1 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs NARUC / FERC Demand Response Collaborative Perspectives of a Large End Use Participant of NYISO Programs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Demand Response Commissioner Suedeen Kelly June 3, 2008.
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
The Role of Dynamic Pricing in Fostering the Efficient Use of Electric Sector Resources Presented to Kansas Corporate Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency.
© New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. New Challenges Facing System Operators Stephen G. Whitley President & Chief.
New England Developments in Demand Response and Smart Grid 2010 National Town Meeting on Demand Response and Smart Grid Henry Yoshimura, Director, Demand.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
WAL-MART STORES, INC. DEMAND RESPONSE. Wal-Mart in New York Supercenters45 Discount Stores45 Neighborhood Markets 0 Sam’s Clubs17 Distribution Centers4.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Introductions Energy Curtailment Specialists, Inc. Confidential – Property of ECS, Inc Paul Tyno, Executive Vice President Program Development − Responsible.
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
1 RELIABILITY AND COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS POWER Research Conference UC Berkeley March 19, 2004 Paul Joskow MIT, CEEPR, CMI and Jean Tirole IDEI,
1 RELIABILITY AND COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS POWER Research Conference UC Berkeley March 19, 2004 Paul Joskow MIT, CEEPR, CMI and Jean Tirole IDEI,
Electric Utility Basics An overview of the electric industry in New England and the operation of consumer-owned utilities 1.
WAL-MART STORES, INC. ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND DEMAND RESPONSE.
New Zealand & Australian Wholesale Electricity Markets A Comparative Review Dr Ralph Craven Transpower NZ Ltd.
North American Electricity Markets APEX Paris, France October 15-16, 2007 Kenneth Laughlin, PJM.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
The California energy crisis Introduction (Wolak March ‘01) –Wholesale: averaged $33 MWH in 1999, $116 MWH in 2000, $310MWH Jan –Natural gas $3-$4.
Battling Load Growth in NYC Chris Smith NYSERDA NARUC 2007 Summer Meeting.
Pricing Enabled by AMI What Types? What are the Benefits? Dr. Steven D. Braithwait Christensen Associates Energy Consulting EUCI Webinar September 12,
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Demand Resources: Challenges and New Initiatives for ISO New England Henry Yoshimura, ISO New England NEW DEMAND RESPONSE PRODUCTS IN ELECTRICITY MARKETS.
The Policy Voice for Energy Storage Bulk Energy Storage for the Nation’s Electricity Grid Jason Makansi, Executive Director President, Pearl Street Inc.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
World Forum on Energy Regulation IV Athens, Greece October , 2009 "Reducing Regulatory and Technological Barriers to Demand Side Participation“
Standby Generators & Demand Response What is Demand Response Why Demand Response Works PJM‘s DR Programs Financial Benefits Participation Requirements.
Building the Energy Markets of Tomorrow... Today The Market Value of Demand Response Aaron Breidenbaugh Demand Response Program Coordinator New York Independent.
Freeport Generating Project Project Description Modernization projects at Power Plant #2 Developers – Freeport Electric and Selected Development Company.
Load Management Strategies to Support Grid Integration of Intermittent Renewable Resources Paulina Jaramillo and Lester Lave.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.
8 Halswell St PO Box Thorndon WELLINGTON New Zealand While Strata Energy.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
EPSA REGULATORY AFFAIR CONFERENCE 2006 Washington, DC October 25, 2006 Garry Brown Vice President, External Affairs New York ISO.
Main Office Other Locations 540 Broadway 38 High Rock Avenue, #2C767 Third Avenue, btwn 48 th & 49 th 601 Pennsylvania Avenue HQ Hartford, 100 Pearl Street,
Overview of Distributed Generation Applications June 16, 2003 Harrisburg, PA Joel Bluestein Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc.
1 Capacity Markets Investment in Generation Capacity Payments October 31, 2005 J. W. Charlton.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
Charles Goldman E. O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Michael Kintner-Meyer Pacific Northwest National Laboratory DOE Office of.
NYISO Demand Side Programs and Issues
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Its Revisions to PURPA November 11, 2005 Grace D. Soderberg Assistant General Counsel National Association of Regulatory.
FERC Perspective on Demand Response David Kathan FERC Midwest Demand Response Initiative Chicago, IL February 9, 2007 The author’s views do not necessarily.
Demand Response in Energy and Capacity Markets David Kathan FERC IRPS Conference May 12, 2006.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
Demand Response as Capacity in New York National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Winter Committee Meetings Washington, DC February 17,
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
Ice Storage for Peak Load Reduction Chris Smith NYSERDA NARUC 2007 Summer Meeting.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
New Incentives for Pursuing Demand Response Scott Strauss and Sean Flynn Spiegel & McDiarmid APPA Legal Seminar San Francisco – November 2004.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
Overview of the NYISO Demand Response Programs
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Alternative Approach for Loads in SCED v.2
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Benefits of New England’s Proposed Capacity Market
NYS Department of Public Service
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Presentation transcript:

1 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs NARUC / FERC Demand Response Collaborative Perspectives of a Large End Use Participant of NYISO Programs July 15, 2007 Presented by: Michael Caufield Alcoa Inc.

2 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs NYISO Foot Print / Operational Characteristics  Two aluminum smelting facilities in Massena, NY  Combined 495 MW of full capacity  Typical load factor 95 to 99%  Bilateral contracts with New York Power Authority who serves as Alcoa LSE  20% of contract energy is interruptible.  When curtailed we buy in NYISO markets to sustain full operations.  Participant in NYISO DR Programs  Emergency Demand Response Program (EDRP)  Installed Capacity / Special Case Resource Program  Evaluating participation in Day Ahead Demand Response Program (DADRP)

3 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs Benefits of Demand Response (DR) Programs The effect of these programs is to provide incentives or direct payments to customers to induce curtailments when needed, usually for system reliability. The specific benefits of demand response programs include:  Lower wholesale prices for all consumers due to load shaving on peaks and the impact on locational marginal pricing (LMP) peaks.  Less required investment in high cost peaking generation facilities and enhanced grid reliability.  Reduced carbon emissions.  Enhanced energy cost management capability of end users.

4 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs Alcoa Perspectives on NYISO DR Programs  Programs are working!  NYISO DR Programs provide critical resources that benefit all New York consumers  SCR and EDRP provide compensation to DR providers that can reduce or eliminate usage on short notice  DADRP allows DR providers to compete with generators in the day-ahead energy market; DADRP participation is lagging. Alcoa ability to participate is hampered by bilateral contract restriction.  Ancillary Services markets will be open to DRs very soon.  Another important milestone and opportunity for DR providers like Alcoa to offer capability to the market.

5 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs Why Does Alcoa Participate In DR Programs?  Electricity can be 30% of our production cost.  Grid reliability is important to our operations.  Payments from DR programs help to offset the increased cost of electricity to our Massena plants.  Deregulated markets have resulted in higher bills  Payments to participating end users are intended to provide fair compensation to incent customers to curtail  By increasing competition, participation in DR programs helps to reduce the cost of electricity to all consumers.

6 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs Alcoa Support During 2003 Northeast Blackout Source: NPCC Report “Restoration of NPCC Areas Following The Power Collapse of August 14, 2003” (page 31 of 69)

7 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs DR Program Participation Retention and Growth  Establish clearly defined limits an end user’s ability to define frequency, magnitude, and duration capability and decide between consuming or curtailing electric consumption.  Load aggregation must be allowed to encompass all potential DR providers.  Power supplied via bilateral contracts must be eligible for demand response programs.  Regulators an ISO/RTO’s must continue to be advocates of DR Programs:  Continue to listen to new ideas and opportunities.  Help us minimize the barriers to participation.  Look for cost effective ways to “Market” DR program opportunities.