Rural Education Achievement Program(REAP) and Rural and Low-Income Schools Grant(RLIS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INTENT OF FUNDS. INTENT OF TITLE I A Title I Director salary and benefits Title I Administrative Assistant/Secretary salary and benefits Teachers Educational.
Advertisements

New Title I/NCLB Directors Workshop NCLB Winter Conference January 16, 2007 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon, Title.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Newport News Public Schools First Step Preschool Program
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Benefits for Private School Students and Teachers from Federal Education Programs Office of Non-Public Education Office of Innovation and Improvement U.S.
Title I A Requirements under NCLB Public Law Office of Federal Programs September 2014 Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Maximizing Resources Under the No Child Left Behind Act Region VII Comprehensive Center The University of Oklahoma David Gray.
1 Supplemental Educational Services Office of Elementary and Secondary Education June 2002.
TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February
 Census Data  Non-Census Data  State per-pupil expenditures  Amount appropriated  Hold-harmless guarantee  School Improvement allocations.
REAP Districts Have Flexibility NCLB Strategist Training Spring 2006.
The Future for Rural Schools Mary Kusler Assistant Director, Government Relations American Association of School Administrators June 30, 2007 Rewriting.
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) as reauthorized by The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) Benefits to Private School Students and Teachers.
Uses and Budgeting of Title I, II, III and VI Funds January 13, 2010 Bambi Perrigin and Edmund Moore.
BO MERRITT DIRECTOR OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Federal Grants Planning Titles I, II, & III.
Section 1113 of NCLB, Title I Eligible School Attendance Areas (Does not apply to LEAs with fewer than 1,000 children)
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)
Partnering with Parents in using Federal Programs for Quality Education for all Students Parent Summit 02/21/2014 SAISD Federal Programs Dept. Barbara.
2012 Title I Annual Parent Meeting 1. Let’s learn about Title I Title I is the largest federal assistance program for our nation’s schools. 2.
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY SEPTEMBER 18, 2012 Immigrant and Youth Funds Under Title III.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
Local Applications, Flexibility, Transferability Charles LovettJohn Bailey February 2002.
1 Virginia Department of Education Title I, Part A and The Community Eligibility Provision Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Virginia Department of Education Division Leadership Liaison Meeting January 7, 2013.
ESEA APPLICATION TRAINING 2013 Equitable Participation Rules for Title I Private School Students Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 1.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
New Flexibility Provisions under NCLB Charles Lovett US Department of Education ARCHIVED INFORMATION.
MIS DATA CONFERENCE 2012 JULY 23, 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.
Title II, Part A Improving Teacher and Principal Quality.
Consolidation of Funds in Schoolwide Programs FY15 Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.
TITLE I, PART A ESEA ROLLOUT SPRING 2013 Version Title I, Part A Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
NDTAC Jeopardy True or False?. $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Coordinating Nonpublic School Services Jack Clark Allentown City School District Cindy Rhoads Regional Coordinator, DFP.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Federal Programs and the ESEA Flexibility Waiver Titles I, II, VI and X.
WELCOME Title I School-wide Open House EWING PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Title I Annual Parent Meeting. 2 Let’s learn about Title I Title I is the largest federal assistance program for our nation’s schools.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
McKenzie Special School District No Child Left Behind Parent Advisory Committee Fall 2009.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Private Nonprofit School Participation.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Board of Elementary and Secondary Education March 22, 2016.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): A Briefing for Alaska Lee Posey State-Federal Relations Division National Conference of State Legislatures.
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
FUNDING LEGISLATION FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL. CONTRIBUTIONS TO EDUCATION- 07/08 vs. 08/09  8%- Federal funds  State funds07/08  43%- State funds07/08.
Title I and Title II Funds Private School Expenditures.
No Child Left Behind Application Title VI, Part B, Subpart 2 Virginia Department of Education March 2011.
New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Title I, Part A & Title III, Part A Changes Under ESSA New Jersey Department of Education The Office of Supplemental.
Partnering with Parents in using Federal Programs for Quality Education for all Students Federal Programs Department Parent Summit March 10, 2016.
EDL 525 Week 4 Learning Team NCLB Title Overview To purchase this material click below link 525/EDL-525-Week-4-Learning-Team-
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
Elementary and Secondary Education Act
Private School Consultation
Private School Consultation
Long Branch Public Schools Title I Presentation
WVDE Office of Federal Programs
Illinois State Board of Education Public Nonpublic Conference
Consolidation of Funds for Title I Schoolwide Schools Initiative
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Rural Education Achievement Program
Federal Programs Public Hearing
NSTA Summer Congress July, 2002
ESSA Updates for Title V, Part B, Subpart 2
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Title II Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals Ismail Ardahanli.
Presentation transcript:

Rural Education Achievement Program(REAP) and Rural and Low-Income Schools Grant(RLIS)

What is the purpose of the Rural Education Achievement Program? To assist rural school districts in using Federal funds more effectively to improve the quality of instruction and student academic achievement. REAP consists of two separate programs – the Small Rural School Achievement (SRSA) Program (Project 588) and the Rural and Low- Income Schools (RLIS) Program (Project 587).

What is the legislative authority for REAP? REAP is authorized under Title VI, Part B of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.

What is the Small Rural School Achievement Program (SRSA)? The SRSA program is a rural school initiative with two components – 1) The SRSA Grant Program Eligibility is determined by the US Department of Education and funds are allocated directly to eligible LEAs. (Project 588) (See Section 6212 of the ESEA.) 2) REAP-Flex – the Alternative Uses of Funds Authority REAP-Flex (Project 586) provides eligible LEAs with greater flexibility in using the formula grant funds that they receive under certain State-administered Federal programs. REAP Flex is not a grant program; it does not provide LEAs with funding. Rather, it gives them greater latitude in spending funds that they receive under other Federal programs so that they can better address their particular needs. (See Section 6211 of the ESEA.)

To be eligible for an SRSA grant and to make use of the REAP-Flex authority, an LEA must be both “Small and Rural” 1.To be SMALL, an LEA must: a.Have a total average daily attendance (ADA) of less than 600 students, or b.Serve only schools that are located in counties that have a population density of fewer than 10 persons per square mile 2.To be RURAL, an LEA must: a.Serve only schools that have an NCES school locale code of 7 or 8 (assigned by the US Department of Education’s National Center for Education Statistics) or b.Be located in an area of the State defined as rural by a governmental agency of the State.

Updated Census Data: Impact on REAP Locale Codes Following each Decennial Census, the Census Bureau recalibrates population estimates that are used to determine the metro-centric locale codes used for REAP eligibility. Items that would affect REAP locale codes include changes in: Population estimates Metropolitan area and principal city boundaries Urban and rural boundaries As a result, there may be some shifts in locale codes.

SRSA Locale Code 7 Rural, Outside Any incorporated place, Census-designated place, or non-place territory not within a metropolitan Core Based Statistical Area (CBSA) or within a micropolitan CBSA and defined as rural by the Census Bureau. Metropolitan CBSA Area Rural LEA Outside CBSA Area

SRSA Locale Code 8, Rural Inside Any incorporated place, Census-designated place, or non-place territory within a metropolitan CBSA and defined as rural by the Census Bureau. Metropolitan CBSA Area Rural LEA Inside CSBA Area

State Approved Definition of Rural A rural local education agency is one which is located within an incorporated or unincorporated place which has a district resident population of less than 2,500, or has a population center less than 1,000 persons, and is characterized by sparse, widespread populations.

When is the State’s Rural Designation Applied? If an LEA with a locale code other than 7 or 8 (and otherwise meets the ADA or population density requirement), it is eligible for the SRSA program only if it is located in an area of the State that is defined as rural by a governmental agency of the State and the US Department of Education accepts the State’s rural designation.

Applicable Funding An LEA may use applicable funding to exercise its REAP Flex authority. This includes all funds allocated by formula to an eligible LEA under the following programs: 1.Title II, Part A of (Improving Teacher Quality); 2.Title II, Part D of (Educational Technology); 3.Title IV, Part A of (Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities); and 4.Title V, Part A of (Innovative Programs).

For what purposes may an LEA with REAP Flex Authority use its applicable funding? An LEA may use its applicable funding for activities authorized under one or more of the following programs: 1.Title I, Part A of (Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged), Project 511, 2.Title II, Part A of (Improving Teacher Quality), Project 541, 3.Title II, Part D of (Educational Technology), Project 548 & 548, 4.Title III (Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient and Immigrant Students), Project 571 and 572, 5.Title IV, Part A of (Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities), Project 551, 6.Title IV, Part B of (21st Century Community Learning Centers), Project 550, and 7.Title V, Part A of (Innovative Programs), Project 556.

Set-Aside Requirements

REAP-Flex vs Transferability An LEA that is REAP-Flex eligible cannot transfer funds to Title I, Part A. Why? Transferability increases the allocation of the receiving program and is subject to all of the rules and set-aside requirements of the receiving program.

What is the Rural and Low-Income Schools Program? The Rural and Low-Income Schools (RLIS) program is an initiative that provides grant funds to rural LEAs that serve concentrations of children from low- income families. An LEA may use RLIS funds to support a range of authorized activities in order to assist the LEA in meeting its State’s definition of Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs).

What LEAs are eligible to receive funds under the RLIS program? An LEA is eligible for an allocation under the RLIS program if – 1.20 percent or more of the children age 5 to 17 served by the LEA are from families with incomes below the poverty line; 2.all schools served by the LEA have a school locale code of 6, 7, or 8 (assigned by the US Department of Education’s National Center for Education Statistics) and 3.the LEA is not eligible to participate in the SRSA program.

RLIS Locale Codes LEA Locale Code - 6 Small Town An incorporated place or Census-designated place with a population less than 25,000 and greater than or equal to 2,500 and located outside a metropolitan Core Based Statistical Area (CBSA) or inside a micropolitan CBSA. LEA Locale Code - 7 Rural, Outside Any incorporated place, Census-designated place, or non-place territory not within a metropolitan CBSA or within a micropolitan CBSA and defined as rural by the Census Bureau. LEA Locale Code – 8 Rural, Inside Any incorporated place, Census-designated place, or non-place territory within a metropolitan CBSA and defined as rural by the Census Bureau.

How does the US Department of Education allocate RLIS funds to States?  The US Department of Education allocates RLIS funds to States by formula. The amount of funding a State receives is based on the total average daily attendance of all LEAs eligible to participate in the RLIS program.  In FY2014, $3,165,586 was allocated to 134 eligible LEAs. Allocation amounts ranged from $9,386 to $71,487.

For what purposes may an LEA use its RLIS funds? An LEA may use RLIS funds for: 1.Title I, Part A, activities including Parental involvement, 2.Title II, Part A, Teacher recruitment and retention, including the use of signing bonuses and other financial incentives; teacher professional development, including programs that train teachers to use technology to improve teaching and to train teachers of students with special needs, 3.Title II, Part D, Educational technology activities, including software and hardware, 4.Title III, Part A, (Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient and Immigrant Children and Youth) activities, and 5.Title IV, Part A, Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities State Grants program Activities.

Set-Aside Requirements The set-aside requirement of equitable participation of private school students and teachers does not apply to funds allocated under the RLIS grant program.

Take Away Notes Purpose REAP/RLIS is to Assist Rural and Small Schools Eligibility Requirements o SRSA/REAP-Must be Small and Rural o SRSA/REAP- Has set-aside for an equitable share for private school students and teachers o RLIS-Must have 20 percent or more children that are from families with incomes below the poverty line o RLIS – Does not require an equitable share for private school students and teachers Uses of Funds o Allow greater latitude for LEAs to better address their particular needs

RESOURCES A list of all LEAs that are eligible for the Small Rural School Achievement Program (SRSA) for Fiscal Year 2015 by state can be found at: ty.html ty.html Guidance on the Rural Education Achievement Program (REAP) can be found on the overview tab of the NCLB Consolidated Application link in the Grants Management System.

CONTACTS For technical assistance, contact your assigned Program Specialist or Grant Associate in the Federal Programs office at (405)

Questions????