The Future for Rural Schools Mary Kusler Assistant Director, Government Relations American Association of School Administrators June 30, 2007 Rewriting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INTENT OF FUNDS. INTENT OF TITLE I A Title I Director salary and benefits Title I Administrative Assistant/Secretary salary and benefits Teachers Educational.
Advertisements

New Title I/NCLB Directors Workshop NCLB Winter Conference January 16, 2007 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development Margaret MacKinnon, Title.
Benefits for Private School Students and Teachers from Federal Education Programs Office of Non-Public Education Office of Innovation and Improvement U.S.
Title I A Requirements under NCLB Public Law Office of Federal Programs September 2014 Oklahoma State Department of Education.
No Child Left Behind The Federal Education Law and Science Education May, 2004.
Maximizing Resources Under the No Child Left Behind Act Region VII Comprehensive Center The University of Oklahoma David Gray.
Introduction to Title I October 23, No Child Left Behind (NCLB) January 2001 Re-authorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)
1 Shelton School District Title Programs Gail Straus, Assistant Director, Special Services.
ALLOCATION OF FUNDS Presented By: Kelly Gallatin Federal Funds Manager.
ALLOCATION OF FUNDS Presented By: Kelly Gallatin Federal Funds Manager.
 Census Data  Non-Census Data  State per-pupil expenditures  Amount appropriated  Hold-harmless guarantee  School Improvement allocations.
REAP Districts Have Flexibility NCLB Strategist Training Spring 2006.
Rural Education Achievement Program(REAP) and Rural and Low-Income Schools Grant(RLIS)
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) as reauthorized by The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) Benefits to Private School Students and Teachers.
The Special Education Leadership Training Project January, 2003 Mary Lynn Boscardin, Ph.D. Associate Professor Preston C. Green, III, Ed.D., J.D., Associate.
Selecting Title I Schools and Allocating Funds June 2014.
BO MERRITT DIRECTOR OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Federal Grants Planning Titles I, II, & III.
Title IA Eligible Attendance Areas Title IA Online Training
Calculating Your Per Pupil Expenditure (PPE )….. General Selection Requirements 1.An LEA must rank all of its schools (from which the LEA draws its children)
ARRA and Education Reform What the Stimulus can tell Us about ESEA Reauthorization Mary Kusler American Association of School Administrators September.
Elementary and Secondary Education (ESEA) Law NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND.
Brief History of Education Reform A Move to Promote Equity and Equality.
Noelle Ellerson Sasha Pudelski AASA: The School Superintendents Association July 8, 2013.
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant. It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Council of State Science Supervisors Secretary’s Math and Science Initiative NCLB M/S Partnerships Philadelphia, PA March, 2003 Presented by: Triangle.
What is Title 1? O It is a federal formula grant. O It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Selecting Title I schools and allocating funds June 2015.
No Child Left Behind Math and Science Partnerships Title II Part B.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Federal Education Update Mary Kusler Asst. Director, Advocacy & Policy American Association of School Administrators April 22, 2009.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
New Flexibility Provisions under NCLB Charles Lovett US Department of Education ARCHIVED INFORMATION.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE Consolidated Federal and State Grants Application (CFSGA)
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant. It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Charter School Finance School Business Alexis Schauss, Director October 2015.
Federal Programs and the ESEA Flexibility Waiver Titles I, II, VI and X.
Title I, Part A Program Title I, Part A provides educational services to schools with high percentages of children from low-income families by providing.
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant. It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
What is Title 1? O It is a federal formula grant. O It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
What is Title 1? O It is a federal formula grant. O It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant. It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
NCLB. Introduction Increased federal mandates and requirements on states Increased federal funding to states by almost 25% from the previous year Movement.
1 Schoolwide Accounting John Dunn Director of Financial Review Title II A Conference March 5, 2008 Georgia Department of Education Kathy Cox, Superintendent.
Consequences of Rejecting of Federal Funding October 25, 2006 Presented by: Dr. Paul Johnson Dr. Robert Howell Glenn Gustafson.
McKenzie Special School District No Child Left Behind Parent Advisory Committee Fall 2009.
US Government Mrs. Lacks ON THE ISSUES: EDUCATION.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): A Briefing for Alaska Lee Posey State-Federal Relations Division National Conference of State Legislatures.
ESSA Impact on Health & Physical Education. Inclusion in ESSA Well-rounded education definition – along with 17 other subjects…. – Title I – Title II.
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant. It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
No Child Left Behind Application Title VI, Part B, Subpart 2 Virginia Department of Education March 2011.
Roundtable Discussion: Definition of Rural for After School Programs.
School-wide Consolidation: LEA Panel
Simple Solution. Brighter Futures.
Winding Your Way through Program Details: Titles II-A & VI
Shelton School District
Selecting Title I schools and allocating funds
Brand Message.
Rural Education Achievement Program
No Child Left Behind.
Rural Definitions Rural Fringe: ≤ 5 miles from an urbanized area, or
Selecting Title I schools and allocating funds
Rural Education Achievement Program
Selecting Title I schools and allocating funds
NSTA Summer Congress July, 2002
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
LAUSD Consolidated Application Part II
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant.
Selecting Title I schools and allocating funds
Presentation transcript:

The Future for Rural Schools Mary Kusler Assistant Director, Government Relations American Association of School Administrators June 30, 2007 Rewriting the Rural Education Achievement Program

2 Rural Education Achievement Program (REAP) Part one, the Small and Rural Schools Achievement Program, is targeted to provide additional funding and flexibility to small rural school districts. Part two, the Rural and Low-income Schools program, provides additional funding for poor rural school districts.

3 Who is Eligible for the Small & Rural Schools Achievement Program? Eligible districts have an ADA of 600 or fewer or the county in which the district resides has fewer than 10 people per square mile. AND Defined as rural by the US Department of Education. Rural for USED means having a local code of 7 or 8.

4 Who is Eligible for the Rural and Low-Income School Program? Eligible districts have a census poverty count of 20% or more. AND Have US Department of Education Locale code of 6, 7 or 8. Locale code 6 translates to a small town.

5 What is a Johnson Locale Code? Currently…. This Census coding system is based on both the proximity to metropolitan areas and on population size and density. Codes are assigned based on the addresses of the individual schools and are assigned at the school level. Ranges from 1 (urban) to 8 (rural) Imperfect measure for rural schools.

6 What are the New Locale Codes? Based on a school’s proximity to an urbanized area. Broken down into city, suburban, town and rural If 50% of the district is within one locale code, that is how the district is coded. If no single locale code accounts for 50% of the students, then the category with the greatest % of students determines the locale.

7 New Locale Codes 31 - Town, Fringe: –Territory inside an urban cluster that is less than or equal to 10 miles from an urbanized area Town, Distant: –Territory inside an urban cluster that is more than 10 miles and less than or equal to 35 miles from an urbanized area Town, Remote: –Territory inside an urban cluster that is more than 35 miles from an urbanized area Rural, Fringe: –Census-defined rural territory that is less than or equal to 5 miles from an urbanized area, as well as rural territory that is less than or equal to 2.5 miles from an urban cluster Rural, Distant: –Census-defined rural territory that is more than 5 miles but less than or equal to 25 miles from an urbanized area, as well as rural territory that is more than 2.5 miles but less than or equal to 10 miles from an urban cluster Rural, Remote: –Census-defined rural territory that is more than 25 miles from an urbanized area and is also more than 10 miles from an urban cluster.

8 States Participating in Rural Education Achievement Program

9 How Does Subpart One Work? Can co-mingle funds from Titles II (Teacher & Technology), IV (Safe & Drug Free) and V (Innovative Block Grant) Can spend them in Titles I, II, III (Bilingual and Emergency Immigrant), IV (added 21 st Century Grant) or V.

10 How does the formula work? Provides a supplemental grant with a min. of $20,000 to max. of $60,000. Formula $20,000 for first 50 students plus $100 for each additional student up to $60,000. Subtract allocations in Titles II (Teacher & Technology), IV (Safe & Drug Free) and V (Innovative Block Grant)

11 A Formula Example Mar Lee School District, MI –ADA 289 students $20,000 (50) + $23,900 (239) = $43,900 Title II, Part A (Teacher): $13,715 Title II, Part D (Ed Tech): $385 Title IV (S&DF): $1,196 Title V (In Blk Gnt): $64 –Total federal formula funds: $15,360 $43,900 - $15,360 = $28,540 new funds !

12 The formula problem – FY 2003 Sheridan County School District #3, WY –ADA 103 students $20,000 (50) + $5,300 (53) = $25,300 Title II, Part A (Teacher): $12,723 Title II, Part D (Ed Tech): $1,480 Title IV (S&DF): $1,862 Title V (In Blk Gnt): $3,105 –Total federal formula funds: $19,170 $25,300 - $19,170 = $6,130 grant

13 The formula problem – FY 2005 Sheridan County School District #3, WY –A–ADA 100 students $20,000 (50) + $5,300 (50) = $25,000 Title II, Part A (Teacher): $128,144 Title II, Part D (Ed Tech): $11,349 Title IV (S&DF): $1,862 Title V (In Blk Gnt): $6,700 –T–Total federal formula funds: $148,055 $25,000 - $148,055 = -$123,055 over max. grant

14 With Money, Comes Accountability After receiving the SRSA for 3 years, districts are expected to meet adequate yearly progress (AYP.) If the district does not meet AYP, they will still receive REAP funding but it must be used for school improvement purposes. DoE will not give $$ to districts who consistently do not meet AYP. Applicable to upcoming funding year.

15 Rural & Low-income School Program Program was developed by states that have county-wide districts that include rural areas, but also benefits larger rural districts. Program is administered and dollars flow through the state. State distributes the funding to the eligible districts.

16 State choices for distribution On a competitive basis According to a formula based on the number of students According to a formula that more highly targets the dollars to needy districts –Pre-approved by US Dept. of Ed

17 Uses for new funding… Teacher recruitment/ retention Teacher professional development Educational technology (software too!) Parental involvement activities Safe and Drug Free Schools Title I, Part A Bilingual and Emergency Immigrant (Title III)

18 Funding for REAP REAP is currently funded at $168.9 million. It has been level funded for several years. As title formula dollars are going down, the need for REAP dollars increases. We need to push for more funding.

19 Reauthorization of REAP Some changes need to be made to improve REAP in the coming reauthorization. Specifically, a number of districts are no longer receiving a financial benefit from the program despite qualifying. –Allow districts to choose which program to apply under. –Raise the sliding scale from $20,000 - $60,000 to $25,000 - $70,000. For the Rural & Low-income program, use free and reduced lunch instead of census. Update Locale codes.

20 REAP for the 2007 – 2008 School Year Eligibility spreadsheets are up on the US Department of Education website: ndex.html ndex.html –If you have received REAP in the past and are eligible again this year you do not have to reapply. Rural and Low-income program will continue to work through the state. We need to push for increased funding for REAP!

21 Be sure to share your ideas… American Association of School Administrators Mary Kusler Asst. Director of Government Relations American Association of School Administrators 801 N. Quincy Street, Suite 700 Arlington, VA (703)