M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Zhengyou Zhang Vision Technology Group Microsoft Research
Advertisements

EEG/MEG source reconstruction in SPM5
Bayesian inference Lee Harrison York Neuroimaging Centre 01 / 05 / 2009.
EEG-MEG source reconstruction
EEG/MEG Source Localisation
The General Linear Model Christophe Phillips Cyclotron Research Centre University of Liège, Belgium SPM Short Course London, May 2011.
VBM Voxel-based morphometry
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND SOURCE LOCALISATION
COMP Robotics: An Introduction
HW/Tutorial Week #10 WWWR Chapters 27, ID Chapter 14 Tutorial #10 WWWR # 27.6 & To be discussed on March 31, By either volunteer or class list.
Inversion of coupled groundwater flow and heat transfer M. Bücker 1, V.Rath 2 & A. Wolf 1 1 Scientific Computing, 2 Applied Geophysics Bommerholz ,
BIOP – Center for Biomedical Optics and New Laser Systems Light scattering from a single particle Peter E. Andersen Optics and Fluid Dynamics Dept. Risø.
MEG/EEG Inverse problem and solutions In a Bayesian Framework EEG/MEG SPM course, Bruxelles, 2011 Jérémie Mattout Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre ? ?
From Neuronal activity to EEG/MEG signals
Computer vision: models, learning and inference
Uncertainty Representation. Gaussian Distribution variance Standard deviation.
The M/EEG inverse problem
Chapter 1 Introduction The solutions of engineering problems can be obtained using analytical methods or numerical methods. Analytical differentiation.
METO 621 Lesson 13. Separation of the radiation field into orders of scattering If the source function is known then we may integrate the radiative transfer.
Multi-Cluster, Mixed-Mode Computational Modeling of Human Head Conductivity Adnan Salman 1, Sergei Turovets 1, Allen Malony 1, and Vasily Volkov 1 NeuroInformatics.
The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Numerical Analysis ECIV 3306 Chapter 1 Mathematical Modeling.
Numerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equation
Source Localization for EEG/MEG Stavroula Kousta Martin Chadwick Methods for Dummies 2007.
Applications of Calculus. The logarithmic spiral of the Nautilus shell is a classical image used to depict the growth and change related to calculus.
Co-registration and Spatial Normalisation
The M/EEG inverse problem and solutions Gareth R. Barnes.
Numerical Methods Due to the increasing complexities encountered in the development of modern technology, analytical solutions usually are not available.
Geology 5640/6640 Introduction to Seismology 18 Feb 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Last time: Spherical Coordinates; Ray Theory Spherical coordinates express vector.
Lecture 4: Boundary Value Problems
Introduction to Numerical Methods for ODEs and PDEs Methods of Approximation Lecture 3: finite differences Lecture 4: finite elements.
Source localization for EEG and MEG Methods for Dummies 2006 FIL Bahador Bahrami.
Source localization MfD 2010, 17th Feb 2010
SENSOR LEVEL ANALYSIS AND SOURCE LOCALISATION in M/EEG METHODS FOR DUMMIES Mrudul Bhatt & Wenjun Bai.
General Linear Model & Classical Inference London, SPM-M/EEG course May 2014 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium
Generative Models of M/EEG: Group inversion and MEG+EEG+fMRI multimodal integration Rik Henson (with much input from Karl Friston)
Coregistration and Spatial Normalisation
Background on Composite Property Estimation and Measurement
1 EEE 431 Computational Methods in Electrodynamics Lecture 4 By Dr. Rasime Uyguroglu
SOES6002: Modelling in Environmental and Earth System Science CSEM Lecture 1 Martin Sinha School of Ocean & Earth Science University of Southampton.
EEG/MEG Source Localisation SPM Course – Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging – Oct ? ? Jérémie Mattout, Christophe Phillips Jean Daunizeau Guillaume.
EEG/MEG source reconstruction
1 Reconstructing head models from photograph for individualized 3D-audio processing Matteo Dellepiane, Nico Pietroni, Nicolas Tsingos, Manuel Asselot,
二維反平面力學與穩態熱傳問題之 理論解析 編 號 : NSC E 執行期限: 97 年 08 月 01 日至 98 年 07 月 31 日 執行機構:南台科技大學機械系 主持人 :林 儒 禮 :
Source Estimation in EEG The forward and inverse problems Christophe Phillips, Ir, Dr Cyclotron Research Centre, University of Liège, Belgium.
A fast and precise peak finder V. Buzuloiu (University POLITEHNICA Bucuresti) Research Seminar, Fermi Lab November 2005.
Using Feed Forward NN for EEG Signal Classification Amin Fazel April 2006 Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering University of Missouri.
Introduction to CST MWS
The Islamic University of Gaza Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Numerical Analysis ECIV 3306 Introduction Course Outline.
Silesian University of Technology in Gliwice Inverse approach for identification of the shrinkage gap thermal resistance in continuous casting of metals.
Black Hole Universe Yoo, Chulmoon ( YITP) Hiroyuki Abe (Osaka City Univ.) Ken-ichi Nakao (Osaka City Univ.) Yohsuke Takamori (Osaka City Univ.) Note that.
EEG/MEG source reconstruction
Multimodal Brain Imaging Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College, London Guillaume Flandin, CEA, Paris Nelson Trujillo-Barreto, CNC,
Bayesian inference Lee Harrison York Neuroimaging Centre 23 / 10 / 2009.
CREWES 2003 Sponsors Meeting We’ve presented our research results and educational progress in geophysical exploration in partnership with the resource.
M/EEG: Statistical analysis and source localisation Expert: Vladimir Litvak Mathilde De Kerangal & Anne Löffler Methods for Dummies, March 2, 2016.
MEG Analysis in SPM Rik Henson (MRC CBU, Cambridge) Jeremie Mattout, Christophe Phillips, Stefan Kiebel, Olivier David, Vladimir Litvak,... & Karl Friston.
EEE 431 Computational Methods in Electrodynamics Lecture 2 By Rasime Uyguroglu.
General Linear Model & Classical Inference London, SPM-M/EEG course May 2016 Sven Bestmann, Sobell Department, Institute of Neurology, UCL
1 Jean Daunizeau Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging 23 / 10 / 2009 EEG-MEG source reconstruction.
Imaging Source Reconstruction in the Bayesian Framework
Finite Element Modelling of the dipole source in EEG
An Inverse Function.
Statistical Analysis of M/EEG Sensor- and Source-Level Data
General Linear Model & Classical Inference
M/EEG Statistical Analysis & Source Localization
Adnan Salman1 , Sergei Turovets1, Allen Malony1, and Vasily Volkov
Generative Models of M/EEG:
Statistical Analysis of M/EEG Sensor- and Source-Level Data
Dynamic Causal Modelling for M/EEG
M/EEG Statistical Analysis & Source Localization
Presentation transcript:

M/EEG forward problem & solutions Brussels 2011 SPM-M/EEG course January 2011 C. Phillips, Cyclotron Research Centre, ULg, Belgium

Forward Problem Inverse Problem Source localisation in M/EEG

Head anatomy Solution by Maxwell’s equations Head model : conductivity layout Source model : current dipole Forward problem

Ohm’s law : Continuity equation : Maxwell’s equations (1873)

From Maxwell’s equations find: where M are the measurements and f(.) depends on: signal recorded, EEG or MEG head model, i.e. conductivity layout adopted source location source orientation & amplitude Solving the forward problem

From Maxwell’s equations find: with f(.) as an analytical solution -highly symmetrical geometry, e.g. spheres, concentric spheres, etc. -homogeneous isotropic conductivity a numerical solution -more general (but still limited!) head model Solving the forward problem

Con’s: Human head is not spherical Conductivity is not homogeneous and isotropic. Analytical solution Example: 3 concentric spheres Pro’s: Simple model Exact mathematical solution Fast calculation

Overlapping spheres in MEG Better but…

Usually “Boundary Element Method” (BEM) : Concentric sub-volumes of homogeneous and isotropic conductivity, Estimate values on the interfaces. Numerical solution Pro’s: More exact head shape modelling Con’s: Mathematical approximations of solution  numerical errors Slow and intensive calculation

Features of forward solution Find forward solution (any) : with f(.) linear in non-linear in If source location is fixed, then

SPM solutions Source space & head model Template Cortical Surface (TCS), in MNI space. Canonical Cortical Surface (CCS) = TCS warped to subject’s anatomy Subject’s Cortical Surface (SCS) = extracted from subject’s own structural image (BrainVisa/FreeSurfer)

SPM solutions Jérémie Mattout, Richard N. Henson, and Karl J. Friston, 2007, Canonical Source Reconstruction for MEG

SPM solutions Source space & head model Template Cortical Surface (TCS), in MNI space. Canonical Cortical Surface (CCS) = TCS warped to subject’s anatomy Subject’s Cortical Surface (SCS) = extracted from subject’s own structural image (BrainVisa/FreeSurfer) Forward solutions: Single sphere Overlapping spheres Concentric spheres BEM … (new things get added to SPM & FieldTrip)

Solving the Forward Problem is not exciting but necessary… Solution depends on data at hand: MEG vs. EEG: single sphere or overlapping spheres vs. 3 concentric spheres or BEM Structural image available? CCS (good enough) or SCS (tedious work) vs. TCS (best proxy) Sensor location/head position available? Conclusions

Thank you for your attention