UIFSA 2008 Intergovernmental Child Support Enforcement Speaker: John Cardoza 805-437-8110 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Best international practices – the ICC model contracts and changing circumstances.
Advertisements

CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION: PALESTINE 10 DECEMBER 2013 V.V.VEEDER DRAFTING ARBITRATION AWARDS 1.
Enforcing Settlement Agreements in Arbitration Proceedings Limassol, 18 November 2014 Speaker: Athina Papaefstratiou Fouchard.
The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act The “UCCJEA”
An overview by Professor M. R. Franks Copyright © 2009, M. R. Franks
ERICSA 51 st Annual Training Conference & Exposition ▪ May 18 – 22 ▪ Sheraton Greensboro ▪ Greensboro, North Carolina Lame Duck Jurisdiction Kelly Peiper.
Uniform Family Laws in Kansas: Alphabet Soup for the Soul. Ronald W. Nelson | Lenexa, Kansas kansas-divorce.com | twitter.com/kansasdivorce.
UIFSA What does the future of UIFSA Look like for CA?
INTERNATIONAL CHILD SUPPORT ISSUES Presenter: Randy Barker Kansas Child Support Chief of Litigation.
Pretzel Logic: Handling the Twists and Turns of UIFSA Modification
2005 CHILDREN’S CODE REVISIONS ARTICLE 5 ADOPTION ACT.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
MODEL IMPLEMENTING IDERA REGULATION SUMMARY POWERPOINT FIRST EDITION NOVEMBER 2014.
1 Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board. The Marketplace Fairness Act of 2015(MFA) Grants state and local jurisdictions the right to require the collection.
Enforcing Domestic Violence Orders Across Country Lines Linda D. Elrod, Richard S. Righter Distinguished Professor of Law, Director of Children and Family.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Japan - with a particular reference to Australian Judgments - Koji Takahashi Doshisha University Law.
AGENCY IN LIBYA OVERVIEW.  In1971, the Agency Law permitted the Libyan nationals to carry out activities of commercial agency  In 1975, the Libyan government.
Unit 8 Post Judgment Motions and State Intervention
Sales and Consumer Issues Objective Interpret sales contracts and warranties within the rights and law of consumers. REGULATION OF SALES.
COLORADO FAMILY SUPPORT COUNCIL CONFERENCE STEAMBOAT SPRINGS, CO June, 2015 Jeanette Savoy Chris Sorenson UIFSA 2008 AND THE HAGUE CONVENTION.
The Hague Convention and UIFSA 2008
UIFSA 101 Ins and Outs of Intergovernmental Cases Tonya Brunson & Daniel Macias.
1 GOING GLOBAL: INTERNATIONAL CHILD SUPPORT ISSUES Anne Miller Federal Office of Child Support Enforcement Jeanette Savoy Colorado State Office of Child.
Amy Beauchaine, Esq.. Rule (b) (3) Original Jurisdiction. District courts of appeal may issue writs of prohibition. What is a writ of prohibition?
ERICSA 51 st Annual Training Conference & Exposition ▪ May 18 – 22 ▪ Sheraton Greensboro ▪ Greensboro, North Carolina UIFSA 1996, 2001 & Third Time's.
UIFSA – Today & Tomorrow. UIFSA? Tell me more! Controlling Order  The order that governs your case  “Which” order is the enforceable order Continuing,
P ROGRAMS TO S UPPORT S TUDENT D EVELOPMENT N.J.A.C. 6A:16.
KCSE Annual Conference Tribal and State Jurisdiction in Enforcement and Establishment Presented by Marsha L. Harlan.
Western Energy Markets Working Group Form of California ISO Market Redesign and Technology Upgrade (MRTU) Contract Amendment Panelist: Jeremy D. Weinstein.
The Brussels II Regulation The Council Regulation no 2201/2003 concerning the jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgment in matrimonial.
PRESENTATION TO THE NCOP ON THE CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL INTERESTS IN MOBILE EQUIPMENT BILL, MARCH 2007.
INTERNATIONAL CHILD SUPPORT: WHERE ARE WE NOW? ERICSA 50 th Annual Training Conference & Exposition ▪ May 19 – 23 ▪ Hilton Orlando Lake Buena Vista, Florida.
Introduction to the Tribal Child Support Enforcement Program.
COPYRIGHT © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning..
1.WHAT DOES CAPE TOWN MEAN FOR CANADA?  U.S. Rating Agencies analyzed Air Canada EETC Issue of Series A, B and C Aircraft Notes and Critical Importance.
Interstate - All Things Considered INTERSTATE ESTABLISHMENT NC CHILD SUPPORT COUNCIL 31 ST CONFERENCE, ASHEVILLE, NC AUGUST 27, 2015.
UIFSA: The Fundamentals and More
UIFSA 2008 It’s Time Has Come!
1 George Mason School of Law Contracts I XX.Contract Modification F.H. Buckley
1 1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association U.S. Implementation of the Hague Agreement For Designs John (Jack) J. Penny, V Event.
Canada’s System for the International Recovery of Maintenance and its Application to the 2007 Child Support Convention Chris Beresford (Ministry of Justice.
ARBITRATION Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot.
Clark Snelson Assistant Attorney General State of Utah (With thanks and recognition to Ted Spangler, Assistant Attorney general, Idaho, retired) For presentation.
Sources of IFL Plan: 1. International Treaties as Sources of IFL 2. Agreement on the IMF 3. Multilateral Treaties in the IFS 4. Statements of International.
REVIEW OF THE LISBON AGREEMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION: LATEST DEVELOPMENTS Florence Rojal Legal.
1 Commodity Agreements Sugar, Coffee, Cocoa, Coconut New York, May 2004 Lynne Moorhouse.
New Federal Intergovernmental Regulations
WASHINGTON STATE LEGISLATURE BILL DRAFTING AND BILL REPORT WRITING October 29, 2004.
1 National responsibility and response. 2 Objectives  Introduce the concepts of primary and complementary responsibilities  Examine the foundation and.
1 Intergovernmental Child Support: Final Rule. 2 Overview Purpose and Scope Major Areas of the Final Rule Questions and Answers.
Other amendments. Automatic stay scope 11 U.S.C. § 362(a): Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a petition...operates as a stay, applicable.
International Child Support 101 California 2007 Annual Child Support Training Conference.
From Interstate to International Child Support GoesGlobal.
1 UNIQUE CHALLENGES TO OBTAINING AND ENFORCING INTERSTATE CASES Presented by: Victor V. Urso, Attorney, San Bernardino County Diane Brower, Attorney, Los.
OVERVIEW ■History of Interjurisdictional Law ■URESA/RURESA ■FFACCSOA ■UIFSA ✷ CEJ, DCO, ROA ■Federal Intergovernmental Regulations ■International Cases.
Copyright Protection in Indonesia: General Information on the Implementation of Copyright Law in Indonesia; policies and planning Seoul, November 2007.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 19 – Social Policy and Employment.
Registration of treaties under Article 102 of the Charter of the United Nations Keiichiro Okimoto Associate Legal Officer Treaty Section, Office of Legal.
UNIFORM CHILD CUSTODY AND JURISDICTION ACT (U.C.C.J.E.A.)
Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot
IV-D Law and Regulations
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Russia Roman Zaitsev, PhD, Partner 05/09/2018.
Civil Registration Process: Place, Time, Cost, Late Registration
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral Awards
New Customs Legislation of the Eurasian Economic Union
Extraordinary Intergovernmental Topics
What is OAL? The Office of Administrative Law (OAL) ensures that agency regulations are clear, necessary, legally valid, and available to the public. OAL.
Board of County Commissioners
ON EUROPEAN TRADEMARKS AND DESIGNS
Presentation transcript:

UIFSA 2008 Intergovernmental Child Support Enforcement Speaker: John Cardoza

History Takeaways…. Prior to the implementation of the Full Faith and Credit of Child Support Orders Act (FFACSOA) and the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA), multiple states could have valid Child Support Orders for the same family unit. Prior to the implementation of the Full Faith and Credit of Child Support Orders Act (FFACSOA) and the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA), multiple states could have valid Child Support Orders for the same family unit. FFACSOA and UIFSA provide a system where there is only one Order for a family unit, which can be enforced and/or modified. FFACSOA and UIFSA provide a system where there is only one Order for a family unit, which can be enforced and/or modified.

History Takeaways…. FFACSOA and UIFSA: FFACSOA and UIFSA: Provides a frame work that allows a state to enforce another state’s Support Order. Provides a frame work that allows a state to enforce another state’s Support Order. Limit the circumstances when one state can modify the Support Order of another state. Limit the circumstances when one state can modify the Support Order of another state. Are supposed to be consistent in their application. Are supposed to be consistent in their application.

History-- URESA Prior to UFISA and FFACSOA, each state had a version of the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA). Prior to UFISA and FFACSOA, each state had a version of the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA). Initially enacted in 1952, revised in 1968 (R- URESA). Initially enacted in 1952, revised in 1968 (R- URESA). Sought to simplify interjurisdictional child support. Sought to simplify interjurisdictional child support. Not that Simple. Not that Simple. Modification was confusing. Modification was confusing. “magic words” needed. “magic words” needed. Often valid Orders from multiple jurisdictions. Often valid Orders from multiple jurisdictions.

History– URESA to FFACSOA to UIFSA Confusion Confusion Federal Fix: UIFSA Federal Fix: UIFSA States did not all adopt UIFSA at the same time. States did not all adopt UIFSA at the same time. Federal Fix: FFACSOA (28 USC §1738B) Federal Fix: FFACSOA (28 USC §1738B) October 1994—remember the date! October 1994—remember the date! Forced a “one order world” on all the states. Forced a “one order world” on all the states. In place before most state adopted UIFSA. In place before most state adopted UIFSA.

History– URESA to FFACSOA to UIFSA Concepts of Continuing Exclusive Jurisdiction and Choice of Law are part of FFACSOA. Concepts of Continuing Exclusive Jurisdiction and Choice of Law are part of FFACSOA. FFACSOA was amended in 1996 to be consistent with UIFSA. FFACSOA was amended in 1996 to be consistent with UIFSA. All States were required to adopt UIFSA by 1998—California adopted then. All States were required to adopt UIFSA by 1998—California adopted then. Family Code Currently §4900 to §5005. Family Code Currently §4900 to §5005.

UIFSA 2001 …clarified and extended the act without making any fundamental change in the earlier policies and procedures from UIFSA 1996 …clarified and extended the act without making any fundamental change in the earlier policies and procedures from UIFSA 1996

UIFSA 2001 Example: Example: Family Code §4953(a) Family Code §4953(a)

UIFSA Version: 1996 Version: § (a) The law of the issuing state governs the nature, extent, amount, and duration of current payments and other obligations of support and the payment of arrearages under the order. § (a) The law of the issuing state governs the nature, extent, amount, and duration of current payments and other obligations of support and the payment of arrearages under the order.

UIFSA Version: 2001 Version: § (a) Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (d), the law of the issuing state governs the nature, extent, amount, and duration of current payments under a registered support order, the computation and payment of arrearages and accrual of interest on the arrearages under the Support Order, and the existence and satisfaction of other obligations under the Support Order. § (a) Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (d), the law of the issuing state governs the nature, extent, amount, and duration of current payments under a registered support order, the computation and payment of arrearages and accrual of interest on the arrearages under the Support Order, and the existence and satisfaction of other obligations under the Support Order.

UIFSA 2001 Foreign Cases… Foreign Cases… US began crafting reciprocal agreements for support with foreign countries US began crafting reciprocal agreements for support with foreign countries. UIFSA (2001) redefined “state” to encompass foreign countries with a bilateral agreement with the United States. UIFSA (2001) redefined “state” to encompass foreign countries with a bilateral agreement with the United States. 14 Nations, 14 Nations, 11 Canadian Provinces 11 Canadian Provinces The US is currently not a party to any multilateral agreements. The US is currently not a party to any multilateral agreements.

The Hague Convention From June 2003, through November 2007, more than 70 countries met in The Hague, Netherlands, in five separate negotiating sessions to forge a new Hague Convention on the Enforcement of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance. From June 2003, through November 2007, more than 70 countries met in The Hague, Netherlands, in five separate negotiating sessions to forge a new Hague Convention on the Enforcement of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance.

The Hague Convention The Convention was signed by the United States at The Hague, Netherlands in November The Convention was signed by the United States at The Hague, Netherlands in November Establishment, enforcement, and modification of family support are basically matters of state law. Establishment, enforcement, and modification of family support are basically matters of state law. To realize the goals of the Convention at the state level, UIFSA needed to be revised again, leading us to… To realize the goals of the Convention at the state level, UIFSA needed to be revised again, leading us to…

UIFSA 2008 UIFSA 2001 had an a substantial impact on the Convention—so revisions were not wholesale. UIFSA 2001 had an a substantial impact on the Convention—so revisions were not wholesale. “The clear drafting goal was to integrate the Convention into state law…”. “The clear drafting goal was to integrate the Convention into state law…”. Foreign Countries no longer analogous to “states”, and are referred to and defined separately. Foreign Countries no longer analogous to “states”, and are referred to and defined separately.

UIFSA 2008 Example… Example… Family Code §4908 (UIFSA §204) Family Code §4908 (UIFSA §204) (a) A tribunal of this State may exercise jurisdiction to establish a support order if the [petition] or comparable pleading is filed after a pleading is filed in another State state or a foreign country only if: (a) A tribunal of this State may exercise jurisdiction to establish a support order if the [petition] or comparable pleading is filed after a pleading is filed in another State state or a foreign country only if:

UIFSA 2008 (1) the [petition] or comparable pleading in this State state is filed before the expiration of the time allowed in the other State state or the foreign country for filing a responsive pleading challenging the exercise of jurisdiction by the other State state or the foreign country. (1) the [petition] or comparable pleading in this State state is filed before the expiration of the time allowed in the other State state or the foreign country for filing a responsive pleading challenging the exercise of jurisdiction by the other State state or the foreign country. Etc… Etc…

UIFSA 2008 To simplify the integration of the Hague Convention into state law (UIFSA), rather than substantively amending numerous sections, the drafters added and amended Article 7 to the Act. To simplify the integration of the Hague Convention into state law (UIFSA), rather than substantively amending numerous sections, the drafters added and amended Article 7 to the Act. Note: UIFSA 2008 does not limit Enforcement of Foreign Orders to Convention Countries. Note: UIFSA 2008 does not limit Enforcement of Foreign Orders to Convention Countries.

UIFSA 2008 §701—Definitions. §701—Definitions. §702– Applies only to convention §702– Applies only to convention Countries. Countries. §703-- State Agency performs functions §703-- State Agency performs functions under the convention. under the convention. §704-- Lists the rights and duties of the §704-- Lists the rights and duties of the IVD agency and the Obligee. IVD agency and the Obligee. §705-- Direct requests for services. §705-- Direct requests for services.

UIFSA 2008 §706—Registration of Convention Suppor §706—Registration of Convention Suppor Order. Order. §707–Contest of Registration of §707–Contest of Registration of Convention Support Order. Convention Support Order. §708-Recognition, limits and §708-Recognition, limits and Enforcement of A registered Enforcement of A registered Convention Support order. Convention Support order. §709–Partial Enforcement. §709–Partial Enforcement.

UIFSA 2008 §710—Foreign Support Agreements. §710—Foreign Support Agreements. §711—Modification of Convention Child §711—Modification of Convention Child Support Order. Support Order. §712—limitation of Use of Personal §712—limitation of Use of Personal Information. Information. §713—Record in original language with §713—Record in original language with translation required. translation required.

Take Aways California currently uses UIFSA 1996; California currently uses UIFSA 1996; UIFSA 2001 which has not been adopted by California, clarifies and extends UIFSA 1996 and includes components allowing bi-lateral agreements with foreign countries; UIFSA 2001 which has not been adopted by California, clarifies and extends UIFSA 1996 and includes components allowing bi-lateral agreements with foreign countries; UIFSA 2008 is designed to incorporate UIFSA 2001 with processes to Register, Enforce and in some cases, modify Support Orders from Convention Countries. UIFSA 2008 is designed to incorporate UIFSA 2001 with processes to Register, Enforce and in some cases, modify Support Orders from Convention Countries.

Take Aways The general concepts of personal and subject matter jurisdiction, enforcement and modification do not change with implementation of UIFSA The general concepts of personal and subject matter jurisdiction, enforcement and modification do not change with implementation of UIFSA 2008.

QUESTIONS???