1 Report on the 30 th Session of the Joint Scientific Committee of the World Climate Research Programme 6-9 April 2009, Maryland, USA N. McFarlane, T.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Work Plan Development Guidelines and Schedule.
Advertisements

Work Plan Development Guidelines and Schedule.
© GEO Secretariat THORPEX-TIGGE Overall Concept What? –TIGGE: THORPEX will develop, demonstrate and evaluate a multi- model, multi-analysis and multi national.
27 September, 2004 GEO Special Session on Governance Analysis of Comments on Governance of GEOSS International Cooperation Subgroup Co-Chairs Patricio.
1 GlobModel The GlobModel study, initial findings and objectives of the day Zofia Stott 13 September 2007.
World Climate Research Programme Moving Towards Future WCRP Progress and Plans Ghassem R. Asrar & Antonio J. Busalacchi.
Potential role of WMO in Space Weather Jerome LAFEUILLE WMO Space Programme Office World Meteorological Organization Geneva.
Vision for the GFOI R&D Brice Mora, Frank Martin Seifert, Pontus Olofsson, Martin Herold in coordination with Ake Rosenqvist, Anthea Mitchell, and Alex.
AMY: (WHERE ARE WE GOING AND HOW WILL WE KNOW WHEN WE ARE THERE?) Rick Lawford.
WOAP 4 meeting, Hamburg, 29 – 31 March 2010 Perspectives from WCRP projects SPARC: Objectives of the next two years Christian von Savigny (IUP Bremen)
The Quality Challenge: The Early Years Strategy Nóirín Hayes Centre for Social and Educational Research
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-05 Resource Mobilization for Capacity Building (individual, institutional & infrastructure)
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF. Work Package 4 & Methodology for Open Living Lab O4.1.7 Budapest,
CORDEX Scope, or What is CORDEX?  Provide a set of regional climate scenarios (including uncertainties) covering the period , for the majority.
World Climate Research Programme Moving towards Future Horizons WCRP Developments/Response Post Review Antonio J. Busalacchi Chairman, Joint Scientific.
Slide: 1 27 th CEOS Plenary |Montréal | November 2013 Agenda item: 29 Adrian Simmons, Chair of the GCOS Steering Committee Update from the Global.
28 th CEOS Plenary Session Alain Ratier EUMETSAT CEOS Plenary, Agenda Item 28 Tromsø, Norway October 2014.
Click to edit Master title style Five-year work programme on the scientific, technical and socio-economic aspects of impacts, vulnerability and adaptation.
From GAIM to AIMES Guy P. Brasseur Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Chair of IGBP.
Modelling Theme White Paper G. Flato, G. Meehl and C. Jakob.
7 October 2003COST 723 Objectives To determine  the predictability of climate  the effect of human activities on climate WCRP.
The future of GODAE activities through the IOC Albert Fischer IGST, St John’s NL, Canada, 7-9 August 2007.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
Building the Europe of Knowledge Proposals for the 7 th Research Framework Programme
WCRP Update / WCC-3 Outcomes Ghassem R. Asrar Director, WCRP Vladimir Ryabinin SSO, JPS for WCRP &
IASC-IGAC Arctic Air Pollution Workshop Goals Co-Chairs: Law, Starkweather Organizing Committee: Arnold, Sharma, Thomas, Von Salzen Boulder, CO 3-5 FEB,
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE and Industry Bob Jones EGEE-II Project Director Final EGEE Review CERN, May 2006.
April_2010 Partnering initiatives at country level Proposed partnering process to build a national stop tuberculosis (TB) partnership.
Global Environmental Change Changes in the biophysical environment caused or strongly influenced by human activities Land cover & soils Atmospheric.
1.How much adaptation do we need within the period to ~2030 to cope with ‘inevitable’ climate change? (lines up with 2030 RCP) 1.What climate changes (global.
Chemistry Climate Modeling of the UTLS An update on model inter-comparison and evaluation with observations Andrew Gettelman, NCAR & CCMVal Collaborators.
Synthesis of Strategic Issues (Climate, Disasters, Water) and a draft European strategic framework.
Joint Canada-Mexico-USA (North American*) Carbon Program Planning Meeting January 25–26, 2007 *By North America we mean the North American land, adjacent.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division S.T. Rao Director, NERL/AMAD U.S.
Climate and Cryosphere (CliC): Legacy for 2013 and Beyond Jeff Key NOAA/NESDIS Chair, CliC Observation and Products Panel (Agenda item )
SPARC-IPY (Activity No 217) The Structure and Evolution of the Polar Stratosphere and Mesosphere and Links to the Troposphere during IPY
An Integrated Global Atmospheric Chemistry Observations Strategy IGACO & WMO GAW and GEOSS Hennie Kelder Professor University of Technology of Eindhoven.
MAP MODELING EFFORTS MAP: Building Integrated Earth System Analysis (Modeling): IESA CTM work funded by MAP will be seen as part of the overall Earth System.
High Impact Weather Emerging challenge identified at CASXVI Mariane DIOP KANE Mariane DIOP KANE CASMG9, Geneva, April 2014.
ECOMS: European Climate Observations, Modelling and Services Chris Hewitt, UK Met Office ECOMS Kick-Off Meeting, Barcelona, 6-9 th November 2012.
CLIVAR (Climate Variability and Predictability) CLIVAR is an interdisciplinary research effort within the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) focusing.
World Climate Research Programme Joint Scientific Committee – 31 Antalya, Turkey.
CIRES-CDC Institutional Partnership Western Water Assessment Review Randall M. Dole, Director Climate Diagnostics Center September 2001.
Key S&T Programmes, Resources and Funding Mechanisms to develop GEOSS Professor Stuart Marsh - UK STC Representative - Chair, IGOS Theme Leaders Group.
ESM Perspectives on IAV and Coordination with Other Groups Gerald A. Meehl National Center for Atmospheric Research.
GESAMP (IMO/FAO/UNESCO-IOC/WMO/WHO/IAEA/UN/UNEP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection) February 7-8, 2002,
External Communications Working Group Molly E Brown, NASA GSFC with WG team.
David M. Legler U.S. CLIVAR Office U.S. Climate Variability and Predictability Program usclivar.org CLIVAR Welcome Climate Diagnostics.
The Polar Prediction Workshop, Oslo, Norway, 6-8 October 2010.
EO Summits & NOAA Strategic Planning Activities How might global wind profiles fit in?
GEO Implementation Boards Considerations and Lessons Learned (Document 8) Max Craglia (EC) Co-chair of the Infrastructure Implementation Board (IIB) On.
Information Quality Cluster - Introduction H. K. (Rama) Ramapriyan Science Systems and Applications, Inc. & NASA Goddard Space Flight Center David Moroni.
Breakout sessions 13:15-14:45Five Breakout sessions 1.Atmosphere – Walsh/Elliot 2.Sea Ice/Ocean – Proshutinsky/Flato/Gerdes 3.Terrestrial/Permafrost –
SPARC Office Staff Victoria De Luca (Office manager) Diane Pendlebury (Staff Scientist) Elham Farahani (IPY coordination Scientist) Norman McFarlane (Director)
A Community InSAR Working Group: Organizing from a Satellite Perspective Jeanne Sauber, Oxnard California Oct. 21, 2004.
Six global challenges were identified in policy for development cooperation: Oppression Economic exclusion Migration flows Climate change and environmental.
Future Earth Summary of comments received and initial responses.
1 WCRP – Quo vadis? SPARC – Quo vadis? Monday – Open SSG Session 14:00 2. WCRP UPDATE 2.1 WCRP Updates/WCC-3 Outcomes (30 min) G. Asrar/V. Ryabinin 2.2.
Questions to be discussed: How can the research framework be further improved? What additional priority research questions should be included or how should.
Building Strong Library Associations | Regional Convenings DAY 2 Session 6 How will I get support for my proposal? External relationships.
Ocean Carbon and Biogeochemistry Scoping Workshop on Terrestrial and Coastal Carbon Fluxes and Exchanges in the Gulf of Mexico May 6-8, 2008 St. Petersburg,
Oceans and Society: Blue Planet An Integrating Task of GEO for Oceans Oceans and Society: Blue Planet An Integrating Task of GEO for Oceans Trevor Platt.
Chemistry-Climate Model Validation Activity for SPARC (CCMVal)
IGOS Cryosphere Theme The cryosphere is an integral part of the global climate system, modulating surface energy and moisture fluxes, clouds, precipitation,
Open Science Conference
CLIVAR/WCRP Issues Imperatives WCRP Restructuring
Michel Rixen, WCRP Joint Planning Staff
  1-A) How would Arctic science benefit from an improved GIS?
Transition of WCRP projects beyond 2013: SPARC legacy and issues Christian von Savigny (IUP Bremen) on behalf of SPARC.
Framework for Ocean Observing
Presentation transcript:

1 Report on the 30 th Session of the Joint Scientific Committee of the World Climate Research Programme 6-9 April 2009, Maryland, USA N. McFarlane, T. G. Shepherd, T. Peter, V. Ryabinin  2008 external review of the WCRP, commissioned by its Sponsors and the International Group of Funding Agencies of Global Change Research.  Key issues raised in the WCRP review to be addressed as part of the planning for the near future (up to 2013) and longer-term activities:  WCRP lacks visibility within key communities, notably user communities, and particularly within developing countries.  WCRP structural issues were the main overarching theme.  Fundamental research role of WCRP was pointed out as important particularly for the major science funding agencies (e.g. NERC, NOAA, NSF).

2 Report on the 30 th Session of the Joint Scientific Committee of the World Climate Research Programme  SPARC Plans to 2013 and beyond:  Legacy document: (a) chemistry-climate model validation, (b) assessment of key uncertainties in measurements, (c) linking various scientific communities.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate (AC&C): SPARC/WCRP: A. Ravishankara  Martyn Chipperfield IGAC/IGBP: Phil Rasch and Sarah Doherty WCRP – Quo vadis? SPARC – Quo vadis?

3 Report on the 30 th Session of the Joint Scientific Committee of the World Climate Research Programme  Future of the WCRP as discussed in 3 breakout groups:  Tasked to consider the same three questions: (1) What should be the function of WCRP? (2) What should be the main themes of WCRP? (3) What should be the structure of WCRP?  Result: Framework for restructuring WCRP beyond 2013:  Central structured activities analogous to the current core projects.  Broad disciplinary themes that recognize major couplings and processes in the climate system: Land /Atmosphere, Ocean/Atmosphere, Cryosphere, Stratosphere/Troposphere.  Applications, communications, and outreach will be addressed through a major interdisciplinary cross-cutting activity. WCRP – Quo vadis? SPARC – Quo vadis?

4 Potential points for discussion: SPARC needs to “encompass the troposphere“! Does SPARC need to change its name? A central issue will be a good coordination with IGAC! Should we reconsider a merger IGAC&SPARC? Ensure lab studies stay a strong component in SPARC! AC&C: Intensify interaction between SPARC and IGAC! To this end benefit from the CCMVal and achieve real collaboration between CCMVal modelers and tropospheric modelers! WCRP – Quo vadis? SPARC – Quo vadis?

5 SPARC needs to “encompass the troposphere“! “Encompass” does not mean “take over”. Dynamical and chemical aspects. Does SPARC need to change its name? Not necessarily. A central issue will be a good coordination with IGAC! Identify projects of mutual interest – or is this already exhausted by AC&C? Should we reconsider a merger IGAC&SPARC? No majority presently on SPARC-SSG; rather follow up on and intensify specific activities. Ensure lab studies stay a strong component in SPARC! Follow up on the good examples given during this meeting. AC&C: Intensify interaction between SPARC and IGAC! SPARC needs “heros”. Time-constraint by CCMVal will relax. WCRP – Quo vadis? SPARC – Quo vadis?

6

7