Handbook for Estimating Transportation Greenhouse Gases for Integration into the Planning Process Jody McCullough Federal Highway Administration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Advertisements

GIS and Transportation Planning
Resetting the measurement table CTR Board Meeting March 28, 2014 WSDOT Staff Evaluating a New CTR Program.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
Applying the SWIM2 Integrated Model For Freight Planning in Oregon Prepared for the 13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9, 2011.
1 Travel Model Application for Highway Vehicle Emission Estimation Ho-Chuan Chen, Ph.D., P.E. King County Department of Transportation Seattle, Washington.
Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine (former Ministry of Transport and Communications) State Enterprise «State Road Transport Research Institute» (SE.
California Energy Commission Medium and Heavy Vehicles and Movement of Light and Heavy Vehicles Inputs and Assumptions for Transportation Energy Demand.
TRIAD II. WorkshopTransportation and sustainability TRIAD II. Workshop Transportation and sustainability - Making transportation policies and developments.
Advanced Modeling System for Forecasting Regional Development, Travel Behavior, and the Spatial Pattern of Emissions Brian J. Morton Elizabeth Shay Eun.
1 BASSTEGG - Sketch Planning Charrette/GIS Models for Predicting Household Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) and Greenhouse Gas (CO 2 ) Emissions Chuck Purvis.
GreenSTEP Statewide Transportation Greenhouse Gas Model Cutting Carbs Conference December 3, 2008 Brian Gregor ODOT Transportation Planning Analysis Unit.
1 Calculating Mode Shift and Congestion Relief-Related Greenhouse Gas Displacement For the Current Year (see last slide for contact information)
Getting More Value from All Highway Data FHWA’s Current Initiatives and Future Plans Presented at Data System Requirements and Gaps to Support Restructuring.
1 Multi-Sector Approach to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Metropolitan Washington Region Land Use and Transportation Strategies Prepared for:
Research Week 2009‐2010 University of Mauritius A Sookun, R Boojhawon, SDDV Rughooputh1.
Opportunities and Constraints on Possible Options for Transport Sector CDM Projects – Brazilian Case Studies Suzana Kahn Ribeiro Importance of Transport.
Linking energy and environmental changes through statistics Duncan Millard Department of Energy and Climate Change, UK IAOS.
1 Current Issues And Problems Encountered For Projections In The United States And Canada Presented by Ms. Rebecca Lee Tooly USEPA Office of Air Quality.
Using the Oregon Statewide Integrated Model for the Oregon Freight Plan Analysis Prepared for the TRB SHRP2 Symposium: Innovation in Freight Demand Modeling.
11. 2 Public Transportation’s Role in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Kevin Desmond King County Metro Transit Division Seattle, WA On behalf of the.
How to Conduct a Government Operations GHG Emissions Inventory AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Broward County Pollution Prevention, Remediation and.
ESTABLISHING A CARBON BASELINE FOR THE CITY OF MADISON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS Report to the City of Madison Sustainable Design and Energy Committee Madison,
Transportation Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Background & Strategies Local Government Climate Change Summit Washington, DC April 10, 2008 Paul Bubbosh,
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: A Challenge for Engineers Ata M. Khan March 2002.
0 Mike Savonis Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) US Department of Transportation IntelliDrive is a registered service mark of the US Department of.
Beyond the Crossroads National Conference on Transportation Infrastructure and Regulatory Policy May 27, Denver, CO Future Infrastructure Needs,
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
New York State DOT Strategies for Climate Change John Zamurs 2008 NASTO Annual Meeting Pittsburgh, PA June 9, 2008.
Pricing policies for reducing CO 2 emissions from transport Huib van Essen Manager Transport CE Delft.
Name of Presentation Use Your AVI System for Commercial Vehicle Emissions Monitoring and Measuring Creating & Monitoring the Safe and Sustainable Green.
Energy Law, Fall 2010 Natashia Holmes
Regional Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory 5 TH MID-ATLANTIC REGIONAL PLANNING ROUNDTABLE NOVEMBER 7 TH, 2008 Robert Graff Delaware Valley Regional Planning.
HOW WILL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS BE TRANSFORMED IN OUR ENERGY FUTURE? GEORGE A. HUME April 28, 2006 Reference was made to the following internet sites in.
Evaluation of Environmental and Economic Impacts.
Life Cycle Assessment of Biofuels Paolo Masoni ENEA – LCA & Ecodesign Lab (ACS PROT – INN) Rome, th January.
Hejun (June) Kang 1, Sara Tomlinson 2, Charles Baber 2 1 Fairfax County Department of Transportation 2 Baltimore Metropolitan Council Using EERPAT to Study.
Office of the Chief Economist Office of Energy Policy and New Uses National Agricultural Credit Committee Harry S. Baumes Associate Director Office of.
1 Industry Plenary and Round Table 16 th World Congress Stockholm 2009 Steve Heminger Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission San Francisco.
1 Transit and Climate Change April 10, 2008 Deborah Lipman Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
CO 2 Emissions from Cars, Trucks & Buses in the Metropolitan Washington Region Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
Transportation and the CDM: Key Issues & Potential Case Studies March 14, 2003 Winnipeg.
1 EPA’s Climate Change Strategy Robert J. Meyers Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation December 3, 2007.
It’s Easy to Quantify Changes in GHG Emissions from Cars and Light Trucks – Right? Presented to: SACOG Panel Discussion April 16, 2009 Presented by: Bob.
2015 INTERNATIONAL EMISSIONS INVENTORY CONFERENCE: APRIL 14, 2015 DEVELOPING CALIFORNIA EMISSION INVENTORIES: INNOVATION AND CHALLENGES.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
Senate Transportation and Housing Committee Providing Fuels of the Future Catherine Reheis-Boyd President October 24, 2011 WESTERN STATES PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
Transportation Conformity Overview H-GAC Conformity Workshop May 30, 2007.
Item #11 Alternative Approaches for Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
1 Methodology for Estimating Green House Gas Emissions and Assessing Mitigation Options for Project Level Applications for O-Road Mobile Sources Graciela.
FHWA’s Current Activities Related to Climate Change Southeastern Natural Resource Leadership Group Regional Climate Change Meeting Charleston, SC May 27,
Road Impact Fee Update Discussion Item June 21, 2011 Transportation Impact Fee Update Discussion Item June 21, 2011.
1 Climate Change: Impact on Transportation (And Transportation Impact on Climate Change) August 14, 2008 Mike Clifford Metropolitan Washington Council.
1 Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change Smart Growth America, The Urban Land Institute.
Integrated Energy-Environmental Modeling for Regional Scenario Analysis Timothy Johnson U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development Research Triangle Park,
What Part Does Transportation and Land Use Play in Tackling Climate Change & Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Gordon Garry Director of Research and Analysis,
Air Quality, Transportation Conformity, and the FSTIP FTIP/FSTIP Workshop February 9, 2016.
Freight Transportation Plan Savannah, GA AMPO Conference - October 23, 2014.
Workshop on the Criteria to establish projections scenarios Sectoral projection guidance: Transport Mario Contaldi, TASK-GHG Emanuele Peschi, TASK-GHG.
Local Action Moves the World! 12 Years of the Cities for Climate Protection Campaign International Cities in Action.
Proposed Research Plan Fiscal Year Today’s Proposed Action Approve Fiscal Year Research Plan Allocate $6 million in four research.
SAUSALITO COMMUNITY GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY Years 2005 and 2010.
Overview of Sustainability Policy Issues CMAP Board of Directors October 10, 2007.
Border Wait-Time Emissions Analysis Study 1 Project Briefing Travis Black Federal Highway Administration November 14, 2012.
COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING July 29, 2015 Summit County 2015 Climate Action Plan.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Initiative City of Wichita
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Presentation transcript:

Handbook for Estimating Transportation Greenhouse Gases for Integration into the Planning Process Jody McCullough Federal Highway Administration

Webinar Agenda 1.Handbook Overview 2.Background on GHGs in Transportation 3.GHG Analysis in the Transportation Planning Process 4.Methods and Tools for GHG analysis  Key Methods  Fuel-based Methods  VMT-based Methods  Alternative Approaches, Strategy Analysis Methods, & Additional Considerations 5.Summary 6.Presentations from Sample Areas: XXXXXXXX 7.Questions & Answers 2

HANDBOOK OVERVIEW 3

Need for Handbook No federal requirement for state DOTs and MPOs to consider GHG impacts of transportation plans, but there is growing interest in analyzing GHG emissions in the transportation planning process. Some state DOTs and MPOs may have state or local requirements. State DOTs and MPOs still face questions:  How can GHG emissions analyses be applied in the transportation planning process?  What are the most appropriate methods to use?  What data are needed, and what are common sources?  What are the strengths and limitations of different approaches?

Handbook Purpose To help state DOTs and MPOs of all sizes and capabilities understand possible approaches, data sources, and step-by- step procedures for analyzing GHG emissions in the planning process. Designed to: Be user friendly and informative, particularly for State DOTs and MPOs that have limited experience with emissions analysis. Provide references to more detailed user manuals and technical resources.

Including GHG Analysis in the Transportation Planning Process

Types of GHG Analysis within the Planning Process GHG analysis falls into three broad categories based on purpose and timeframe: 1. Inventories - past or current emissions levels; 2. Forecasts - predictions about future emissions, potentially under different transportation investment or policy scenarios; 3. Strategy analysis – emissions effects of transportation strategies or sets of strategies, either to document the impact of existing programs or to forecast the potential impacts.

Handbook Sections Handbook includes: 1.Introduction 2.Overview: Estimating GHG Emissions in the Planning Process 3.What Methodologies are Applicable in Your Situation? 4.Fuel-based Methods 5.VMT-based Methods 6.Alternative GHG Estimation Approaches 7.Specific Transportation Strategy Analysis Methods 8.Additional Considerations in GHG Analysis: Lifecycle Analysis and GHG Emissions from Transportation Construction & Maintenance 9.References 8

BACKGROUND ON GREENHOUSE GASES IN TRANSPORTATION 9

Greenhouse Gases Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere are often called greenhouse gases (GHGs) The principal GHGs that enter the atmosphere because of human activities are:  Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 )  Methane (CH 4 )  Nitrous Oxide (N 2 O)  Fluorinated Gases

GHGs are Different GHG emissions differ from criteria air pollutants currently regulated under the Clean Air Act: The environmental impact of GHGs is the same regardless of where or when they are released. GHGs encompass at least six different gases. There are no means of using air quality monitoring data to designate nonattainment areas. GHGs persist in the atmosphere for decades; thus cumulative emissions are important. 11

Transportation GHGs About one third (27%) of GHG emissions in the U.S. come from transportation. U.S. GHG Emissions Allocated to Economic Sectors, Most transportation emissions come from on-road sources.

Factors affecting GHG Emissions from Transportation CO 2 emissions are a function of vehicle technology and activity, transportation infrastructure, and external factors.

GHG ANALYSIS IN THE PLANNING PROCESS 14

Why Include GHGs in the Planning Process? Better understand environmental implications of LRTPs Address environmental sustainability within performance- based planning efforts Support state/local climate action planning efforts

Why Include GHGs in the Planning Process? (continued) Complement planning and environment linkages (PEL) efforts  PEL is designed to help planners address complex environmental challenges early on.  Can help minimize duplication of effort later on in the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process for projects included in the plan. A planning level analysis has several advantages compared to project-level analysis:  System-wide approach  Broader geographic scope  Longer time scale 16

METHODS AND TOOLS 17

Methods for Estimating On-Road GHG Emissions Two common methods exist for estimating GHG emissions: Fuel-based methods Note: The emissions factor will depend on the fuel type VMT-based methods Note: The emissions factor will depend on vehicle type, technology/fuel type, speeds and operating conditions; different emissions factors are available for CO 2, N 2 O, and CH 4 Fuel Consumed Emission Factors CO 2 Emissions GHG Emissions VMT Emission Factors

Methods for Estimating On-Road GHG Emissions (continued) Other approaches discussed in the Handbook include: Alternative GHG Estimation Approaches  Commodity flow based methods  Energy and Emissions Reduction Policy Analysis Tool (EERPAT) Specific Transportation Strategy Analysis Methods  Conducted to analyze specific strategies, such as land use, operations strategies, and freight strategies.  Often used in combination with fuel-based or VMT-based methods. Additional Considerations in GHG Analysis  Life cycle analysis  Transportation construction and maintenance emissions

What are the most appropriate methods to use?

FUEL-BASED METHODS 21

Fuel-based Methods: An Overview Fuel Consumed (e.g., gallons) Emission Factors (e.g., CO2 per gallon) CO2 Emissions 22 Only accounts for CO 2, not other GHGs Most applicable at the state level, where fuel data are typically available Assigns emissions based on fuel sales; may not match with transportation planning assumptions about VMT Forecasts typically do not account for impacts of transportation investments

Fuel-based Methods: Collecting Fuel Consumption Data Fuel Consumed (e.g., gallons) Emission Factors (e.g., CO2 per gallon) CO2 Emissions Common Data Sources:  State fuel sales data and projections (generated for tax revenue purposes)  FHWA’s Highway Statistics report  Data from the Energy Information Administration (EIA), including forecasts in the Annual Energy Outlook

Fuel-based Methods: Calculating Emissions Fuel Consumed (e.g., gallons) Emission Factors (e.g., CO2 per gallon) CO2 Emissions 24 Emissions factors vary by type of fuel (e.g., motor gasoline, diesel, LPG) Common Sources / Tools: Emissions factor tables from EIA or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Tools that include emissions factors : State Inventory Tool (SIT) State Inventory Projection Tool

Fuel-based Methods: Emissions Factors Transportation FuelEmission Factors Kilograms CO 2 Per Unit of Volume Kilograms CO 2 Per Million Btu Aviation Gasoline8.32per gallon69.19 Biodiesel -B1000per gallon0 -B208.12per gallon B109.13per gallon B59.64per gallon B29.94per gallon71.80 Diesel Fuel10.15per gallon73.15 Ethanol/Ethanol Blends -E1000per gallon0 -E851.34per gallon E10 (Gasohol)8.02per gallon M per gallon M854.83per gallon65.56 Motor Gasoline8.91per gallon71.26 Jet Fuel, Kerosene9.57per gallon70.88 Natural Gas54.60per thousand cubic feet53.06 Propane5.74per gallon63.07 Residual Fuel11.79per gallon78.80 Emissions Factors, available at: Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration

Example: Vermont Statewide GHG Inventory and Forecast Vermont GHG Inventory:  Developed using SIT software and methods in Emissions Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP) guidance  Default motor fuel consumption data within SIT were replaced with gasoline consumption estimates from state tax data Vermont GHG Projections:  Estimated future fuel consumption using VMT projections combined with estimated vehicle fuel economy from EIA and information on new vehicle GHG standards 26  SIT CO 2 emissions factors were applied to calculate CO 2 emissions

VMT-BASED METHODS 27

VMT-based Methods: An Overview 28 VMT (miles) Emission Factors (grams / mile) GHG Emissions Can be used to estimate CO 2 and other GHGs Relies on VMT data commonly used in transportation planning Can be conducted at various levels of sophistication Involves two main components: 1) Developing VMT estimates; 2) Estimating emissions (relying on simple emission factors or use of sophisticated emissions models)

VMT-based Methods: Estimating VMT 29 VMT (miles) Emission Factors (grams / mile) GHG Emissions The first step in developing a GHG emissions estimate is developing estimates of VMT. There are a range of data sources and methods for estimating current and future VMT.

VMT-based Methods: Estimating VMT using Vehicle, Household, and Land Use Data Simple Approaches Vehicle Odometer data  Data on miles traveled per vehicle from inspection programs or registration data. Household Travel Survey data  Surveys can be used to estimate VMT by trip purpose or household characteristics and apply to a region or state Land Use data  Use land use based trip generation factors to estimate vehicle trips, and then multiply by average trip lengths to calculate VMT  Often applied at a small geographic scale (e.g., county or city or sub-area) and used for forecasts 30

VMT-based Methods: Estimating VMT using HPMS Data or Network-based Travel Model 31 Traffic count and Travel Model data HPMS  Data on traffic volumes submitted by all State DOTs to FHWA; can be used to estimate VMT by functional class.  Can apply simple factors or more sophisticated approaches to estimate future VMT. Travel model data  Readily available in most MPOs, commonly used for forecasting future conditions.  Accounts for factors such as land use patterns and transportation investments in developing forecasts

VMT-based Methods: Estimating Emissions Emissions rates depend on vehicle type, technology/fuel type, speeds, and operating conditions 32 VMT (miles) Emission Factors (grams / mile) GHG Emissions There are multiple ways to apply emissions factors  Simple factor  Look-up table only accounting for fleet characteristics  Look-up table accounting for fleet characteristics and speeds  MOVES inventory mode  MOVES emission rates

VMT-based Methods: Estimating Emissions (continued) 33 For resources on using MOVES, see: Guidance: Using MOVES for Estimating State and Local Inventories of On-Road Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Consumption: E PA’S MOVES (Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator) EPA’s MOVES model is the most robust methodology. The model works by simulating actual vehicle drive cycles, including the effect of travel at different speeds and vehicle power loads.

VMT-Based Methods: Example DVRPC Regional Inventory (Philadelphia) DVRPC developed a regional GHG emissions inventory HPMS data used to determine VMT total Through traffic was estimated based on travel demand model, and subtracted from total VMT apportioned to municipalities based on trip origins, destinations & length Emissions are mapped per acre, and per population and employment 34

VMT-Based Methods: Example Atlanta Regional Commission GHG Forecasting Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) modeled emissions impact of various land use scenarios describing different types of growth. Used 4-step travel demand model and emissions model. Allowed ARC to demonstrate impact of various strategies.

OTHER APPROACHES 36

Alternative GHG Estimation Approaches Methods to address specific needs: Commodity Flow Methods – for freight-related emissions  Travel models are generally geared toward passenger traffic  Commodity flow methods may be used to estimate freight emissions (see NCFRP Report 4*) Energy and Emissions Reduction Policy Analysis Tool (EERPAT) - for policy analysis  Many forecasting methods do not account for full range of GHG reduction strategies, including policies on pricing, incentives for energy efficient vehicles, and land use  EERPAT conducts a screening-level analysis of a range of strategies  See for more informationhttp:// 37 *

Specific Strategy Analysis Methods Most travel forecasts cannot evaluate certain GHG reduction strategies. Handbook addresses specific analyses for:  Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies (e.g., employer-based programs, parking pricing)  Land use strategies (e.g., land use mixing, pedestrian friendliness)  Transportation system management and eco-driving strategies (e.g., traffic surveillance, ramp metering, emergency management, eco- driving)  Freight strategies (e.g., idle reduction programs, logistics improvements) Examples for each are included in the Handbook 38

Additional Considerations in GHG Analysis Transportation emissions come from sources other than motor vehicles.  Lifecycle analysis methods account for direct emissions from motor vehicles and emissions associated with connected activities (e.g., vehicle disposal, fuel processing, electricity used in transit)  Transportation infrastructure construction and maintenance activities also produce emissions, which can be analyzed 39

SUMMARY 40

Key Points GHG emissions can be an important planning consideration. To get started, determine:  What is the goal of the analysis?  What data, tools, and resources do we have available?  What variables do we want to analyze? Approaches can vary from simple to complex  Recognize the strengths and limitations of different approaches – what may be applicable in one case may not be in another  Use of VMT data/forecasts with EPA’s MOVES model provides the most robust methodology for most planning applications More detailed resources, documentation, and modeling guidance are available 41

Contact Information Jody McCullough Federal Highway Administration Office of Planning 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC