inventorship Conception of an idea Conception of an idea Formulation in the mind of a definitive way of realizing that idea (ie – a concrete and complete solution to a problem) Formulation in the mind of a definitive way of realizing that idea (ie – a concrete and complete solution to a problem)

Who Is Not An Inventor? Individuals that merely act as research technicians under the direction of the actual inventors Individuals that merely act as research technicians under the direction of the actual inventors

Those researchers who continue with the mindset of publish or perish while not taking advantage of the opportunities that patents provide may be doing so at their own peril (and that of their sponsors). Those researchers who continue with the mindset of publish or perish while not taking advantage of the opportunities that patents provide may be doing so at their own peril (and that of their sponsors).

Public Disclosure – What Determines Publication? Length of time presented/exhibited Length of time presented/exhibited Expertise of the audience Expertise of the audience Lack of notice or reasonable expectation that the material displayed would not be copied Lack of notice or reasonable expectation that the material displayed would not be copied The simplicity with which the material could have been copied The simplicity with which the material could have been copied

The Easiest Way to Protect Your Invention January 1, 2007 – Publish January 2, 2007 – Patent BAD

The Easiest Way to Protect Your Invention January 1, 2007 – Patent January 2, 2007 – Publish GOOD

Provisional Patent Application Advantages Preserves international filing rights Preserves international filing rights Defers substantial patent costs Defers substantial patent costs Permits inventions to be marked as “patent pending” Permits inventions to be marked as “patent pending”

Provisional Patent Application Limitations Not examined by the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) Not examined by the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) Lapses in 12 months Lapses in 12 months Does not form the basis for enforceable patent protection Does not form the basis for enforceable patent protection

Provisional Patent Application Costs $100 USPTO filing fee $100 USPTO filing fee Minimal fees for legal services Minimal fees for legal services What you can do to keep those costs from escalating What you can do to keep those costs from escalating

Provisional Patent Application What We Need From You More than a generalized description of the invention and/or its performance More than a generalized description of the invention and/or its performance Legally sufficient disclosure (ie - what you are doing, lab results, working papers) Legally sufficient disclosure (ie - what you are doing, lab results, working papers) We need your research We need your research

What Happens After the Provisional Application is Filed? At the USPTO… nothing At the USPTO… nothing Provisional applications are never published by the USPTO Provisional applications are never published by the USPTO Patentability Search Patentability Search Analysis Analysis

Evolving Research When Additional Provisional Applications May Be Necessary

Non-provisional/Utility Application Must be filed within 1 year of the provisional application Must be filed within 1 year of the provisional application Formally examined Formally examined Provides enforceable patent protection if granted Provides enforceable patent protection if granted Considerable cost and time Considerable cost and time

If you’ve followed the Patent then Publish doctrine and a patent issues… The Benefits are Numerous

The Dawning of the Age of Aquarius – The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980

In 2004, U.S. Universities filed 10, 517 patent applications – 3 times more than IBM, the corporate leader in worldwide patent filings. WHY?

The Value of Academic Technology Transfer For the University – gives the academic community the opportunity to have a positive impact on products and the marketplace For the University – gives the academic community the opportunity to have a positive impact on products and the marketplace For the Industrial Community – gives the private, for-profit sector the means to tap the very significant work of new discovery found in the academic lab For the Industrial Community – gives the private, for-profit sector the means to tap the very significant work of new discovery found in the academic lab For the General Public – provide the opportunity to benefit from extraordinary new advances being made by the brightest minds For the General Public – provide the opportunity to benefit from extraordinary new advances being made by the brightest minds

Other Advantages of Patenting Before Publishing Provides an additional quantitative indicator to assess the quality and quantity of university scientific work Provides an additional quantitative indicator to assess the quality and quantity of university scientific work Gives private investors convincing evidence that the dollars they spend on academic research and development are yielding results Gives private investors convincing evidence that the dollars they spend on academic research and development are yielding results Unlike publishing, can have a tangible valuation applied to it that can be compared equally with other patents on a global scale Unlike publishing, can have a tangible valuation applied to it that can be compared equally with other patents on a global scale

Trends in University Patenting 16,871 invention disclosures – 82% deemed potentially patentable ¹ 16,871 invention disclosures – 82% deemed potentially patentable ¹ 183 institutions reported filing 10,571 new applications – 32.8% more than the previous year ¹ 183 institutions reported filing 10,571 new applications – 32.8% more than the previous year ¹ Patenting and Publishing are not mutually exclusive – 9 of the top 10 Universities filing patents in 2005 in the United States were also in the top 100 of an international ranking of Universities based on publication output in 2000 Patenting and Publishing are not mutually exclusive – 9 of the top 10 Universities filing patents in 2005 in the United States were also in the top 100 of an international ranking of Universities based on publication output in 2000 ¹ Based on results of a survey of 198 universities conducted by the Association of University Technology Managers (“AUTM”) in Fiscal Year 2004

The Dollar Value of Patent Applications¹ Licensing – The Gift that Keeps on Giving 11,414 licenses/options yielding income - $1.385 billion 11,414 licenses/options yielding income - $1.385 billion 6,116 licenses/options generated running royalties - $1.122 billion 6,116 licenses/options generated running royalties - $1.122 billion 33% of respondents reported having at least one licenses that generated more than $1 million 33% of respondents reported having at least one licenses that generated more than $1 million ¹ Based on results of a survey of 198 universities conducted by the Association of University Technology Managers (“AUTM”) in Fiscal Year 2004

Trends in Licensing Revenue In 1991, University revenue from patenting was only $200 million compared the $1.385 billion in That’s nearly a 600% increase in 13 years.

More Specifically… In 2005, the University of California and San Diego reported making $21 million on patent royalties In 2005, the University of California and San Diego reported making $21 million on patent royalties MIT reports making $45 million from IP revenue annually MIT reports making $45 million from IP revenue annually

Additional Benefits from Licensing Patents Collaborative partnerships help move new discoveries from the laboratory to the marketplace Collaborative partnerships help move new discoveries from the laboratory to the marketplace Ongoing partnerships enable researchers who make discoveries in the early stages of a University’s tech transfer program to participate in future developments with industry Ongoing partnerships enable researchers who make discoveries in the early stages of a University’s tech transfer program to participate in future developments with industry

What Is Being Licensed? ¹ 56% of Universities report making at least one new product commercially available to the public – total 567 new products 56% of Universities report making at least one new product commercially available to the public – total 567 new products More than 3,100 new products have entered the marketplace from FY1998 through FY2004 More than 3,100 new products have entered the marketplace from FY1998 through FY2004 ¹ Based on results of a survey of 198 universities conducted by the Association ¹ Based on results of a survey of 198 universities conducted by the Association of University Technology Managers (“AUTM”) in Fiscal Year 2004 of University Technology Managers (“AUTM”) in Fiscal Year 2004

Licenses Provide More Than Just a Revenue Steam ARM Ltd., a leader in microprocessor technology, sponsors 10 research assistants at an annual salary of $65,000 at the University of Michigan in return for taking co-ownership of any patents they file.

Patents are an Indicator of the Relationships Between Academic Research and Commercial Application of New Technologies Since 1980 there have been nearly 5000 startup companies spun out from U.S. University license of patents Since 1980 there have been nearly 5000 startup companies spun out from U.S. University license of patents 2/3 of these are still in operation 2/3 of these are still in operation IN FY2004, Universities spun out 462 new companies and received an equity interest in 51.9% of them IN FY2004, Universities spun out 462 new companies and received an equity interest in 51.9% of them

Simply put, the difference between not patenting your ideas and seeking patent protection…….

Baby Gets A New Pair of Shoes or…

Baby Gets A New Beach House

Patent or Perish? Presented By: John F. Letchford Archer & Greiner, P.C. October 19, 2006