Service Learning Academic aTtainment Evaluation Conducted for the CalServe Initiative By Sasha Neumann.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Advertisements

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
Simpson County Schools: New Teacher Support Program A Proposal.
The Anatomy of Systemic Support for Immersion Programs.
Teacher Evaluation Model
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Debbie C. Hester Austin ISD July 9 & 11, 2012 Texas Turnaround Center.
Beginning Teacher Support Program Peer Review Process Training for Charter Schools June 2013.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Parental Involvement Requirements A Focused Look at Compliance Spring 2009.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Measuring the Power of Learning.™ California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Using Formative Assessment and the Digital Library.
How can school districts support the development of healthy school communities? Facilitated by: Rhonda Patton, Alberta Health Services Dr. Steve Manske,
WELCOME! Get an agenda Get an agenda Take your child’s folder from the correct grade level box. Folders are in alphabetical order Take your child’s folder.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Program Assessment Training September 29, Learning Objectives By participating in this session, you will develop a better understanding of: how.
NCATE Standards for Professional Development Schools Doug MacIsaac Stetson University Cynthia Hutchinson University of Central Florida.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Math and Science Partnership Program Approaches to State Longitudinal Evaluation March 21, 2011 San Francisco MSP Regional Meeting Patty O’Driscoll Public.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Training Goals ► To define “Educational Benefit” ► To learn a process for reviewing your district’s IEPs.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR)
Building NSTA’s Future… Strategy 2010 Presented by: Dr. Francis Eberle, Dr. Christine Royce, Dr. Pat Shane, Mrs. Jean Tushie, and Dr. Jerry Valadez Tuesday,
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Science Instructional Guide For High School Integrated Coordinated Science Biology and Chemistry Professional Development Module 1 Introduction to the.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
PARENT & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT GRACIELA AVILA DIVISION OF INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT OFFICE OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT, ACCOUNTABILITY AND COMPLIANCE.
Oregon Department of Education March 10, 2005 Video Conference Title ID Subpart 2 Formal Agreements with Facilities to Provide Academic Programs.
Leading Learning in a School & District Dr. Brad Balch, Indiana State University Mrs. Leslie Ballard, AdvancED Indiana
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
2013.  Familiarize staff with parent involvement requirements  Learn process to involve parents in the development of activities and policies  Learn.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
Consortium for Educational Research and Evaluation– North Carolina Building LEA and Regional Professional Development Capacity First Annual Evaluation.
July 11, 2013 DDM Technical Assistance and Networking Session.
Welcoming, caring, respectful, and safe learning and working environments and student code of conduct A presentation for EIPS leadership, COSC, EIPS staff,
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
A Productive Partnership
Home Base Partnership Team
Start with the Science & Technology Standards (2002, 2008?)
School Title I Stakeholder Meeting
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Continuous Assessment Establishing Checkpoints
Presentation transcript:

Service Learning Academic aTtainment Evaluation Conducted for the CalServe Initiative By Sasha Neumann

 Identify the roles and expectations of partnership coordinator (or designee) in SLATE process  Review results of prior studies  Define the purpose of the SLATE process  Outline the procedures for SLATE process  Provide reflection ideas for SLATE process

 Provides data to one of six key areas for evaluation, Section 2 – High quality service learning.  Documentation of high quality service learning  Assess student proficiency on two content standards

 LEA School Boards  CalServe Partnership Coordinators  Service learning site advocates  Other key stakeholders and decision makers  Teachers better understand how high quality service-learning helps their students’ achieve content standards and  Increases student engagement  Provides evidence consistent with national research

 “These projects make a difference in the students’ lives.”  “I have had the opportunity to see the powerful effects service learning has had on my students...”  “Thankful for an opportunity to explicitly look at my own professional development as a service-learning practitioner.”

 CalServe funded Partnerships  Partnerships identify at least 3 teachers, preferably one per grade span  CalServe Regions  STEM Projects representing various regions

 Regional Evaluation Facilitators (REFs)  Partnership Coordinators  Local Evaluator

 Webinar  Teacher recruitment  Pre-flection with SL Quality Checkup Tool  Teacher Identification Form  Student Tracking Form  Reflection with SL Quality Checkup Tool  SLATE survey

Partnership Coordinator (or designee)  Recruits SLATE teachers January/February  Works with SLATE teachers to complete TIF  Reviews and submits TIF to REF - February 4  Works with SLATE teachers to complete STF  Assists SLATE teachers in completing SLATE survey  Reviews and submits STF & SLATE survey to REF – May 6

 Recruit and excite teachers  Recognize successful projects and invite participation  Share “Teacher Benefits” comments  Conduct interviews (pre-flection) SL Check Up Tool; ensure progress towards high quality service learning  Complete Teacher Identification Form  SLATE teachers TIF to Partnership Coordinator (or designee)

 All teaching & projects aligned to standards  California State Content Standards that most directly align with the service-learning activity California State Content Standards  Standards most important to school and LEA  Use district benchmarks  Use standards from district wide assessments  Focus on two content standards

 Assumed all teachers collect data for standards achievement through assessing students  Meet & dialogue with SLATE teachers  Identify assessments being used  Discuss potential of comparison to district wide data  Discuss what defines proficient and non-proficient

 Identify 2 Standards  Report whether students achieved proficiency (1) or not (0).  Track how many days project spanned (discuss this as a group so teachers include all days)  Record student attendance data  Double check each others Student Tracking Forms for accuracy  SLATE teachers STF to Partnership Coordinator (or designee)

 Find time to meet as a team with SLATE teachers.  Bring completed STFs  Conduct SL Check Up Tool via dyad interview  Complete SLATE survey on PDF  SLATE teacher s SLATE survey to Partnership Coordinator

 Teacher reflections from surveys  Perspectives on evaluation make a difference  Encourage curiosity and promote insights  Use data to promote team reflection  Provide time for teachers to share successes  Celebration activities