Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) based Emergency Alerts using the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) draft-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea-02.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary Introduction The protocols developed by ITU-T E-Health protocol Architecture of e-Health X.th1 X.th2 to X.th6 Common Alerting Protocol Conclusion.
Advertisements

Anguilla British Overseas Territory Population: 13,477 (2006 est.) 102 square km 26 km x 5 km.
After Action Report & Improvement Plan (AAR/IP) Elizabeth Jane Tangwall Office of Emergency Preparedness.
TOPIC : MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions ) By: Cecilia Gomes COSC 541,DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS & NETWORKS Instructor: Prof. Anvari (SEU)
Presenter: Norm Paulsen Date: May 2, 2012 Session: 8 Weather Alerts in Canada.
Spring 2012: CS419 Computer Security Vinod Ganapathy SSL, etc.
Copyright © 2014 American Water Works Association Water Sector Approach to Process Control System Security.
Rev Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) v. 1.0 Emergency Management Technical Committee.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum INFOD Use Case Scenario OGF22, Boston, MA, USA
Session 131 Hazard Mapping and Modeling Supporting Emergency Response Operations using GIS and Modeling.
Community Emergency Response Team. What is CERT? Community Emergency Response Teams (CERTs) are formed by trained volunteers from a neighborhood or workplace.
Modeling Human Response to Threats and Disasters John H. Sorensen Oak Ridge National Laboratory May 29-30, 2003.
PPA 573 – Emergency Management and Homeland Security Lecture 4c – Planning, Training, and Exercising.
INTERNET and CODE OF CONDUCT
Voluntary Design Guidelines for Online Warnings Presented by Eliot Christian at the 2014 CAP Implementation Workshop Negombo, Sri Lanka 18 June 2014.
Network security policy: best practices
Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Event Package for the Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) B. Rosen, H. Schulzrinne, H. Tschofenig.
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies (ECRIT) Marc Linsner Roger Marshall IETF 92 - Dallas March 24, 2015.
Implementation of CAP in Hong Kong Observatory
Protecting your Employees and Securing your Mail Center.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency EPR-Public Communications L-011 Good Practices for PIOs.
HOMELAND SECURITY ADVISORY SYSTEM. Established after the terrorist attacks on America September 11, 2001.
Homeland Security Advisory System protectivemeasures vulnerability responseFederal departments and agencies would implement a corresponding set of protective.
OSHA Office of Training and Education 1 Hazard Communication.
INTRODUCTION TO LAW, PUBLIC SAFETY, CORRECTIONS AND SECURITY.
EARTO – working group on quality issues – 2 nd session Anneli Karttunen, Quality Manager VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland This presentation.
International Atomic Energy Agency THE “EMERGENCY CONVENTIONS” Interregional Training Course on Technical Requirements to Fulfil National Obligations in.
1 The DNA of Emergency Management. 2 Approaches to Disaster Planning Two types of planning u Emergency 0perations Plan u Emergency Support Function.
Requirements, Terminology and Framework for Exigent Communications H. Schulzrinne, S. Norreys, B. Rosen, H. Tschofenig.
Lessons Learned End to End CAP Alerting Systems WMO CAP Implementers Workshop Geneva, Switzerland Norm Paulsen Environment Canada April 24, 2013.
Lesson 3. Communicating In an Emergency
Environment, Health and Safety OARS Online Accident Reporting System A guide to the University of Calgary’s new web- based On-line Accident Reporting System.
OASIS Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards Presentation Title Appears Here Appears Here Appears Here Appears Here.
ACM 511 Introduction to Computer Networks. Computer Networks.
Bernards Township Office of Emergency Management February 28, 2012.
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies Marc Linsner Roger Marshall IETF 87 Berlin July 29, 2013.
Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies Marc Linsner Roger Marshall IETF 84 Vancouver July 31, 2012.
Innovative Trends in Providing Global Extreme Weather Warnings Jonathan Porter Vice President, Innovation & Development WMO CAP.
Presented February 21, 2006 at NOAA RSS, Podcast/Vodcast, Blog Workshop by Eliot Christian, United States Geological Survey Using RSS for Public Warnings.
ECEN “Internet Protocols and Modeling”, Spring 2012 Course Materials: Papers, Reference Texts: Bertsekas/Gallager, Stuber, Stallings, etc Class.
Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) v. 1.0 Emergency Management Technical Committee.
BYOD: Bring Your Own Device
OASIS Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards Emergency Management Presentation Guidelines.
1 © 2005 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Session Number Presentation_ID Cisco Public Cisco Unity Connection Notification Jane Rygg Core Services.
Networking Material taken mainly from HowStuffWorks.com.
Draft-rosen-ecrit-data-only-ea- 00.txt Brian Rosen Neustar (and NENA)
Omar Baddour Chief World Climate Data and Monitoring WMO, Geneva WMO Climate Watch System Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) Implementation.
1 Crisis Management and Communication Dr. Joy Smith and Ms. Robin Denny.
OASIS Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards Emergency Management Presentation Guidelines.
Week #8 OBJECTIVES Chapter #5. CHAPTER 5 Making Networks Work Two Networking Models –OSI OPEN SYSTEMS INTERCONNECTION PROPOSED BY ISO –INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS.
Harris County Case Study.  Aligning plans with emergency support functions (ESFs) can facilitate an efficient and effective response to emergencies.
Introduction to the Emergency Operations Center City of Santa Cruz 2011 EOC Training and Exercise.
OASIS Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards Introduction Slide Decks.
DHS/ODP OVERVIEW The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office for Domestic Preparedness (ODP) implements programs designed to enhance the preparedness.
Understanding the Value and Importance of Proper Data Documentation 5-1 At the conclusion of this module the participant will be able to List the seven.
(class #2) CLICK TO CONTINUE done by T Batchelor.
New Hanover County Schools Managing Crisis Events
2017 CAP Workshop Sept 20-21, 2017 Rome, Italy
INFOD Use Case Scenario
THE OSI MODEL By: Omari Dasent.
Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) v. 1.0
Implementation of CAP in Hong Kong Observatory
Chapter 6: Distributed Applications
Training Appendix for Adult Protective Services and Employment Supports June 2018.
Common Alerting Protocol (CAP)
Implementation of CAP in Hong Kong Observatory
DMIS Tools Course Lesson 3 - Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) Alerts
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
THE PWSD PROGRAMME.
Presentation transcript:

Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) based Emergency Alerts using the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) draft-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea-02

Status Marc stated WGLC on draft-ietf-ecrit-data- only-ea-01.txt Martin Thomson, James Winterbottom, Marc Linsner, Shida Schubert, and Bernard Aboba provided feedback. In the subsequent mailing list discussions we ran into two issues.

Issue #1: CAP Usage for Data Only Emergency Calls Data-only emergency alerts are similar to regular emergency calls since they require emergency call routing functionality and may even have the same location requirements. On the other hand, the initial communication interaction will not lead to the establishment of a voice or video channel. draft-ietf-ecrit-data-only-ea uses CAP to convey data about the emergency call. – Does CAP provide anything useful that INVITE with Call-Info with Additional Data doesn't provide? – Keep in mind that we are using CAP outside it’s originally attended purpose.

S T14:57:00-07:00 Actual Alert Private abc1234 Security BURGLARY Expected Likely Moderate SENSOR 1 SENSOR-DATA-NAMESPACE1 123 SENSOR-DATA-NAMESPACE2 TRUE Alert Example

Object Model

"alert" Element and Sub-elements : The identifier of the alert message : The identifier of the sender of the alert message : The time and date of the origination of the alert message : The code denoting the appropriate handling of the alert message. Code Values: – “Actual” - Actionable by all targeted recipients – “Exercise”- Actionable only by designated exercise participants; exercise identifier should appear in – “System” - For messages that support alert network internal functions. – “Test” - Technical testing only, all recipients disregard – “Draft” – A preliminary template or draft, not actionable in its current form. : The code denoting the nature of the alert message. Code Values: – “Alert” - Initial information requiring attention by targeted recipients – “Update” - Updates and supercedes the earlier message(s) identified in – “Cancel” - Cancels the earlier message(s) identified in – “Ack” - Acknowledges receipt and acceptance of the message(s)) identified in – “Error” indicates rejection of the message(s) identified in ; explanation SHOULD appear in

"alert" Element, cont. : The text identifying the source of the alert message. The particular source of this alert; e.g., an operator or a specific device. : The code denoting the intended distribution of the alert message. Code Values: – “Public” - For general dissemination to unrestricted audiences – “Restricted” - For dissemination only to users with a known operational requirement (see, below) – “Private” - For dissemination only to specified addresses (see, below) : The text describing the rule for limiting distribution of the restricted alert message : The group listing of intended recipients of the private alert message : The code denoting the special handling of the alert message : The text describing the purpose or significance of the alert message : The group listing identifying earlier message(s) referenced by the alert message : The group listing naming the referent incident(s) of the alert message

"info" Element and Sub-elements, : The code denoting the language of the info sub- element of the alert message : The code denoting the category of the subject event of the alert message. Code Values: – “Geo” - Geophysical (inc. landslide) – “Met” - Meteorological (inc. flood) – “Safety” - General emergency and public safety – “Security” - Law enforcement, military, homeland and local/private security – “Rescue” - Rescue and recovery – “Fire” - Fire suppression and rescue – “Health” - Medical and public health – “Env” - Pollution and other environmental – “Transport” - Public and private transportation – “Infra” - Utility, telecommunication, other non-transport infrastructure – “CBRNE” – Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear or High-Yield Explosive threat or attack – “Other” - Other events : The text denoting the type of the subject event of the alert message

"info" Element, cont. : The code denoting the type of action recommended for the target audience. Code Values: – “Shelter” – Take shelter in place or per – “Evacuate” – Relocate as instructed in the – “Prepare” – Make preparations per the – “Execute” – Execute a pre-planned activity identified in – “Monitor” – Attend to information sources as described in – “Assess” – Evaluate the information in this message. (This value SHOULD NOT be used in public warning applications.) – “None” – No action recommended : The code denoting the urgency of the subject event of the alert message. Code Values: – “Immediate” - Responsive action SHOULD be taken immediately – “Expected” - Responsive action SHOULD be taken soon (within next hour) – “Future” - Responsive action SHOULD be taken in the near future – “Past” - Responsive action is no longer required – “Unknown” - Urgency not known : The code denoting the severity of the subject event of the alert message. Code Values: – “Extreme” - Extraordinary threat to life or property – “Severe” - Significant threat to life or property – “Moderate” - Possible threat to life or property – “Minor” - Minimal threat to life or property “Unknown” / Severity unknown

"info" Element, cont. : The code denoting the certainty of the subject event of the alert message. Code Values: – “Observed” – Determined to have occurred or to be ongoing. – “Likely” - Likely (p > ~50%) – “Possible” - Possible but not likely (p <= ~50%) – “Unlikely” - Not expected to occur (p ~ 0) – “Unknown” - Certainty unknown : The text describing the intended audience of the alert message : A system- specific code identifying the event type of the alert message : The effective time of the information of the alert message : The expected time of the beginning of the subject event of the alert message : The expiry time of the information of the alert message : The text naming the originator of the alert message : The text headline of the alert message : The text describing the subject event of the alert message : The text describing the recommended action to be taken by recipients of the alert message : The identifier of the hyperlink associating additional information with the alert message : The text describing the contact for follow-up and confirmation of the alert message : A system- specific additional parameter associated with the alert message

"resource" Element and Sub-elements : The text describing the type and content of the resource file. The human-readable text describing the content and kind, such as “map” or “photo,” of the resource file. : The identifier of the MIME content type and sub-type describing the resource file : The integer indicating the size of the resource file : The identifier of the hyperlink for the resource file : The base-64 encoded data content of the resource file : The code representing the digital digest (“hash”) computed from the resource file

"area" Element and Sub-elements : The text describing the affected area of the alert message using various location shapes – Civic location: geocode – Geodetic Location: circle, polygon, altitude

Issue #2: Messaging Is INVITE the only message it can be attached to? – Current draft version allows CAP payload to be attached to various messages. How to communicate an error (if the recipient does not support certain functionality)? – Current draft re-uses concepts from SIP Location Conveyance draft.