© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. © 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this presentation may be copied,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISO EMS OVERVIEW FOR CONTRACTORS
Advertisements

Federalism Consultation for the Lead and Copper Rule Long-Term Regulatory Revisions Office of Groundwater and Drinking Water November 15,
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee August 24, 2010 Metro Permit Reissuance Proposed.
FDA’s Proposed Rule under FSMA for Preventive Controls
WWTF’s MPCA Permit Renewal January 14,  Our current NPDES permit expired Sept. 30,  NPDES permits are a 5 year term.  Upon expiration,
MSW LANDFILL MACT STANDARD DEVELOPMENT SWANA’s 22nd Annual Landfill Gas Symposium March 22-25, 1999 Michele Laur Emission Standards Division US Environmental.
NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR CHROMIUM EMISSIONS FROM HARD & DECORATIVE CHROMIUM ELECTROPLATING & CHROMIUM ANODIZING TANKS.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
Exceptional Events Elements of an Effective Demonstration Darren Palmer US EPA Region 4.
The New Low Lead Regulations 2014 AWWA Meeting February 26, 2014 LAURA A. TAYLOR (334)
CO ‑ STAR: Colorado Strategy for Arsenic Reduction A Five Phase Compliance Assistance Program 1. Evaluate 2. Sample 3.Engineer4. Finance 5. Implement.
Mitigating Risk of Out-of-Specification Results During Stability Testing of Biopharmaceutical Products Jeff Gardner Principal Consultant 36 th Annual Midwest.
1 Department of Toxic Substances Control - Office of Pollution Prevention and Green Technology Multimedia Products Unit Andre Algazi - DTSC
SDWA1 The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
PRESENTED BY: NAMA’S GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS DIVISION ERIC DELL SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT Reduction of Lead in Drinking Water Act NAMA Webinar.
NSF/ANSI 61 Drinking Water System Components - Health Effects Acceptance criteria….. Regulated contaminants: Includes USEPA and Health Canada regulated.
Contaminant Candidate List (CCL) Regulatory Determinations Water Quality Training Roundtable 2000 February 7, 2000.
National Association of Water Companies October 11, 2010 Eric Burneson, Acting Deputy Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water Potential Approaches.
Operational Evaluation Level Stage 2 D/DBP Rule Compliance Michael W. Deal Compliance Assurance Section Central Office Division of Drinking And Ground.
USEPA Regulations By Douglas Rittmann, Ph.D., P.E. Water/Wastewater Consultant Presented to Entrepreneurs Association of Bari.
Basics of OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Management System
Lead in Drinking Water EPA’s Lead and Copper Rule Rick Rogers, Chief Drinking Water Branch U. S. EPA Region 3 District of Columbia Council of Governments.
Mississippi State Department of Health
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
Western Regional Gas Conference August 24, 2010 Distribution Integrity Management Programs (DIMP) Rule.
Dominique Poulin Environmental Health First Nations and Inuit Health Branch Health Canada Health Canada’s Implementation of the Drinking Water Safety Program:
Richard A. Snyder Center for Environmental Diagnostics and Bioremediation January, The Environmental Working.
STATUS OF ECOLOGY’S DRAFT FLOW BLENDING POLICY WATER QUALITY PARTNERSHIP MEETING January 20, 2005.
Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System DRG-Based Inpatient Hospital Payment System Project Overview June 14, 2012.
1 of 21 Introduction to the EPA 7-Step DQO Process DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 7 (30 minutes) Steps Presenter: Sebastian Tindall.
MRWS GROUND WATER RULE (GWR) PREPARED BY JOHN CAMDEN MRWS GROUND WATER TECH
© 2014 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. © 2014 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this presentation may be copied,
The Safe Drinking Water Act and the Arsenic Rule Rajiv Khera, P.E. Arsenic in Drinking Water Discussion Panel - ITRC Fall Meeting October 27, 2004.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
Understanding Public Health Risks and Putting it into Context USEPA National Drinking Water Program Update for the NARUC Water Committee Presented at:
2015 Fly-in Regulatory Update for SEFLUC Meeting Lisa M. Wilson-Davis City of Boca Raton Shamelessly “borrowed” from and with gratitude to J. Alan Roberson,
Boil Water Notices – Mandated vs. Precautionary Operating Board November 6, 2014.
1 Analytical Methods for Perchlorate: Current Technology and Possibilities for the Future David J. Munch Daniel P. Hautman Office of Ground Water and Drinking.
Ch WAC Geologic Sequestration of Carbon dioxide John Stormon Hydrogeologist Washington Department of Ecology Seattle, WA October.
The Paper and Other Web Coating (POWC) MACT – Executive Summary The executive summary is a power point presentation designed to be used for basic education.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
1 Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal General Overview March 1, 2006 US EPA.
1 TCEQ Drinking Water Sample Collector Training October 2006 Alicia Diehl TCEQ Public Drinking Water Section UCMR Sampling TCEQ Drinking Water Sample Collector.
Using GIS to Map Chromium Occurrence in Drinking Water Nate Rogers CEE 6440.
Hexavalent Chromium MCL Regulation Guidance Eric Zuniga, PE San Bernardino District SWRCB – DDW.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Why is Coal Ash of Concern and how to assess potential impacts?
Aberdeen S.D. Community Meeting Aberdeen S.D. Community Meeting Presenters: Mr. Brad Olson, President Aberdeen School Board Mr. Tom Opstad, Superintendent.
OBG PRESENTS: Lead Corrosion: Lessons Learned and New Approaches George Rest, PE | Michelle McEntire, PE – Tifft Water Supply Symposium – September 22,
SIMULTANEOUS ADSORPTION OF 11 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS BY AN ACTIVATED CARBON MADE FROM POLYSTYRENE SULFONIC ACID-BASED ORGANIC SALT.
Outline Background on Lead in Drinking Water How Lead is Regulated
Interpreting Filter Profiles
October 19, 2006 Oklahoma Water Resources Board City of Tulsa
Preventing Exposure to Lead in Drinking Water
Safe Drinking Water Act , CCL and Perchlorate
Flexible Air Permitting
Drinking Water Services Program Update Dave Emme May 2017
Lead in Drinking Water Forum
Kentucky Lead Workgroup Lead Corrosion and Treatment
Kentucky Lead Workgroup Recommendations
A Training Design Tool for Stakeholders Tasked with Evaluating New and Innovative Treatment Technologies for Small Drinking Water Systems Be sure to type.
Preventing Exposure to Lead in Drinking Water
Exceptional Events Rulemaking Proposal
J. Alan Roberson, P.E. ASDWA Executive Director
SDWA Collaborative Efforts Overview
Flint Water.
1915(c) WAIVER REDESIGN 2019 Brain Injury Summit
Lead Service Line Replacement: Regulatory Perspective
City Council Public Hearing August 16, 2010
Trihalomethanes Removal Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. © 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this presentation may be copied, reproduced, or otherwise utilized without permission.

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. © 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this presentation may be copied, reproduced, or otherwise utilized without permission. NARUC Conference Washington, DC February 2013

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Overview Lead-Copper Rule Nitrogenous DBPs Carcinogenic VOCs Summary

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Lead and Copper Rule

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Long Term LCR Proposed Revisions Proposed rule available ~August 2013 Potential changes to the rule —Sample site collection criteria and sampling procedures for lead and copper tap monitoring —Corrosion control treatment and water quality parameter monitoring requirements —Lead service line replacement requirements —Sampling in schools and child care facilities —Consecutive system requirements —Potentially outdated requirements, rule relevancy, and simplicity for systems

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Long Term LCR Proposed Revisions Potential changes to the rule (contd.) —Require Tier 1 samples to be taken from lead service line rather than 50% lead services and 50% copper solder —Changes to lead service line replacement requirements and follow up sampling —Alternative in home sampling schemes ▪Sample from lead service line, random daytime sample, profile sampling —If Action Level exceeded, system must re-optimize —Redefine “optimized” based solely on Pb and Cu corrosion control —More stringent Water Quality Parameters or phosphate addition as benchmark for effective optimization —Additional sampling and separate sites for copper

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Reduction of Lead in Drinking Water Act Amends SDWA Section 1417 – Prohibition on Use and Introduction into Commerce of Lead Pipes, Solder and Flux Effective January 4, 2014 Key Revisions: —Creates exemptions for products that are used exclusively for non- potable services —Changes the definition of “lead-free” from 8% to a weighted average of not more than 0.25% in the wetted surface material (primarily affects brass/bronze) —Establishes requirement for calculating wetted surface area lead content Next Steps: —Revise 40 CFR section on lead free as part of the LT-LCR revisions —Guidance for how to comply available in LT-LCR revisions

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Ongoing Research Projects Evaluation of Lead Service Line Lining and Coating Technologies (2014) Impact of Galvanic Corrosion on Lead Release Following Partial Lead Service Line Replacement (2013) Non-Intrusive Methodology for Assessing Lead and Copper Corrosion (2013) Assessing Risk of Lead and Copper Consumption from Drinking Water (2013) Lead and Copper Rule Revision Data Gaps Analysis (2013)

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Projects Completed in 2012 and Other Available Resources Is NSF 61 Relevant for Chloraminating Utilities? Lead (IV) Oxide Formation and Stability in Drinking Water Distribution Systems Lead and Copper Rule and Distribution System Corrosion: An Overview of Foundation Research

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NDMA and Other Nitrosamines

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. What Do We Know? Nitrosamines are known carcinogens Causes: —Chloramine —Amine-based polymers and anion exchange resins —Wastewater Impact Widespread occurrence of NDMA

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. EPA’s Decision Environment ― Be a rule ― Proposal will be completed in ≤2 years ― Rule will be based almost exclusively on what is known about NDMA Considerations ― EPA has publicly committed to regulating “nitrosamines” ― There is widespread occurrence of NDMA ― NDMA is a recognized DBP that is nominally carcinogenic; therefore, an MCLG of zero is the policy objective A positive regulatory determination is likely If a positive determination is made, then there will almost certainly: “Policy Discussion Around Regulation of Nitrosamines” Webcast (9/5/2012)

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. In terms of timeline, there are several considerations Multi-year Research Agenda Third round of Regulatory Determinations will occur in 2013 A proposed EPA regulation will occur at the earliest in 2015 —Need to understand limits of treatability and understand cost consequences A final EPA regulation will not be until 2017 —Need to be able to really understand precursors and treatment options at a high level of detail Compliance will not be required until 2020 —Need to have a cohesive package of products that allow water systems to make treatment choices and begin construction in 2018

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Focus Area Objective Develop information on occurrence, precursors, formation, treatment and control, and fate of nitrosamines in distribution systems  Inform regulators  Assist utility compliance with pending regulations

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Objectives 1.Investigate the contribution of source water quality, treatment processes, and distribution system operations to the total pool of nitrosamine precursors 2.Develop control strategies to prevent or minimize the formation of nitrosamines from source to tap 3.Identify unintended consequences and cost of compliance

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Ongoing Projects Investigating Coagulant Aid Alternatives to PolyDADMAC Nitrosamine Occurrence Survey Controlling the Formation of Nitrosamines During Water Treatment Seasonal Patterns of NDMA Precursors in Water Sources and Their Removal at Drinking Water Treatment Plants

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Related WaterRF Research Anion Exchange Resins as a Source of Nitrosamines and Nitrosamine Precursors Development and Application of a Total Nitrosamine Assay for Disinfected Waters

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Recent Developments EPA still working on the third round of regulatory determinations Formation of nitrosamines is being used as an argument against the use of chloramines

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Carcinogenic VOCs

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Background on cVOC Rule March 2010 – EPA Administrator Jackson released Drinking Water Strategy —Regulate groups as opposed to one-at-a time February 2011 – Jackson announced cVOCs would be the first group to be regulated —Listed 8 regulated VOCs and up to 8 unregulated Fall 2013 – Proposed cVOC Rule Fall 2015 – Final cVOC Rule

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Carcinogenic VOCs (2/11 list) Regulated – Benzene – Carbon tetrachloride – 1,2-dichloroethane – 1,2-dichloropropane – Dichloromethane – Trichloroethylene (TCE) – Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) – Vinyl chloride Unregulated (CCL3) – Aniline – Benzyl chloride – 1,3-butadiene – 1,2,3-trichloropropane (TCP) – 1,1-dichloroethane – Nitrobenzene – Methyl-oxirane – Propylene glycol – Urethane

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Main Issues Analytical Methods —How many methods might work for the proposed cVOC Rule? —Which method works for which VOC? —More than one method? —How low could these methods go from a practical perspective? Treatment —How many treatment technologies might work for the proposed cVOC Rule? —Which treatment works for which VOC? —More than one treatment? —Treatment in series? —How low could these treatment technologies go from a practical perspective? —What are the costs (capital and O&M)?

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Focus Area Objectives Develop a comprehensive research agenda to 1.Assess effectiveness of analytical methods 2.Address occurrence and co-occurrence of VOCs 3.Evaluate treatment for removing VOCs and reliability of technologies 4.Develop cost information for VOC treatment.

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Related Research Removal of VOCs from Drinking Water via Low- Profile Aeration Technologies GAC-Rapid Small Scale Column Test (RSSCT) at Low Concentrations of VOCs Predicting the Impact of Competing Contaminants on GAC Breakthrough at Low Levels VOCs Development of New Innovative Technologies for cVOC Removal

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Summary Several water regulations are planned Compliance will require: —Increased capital expenditures —Increased operational costs Utility costs will increase, while water use is declining

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. That’s all folks

© 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. © 2013 Water Research Foundation. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this presentation may be copied, reproduced, or otherwise utilized without permission. THANK YOU Rob Renner Executive Director