Aim 1: Silviculture and Ecophysiology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1st of 3 Part Training Series Christopher Woodall INTRODUCTION TO THE P2+ DOWN WOODY MATERIALS INDICATOR.
Advertisements

Effects of Land Use Change on Forest Carbon Budgets Throughout the Southern USA from 1900 to 2050 Peter B. Woodbury Crop and Soil Sciences Department,
Effects of Forest Thinning on CO 2 Efflux Peter Erb, Trisha Thoms, Jamie Shinn Biogeochemistry 2003: Block 1.
INFLUENCE OF INTENSIVE MANAGEMENT ON CANOPY TRANSPIRATION IN LOBLOLLY PINE Thomas A. Stokes, Lisa Samuelson, Greg Somers, and Tom Cooksey School of Forestry,
The C budget of Japan: Ecosystem Model (TsuBiMo) Y. YAMAGATA and G. ALEXANDROV Climate Change Research Project, National Institute for Environmental Studies,
Daniel Metcalfe Oxford University Centre for the Environment Comprehensive monitoring of carbon allocation and cycling across.
A MONASH UNIVERSITY PERSPECTIVE Musa Kilinc and Danielle Martin School of Geography and Environmental Science.
Forest Project Protocol v3.1 Use of FIA Data John Nickerson FIA Conference February 2010.
Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems Important Concerns: Potential greenhouse warming (CO 2, CH 4 ) and ecosystem interactions with climate Carbon management (e.g.,
Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in Southern Pine Forests Dr. Lisa Samuelson Alumni Professor, Dwain G. Luce Professor of Forestry School of Forestry.
School Research Conference, March 2009 Jennifer Wright Supervisors: M.Williams, G. Starr, R.Mitchell, M.Mencuccini Fire and Forest Ecosystems in the Southeastern.
Predicting Nitrogen Fertilizer Response in Douglas-fir Plantations Kim Littke Rob Harrison.
Assessing Douglas-fir water-use history using stable isotope ( 13 C and 18 O) in tree rings: principles and potential J. Renée Brooks Western Ecology Division,
Climate Change and Douglas-fir Dave Spittlehouse, Research Branch, BC Min. Forest and Range, Victoria.
Water use and water use efficiency in west coast Douglas-fir Paul Jassal, Andy Black, Bob Chen, Zoran Nesic, Praveena Krishnan and Dave Spittlehouse University.
Milankovitch Theory of Climate Change The Earth changes its: a)orbit (eccentricity), from ellipse to circle at 100,000 year cycles, b)wobble (precession),
Managing for Forest Carbon Storage. Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change.
Soil and vegetation components Ecophysiology Group - Mica Creek.
The Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Nutrient Cycling and Forest Productivity By: Eric Sucre.
Climate Change Impacts on Georgia’s Natural Resources Steven McNulty, Ph.D. Research Ecologist USDA Forest Service Raleigh, NC.
Forest Sensitivity to Elevated Atmospheric CO 2 and its Relevance to Carbon Management Richard J. Norby Oak Ridge National Laboratory Aspen Global Change.
Making sure we can handle the extremes! Carolyn Olson, Ph.D. 90 th Annual Outlook Forum February 20-21, 2014.
Effects of Forest Management on Carbon Flux and Storage Jiquan Chen, Randy Jensen, Qinglin Li, Rachel Henderson & Jianye Xu University of Toledo & Missouri.
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
What is PINEMAP?? Pine Integrated Network: Education, Mitigation, and Adaptation Project Pine Integrated Network: Education, Mitigation, and Adaptation.
Pine Integrated Network: Education, Mitigation, and Adaptation Project A NIFA-Funded Climate Change CAP Google Earth The Pine Integrated Network: Education,
Plant physiological responses to precipitation in the Amazon forest, an isotopic approach Universidade de São Paulo: Jean Pierre Ometto; Luiz Martinelli;
Nitrogen Use Efficiency Workshop Canopy Reflectance Signatures: Developing a Crop Need-Based Indicator for Sidedress Application of N Fertilizer to Canola.
Soil Nutrient Availability Following Application of Biosolids to Forests in Virginia. Eduardo C. Arellano and Thomas R. Fox Department of Forestry, Blacksburg,
Plant Ecology - Chapter 14 Ecosystem Processes. Ecosystem Ecology Focus on what regulates pools (quantities stored) and fluxes (flows) of materials and.
Fire Prevention as a GHG Mitigation Strategy Presented by Robert Beach, RTI International Brent Sohngen, The Ohio State University Presented at Forestry.
Field Measurement Networks D. Hollinger, E. LaPoint, R. Birdsey, L. Heath U.S. North American Carbon Program (NACP) Investigators Meeting, January 22-24,
Oregon State University (lead) University of Washington Northern Arizona UniversityUSFS Pacific Northwest Research Station University of ArizonaUSFS Rocky.
Project 2: Geospatial and Statistical Basis for Mine Soil Sampling for C Sequestration Accounting. Objectives: To determine the horizontal and vertical.
Summary of Research on Climate Change Feedbacks in the Arctic Erica Betts April 01, 2008.
A process-based, terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid v. 3.0) A. D. Friend, A.K. Stevens, R.G. Knox, M.G.R. Cannell. Ecological Modelling.
Why Establish an Ecosystem-Atmosphere Flux Measurement Network in India? Dennis Baldocchi ESPM/Ecosystem Science Div. University of California, Berkeley.
Guidance on Measurement Elaboration and Examples.
Modeling Forest Ecosystem Energy, Carbon and Water Fluxes: Impacts of Canopy Structure Conghe Song Department of Geography University of North Carolina.
Carbon Sequestration in Farm and Forest Ecosystems Sarah Hines April 2009
Delivering PINEMAP Outcomes Tim Martin Gary Peter Tom Fox Martha Monroe PINEMAP Annual Meeting Atlanta, GA, May 16, 2012.
Carbon Flux and Storage in Mixed Oak Forests of the Ozarks MDC Project Leader: Randy Jensen Principal Investigator: Jiquan Chen Team Members: Qinglin Li,
Improving the representation of large carbon pools in ecosystem models Mat Williams (Edinburgh University) John Grace (Edinburgh University) Andreas Heinemeyer.
The impacts of land mosaics and human activity on ecosystem productivity Jeanette Eckert.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Introduction: Globally, atmospheric concentrations of CO 2 are rising, and are expected to increase forest productivity and carbon storage. However, forest.
A New Effort to Study Intensively Managed Pine Plantations CAPPS - Consortium for Accelerated Pine Production Studies.
Predicting climate change impacts on southern pines productivity in SE United States using physiological process based model 3-PG Carlos A. Gonzalez-Benecke.
Primary Production in Terrestrial Systems Fundamentals of Ecosystem Ecology Class Cary Institute January 2013 Gary Lovett.
Sharon Stanton & FIA National Indicator Leads RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENHANCED FOREST INDICATORS.
Effects of Rising Nitrogen Deposition on Forest Carbon Sequestration and N losses in the Delaware River Basin Yude Pan, John Hom, Richard Birdsey, Kevin.
Site Description This research is being conducted as a part of the Detritus Input and Removal Treatments Project (DIRT), a cross-continental experiment.
Development of a Forest Carbon Sequestration Protocol for the State of Georgia J. Siry, P. Bettinger, B. Borders, C. Cieszewski, M. Clutter, B. Izlar,
Investigating the Carbon Cycle in Terrestrial Ecosystems (ICCTE) Scott Ollinger * -PI, Jana Albrecktova †, Bobby Braswell *, Rita Freuder *, Mary Martin.
The age of C respired from tropical forest Susan Trumbore, Jim Randerson (UC Irvine) Jeff Chambers (Tulane) Simone Vieira, Plínio Camargo, Everaldo Telles,
Flux Measurements and Systematic Terrestrial Measurements 1.discuss gaps and opportunities What are gaps? 2. brainstorm ideas about collaborative projects.
Ecosystem Structure & Function Chapter 24. Questions to Answer Based on the vegetation in the picture on 632, what inference can you make about the.
Focus on “deep soil column” Spatial patterns Mechanism that control development and function Implications for ecology, biogeochemistry and hydrology What.
George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center 2010 Southern Regional Cooperative Soil.
Above and Below ground decomposition of leaf litter Sukhpreet Sandhu.
Production.
1 UIUC ATMOS 397G Biogeochemical Cycles and Global Change Lecture 18: Nitrogen Cycle Don Wuebbles Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Illinois,
{ PINEMAP INTERNSHIP Summer Session 2015 Manon Legendre & Toby SantaMaria.
Carbon Dioxide Fluxes in a Forest Soil in the Citronelle Oil Field of South Alabama Latasha Lyte and E.Z. Nyakatawa Department of Natural Resources and.
Center for Advanced Forestry Systems 2014 Meeting Do Below Ground Processes Explain Differences in Growth, Productivity and Carrying Capacity of Loblolly.
Genotype by silviculture interactions on growth, stand uniformity and leaf-level gas exchange of loblolly pine varieties Marco Yanez, Thomas Fox, John.
Global Carbon Budget. Global Carbon Budget of the carbon dioxide emitted from anthropogenic sources) -Natural sinks of carbon dioxide are the land.
3-PG The Use of Physiological Principles in Predicting Forest Growth
Conghe Song Department of Geography University of North Carolina
Presentation transcript:

Aim 1: Silviculture and Ecophysiology

Graduate Students Joe Clark- MS, Auburn Brett Heim- MS, Virginia Tech Andy Laviner- PhD, Virginia Tech Wen Lin- PhD, North Carolina State Cody Luedtke- PhD, Georgia Adam Maggard- PhD, Oklahoma State Jay Raymond- PhD, Virginia Tech Maxwel Wightman- MS, Florida Lu Zhai- MS, Texas A&M

Outline Introduction Monitoring network Carbon – Research proposed and justification Nitrogen – Research proposed and justification Water – Research proposed and justification Conclusion

Fundamental goal The fundamental goal of PINEMAP is to develop knowledge, technology, approaches and tools essential to increase C sequestration by 15% and reduce energy, N fertilization, and water use by 10% through resilient southern conifer forest production systems under changing climates by 2030 relative to 2010 baselines I am not sure how to revise this slide since there are some doubts over the water use. Maybe we can discuss with Dr. Kane.

Deliverables from Aim 1 Establish a regionwide three-tiered monitoring network Existing cooperative field trials will be the backbone of the three-tiered monitoring network Standardized methods will be developed to quantify : C, water, and nutrient storage Flux baselines Responses to climate and management

Deliverables from AIM 1 Initial quantification of cross-region fertility rating and stomatal response functions Relative index of soil nutrient availability Stomatal response functions critical to C assimilation δ18O and δ13C from Tier II wood samples Use measurements of these wood stable isotopes to quantify amount of biomass produced per unit of water 3 methods for testing fertility (soil attributes of A horizon) (Early stand height, up to five years) and (soil chemical structural and or biological properties)

Monitoring Network Aim 1 will establish a three-tiered monitoring network to quantify carbon, water, nutrient storage and flux baselines This information will be used to assess responses to climate and management Existing region wide cooperative field trials will be used as a backbone for the monitoring network

Tier 1 Goal: To measure regional variation in pine productivity Includes existing growth and yield monitoring sites: Several hundred sites included Includes sites and data from research cooperative experiments representing a 50+ year, multimillion dollar investment by universities, state and federal agencies and forest industry Includes US Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) permanent plots Data includes information on: Site characterization (soils & climate) Establishment date, study design, and original spacing Information on silvicultural treatments Individual tree height, DBH, and tree condition Growth and yield data Most of these plots have repeated measurements over time and thus provide excellent information on spatial and temporal variability in productivity in relation to geographic and climate factors.

Tier 2 Goal: Measure effects of management actions on carbon, nutrient, and water cycles Contain sites chosen from existing cooperative field studies and planted forest AmeriFlux installations (~140 Sites) Cover the full range of climate and soils in the region Include replicated silvicultural treatments focusing on: fertilization, competition control, thinning, and planting density Trials have multiple historical tree inventory measurements

Tier III Goals: Test loblolly pine plantation response to nutrition and artificial drought around the fringe of the natural range of the species Create a platform where ecophysiological measurements can be made that will aid process model parameterization Determine C, N & H2O fluxes and pools under drought conditions that could exist in the future Provide educational opportunities for graduate education Test loblolly pine resilience under extreme conditions

Tier III Four new installations across productivity gradients around the fringe of the loblolly pine range Stands at or near crown closure Open pollinated seed orchard mix

Tier III 2X2 Factorial of fertilization and throughfall exclusion Control (no treatment) Fertilized - one time balanced application (N, P, K, B, S, Zn, Mn, Cu) Drought (30% throughfall exclusion) Fertilized and Drought

Aim 1 - Carbon: PINEMAP Research Proposed and Justification

Justification • Planted pine systems in the Southeastern US will be impacted by climate change. • Increases in temperature, with summer precipitation rates declining by 10 to 30% • These changes will increase vapor pressure deficits, changing soil water deficits and impacting C sequestration in Southern pines • Warming oceans are expected to increase hurricane intensity, thus wind damage, leading to a potentially large impact on regional C balance USGCRP 2010

Justification • Southern forests contain 36% (12 Pg) of sequestered forest C in the contiguous United States • Forests sequester 13% (76 Tg) of regional C emissions • Can sequester more through reforestation, afforestation, and improved forest management • PINEMAP goal is to enable landowners to mitigate rising atmospheric CO2 through research and extension

Experimental Sites: 3-tiered approach Tier I sites (several thousand) • Will provide spatial and temporal variability of productivity in relation to geography and climate   Tier II sites (~140) • Quantification of C pools and fluxes – soil heterotrophic respiration • Vegetation and soil C sampling Tier III Sites (4) • Manipulative treatments will be done to test interactions of genetics, fertilization and precipitation • Soil CO2 efflux measured and vegetation and soil C sampling

Vegetation and Soil Sampling Following international protocol for C accounting Measurements of standing live and dead trees, understory vegetation, coarse and fine woody detritus, forest floor, and soil organic matter, roots, and chemical and physical properties collected at 0-5, 5-10, and 10-20 cm depths Sieved, air dried soils archived according to USDA supported National Soil Carbon Network methods

Ecophysiological Measurements Parameterize inputs for Physiological Principles in Predicting Growth (3-PG) model (IPARmax) Stomatal conductance, WUE Linked to C assimilation Soil CO2 efflux on Tier II and III sites Heterotrophic separated from autotrophic by root exclusion tells us Quantify NEP or C storage Minimum GPP allocated to support root development Rate of decay of old soil carbon Data shared in a centralized C information system   Measuring soil CO2 efflux at the GA Tier III site with the LI 6400 Portable Photosynthesis System and Soil CO2 Flux Chamber

Soil Respiration Soils are the largest terrestrial C pool (Schlesinger, 1977) Soil respiration is the second largest flux in the C cycle (Raich and Schlesinger, 1992) Management can decrease the time it takes for forests to go from a C source to a C sink (Sampson et al., 2006) The predicted shift in productivity of intensively managed forests due to climate change could negatively impact the forests ability to sequester C However the goals of PINEMAP to mitigate these climate effects on pine production will aim to increase resilience of pines © Climate Change 2007: The Physical Scientific Basis, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Soil Respiration Measuring Soil respiration will elucidate Net ecosystem productivity (NEP), or C storage, from estimates of net primary productivity (NPP) requires the separation of heterotrophic, microbial respiration (RH) from autotrophic, root-derived respiration (RA)  Separating RH from RA will yield estimates of NEP.  The difference between NPP and RH estimates NEP and thus the carbon balance of  the system Separating these components under experimental manipulations (Tier III) will inform models of how these treatments might affect the C storage under various management scenarios

AIM 1 - Nitrogen: PINEMAP Research Proposed and Justification

Nitrogen & PINEMAP - Project Goal 1 Establish a three-tiered monitoring network based on existing cooperative research trials, and develop standardized methods to quantify C, water and nutrient storage (Nitrogen = N) and flux baselines and response to climate and management

Nitrogen & Productivity Productivity of loblolly pine plantations in the SE USA commonly limited by low soil nutrient availability (Fox et al. 2007) Important stages for fertilization: Stand establishment – N availability > N demand High decomposition & mineralization rates Seedlings smaller size Rapid expansion of foliage that occurs at this period (Blazer et al. 2006) • Canopy closure – N availability < N demand (Piatekand Allen 1999, 2001) Plant available nutrient supply decreases in soil Nutrient use increases for plant • N availability limits leaf area production and plant growth

N Relationships in Loblolly Pine Stands Fox et al. 2007

Solving N Limitations in Stands Nutrient amendments (fertilization) aimed at increasing leaf area and stemwood production are common (Albaugh et al. 2007) Most field trials (~85%) for SE USA stands (>5–10 yrs. old) displayed strong growth responses following N fertilization (Martin et al. 1999, Amateis et al. 2000, Fox et al. 2007)

Where Does Fertilizer N Go? 10-25% in trees (Mead and Pritchett 1975, Blazier et al. 2006, Mead et al. 2008) 75-90% Other pathways Understory (hardwood, vine, herbaceous species) NH3 volatilization leaching denitrifcation harvest fire erosion

Decisions for N Fertilization Magnitude of growth response Product mix in the stand Stumpage prices Cost of fertilization Length of time before harvest

Efficient N Fertilization Developing an integrated silvicultural program (Fox et al. 2007) Genotypes Site preparation Hardwood herbaceous control Thinning Additional nutrients (Fox et al. 2007, Timothy et al. 2007) Understanding N volatilization (Zerpa and Fox 2010) Site specific concerns Forest floor moisture Forest floor vs. open mineral soil Urea formulation

PINEMAP N Efficiency - Management Alterations Increase acreage fertilized due to lower fertilization cost associated with improved N efficiency fertilizers Use of enhanced efficiency N fertilizer to reduce amount of N applied per acre Use of enhanced efficiency N fertilizer to reduce C cost associated with N fertilizer manufacture Martin et al., Southern Conifer Climate Change CAP

PINEMAP N Efficiency – Potential Impacts for Stands 15% increase in in situ + ex situ C stocks Industrial = 10 million ac. NIPF = 500,000 ac. 50% reduction of N fertilizer application Industrial = 50% reduction in N fertilizer acres /500,000 ac/yr 50% of fertilized acres /50,000 ac/yr Martin et al., Southern Conifer Climate Change CAP

Conclusion N is essential nutrient for plant growth and N limitation reduces loblolly pine plantation productivity Plantation management decisions based on inefficient N fertilization can be costly and environmentally problematic PINEMAP is integrating existing and current research on enhanced N fertilization, silviculture, and genetics to increase N efficiency, reduce N fertilizer application, and increase productivity in SE USA loblolly pine plantations

AIM 1 - Water: PINEMAP Research Proposed and Justification

Contents Precipitation manipulation Ecophysiological measurements in Tier III sites Ecophysiological measurements in Tier II and III sites Sap flow measurements Stable isotope analysis

10% Reduction in Water Use How to reach this goal: Water Use Efficiency Increase carbon gain per unit of transpiration Genetic selection Stand level reduction in transpiration Competition control Stand density management

Precipitation manipulation Conducted at 4 Tier III sites at the edges of the loblolly pine range Imposed by installing fiberglass throughfall diversion panels in the forest understory

Precipitation manipulation at Virginia site Factorial design with precipitation as a factor Two levels: control, 30% reduced

Precipitation manipulation at Virginia site

Ecophysiological measurements Sap flow measurements for tree level water use Stable isotope (δ13C and δ18O) analysis for water use efficiency

Sap flow measurements Photos taken from: http://www.ictinternational.com.au/tdp.htm, http://hannes-hachmann.blogspot.com/2010/10/sap-is-finally-flowing-under.html

Stable isotope analysis Collect tree cores Cut the latewood from the target tree rings Analyze δ13C and δ18O from the wood samples Obtain WUE data based on isotopic analysis data Photo taken from http://dendrodan.wordpress.com/category/introduction/

Ecophysiological measurements For model parameterization (Aim 2) Tree level transpiration estimates Link transpiration rates to soil water availability and vapor pressure deficits

Ecophysiological measurements Attribute water stress to physiological or environmental constraints Characterize variation in tree WUE by genotype, tree age, and region Provide a physiological understanding of underlying mechanisms for the relationship between regions and genotype under climatic change scenario

Aim 1 Conclusions: Deliverables: Standardize methods for estimating C, N, H20 pools and fluxes Quantification of cross-regional fertility rating and stomatal response functions Regional C, N, H20, Soil CO2 evolution baselines and responses to silvicultural treatments

Aim 1 Conclusions: Collaborate with other Aim Groups Data to Aim 2 for modeling Silviculture by Genetics interactions (Aim 3) Data to Aim 4 for LCA and management responses Graduate educational opportunities and support to (Aim 5) Disseminate findings through Coops and support (Aim 6)