Summary of Results from Spring 2014 Presented: 11/5/14.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
World’s Largest Educational Community
Advertisements

Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
1 Ottumwa Needs Assessment Winter 2014 School Improvement Needs Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards (IASB)
2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
POLLARD Survey Respondents Response Rates 402 PARENTS48.7% * 774 STUDENTS93.8% 65 STAFF47% ** * Parent Survey Respondents: 28% ONLINE and 72% PAPER **
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Parent School Climate Survey Results and Analysis November 2010.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
Talbert House Project PASS Goals and Outcomes.
TalentMap 1 York Community Services: November 1-12, TalentMap Athabasca University – Spring TalentMap Employee Survey Results Presentation.
Ways to Utilize the 2012 FCPS Working Conditions Survey April 11, 12, 13 Laurie Fracolli, Sid Haro, and Andrew Sioberg.
SPE Engagement Survey Results Summary Digital Media Group Masek November 2012 Confidential 1.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
School Leadership Teams Collaborating for Effectiveness Begin to answer Questions #1-2 on the Handout: School Leadership Teams for Continuous Improvement.
Centennial Elementary School Parent Opinion Inventory 1 Ocean City Public Schools Parent Opinion Inventory Summary Analysis November 2007 Prepared by the.
Sherri M. Kenley Seeking ~ MCPS Elementary School Assistant Principal position position.
Union Elementary School “Soaring Above and Beyond”
EES-Student v3.0 (Student Engagement Edition) Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
School Safety. Session Objectives: Become familiar with school safety factors and early warning signs Assess school safety Discuss the role of stakeholders.
EES Parent v2.1 Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY TM Parent Edition.
January 18, 2012 Administrative Council Presentation.
Engagement at The Health Trust Presented by Quantum Workplace 2014 Executive Report - The Health Trust.
Blended Learning: Finding the Right Mix Work Expectations Profile  Explores the “psychological contract” of needs and expectations between employees.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
C ULTURE & C LIMATE S URVEY. Sample Employee Survey Report Findings ACME Widgets.
12-14 Pindari Rd Peakhurst NSW 2210 p: e: Employee Survey Links2Success.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
1 Claverley COE School Parent/Carer Questionnaire Results Summer Term - June 2014.
ROSSHALL ACADEMY “Our School Our Future” Our Future”
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Parent Satisfaction Surveys What is the Parent Satisfaction Survey?  Each year schools from our district are selected to participate in the.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
BROMWELL COMMUNITY MEETING November 17, SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK (SPF)
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin.
1 CHILDREN FIRST NETWORK SUMMARY Winter 2009 Confidential – Not for Distribution.
Parent Satisfaction Surveys November What is the Parent Satisfaction Survey?  The survey consists of 18 questions that examine schools’ efforts.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE) Survey Summary of Fall 2014 Results Presentation to College Council Executive Cabinet August 5, 2015.
- CAT 1 - Developing the Organization: By Recognizing the Importance and Relevance of Student Voices in Developing a Positive School Climate.
Ekaterina P. Forrester, Ph.D.
Human Resources Office of 1 Summary of Results College of Design Dean’s Reports.
Nevada Department of Education Office of Educational Opportunity Nevada Comprehensive Curriculum Audit Tool for Schools NCCAT-S August
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Northwest ISD Board Presentation Staff Survey
Mid Michigan Community College Prepared by President Christine Hammond March 31, 2016 PACE Survey Results Summary.
Sharing Your School Climate Data with STAFF Directions for PowerPoint users: The following is a sample template for sharing your DSCS results.
Items in red require your input
Sharing Your School Climate Data with YOUR FAMILIES
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Lake Sybelia Elementary
Sharing Your School Climate Data with YOUR FAMILIES
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Items in red require your input
Items in red require your input
Sharing Your School Climate Data with YOUR FAMILIES
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Empire Southwest 2017 Companywide EOS Results.
Teacher Insight Survey 2019
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
Sharing Your School Climate Data with YOUR FAMILIES
Presentation transcript:

Summary of Results from Spring 2014 Presented: 11/5/14

Context In an effort to gauge the current climate of the district community with regard to our schools and organization a survey was commissioned in Spring of The National Center for School Leadership ( performed the survey. The survey addressed various stakeholder groups: students, parents, faculty and staff. Results were compiled into 4 areas: School Climate, Parent Engagement, Student Engagement, and Teacher Attitudes.

Each area was reported out from varying perspectives: School Climate: by ethnicity, by tenure, by position, by location Parent Engagement: by grade level, by school performance, by location, by source Student Engagement: by job status, by extra-curricular status, by location, by grade level Teacher Attitudes: by grades taught by tenure by position

Process Overview  Survey Stakeholders  Review the data and follow-up with discussions where the data suggests more clarification is needed  Summarize the priorities  Share the results  Develop a team (district/school leadership) and conduct strategy sessions -delve deeper into the varying perspectives -create focus groups to delve deeper where appropriate  Develop Action Plan(s)  Implement and evaluate the progress

Notes for Interpreting Survey Scores Remember, throughout this process it is critical that national trends are eliminated from district data and likewise, district trends are eliminated from building specific data. This enables the organization to focus in on those critical elements that they will be able to most effectively address. Additionally, the protocols we are going to share with you are based on the assumption that each location has a significant sample of at least 30 respondents per category. While breakdowns in the data for groups of less than 30 can be interesting, this data must be considered anecdotal. As you will see, we have numerous categories where sample size does not lend itself to statistical significance.

Strengths  Review the top 10 highest rated items for your location. Identify those that are not among the top 10 highest rated items for either the national and/or district sample. These tend to be significant strengths of your organization/location.  Scores of 67% favorable are generally considered strengths.  Scores of 75%+ favorable are generally considered real strengths.  Compare favorable percentages for your location to a district or national average. Five (5%) percent above is a relative strength while ten (10%) above is a very positive strength.

Opportunities (areas for growth)  Review the 10 lowest rated items for your location. Identify those that are not among the 10 lowest rated items for either the national and/or district sample. These tend to be significant areas for growth within your organization/location.  Scores of 20%-30% unfavorable are generally considered an area for improvement.  Scores of 30%+ unfavorable are generally considered an area for immediate improvement.  Compare unfavorable percentages for your location to a district or national average. Five (5%) percent below is an opportunity for improvement while ten (10%) percent below is a significant risk that should be explored further.

High Neutrals High neutral scores can indicate one of several things. Most notable high neutrals indicate a degree of apathy or ambivalence related to the topic. High neutrals are typically thought to be either an opportunity in that organization that can sway the thinking of a large percent of the population by addressing the topic or a threat if the topic remains unaddressed (and the stakeholder group becomes less satisfied).

District Highest Rated: I am committed to seeing my school/district succeed 95% I feel safe at work 87% I know what is expected of me at work 86% Considering everything, I am satisfied working at my school/department 83% I would recommend my school/school district to a family member seeking school for their children 81% I have the freedom I need to do my job 81% I would recommend my school/department to a friend seeking employment 80% Overall, my school/department does a good job of meeting my needs 79% I am able to share my ideas and opinions with school/department leadership 78% I am satisfied with the level of supervision I receive 78% National Highest Rated: I am committed to seeing my school/district succeed 97% I know what is expected of me at work 91% I feel safe at work 87% The people I work with care a great deal about the quality of their work 86% The people that I work with cooperate to get the job done 84% Considering everything, I am satisfied working at my school/department 82% The people that I work with care about each other on a personal level 81% I am satisfied with the level of supervision I receive 81% I am given fair opportunity to succeed in my school/department 80% My peers exhibit a strong belief that all students can excel if we all do our jobs well 79% For Example

Lowest Rated District: Many parents volunteer time to assist in my school 40% I am satisfied with the PD opportunities that are available to me 30% The people that I work with care about each other on a personal level 26% The parents at my school are very involved in their child’s school life 23% I work in a positive, professional work environment 23% The people that I work with trust and respect each other 23% The students in my school/district show respect for our teachers 23% I am clear about how performance will be evaluated 23% School/department leadership keeps me well informed about what is going on 23% School-wide/dept. meetings are a good use of my time 22% Lowest Rated National: Many parents volunteer time to assist in my school 38% I have time available during school/work to collaborate with my peers… 29% The parents at my school are very involved in their child’s school life 28% Parents at my school are very engaged in the learning of their child 25% School-wide/dept. meetings are a good use of my time 23% I am satisfied with the PD opportunities that are available to me 22% Staff development opportunities at my school/district are very relevant to my work 21% Teachers at my school are well-supported by the parents with respect to discipline issues 20% I am involved in the decisions that affect my work 19% Example 2

Climate and Culture Survey

Parent Engagement and Satisfaction Survey

Student Engagement Survey

Teacher Climate Survey