Teppei Katori, Indiana University1 PRD74(2006)105009 Global 3 parameter Lorentz Violation model for neutrino oscillation with MiniBooNE Teppei Katori,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P Spring 2003 L7Richard Kass Neutral Kaons and CP violation Since CP is not conserved in neutral kaon decay it makes more sense to use mass (or lifetime)
Advertisements

1 3+2 Neutrino Phenomenology and Studies at MiniBooNE PHENO 2007 Symposium May 7-9, 2007 U. Wisconsin, Madison Georgia Karagiorgi, Columbia University.
The classically conformal B-L extended standard model Yuta Orikasa Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
Status of Neutrino Science Hitoshi Murayama LBNLnu April 11, 2003.
Lorentz Violation and an Experimental Limit Ben Rybolt 12/10/2012.
G. Sullivan - Princeton - Mar 2002 What Have We Learned from Super-K? –Before Super-K –SK-I ( ) Atmospheric Solar –SNO & SK-I Active solar –SK.
Neutrino oscillations and non- standard neutrino-matter interactions (NSI) Cecilia Lunardini INT & UW department of Physics, Seattle A.Friedland, C.L.
Probing Majorana Neutrinos in Rare Meson Decays Claudio Dib UTFSM I.S. & B.K. Fest, UTFSM, May 2010 G. Cvetic, C.D., S.K. Kang, C.S. Kim, PRD 82, ,
P461 - particles VII1 Glashow-Weinberg-Salam Model EM and weak forces mix…or just EW force. Before mixing Bosons are massless: Group Boson Coupling Quantum.
LSND/MiniBooNE Follow-up Experiment with DAEdALUS W.C. Louis Los Alamos National Laboratory August 6, 2010.
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 2 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
Mass-varying neutrino oscillations Danny Marfatia University of Kansas with V. Barger and K. Whisnant (hep-ph/ )
Reactor & Accelerator Thanks to Bob McKeown for many of the slides.
June 11, 2007 Oral Examination Observation of CP Violation in Kaon Decays Igor Senderovich.
Aug 29-31, 2005M. Jezabek1 Generation of Quark and Lepton Masses in the Standard Model International WE Heraeus Summer School on Flavour Physics and CP.
A New Theory of Neutrino Oscillations Netta Engelhardt
P461 - particles VIII1 Neutrino Physics Three “active” neutrino flavors (from Z width measurements). Mass limit from beta decay Probably have non-zero.
States, operators and matrices Starting with the most basic form of the Schrödinger equation, and the wave function (  ): The state of a quantum mechanical.
Monday, Apr. 2, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #12, 13, 14 Monday, Apr. 2, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Local Gauge Invariance 2.U(1) Gauge.
Search for CP violation in  decays R. Stroynowski SMU Representing CLEO Collaboration.
Recent Results from Super-Kamiokande and Sudbury Neutrino Observatory R. D. McKeown California Institute of Technology January 17, 2004 IHEP Beijing.
Model building: “The simplest neutrino mass matrix” see Harrison and Scott: Phys. Lett. B594, 324 (2004), hep-ph/ , Phys. Lett. B557, 76 (2003).
Neutrino oscillation physics II Alberto Gago PUCP CTEQ-FERMILAB School 2012 Lima, Perú - PUCP.
Introduction to Flavor Physics in and beyond the Standard Model
Testing Relativity Theory With Neutrinos Brett Altschul University of South Carolina May 15, 2008.
L. R. Dai (Department of Physics, Liaoning Normal University) Z.Y. Zhang, Y.W. Yu (Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China) Nucleon-nucleon interaction.
February 23, 2005Neutrino Telescopes, Venice Comparing Solar and KamLAND Data Comparing Solar and KamLAND Data Carlos Pena Garay IAS, Princeton ~
Osamu Yasuda Tokyo Metropolitan University Model independent analysis of New Physics interactions and implications for long baseline experiments INTERNATIONAL.
06/05/2009Teppei Katori, MIT1 Teppei Katori Massachusetts Institute of Technology KEK seminar, June 05, 09 Test for Lorentz violation in the neutrino.
05/09/2011Teppei Katori, MIT1 Teppei Katori Massachusetts Institute of Technology Phenomenology 2011 symposium (Pheno11), Madison, WI, May 9, 2011 Test.
Tests of Lorentz and CPT violation with Neutrinos Teppei Katori Massachusetts Institute of Technology ICHEP2012, Melbourne, Australia, July 10, /10/12Teppei.
Gravitational Experiments and Lorentz Violation Jay D. Tasson V. Alan Kostelecký Indiana University TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual.
Influence of Lorentz violation on the hydrogen spectrum Manoel M. Ferreira Jr (UFMA- Federal University of Maranhão - Brazil) Colaborators: Fernando M.
Sterile Neutrino Oscillations and CP-Violation Implications for MiniBooNE NuFact’07 Okayama, Japan Georgia Karagiorgi, Columbia University August 10, 2007.
1 Neutrino Phenomenology Boris Kayser Scottish Summer School August 11,
Neutrino oscillation physics Alberto Gago PUCP CTEQ-FERMILAB School 2012 Lima, Perú - PUCP.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
Neutrino mass and DM direct detection Daijiro Suematsu (Kanazawa Univ.) Erice Sept., 2013 Based on the collaboration with S.Kashiwase PRD86 (2012)
Impact of Neutrino Oscillation Measurements on Theory Hitoshi Murayama NuFact 03 June 10, 2003.
A Letter of Intent to Build a MiniBooNE Near Detector: BooNE W.C. Louis & G.B. Mills, FNAL PAC, November 13, 2009 Louis BooNE Physics Goals MiniBooNE Appearance.
Hirophysics.com PATRICK ABLES. Hirophysics.com PART 1 TIME DILATION: GPS, Relativity, and other applications.
1 Neutrino Physics 2 Pedro Ochoa May 22 nd What about solar neutrinos and the solar neutrino problem? KamLAND uses the entire Japanese nuclear.

1 Luca Stanco, INFN-Padova (for the OPERA collaboration) Search for sterile neutrinos at Long-BL The present scenario and the “sterile” issue at 1 eV mass.
March 7, 2005Benasque Neutrinos Theory Neutrinos Theory Carlos Pena Garay IAS, Princeton ~
Kam-Biu Luk 28 Nov, 2003 Neutrino at Daya Bay Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkely National Laboratory.
CPT and Lorentz violation as signatures for Planck-scale physics Discrete08.
Future neutrino oscillation experiments J.J. Gómez-Cadenas U. Valencia/KEK Original results presented in this talk based on work done in collaboration.
Neutrino states in oscillation experiments – are they pure or mixd? Pheno 07, May, 07-09, 2007, Madison, Wisconsin Marek Zralek, Univ. of Silesia.
Tests of Lorentz and CPT Violation with Neutrinos Teppei Katori Queen Mary University of London NExT meeting, University of Southampton, UK, Nov. 27, 2013.
THE CONNECTION BETWEEN NEUTRINO EXPERIMENTS AND LEPTOGENESIS Alicia Broncano Berrocal MPI.
Neutrino physics: The future Gabriela Barenboim TAU04.
1-2 Mass Degeneration in the Leptonic Sector Hiroyuki ISHIDA (Tohoku University) Collaboration with : Takeshi ARAKI (MISC) Ref ; T. Araki and H.I. arXiv.
1 A.Zalewska, Epiphany 2006 Introduction Agnieszka Zalewska Epiphany Conference on Neutrinos and Dark Matter, Epiphany Conference on Neutrinos.
R. Tayloe, Indiana University CPT '07 1 Neutrino Oscillations and and Lorentz Violation Results from MiniBooNE Outline: - LSND - signal for oscillations.
and what we unsuccessfully tried to explain (so far)
Teppei Katori Queen Mary University of London
Pontecorvo’s idea An introductory course on neutrino physics (IV)
Classically conformal B-L extended Standard Model
Sterile Neutrinos and WDM
Impact of sterile neutrinos on long baseline experiments
Handout 9 : The Weak Interaction and V-A
Neutrino oscillations with the T2K experiment
What is the GROUND STATE?
Spontaneous Lorentz-Symmetry Breaking in Gravity
Neutrino diffraction : finite-size correction to Fermi’s golden rule k
Neutrino oscillation physics
Future neutrino experiments
Neutral Kaons and CP violation
Presentation transcript:

Teppei Katori, Indiana University1 PRD74(2006) Global 3 parameter Lorentz Violation model for neutrino oscillation with MiniBooNE Teppei Katori, V. Alan Kostelecky, and Rex Tayloe Indiana University Pheno'08, Madison, Apr. 28, 08

Teppei Katori, Indiana University2 PRD74(2006) Global 3 parameter Lorentz Violation model for neutrino oscillation with MiniBooNE Teppei Katori, V. Alan Kostelecky, and Rex Tayloe Indiana University Pheno'08, Madison, Apr. 28, 08

Teppei Katori, Indiana University3 PRD74(2006) Global 3 parameter Lorentz Violation model for neutrino oscillation with MiniBooNE 1. Neutrino oscillation - A natural interferometer 2. Tandem model 3. Tandem model oscillation signals 3.1 Solar neutrinos 3.2 Atmospheric neutrinos 3.3 Reactor neutrinos 3.4 LSND neutrinos and prediction for MiniBooNE 4. Global fit with MiniBooNE data 5. Conclusion

Teppei Katori, Indiana University4 1. Neutrino oscillation - A natural interferometer 2. Tandem model 3. Tandem model oscillation signals 3.1 Solar neutrino 3.2 Atmospheric neutrino 3.3 Reactor neutrino 3.4 LSND neutrinos and prediction for MiniBooNE 4. Global fit with MiniBooNE data 5. Conclusion

09/19/2007Teppei Katori, Indiana University5   1. Neutrino oscillation - A natural interferometer Neutrino oscillation is an interference experiment (cf. double slit experiment) - If 2 neutrino Hamiltonian eigenstates, 1 and 2, have different phase rotation, they cause quantum interference.

09/19/2007Teppei Katori, Indiana University6  1 2 U  UeUe 2 1  1. Neutrino oscillation - A natural interferometer Neutrino oscillation is an interference experiment (cf. double slit experiment) - If 2 neutrino Hamiltonian eigenstates, 1 and 2, have different phase rotation, they cause quantum interference. e e U  UeUe

09/19/2007Teppei Katori, Indiana University7  1 2 U  UeUe  1. Neutrino oscillation - A natural interferometer Neutrino oscillation is an interference experiment (cf. double slit experiment) - If 2 neutrino Hamiltonian eigenstates, 1 and 2, have different phase rotation, they cause quantum interference. - If 1 and 2, have different coupling with space-time properties (i.e. Lorentz violating field), interference fringe (oscillation pattern) depend on their couplings - The measured scale of neutrino eigenvalue difference is comparable the target scale of Lorentz violation (< GeV). 1 2 e e U  UeUe

Teppei Katori, Indiana University8 1. Neutrino oscillation - A natural interferometer 2. Tandem model 3. Tandem model oscillation signals 3.1 Solar neutrinos 3.2 Atmospheric neutrinos 3.3 Reactor neutrinos 3.4 LSND neutrinos and prediction for MiniBooNE 4. Global fit with MiniBooNE data 5. Conclusion

Teppei Katori, Indiana University9 Standard Hamiltonian (7 free parameters) 2. Standard massive neutrino model

Teppei Katori, Indiana University10 2 mass differences and 2 mixing angles are sufficient to describe al known phenomena of neutrino oscillation. 2. Standard massive neutrino model Standard Hamiltonian (4 free parameters)

Teppei Katori, Indiana University11 Lorentz and CPT violating Hamiltonian (18 free parameters for real rotation invariant model) Standard Model Extension (SME) is the minimum extension of Standard Model to include Particle Lorentz and CPT violation. It has all possible type of Lorentz and CPT violating tensors in the Lagrangian. Kostelecky and Mewes, PRD,69(2004)016005;70(2004) Standard Model Extension (SME) for neutrino oscillations

Teppei Katori, Indiana University12 Lorentz and CPT violating Hamiltonian (18 free parameters for real rotation invariant model) 2. Standard Model Extension (SME) for neutrino oscillations Lorentz violating coefficients (CPT-even) Lorentz and CPT violating coefficients (CPT-odd) Kostelecky and Mewes, PRD,69(2004)016005;70(2004)076002

Teppei Katori, Indiana University13 Lorentz and CPT violating Hamiltonian (3 free parameters for real rotation invariant model) 2. Tandem model Numerical parameter search shows 3 parameters model reasonably works to describe all 4 classes of known neutrino oscillation data (solar, atmospheric, reactor, and LSND signals). TK, Kostelecky and Tayloe, PRD74(2006)105009

Teppei Katori, Indiana University14 1. Neutrino oscillation - A natural interferometer 2. Tandem model 3. Tandem model oscillation signals 3.1 Solar neutrinos 3.2 Atmospheric neutrinos 3.3 Reactor neutrinos 3.4 LSND neutrinos and prediction for MiniBooNE 4. Global fit with MiniBooNE data 5. Conclusions

Teppei Katori, Indiana University Solar neutrinos Solar neutrino suppression is created by the energy dependences of mixing angles. So even long base line limit has energy dependence for neutrino oscillation. Since Lorentz violating terms are bigger than solar matter potential, this model doesn't use MSW effect. Barger et al., PLB,617(2005)78 Solar neutrino data Theoretical signals (no experimental smearing)

Teppei Katori, Indiana University16 1. Neutrino oscillation - A natural interferometer 2. Tandem model 3. Tandem model oscillation signals 3.1 Solar neutrinos 3.2 Atmospheric neutrinos 3.3 Reactor neutrinos 3.4 LSND neutrinos and prediction for MiniBooNE 4. Global fit with MiniBooNE data 5. Conclusions

Teppei Katori, Indiana University Atmospheric neutrinos Although model has CPT-odd term, there is no difference for neutrinos and anti- neutrinos oscillation at high energy region (consistent with MINOS). PRL,94(2005) Super-Kamiokande data PRD,73(2006) Theoretical signals (no experimental smearing) High energy neutrino oscillation is identical with standard maximum  -   oscillation.

Teppei Katori, Indiana University18 1. Neutrino oscillation - A natural interferometer 2. Tandem model 3. Tandem model oscillation signals 3.1 Solar neutrinos 3.2 Atmospheric neutrinos 3.3 Reactor neutrinos 3.4 LSND neutrinos and prediction for MiniBooNE 4. Global fit with MiniBooNE data 5. Conclusions

Teppei Katori, Indiana University Reactor neutrinos KamLAND neutrino oscillation is created by the combination of all oscillation channels. PRL,94(2005) KamLAND data Theoretical signals (no experimental smearing) All e oscillation amplitudes go to zero at high energy limit (>100MeV), so this model predicts null signal for NOvA and T2K.

Teppei Katori, Indiana University20 1. Neutrino oscillation - A natural interferometer 2. Tandem model 3. Tandem model oscillation signals 3.1 Solar neutrinos 3.2 Atmospheric neutrinos 3.3 Reactor neutrinos 3.4 LSND neutrinos and prediction for MiniBooNE 4. Global fit with MiniBooNE data 5. Conclusions

Teppei Katori, Indiana University21 LSND signal is created by small, yet non zero amplitudes around MeV region. The tandem model predicts; (1) factor 3 smaller appearance signal for KARMEN than LSND (2) small (~0.1%), but non zero appearance signal for LSND (3) factor 3 large appearance signal for OscSNS than LSND (4) Large signal at MiniBooNE low energy region with energy dependence. Theoretical signals (no experimental smearing) 3.4 LSND neutrinos and MiniBooNE prediction

Teppei Katori, Indiana University22 1. Neutrino oscillation - A natural interferometer 2. Tandem model 3. Tandem model oscillation signals 3.1 Solar neutrinos 3.2 Atmospheric neutrinos 3.3 Reactor neutrinos 3.4 LSND neutrinos and prediction for MiniBooNE 4. Global fit with MiniBooNE data 5. Conclusions

Teppei Katori, Indiana University23 MiniBooNE didn't see the oscillation signal in the region where signal is expected from LSND motivated massive neutrino model. However MiniBooNE observed interesting excess of events at low energy region. 4 MiniBooNE low energy excess Excluded region Any 2 neutrino massive models fit with this excess. Is this signal predicted by Tandem model? PRL,98(2007) MiniBooNE e candidate data

Teppei Katori, Indiana University24 We used MiniBooNE public database We did a quick survey in the parameter space to maximize MiniBooNE signal without breaking other oscillation signals. 4 MiniBooNE low energy excess Ongoing...but... It is difficult to enhance MiniBooNE low E signal without breaking other oscillation signal. The extension of the model is required? data with all errors predicted total events predicted backgrounds predicted signals Preliminary Tandem model prediction events/MeV

Teppei Katori, Indiana University25 5. Conclusions Reactor Atmospheric solar LSND Tandem model Lorentz and CPT violation is a predicted phenomenon from Planck scale physics. The tandem model reasonably describes the existing all 4 classes of neutrino oscillation data (solar, atmospheric, KamLAND, and LSND) using only 3 parameters. Tandem model predicts MiniBooNE low E excess, and fitting is ongoing Quantitative predictions are offered for OscSNS, NOvA, and T2K. Thank you for your attention! MiniBooNE

Teppei Katori, Indiana University26 Backup

09/19/2007Teppei Katori, Indiana University27 The neutrino weak eigenstate is described by neutrino Hamiltonian eigenstates, 1, 2, and 3 and Hamiltonian mixing matrix elements. The time evolution of neutrino weak eigenstate is written by Hamiltonian mixing matrix elements and eigenvalues of 1, 2, and 3. Then the transition probability from weak eigenstate  to e is (assuming everything is real) This formula is model independent 1. Neutrino oscillation - A natural interferometer

Teppei Katori, Indiana University28 2. Tandem model (1) Analytical solution of cubic equation (Ferro-Cardano solution) We used 2 independent methods to diagonalize our Hamiltonian. The solutions come from same Hamiltonian but different method should be same.

Teppei Katori, Indiana University29 2. Tandem model (2) Numerical matrix diagonalization (Jacobi method) These 2 methods are independent algorithms, and important check for the diagonalization of the Hamiltonian.

Teppei Katori, Indiana University30 3. Tandem model Mixing angles are energy dependent now, and the model creates maximum e  -  mixing at low energy and maximum   -  mixing at high energy regions. maximum e  -   mixing by  12 maximum   -   mixing by  12 KamLAND Atmospheric Middle energy region is responsible for LSND and solar. But it has a complicated energy dependences, and only understandable by numerical calculation (see next). High ELow E Mixing angles of Hamiltonian

Teppei Katori, Indiana University Global signal predictions neutrino disappearance anti-neutrino disappearance neutrino appearance anti-neutrino appearance disappearance signals P>10% appearance signals P>0.1%

Teppei Katori, Indiana University Motivation aa aa aa SSB PRD,39(1989)683 In a field theory, spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB) occurs when symmetries of the Lagrangian are not respected by the ground state of the theory In string theory, there is a possibility that some Lorentz tensor fields acquire a nonzero vacuum expectation value (spontaneous Lorentz symmetry breaking)

Teppei Katori, Indiana University Motivation Universe might be polarized! The polarization of vacuum is the source of Particle Lorentz violation. The signature of Lorentz violation is sidereal time variation of physics observables in a fixed coordinate system. (Today's talk is nothing about sidereal variation).

Teppei Katori, Indiana University Standard Model Extension (SME) SME parameters PRD,55(1997)6760;58(1998) SME is the minimum extension of Standard Model to include Particle Lorentz and CPT violation. It has all possible type of Lorentz and CPT violating tensors in the Lagrangian. Modified Dirac Equation

Teppei Katori, Indiana University Standard Model Extension (SME) SME parameters PRD,55(1997)6760;58(1998) SME is the minimum extension of Standard Model to include Particle Lorentz and CPT violation. It has all possible type of Lorentz and CPT violating tensors in the Lagrangian. Modified Dirac Equation Lorentz and CPT violating coefficients (CPT-odd) Lorentz violating coefficients (CPT-even)

Teppei Katori, Indiana University SME for neutrino oscillation Effective Hamiltonian (minimal SME) Rotation invariant form (no sidereal dependence) Real hermitian matrix expression (18 free parameters) PRD,69(2004)016005;70(2004) CPT-odd CPT-even

Teppei Katori, Indiana University L-E plane Criteria for alternative model may be; (1) based on quantum field theory (2) renormalisable (3) acceptable description of data (4) mass is < 0.1eV for seesaw compatibility (5) less than equal 4 parameters (6) Lorentz violation is < ~ (M z / M Planck ) (7) has LSND signal

Teppei Katori, Indiana University L-E plane The solution of global 3- parameter model using Lorentz violation (tandem model). In fact, energy dependence of the amplitudes are also important. This model can reproduce all data with acceptable values. Neutrino behavior in the tandem model

Teppei Katori, Indiana University L-E plane Solution is different for neutrino and anti-neutrino due to CPT- odd terms. Although there is CPT violation, in tandem model, sometimes there is no difference between neutrinos and anti-neutrinos. Anti-neutrino behavior in the tandem model