Scoping the North Carolina Cooperating Technical State Project Ed Curtis, P.E., CFM, North Carolina Division of Emergency Management Jerry Sparks, P.E.,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In coordination with FEMA Kickoff Meeting Riverside County, CA May 27, 2010.
Advertisements

State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Cooperating Technical State (CTS) Statewide Mapping… North Carolina’s Pioneering Effort John Dorman, Program Director, NC CTS Flood Mapping Program Tim.
Preliminary DFIRM Community Coordination Meeting November 10, 2005 ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA Preliminary DFIRM and FIS Text.
Alabama’s Floodplain Management Program Tom Littlepage Alabama Office of Water Resources.
North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Cooperating Technical State.
Federal Emergency Management Agency Map Modernization Project City of Bryan City of College Station & Brazos County, Texas.
FEMA Update: Flood Map Modernization and Risk MAP Presented on behalf of FEMA by David I. Maurstad, PBS&J.
3-D Flood Risk Visualization Beth Norton December 21, 2011.
The Risk is Real… Be PREPARED! Robert Billings, PE, PH, CFM Flood Mitigation Project Manager Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Services May 18, 2011 Briar.
Risk MAP and Discovery FEMA Region [#], [WATERSHED NAME] Watershed Discovery Meetings [DATE]
Resilience Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
Flood Risk Mapping Project Identifying the Risk Editorial Board Meeting [COMMUNITY NAME] Flood Risk Mapping Project.
In coordination with FEMA Scoping Meeting Lake County, California February 19, 2010.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #3 December 12, 2000.
NC Floodplain Mapping Program North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Becoming a Cooperating Technical State.
Oregon GIS Utility & Hazard Surveys Webex Session.
Issues and Answers in Quality Control of LIDAR DEMs for North Carolina DFIRMs Gary W. Thompson, RLS North Carolina Geodetic Survey David F. Maune, Ph.D.,
Proven People... Proven Technology... Proven Results Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel Management Module Katherine Hermann, CFM, Dewberry Ken Logsdon,
NC LiDAR ( ) Success in other States – (Zsolt Nagy – AECOM) 1.What was the business driver for NC LiDAR? 2.What was the coordination approach?
Utilizing a Basinwide Approach for the North Carolina Flood Mapping Program John Dorman, Program Director, NC CTS Flood Mapping Program Gib Jones, P.E.,
NC Floodplain Mapping Program Highlights (preliminary observations) -Large number of data producers -Handful of 1 st generation delivery orders in progress.
Feedback on the New Datums 2015 Geospatial Summit April 13 to 14, 2015 North Carolina Geodetic Survey Gary W. Thompson.
Flood Risk Mapping Project Editorial Board Meeting [COMMUNITY NAME]
North Carolina Neuse River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings April 23, 24, and 25, 2001.
Mitigation. Hazard Mitigation is any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and their property from hazards and their.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #6 March 20, 2001.
FLOOD STUDY Rockland County, NY
Mitigation. Hazard Mitigation is any sustained action taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to people and their property from hazards and their.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #9 June 19, 2001.
FLOOD STUDY Oswego County, NY FEMA REGION II February 7, 2011.
Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program
1 US Army Engineer Research and Development Center FEMA REGION III COASTAL MAPPING PROJECT May 19, 2011 Coastal Analyses and Outreach Robin Danforth, FEMA.
An update from the National Committee on Levee Safety Presented to the TWCA by Karin M. Jacoby, PE, Esq. June 17, of 14An Involved Public and Reliable.
FEMA’s Coastal Mapping and Management Process. 2 2 Welcome  Background and Coastal study methodologies  Technical Opportunities  Management Opportunities.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #2 November 14, 2000.
Dave Knipe, PE Indiana DNR Division of Water (317) Mike Anderson Stantec (859) Flood Data Management System INDIANA | Flood Data Management.
Predicting and Preparing for Natural Disasters Margaret A. Davidson Director NOAA Coastal Services Center June 7, 2005.
Back Creek Floodplain SEPTEMBER 2, Why are we here Introductions Almost 300 parcels affected by revised flood study of Back Creek Outline ◦History.
North Carolina White Oak River Basin Plan December 19, 2000.
Georgia Flood Risk Management - Beyond the Why and Getting to How 1 August 28, 2014 Flood Planning and Policy: Education / Outreach Workshop The Armstrong.
National Weather Service Flood Inundation Mapping A New Way A New Wayof Looking at Flooding Diane Cooper Hydrologic Services Program Manager NWS - Southern.
US Army Engineer Research and Development Center COASTAL OUTREACH ADVISORY TEAM Kick-off Meeting November 19, 2010 FEMA Region III Coastal Mapping Project.
Overview of Flood Program April Doug Bellomo, Director Risk Analyses Division Mitigation Directorate, FEMA.
Resilience Meeting: [Watershed Name] [LOCATION] [DATE]
Office for Information Resources GIS Services Flood Map Modernization and the Tennessee Base Mapping Program Dennis Pedersen, Director F&A, OIR – GIS Services.
Flood Map Modernization Flood Map Modernization Mapping the Risk Editorial Board Meeting [date] V [COMMUNITY NAME] FLOOD MAP MODERNIZATION.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #4 January 16, 2001.
A Total Water Resource A division of Hayes, Seay, Mattern & Mattern, Inc. North Carolina Floodplain Mapping State of North Carolina North Carolina Floodplain.
Getting Started with FEMA LOMR Delegation May 2012.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting #5 February 13, 2001.
FEMA Region II Somerset County, NJ Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) FEMA Region 2 Mitigation Division June 24th, :00-11:00.
North Carolina Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings January 30 and 31, 2001.
Flood Map Modernization and North Dakota Julie Prescott, ND Map Modernization Coordinator North Dakota State Water Commission And Brian Fischer, CFM, GIS.
North Carolina Pasquotank River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings May 17 and 18, 2001.
The Story of Floodplain Remapping in Springfield, Missouri.
Passaic County, NJ Initial Coordination Meeting FEMA Region II Mitigation Division October 6th, :00-11:00.
In coordination with FEMA Kickoff Meeting Ventura County, CA April 29, 2010.
North Carolina CTS Committee Meeting October 17, 2000.
FLOOD STUDY Burlington County, NJ FEMA REGION II November 29, 2010.
Sonoma Valley Groundwater Management Planning. 2 Presentation Overview SCWA/USGS Groundwater Study Stakeholder Assessment Groundwater Management Work.
Coastal Outreach Advisory Team FEMA Region II COAT Kickoff Meeting April 4, 2013, 10:00 a.m. Alejandro De La Campa, FEMA Region II-Caribbean Division Director.
Draft Public Involvement Plan for: Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation August 19, 2010.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Huntington District Floodplain Management Services Dan Bailey, CFM Huntington District August 2012.
Flood Hazard Area, Flood Insurance and Stormwater Management
North Carolina Lumber River Basin Plan
Risk MAP & the Little River Basin
<<County Name>> <<Date>>
CTP Program Updates Laura Algeo, FEMA HQ.
FEMA Letters of Map Change
Presentation transcript:

Scoping the North Carolina Cooperating Technical State Project Ed Curtis, P.E., CFM, North Carolina Division of Emergency Management Jerry Sparks, P.E., CFM Dewberry & Davis LLC

Background

North Carolina CTS Flood Mapping Program l Hurricane Floyd in 1999 revealed limitations of outdated FIRMs in NC l NC General Assembly committed $25 million to flood mapping l CTS partnership between FEMA, State, and 16 other Federal Agencies l State ownership and responsibility for FIRMs

Project Components l High-resolution topographic data and accurate DEMs l Engineering studies of flood hazards l Countywide digital FIRMs l Online Information Management System

Project Benefits l Current, accurate data for sound siting and design decisions l Use of updated data for floodplain management will reduce long-term flood losses l Updated data will alert at-risk property owners of the need for flood insurance l Faster, cheaper FIRM updates

Project Benefits (Continued) l Digital format allows for more efficient, precise flood risk determinations l Digital format allows for use with GIS for analysis and planning l Digital Information System allows for online access 24 hours a day l DEMs will be useful for almost any engineering or planning applications

Eastern Six River Basins l NC General Assembly directed the State to first address the eastern six basins (Phase I) l Basins most affected by Hurricane Floyd l Approximately half of the State 4 > 50 counties and >330 municipalities (in whole or in part) 4 Encompass ~ 21,200 linear miles of streams and rivers

North Carolina River Basins—by Phase Phase I—blue Phase II—gold Phase III—green

Scoping the Six Eastern River Basins

Scoping Map Production The Flood Mapping Process

What Is Scoping? l Researching/inventorying available elevation, flood hazard, and digital base map data l Assessing adequacy existing flood hazard data l Outreach to, and input from, counties and communities l Identifying data to be developed or acquired l Determining proposed scales, paneling scheme, and format for DFIRM production l Developing schedule

Scoping the Six Eastern River Basins l Comprehensive scoping process l Tailored FEMA’s scoping process to meet the needs of North Carolina’s basin-wide approach and accelerated production schedule l NCDEM worked closely with FEMA and FEMA’s Map Coordination Contractor, Dewberry & Davis LLC (D&D) l Process involved 5 steps

State FEMA Kickoff Meeting with County/Local Floodplain Administrators Mapping Needs Assessment Effective FIS & FIRM Research Evaluate Post-Floyd Data NC Scoping Database Generate Initial Scoping Package Initial Scoping Meetings Develop Draft Basin Plans Final Scoping Meetings Finalize Basin Plans Process for Scoping Six River Basins in Eastern North Carolina Prepare Delivery Orders & CTC Mapping Activity Agreements & Update CTS Mapping Agreement Analysis and Mapping Step 1 Initial Research and Community Coordination Step 2 Initial Scoping Meeting Step 3 Draft Basin Plans Step 4 Final Scoping Meeting Step 5 Final Basin Plans SCOPINGPRODUCTION Questionnaire

Step 1: Initial Research and Community Coordination l Kick-off meeting with county and local floodplain administrators — August 31, 2000 l Objectives: 4 Overview State’s CTS Agreement with FEMA and the Statewide Flood Mapping Program 4 Inform about process that will be followed 4 Encourage active participation 4 Community questionnaire distributed

Step 1: Initial Research and Community Coordination (Continued) l State completed research of community mapping needs 4 September 1999, CTP “Assessment of Community Mapping Needs” agreement with FEMA l FEMA and D&D researched FEMA Flood Mapping Archives and FEMA’s Mapping Needs Update Support System (MNUSS) database

Step 1: Initial Research and Community Coordination (Continued) l State and FEMA evaluated post-Hurricane Floyd data l Identified areas where flooding elevations and inundation limits did not match effective flood hazard data

Step 1: Initial Research and Community Coordination (Continued) l State and FEMA conducted detailed review of effective flood data for counties along the open coast and inland coastal areas l State met with county and community GIS staff to inventory local GIS data to identify potential base map data resources

Step 1: Initial Research and Community Coordination (Continued) l Results of initial research and community questionnaire responses entered into a GIS-enabled scoping database created especially for North Carolina project l Database used to generate “Initial Scoping Packages” for each community l Initial Scoping Packages used to conduct Initial Scoping Meetings (Step 2)

Scoping Database

Step 2: Initial Scoping Meetings l Meetings in each county l Presented results of initial 1 research l Reviewed Initial Scoping Package with each community’s representatives l Asked for community input on proposed study priorities and analysis methods l Identified available local data

Step 3: Draft Basin Plans l Synthesized research and community input l Draft basin plans include: 4 Comprehensive lists of flooding sources to be updated and methods to be used 4 Counties for which DFIRMs will be produced 4 Overall schedule

Step 4: Final Scoping Meeting l Draft Basin Plan sent to affected counties and communities l Meetings held in each county l Present Draft Basin Plans l Provide final opportunity for input l Individual meetings scheduled with community representatives

Step 5: Final Basin Plans l Draft Basin Plans revised to produce Final Basin Plans l Final Basin Plans state how the Draft Basin Plan was revised and why

Step 5: Final Basin Plans (Continued) l Final basin plans used to: 4 Complete CTS Task Agreement with FEMA 4 Develop Delivery Orders for State’s mapping contractor 4 Develop CTP Mapping Activity Agreements with any counties or local communities

Scoping Schedule

Scoping the North Carolina Cooperating Technical State Project Q UESTIONS ? ? ? ? ?