May 2006 1 Middle Fork Project Project Operations Overview May 2006 PCWA MAY 16, 2006 HANDOUT #4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Middle Fork American River Project AQ 2 – Fish Population Technical Study Report Overview March 3, 2009.
Advertisements

Middle Fork Project AQ 6 – Fish Passage Technical Study February 3, 2009.
Potential Climate Change Impacts to the NW Hydroelectric System NW Hydroelectric Association Conference February 20, 2013.
Aspinall Unit Reservoir Operations CRFS Meeting November 16, 2010.
John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wilmington District.
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Water Supply & Operations Meeting Billings, Montana October 8, 2009 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
Oswald Consultancy Ltd Can Scottish hydro smooth wind and wave power? Oswald Consultancy carried out this assessment and would like to thank Scottish and.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Update on Proposed Project.
1 Overview of South Yuba River Hydrology Bob Center Presented to FERC Academy on December 10, 2005.
Aspinall Unit Seasonal Operation Goals Fill Blue Mesa Reservoir before end of runoff. Operate to the 2012 Aspinall ROD at the Whitewater Gage. Meet the.
Klamath Watershed in Perspective A Review of Historical Hydrology of Major Features of the Klamath River Watershed and Evaluation of Hardy Iron Gate Flow.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting July 21, 2008.
June 26, PCWA - Middle Fork Project Project Operations
Hydrological Modeling FISH 513 April 10, Overview: What is wrong with simple statistical regressions of hydrologic response on impervious area?
A Preliminary Analysis of the Impacts of Climate Change on the Reliability on West Side Water Supplies Richard Palmer and Margaret Hahn Department of Civil.
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Billings, Montana January 2011 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
Yellowstone River Compact Commission Technical Committee Discussions Sheridan County Courthouse Sheridan, WY April 24, 2007 Bighorn Reservoir operations.
Reservoir and Diversion Data CBRFC Stakeholder Forum July 31, 2012.
How Much Do We Have Left? Coming to Terms With the Colorado River Water Availability Study Annual Colorado Water Workshop July 21, 2010 Ben Harding – AMEC.
Hood River Basin Study Water Resources Modeling (MODSIM) Taylor Dixon, Hydrologist February 12, 2014.
Federal Columbia River Power System Operations Planning.
Dr. David Ahlfeld Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering The Westfield River Basin Optimization Model Demonstration:
Integrated Water Management Modeling Framework in Nebraska Association of Western State Engineers Spring Workshop Salt Lake City, Utah June 9, 2015 Mahesh.
Lecture 5 Hydropower Sept 9, 2008 CVEN 4838/5838.
July Middle Fork Project Additional Information Potential Project Betterments to be evaluated during Relicensing July 2006.
June 2006 Middle Fork Project Project Maintenance June 20, 2006.
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Operating Criteria Review Billings, MT September, 2010 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
Middle Fork Project AQ 12 - Attachment A California Red-legged Frog Site Assessment March 10, 2008.
Middle Fork Project Flow and Temperature Modeling (Status Report) November 4, 2008.
Stockholm Environment Institute Natural Heritage Institute CABY Watershed Modeling with WEAP CABY Planning Meeting May David Purkey and David Yates.
IRP Approach to Water Supply Alternatives for Duck River Watershed: Presentation to XII TN Water Resources Symposium William W. Wade Energy and Water.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting May 29, 2008.
Hydro Power 102. Hydroelectric Models in the Northwest.
Middle Fork Project Project Description April 25, 2006.
1 Potential Project Betterments to be studied further during Relicensing June 20, 2006 Stakeholder Meeting Middle Fork American River Hydroelectric Project.
Potential Effects of Climate Change on New York City Water Supply Quantity and Quality: An Integrated Modeling Approach Donald Pierson, Elliot Schneiderman.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project (FERC No. 2079) Recreation Technical Working Group Meeting April 8, 2008.
1 Scheduling the TVA Hydro System Using RiverWare’s Optimization Suzanne H. Biddle, P.E. Tennessee Valley Authority.
Middle Fork Project Potential Project Betterments October 1, 2007.
1 Power Resource Management with assistance of Kevin Gawne Karl Reznichek and Dave Cormie.
USBR Updates: Green River CRFS Meeting March 27, 2014.
Overview of Alabama Power’s Tallapoosa River Operations Martin Dam Relicensing Informational Meeting April 1, 2008 Andy Sheppard, P.E. Project Mgr. - Hydro.
Water Balance/Operations Modeling Yuba River Development Project FERC Project 2246 Relicensing Wednesday, May 9, 2012.
Yellowtail Dam Modeling Results Brian Marotz Hydropower Mitigation Coordinator.
Yellowtail Dam & Bighorn Lake Water Supply & Operations Meeting Billings, Montana October 9, 2008 RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting June 1, 2009 Handout #2.
USACE Managing a Drought  Overview  Timeline  Depletion Scenario Current Status– 17 Oct 07.
NON-TREATY STORAGE AGREEMENT “Introduction to Operations and the Non Treaty Storage Scenarios” Presenter: Jim Gaspard.
PCWA MFP Operations Model All Models are Wrong But Some Models are Useful.
Reservoir Operation Simulation D Nagesh Kumar, IISc Water Resources Planning and Management: M7L2 Simulation.
Agenda 9:00 AM - 12:00 PM 12:00 PM Introductions
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
Hydrology and application of the RIBASIM model SYMP: Su Yönetimi Modelleme Platformu RBE River Basin Explorer: A modeling tool for river basin planning.
Model Overview Application of CALSIM II to Friant System.
Middle Fork Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Contingency Sampling Protocol (Contingency Study) September 8, 2008.
1 Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Terrestrial Working Group November 6, 2007 TERR 1: Vegetation Communities and Wildlife.
Hydrology and application of the RIBASIM model SYMP: Su Yönetimi Modelleme Platformu RBE River Basin Explorer: A modeling tool for river basin planning.
Modeling with WEAP University of Utah Hydroinformatics - Fall 2015.
Water Resources Groundwater. Key definitions Zone of aeration – soil and rock are less saturated (some pores contain air) Zone of saturation- pores contain.
Middle Fork American River Project Recreation Resources Technical Working Group Meeting October 5, 2009.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting February 2, 2009 Handout #5.
Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tarkan Erdik
Middle Fork Project AQ 11 – Water Quality Technical Study Plan Report Overview March 10, 2008.
Middle Fork Project Overview of 2008 Technical Study Plan Implementation April 21, 2008.
Middle Fork Project Entrainment Direct Sampling Approach (Contingency Study) September 8, 2008.
Upper Snake Reservoir Operations October 13, 2015
Albeni Falls Dam Operations
Middle Fork Project Project Description and Operations Maps
Hyrum Reservoir and how it applies to Flood Control by Nathan Wright
Department of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources
Presentation transcript:

May Middle Fork Project Project Operations Overview May 2006 PCWA MAY 16, 2006 HANDOUT #4

May MF Project Facilities

May Outline Major storage is at high elevation in the Project watershed Major storage is at high elevation in the Project watershed Project reservoirs store winter precipitation and spring runoff for use through the dry summer and fall Project reservoirs store winter precipitation and spring runoff for use through the dry summer and fall Water released through Project tunnels and powerhouses flows downhill to generate power Water released through Project tunnels and powerhouses flows downhill to generate power Withdrawals from the river to meet PCWA customer demand are at the bottom (downstream end) of the Project Withdrawals from the river to meet PCWA customer demand are at the bottom (downstream end) of the Project

May Upper Diversion & Storage Facilities Duncan diversion into FM Reservoir Duncan diversion into FM Reservoir French Meadows Reservoir French Meadows Reservoir Hell Hole Reservoir Hell Hole Reservoir Collect and store water, total about 340 TAF Collect and store water, total about 340 TAF Pattern of collection & filling: Pattern of collection & filling:  Collect in winter & spring  Release in summer and fall Duncan Diversion inlet in winter

May MF Project Storage Facilities

May

7 French Meadows Reservoir

May Hell Hole Reservoir

May Reservoir Operations Considerations Hydrologic variability: Hydrologic variability:  Spill Avoidance  Current-year minimum releases & consumptive demands  Carry-over to meet following year demands Avg. inflow to Folsom Variability = 240%

May Typical Reservoir Storage Curves Targets: - Fill with minimal spill - Carry-over 150TAF total

May Water Flow and Generation Pathway Middle Fork Project Duncan Diversion French Meadows Reservoir Hell Hole Reservoir Rubicon River Middle Fork MF powerhouse 850 cfs MW Ralston powerhouse 920 cfs - 80 MW Oxbow powerhouse 1050 cfs - 6 MW Middle Fork Duncan Creek French Meadows pwrhse 400 cfs - 15 MW Interbay Reservoir Afterbay Reservoir

May

May Main Power Generation Facilities Hell Hole reservoir to Interbay via Middle Fork powerhouse Hell Hole reservoir to Interbay via Middle Fork powerhouse

May Main Power Generation Facilities Interbay to Afterbay via Ralston powerhouse Interbay to Afterbay via Ralston powerhouse Release from Afterbay via Oxbow Powerhouse Release from Afterbay via Oxbow Powerhouse

May Main generation facilities encompass most of the vertical elevation of the Project

May Secondary Generation facilities French Meadows powerhouse: flows from FM to HH reservoirs French Meadows powerhouse: flows from FM to HH reservoirs Hell Hole power house – stream maintenance flows Hell Hole power house – stream maintenance flows Oxbow power house – releases to Middle Fork Oxbow power house – releases to Middle Fork

May

May Main generation facilities encompass most of the vertical elevation of the Project

May Operations - Generation Drivers to generation scheduling: Drivers to generation scheduling:  Water availability – reservoir level and downstream demands  Power grid needs – responsiveness to load and price

May Water Rights Permits Hydrology Power Market FERC License Terms Physical Constraints Window of Operations Project Operations – Framework for Operations Variable Factors Non-Variable Constraints

May Typical Generation Dispatch to meet Load Most Responsive Units Least Responsive Units

May

May “Peaking” Generation

May Project Operations for Peaking Primarily MF & Ralston stations Middle Fork Project Profile

May Key Elements for Peaking Operations Available water in Hell Hole reservoir Available water in Hell Hole reservoir Middle Fork and Ralston units operate “as one” Middle Fork and Ralston units operate “as one”  Long tunnels and small Interbay mandate closely coordinated operations Afterbay fluctuates for re-regulation Afterbay fluctuates for re-regulation  MF & Ralston may only generate 8 ~12 hrs/day  Downstream requirements and minimum flows are 24 hrs/day  Afterbay fills during peaking generation operations, empties when generation off-line

May Historic Total Generation Avg generation ~ 1.1M MWhr/yr

May Project Operations Overview Questions

May Middle Fork Project Project Operations Overview May 2006 PCWA MAY 16, 2006 HANDOUT #4