IAEA EMRAS Biota working group Future (suggested) plans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 PROTECT: Numerical Benchmarks Workshop, May 2008 Update of UNSCEAR 1996 Presented To: Workshop on Numerical Benchmarks for Protecting Biota Against Radiation.
Advertisements

Centre for Ecology & Hydrology – Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
Integrated Assessment Working group or coordinated activity?
Numerical benchmarks: proposed levels and underlying reasoning
The Need for Requirements and Guidance for Protection of Biota: Basis for DOE’s Biota Dose Limits and Guidance Biota Dose Assessment Committee Meeting.
Use of reference biospheres to prove long-term safety of repositories for radioactive waste Workshop, Berlin, August 2008.
PROTECTFP PROTECT: First Proposed Levels for Environmental Protection against Radioactive Substances Definitions, Derivation Methods to Determine.
Biota Modelling Group WG Leader: Nick Beresford Participants: Participants: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czech Rep., France, Korea, Norway, Russia, Spain,
Wildlife transfer handbook WG leader: Brenda Howard.
PROTECT FP CEH SSI IRSN NRPA (+ UMB) EA Protection of the Environment from Ionising Radiation in a Regulatory Context.
PROTECTFP Radioprotection of the environment in France: IRSN current views and workplan K. Beaugelin-Seiller, IRSN Vienna IC, June 2007.
The UK Approach - the Initial Radiological Assessment Methodology Laura Newsome Scientist – Environment Agency September 2009.
First Technical Meeting on EMRAS II new working group on “Reference approaches to modelling for regulatory compliance for legacy site management”
IAEA EMRAS II : background and introduction. Environmental Modelling for RAdiation Safety (EMRAS II) General aim of programme To improve capabilities.
Tamara Yankovich Division of Transport Radiation and Waste Safety
Experiences from testing the ERICA Integrated Approach Case study application of the ERICA Tool and D-ERICA.
Some conclusions of the ADAPT project Development of a practical methodology requires intensive interaction with partners Policy relevancy of both the.
MIRD Pamphlet No. 21: A Generalized Schema for Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry—Standardization of Nomenclature 5/15/2009.
11 April th International High-Energy Physics Technical Safety Forum 1 Radiation Protection and Safety in High-Energy Physics Kenneth R. Kase, Ph.D.
IAEA plans with respect to environmental protection EC PROTECT Workshop Oslo, Norway, 28–30 January 2008.
EFFECTS WORKING GROUP Tom Hinton; IRSN; France Dose – Effect Modelling to assist Risk Assessments Mathematical Derivation of Screening Level Values / Protection.
Supported by the European Commission, contract number: Fission , and the Research.
Water Management System - WMS What is the Water Management System? The Water Management System is a computer system designed to support the water resource.
 The IAEA EMRAS programme has compared predictions of various models, to each other and to site data.  Model-model intercomparison showed considerable.
ToR of GEOSAF2 WG on Operational Safety Review of WG2.
EMRAS Biota Working Group – Main findings. IAEA EMRAS Biota Working Group Regular participants: Belgium - SCK·CEN; Canada – AECL; France – IRSN; Japan.
Working Group 1 Reference and Graded Approaches for Assessing the Impact of Radioactive Discharges.
GEOSAF-Meeting F. Boissier, S. Voinis, S. Barlow Operational Safety- IGSC Expert Group on Operational Safety (EG-OS) DMR/DIR/ May 2014, Vienna.
Safety Assessment Methodologies and Implementation of Monitoring and Control Programmes Dr. Japie van Blerk AquiSim Consulting (Pty) Ltd Wednesday, 24.
Supported by the European Commission, contract number: Fission , and the Research.
First Technical Meeting on EMRAS II - proposal for a new working group / sub group Astrid Liland and Malgorzata Sneve, Norwegian Radiation.
TREE project, Challenges and Future Updates Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Roger Seitz Addressing Future Human Actions for Safety Assessment Summary from CSM on Human Action And Intrusion.
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: Kazakhstan.
Water Management System – WMS (2007) What is the Water Management System? The Water Management System is a computer system designed to support the water.
AMAP - An international cooperation in far northern conditions Yuri Tsaturov - Roshydromet & Morten Sickel – Norwegian Radiation Protection.
BIOPROTA Biosphere modelling for waste repositories This presentation Objectives Participation and management What it has done and publications Projects.
CRITICAL PATHWAY ANALYSIS FOR RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT CONTROL AND ASSESSMENT Riaz Akber
Working Group 1 Reference models for waste disposal.
RER/9/111: Establishing a Sustainable National Regulatory Infrastructure for Nuclear and Radiation Safety TCEU School of Drafting Regulations November.
PROTECTFP PROTECT recommendations – application in practice.
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: Bulgaria.
Regulatory Approach to Radioactive Waste Management and Remediation in Central Asia Tamara Zhunussova Vienna, IAEA, 6-8 November, 2012.
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations General Principles and Types of Events Prolonged (Chronic) Radiation Exposure Lecture IAEA Post.
56th Regular Session of the IAEA General Conference
SAFRAN Upgraded to support the implementation of the Borehole Disposal Concept Rodolfo Avila, Facilia AB.
Regulation of Discharges of Nuclear Facilities in Ukraine Iurii Bonchuk Radiation Protection Institute Kiev, Ukraine EMRAS II - Reference.
Nick Beresford & David Copplestone Centre for Ecology & Hydrology - Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP BIOTA PROTECTION Stephen L. Domotor (202)
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
The master's program specialty Hygiene In Grodno State Medical University Head of the Department of General Hygiene and Ecology, Secretary of.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency The Activities of the IAEA to Improve the Management of NORM G. Proehl, R. Edge, S. Guy, D. Louvat J. Rowat Division.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency TM Technical Meeting to Discuss Human Intrusion and Future Human Actions in relation to Disposal of Radioactive.
PROTECTFP Recommendations of Work Package 1 David Copplestone.
THE RADIATION SAFETY IN A “DAILY LIFE” Introduction Volodymyr Berkovskyy.
Fernand VERMEERSCH October 20, 2013 Abu Dhabi Capital Grand Hotel ICRP main commission session discussion with organisations in formal relations with ICRP.
1 Assessment of previous ORE evaluation by comparison with 3D exposure analysis. Analysis of the main difference contributors and optimisation of the calculation.
Comparison of MCNP and ERICA results in two different marine areas
Development of Methodology for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Decommissioning Waste Management Scenarios Decommissioning costing in relation to the waste.
RER/9/111: Establishing a Sustainable National Regulatory Infrastructure for Nuclear and Radiation Safety TCEU School of Drafting Regulations
Earl Fordham, Deputy Director, Office of Radiation Protection
Ruth E. McBurney, CHP CRCPD NCRP
Safety of Radioactive Waste Management in Uzbekistan
The IAEA Safety Standards
Plenary Meeting of the Network on  Environmental 
Comparison of Performance Indicators of Different Types of Reactors Based on the ISOE Data H. Janžekovič, M. Križman.
Introduction: IAEA activities / Documents on human intrusion
Addressing Future Human Actions for Safety Assessment
SAFRAN Upgraded to support the implementation of the Borehole Disposal Concept Rodolfo Avila, Facilia AB.
Presentation for TRANSSC 20 meeting – June 2010
Presentation transcript:

IAEA EMRAS Biota working group Future (suggested) plans

Potential areas of interest ICRP interaction New scenarios Methodology Improving parameter values Link to wider ‘EMRAS II’

ICRP Committee 4 discussions Comparison and doses to humans and biota planned in PROTECT (BWG participation)

New scenarios Will consider in next 6 months –Focused on current issues (planned and existing exposures) –Likely to included less studied radionuclides Two initial proposals –U mining (link with NORM group – available scenario?) –Radioactive waste disposal

Methodology Interface environments (eg estuaries) Different situations (eg paddy fields) Variability –Parameter distributions in approaches and how they are used Radioecological sensitivity – does this need to be considered for biota??

Improving parameter values Transfer CR values –Sub task group within BWG –Core group plus invited extras with relevant data –Interaction with ICRP/IUR Effects information (link with UNSCEAR activities) –Quality / Quantity of data –Use of ecological population modelling? Possibly adapting current models to move from individuals to populations