Subduuction Zone Observatory: Faulting and Deformation Jeff Freymueller Geophysical Institute and Dept. of Geology and Geophysics University of Alaska.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slab-mantle decoupling and its implications for subduction zone thermal structure, fluid supply, and geophysical processes Ikuko Wada1,2 and Kelin Wang1,2.
Advertisements

Subduction Zone Observatory Big Geodynamics-Related Science Questions Magali Billen Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences UC Davis Collaborators & Students:
GPS & Seismic Studies of Episodic Tremor & Slip on the Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica Timothy H Dixon MARGINS Lecturer February/March 2009.
GE177b- Objectives Introduce a variety of techniques to describe ‘quantitatively’ deformation of the lithosphere and fault slip history. Introduce.
Charles DeMets Dept. of Geology & Geophysics Univ. of Wisconsin- Madison Subduction tectonics: Earthquake cycle and long-term deformation Acknowledgments.
Amphibious Monitoring of Earthquake Cycle Deformation at Subduction Zones Kelin Wang, Earl Davis, Herb Dragert Pacific Geoscience Centre, Geological Survey.
Sendai Earthquake NE Japan March 11, 2011 Some explanatory slides Bob Stern, Dave Scholl, others updated March
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 12 Nov 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Fri 14 Nov: T&S Last Time: Te and Rheology Key point of Willett et al. papers: T.
Challenges in Achieving Height Modernization in Alaska Crustal Deformation Has Invalidated Much of the Historical Data Jeff Freymueller Geophysical Institute,
Geodesy in the Eastern Aleutians, Alaska Peninsula and Shumagin Region: current state of knowledge Ken Hudnut, USGS Workshop on SoCal Tsunami Scenario.
Active Folding within the L.A. Basin with a focus on: Argus et al. (2005), Interseismic strain accumulation and anthropogenic motion in metropolitan Los.
Slides for Ben Study Area 500 km N Great Earthquakes, Strongly-Coupled Arc Pacific plate motion 1938, , M S 7.4 tsunami earthquake 1957, 9.1.
WHAT COULD BE THE NEXT EARTHQUAKE DISASTER FOR JAPAN  A difficult question, but ---  It is the one that was being asked long before the March 11, 2011.
Evaluation of the Potential of Large Aftershocks of the M9 Tohoku, Earthquake Yo Fukushima, Manabu Hashimoto (DPRI, Kyoto Univ.) Shin’ichi Miyazaki (Grad.
Subduction Zone Observatory An international multi-disciplinary observatory along a subduction zone plate boundary (ies?) “subduction collaboratory” 2014.
Subduction Zone Geodynamics:
The Seismogenic Zone Experiment Revisited MARGINS Theoretical Institute The Seismogenic Zone Revisited Fault Friction and the Transition From Seismic.
Numerical simulation of seismic cycles at a subduction zone with a laboratory-derived friction law Naoyuki Kato (1), Kazuro Hirahara (2), and Mikio Iizuka.
Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Deformation Through the Seismic Cycle Jeff Freymueller University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Since New Madrid's not moving... A complex system view of midcontinental seismicity and hazards Seth Stein Northwestern Eric Calais Purdue Qingsong Li.
Observing an Earthquake Cycle Within a Decade
Geodetic monitoring of subduction zones Some idea of the kinematics of the subduction interface can be inferred from surface deformation measured from.
Subduction Fluids Channelled to Forearc Mantle Corner:
TOPIC 2: How does the challenge of predicting hazards differ between earthquakes - at plate boundaries -In plate boundary zones -within plates?
CIDER 2011 Research Discussion 1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY.
Roland Burgmann and Georg Dresen
The Spectrum of Fault Slip Behaviors 18 Sep. 2013, C. Marone, Geosc500 Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting Stick-slip dynamics and Instability. Introduction.
IV. The seismic cycle IV. 1 Conceptual and kinematic models IV.2 Comparison with observations IV.3 Interseismic strain IV.4 Postseismic deformation IV.5.
Overview of NanTroSEIZE: The Nankai Trough Seismogenic Zone Experiment
“Possibilities for offshore geodesy” Questions of importance for understanding S.Z. deformation offshore and tools that might be applied to address them.
Dealing with paradoxes in subduction zone geodynamics
SISMA Seismic Information System for Monitoring and Alert Galileian Plus Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Milano, Italy Politecnico di.
New earthquake category Nature 447, (3 May 2007) | doi: /nature05780; Received 8 December 2006; Accepted 26 March A scaling law for slow.
Earth Science Applications of Space Based Geodesy DES-7355 Tu-Th 9:40-11:05 Seminar Room in 3892 Central Ave. (Long building) Bob Smalley Office: 3892.
A discussion on Subduction Zones: Links between Structure and Seismogenesis Aron Meltzner TO Brownbag Discussion Group 29 November 2005 Aron Meltzner TO.
I. Introduction II. Methods in Morphotectonics III. Methods in Geodesy an Remote sensing IV. Relating strain, surface displacement and stress, based on.
Interseismic deformation with aseismic stress-dependent fault slip Eric A Hetland, Mark Simons, Ravi Kanda, Sue Owen TO brown-bag – 03 April 2007 a very.
NE Caribbean and Hispaniola = major plate boundary, 2 cm/yr relative motion Strike-slip + convergence partitioned between 3 major fault systems Apparent.
Episodic Tremor in the Alaska/Aleutian Subduction Zone Chloe Peterson, Douglas Christensen, and Steve McNutt Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska.
DYNAMIC DISPLACEMENTS OF THE SEA BOTTOM DUE TO SUBDUCTION ZONE EARTHQUAKES A.I. IVASHCHENKO Institute of Oceanology, RAS, Moscow L.I. LOBKOVSKY Institute.
What can geodesy tell us about rifting & subduction?
Earth Science Applications of Space Based Geodesy DES-7355 Tu-Th 9:40-11:05 Seminar Room in 3892 Central Ave. (Long building) Bob Smalley Office: 3892.
The 11 March 2011 Tohoku-Oki (Japan) Megathrust Event: FEM models of Coseismic and Postseismic deformation captured by DInSAR and GPS Data. Christodoulos.
Using GPS and InSAR to study tectonics, deformation, and earthquakes GPS displacements, velocities (and transients) InSAR displacements.
Yuehua Zeng & Wayne Thatcher U. S. Geological Survey
Elizabeth H. Hearn, UBC, Vancouver, CANADA in collaboration with Semih Ergintav, Marmara Research Centre, Gebze, TURKEY Robert Reilinger, MIT, Cambridge.
Earthquakes in the Ocean: Where, Why, and What Happens? As prepared for ESCI Earth Structure & Deformation And Sally Ride Festival, Houston (10/25/06)
Models for Fault Behavior
GE177b I. Introduction II. Methods in Morphotectonics III. Determining the time evolution of fault slip 1- Techniques to monitor fault slip 2- EQs phenomenology.
Simulating big earthquakes Accessing the inaccessible with models.
Aseismic deformation transients in subduction zone and the role of fault dilatancy -- Numerical simulation in the framework of rate and state friction.
David Schmidt Ray Weldon Reed Burgette Randy Krogstad Haiying Gao
-Liu and Rice (2005), Aseismic slip transients emerge spontaneously in three-dimensional rate and state modeling of subduction earthquake sequences, JGR.
Slow/silent slip events in deeper seismogenic portion of subduction zones -- mechanism investigation from 3D modeling Yajing Liu [1], James R. Rice [1,2]
Slow Slip: An Ubiquitous yet Poorly Understood Mode of Strain Release Susan Y. Schwartz Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences UC Santa Cruz.
EART 118 Seismotectonics MWF D250 9:30-10:40 am; Th D250 2:00-4:00 pm Prof.: Thorne Lay, C382 E&MS, Office Hours 11:00-12:00 MWF TA: Lingling Ye, Office.
Introduction to the modelling of GPS results GPS provides Surface crustal velocities in a global reference frame, or with respect to a block, realized.
Earthquakes and friction laws Victoria Stevens Scholz 1998.
2002/05/07ACES Workshop Spatio-temporal slip distribution around the Japanese Islands deduced from Geodetic Data Takeshi Sagiya Geographical Survey Institute.
Seismogenic Characteristics and Seismic Structure of the Mariana Arc: Comparison with Central America Douglas A. Wiens, James Conder, Sara Pozgay, Mitchell.
GeoFEM Kinematic Earthquake Cycle Modeling in the Japanese Islands Hirahara, K. (1), H. Suito (1), M. Hyodo (1) M. Iizuka (2) and H. Okuda (3) (1) Nagoya.
Seismic Hazard Analysis for Guam & the Northern Mariana Islands Chuck Mueller U.S. Geological Survey Golden, Colorado, USA.
Motion of Bering Plate? Jeff Freymueller.
Alaska 1964 Earthquake Tectonic Deformation
Coupling at subduction zones Background reading: Pacheco, Sykes, Scholz (1993) Hyndman, Yamano, Oleskevich (1997) Carl Tape November 9, 2007 Thanks.
On the relation between Geodetic strain, Seismicity and fault frictional properties Nepal Sumatra Taiwan.
Creager, Wech, Vidale, Melbourne
Creager, Wech, Vidale, Melbourne
Creager, Wech, Vidale, Melbourne
Role of subducted sediments in plate
Presentation transcript:

Subduuction Zone Observatory: Faulting and Deformation Jeff Freymueller Geophysical Institute and Dept. of Geology and Geophysics University of Alaska Fairbanks

Along-Strike Variations are Nearly Ubiquitous Freymueller et al. (2008) Q– What controls along-strike and downdip variations in the extent of slip?

Hikurangi Spatial/Temporal Variation McCaffrey et al. (2008, Nature Geosciences)

Estimated Plate Coupling from GPS data Meade and Loveless (2010)

Estimated Plate Coupling from GPS data Meade and Loveless (2010) Slow Slip Events

Estimated Plate Coupling from GPS data Meade and Loveless (2010) Slow Slip Events Afterslip from 1994 quake

Estimated Plate Coupling from GPS data Meade and Loveless (2010) Slow Slip Events Afterslip from 1994 quake

Comparison of Locked Zone to Slip Colors: Loveless and Meade (2010) interseismic model Contours: Jack Loveless’ slip model contours To first order, the rupture area of the earthquake is the same as the interseismic locked zone Loveless and Meade, 3/14/11 Loveless and Meade (2011)

Along-Strike Variation Trench relative plate motion

Along-Strike Variations are Nearly Ubiquitous Freymueller et al. (2008) Q– What controls along-strike and downdip variations in the extent of slip?

Slip Spectrum I: Seismogenic Zone Slip Modes What do we want to know for understanding the slip modes? – Locked or creeping interface? – Need better constraints on depth, thickness and properties of plate interface and properties of slab. – Are there earthquakes at the updip/downdip end? What is the slip behavior? – Detailed distribution of earthquakes. On interface or not? – Structural controls/influences? Time dependence of above properties? Outcomes controlled by interface properties or surrounding medium?

Slip Spectrum II: Slow Slip Where is there slow slip on a subduction thrust? – Tremor is one marker of slow slip, but there can be slow slip without tremor (why?) – Small migrating earthquakes can be an indication of slow slip? – What conditions are necessary for tremor genesis? Dewatering? Chattering of slip? Space/time distribution of tremor? – Alaska tremor patchy, are there special locations/conditions? – Japan has examples of both patchy and continuous Sustained or episodic? Spectrum of Duration/Size? – One >9 (12?) year event now identified (Li et al., S53C-4511)

Some Complications We Think We Understand (sort of) Postseismic deformation – Afterslip (on the plate interface) – Viscoelastic relaxation (in mantle wedge) Along-strike variations – Extent of slip deficit varies along strike: why? Slow slip events – The locked to creeping transition is dynamic Common theme: slip along interface varies with time – not just interseismic + coseismic.

Q– Why are the amounts of afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation so variable? EarthquakeAfterslipViscoelastic Relaxation 1960 Chile (M9.5)??Large, lasted for decades 1964 Alaska (M9.3)~6 meters (25-30% of coseismic), decades Large, lasted for decades 2004 Sumatra-Andaman (M9.2) Large, lasting > several years 2005 Sumatra (M8.7)Large, both updip and downdip Clearly present in far-field data 1995 Antofagasta (M8.1)Small, gone within ~3 yearsNone? 2007 Kurils (M 8.1)Ended within 0.5 yearLarge, will last ~ decade 1994 Sanriku (M 7.7)Equal to coseismicminimal We have not been successful in making advance predictions of postseismic deformation following large or great earthquakes.

Deformation of Upper Plate Deformation of upper plate is complex, and highly varied along the Americas – Broad zones of diffuse deformation – Slip partitioning of oblique subduction and motion of forearc slivers – Back-arc convergence, fold&thrust and basement Linked to subduction, but need to fully measure stress state and strain field.

Motion of Overriding Plate  SW arc translation of 4 mm/yr  Updip limit is poorly constrained by land-based data  But, moment rate deficit is well constrained Subduction strain Measured vel. What is the Arc velocity? Cross and Freymueller (2008)

Upper Plate Slivers are Common Nocquet et al. (2014, ngeo)

Measurement Needs Geodesy and Deformation – Measurements of long-term and short term steady deformation and transients – Response to loads, earthquakes reveals rheology Seismology – Seismicity – Source – Structure (velocity, anisotropy, attenuation) Integration

Questions?