THE INTERNATIONAL PROJECT ON INNOVATIVE NUCLEAR REACTORS AND FUEL CYCLES (INPRO) F. Depisch, C.Allan, J. Kupitz (IAEA) WATEC Vienna, 3 rd October 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNRESTRICTED Infrastructure Assessment as Viewed by Technology Holders IAEA Technical Meeting December 10-12, 2008 R. Godden.
Advertisements

RISK INFORMED APPROACHES FOR PLANT LIFE MANAGEMENT: REGULATORY AND INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVES Björn Wahlström.
Safety and Security Aspects of the Management of High Level Waste and Spent Fuel Ramzi Jammal Executive Vice-President and Chief Regulatory Operations.
Substantive environmental provisions Prof. Gyula Bándi.
Nuclear Infrastructure Development Evaluation: Perspectives from the United States Dr. Marc A. Humphrey Office of Nuclear Energy, Safety and Security U.S.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
NUNAVUT TUNNGAVIK INCORPORATED Lands Policy Advisory Committee Draft Uranium Policy.
Definition, Role and Documentation of the Safety Case: Quick Review
Challenges of a Harmonized Global Safety Regime Jacques Repussard Director General IRSN IAEA 2007 Scientific Forum.
Technical Meeting on Evaluation Methodology for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development December, 2008 Nuclear Safety in Infrastructure Building.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO) Presented by Jon R. Phillips.
Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy
Safety Driven Performance Conference 2013 The future of managing asset-intensive businesses John Keefe APM/RBMI Technical Manager Asset Integrity Services.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview of legal framework Regional Workshop - School for Drafting Regulations 3-14 November 2014 Abdelmadjid.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
Tom MAZOUR IAEA, Division of Nuclear Power
PBNC- 1 Overview of US Nuclear Energy Initiatives /06- 1 Harold McFarlane President American Nuclear Society.
IAEA - Department of Nuclear Safety & Security
1 THE NUCLEAR ENERGY POLICY FOR SOUTH AFRICA ELSIE MONALE ICRP WORKSHOP.
08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.
Steven Biegalski, Ph.D., P.E. Director, Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering Dusting off the Atom: Nuclear.
INPRO Assessment of Safety of Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycle Facilities INPRO Assessment of Safety of Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection and the Regulatory Framework Module IV 2 Conceptual.
Energy Forum 2011, Changing the Energy Paradigm and Outlook for South-Eastern EU Energy Forum 2011 Nuclear Safety Regulation in Romania Recent Developments.
IAEA Regulatory Cooperation Forum Programme and Activities RCF Plenary 18 th September 2015 Dr. Bismark Tyobeka RCF Vice Chairman.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
International Working Forum for Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites (RSLS) Review of 2013 and Introduction of Next Steps of RSLS Malgorzata.
1 ESTABLISHMENT OF REQUIREMENTS Module “National legislation and licensing” Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Program “Leonardo da Vinci”
Integrated Used Nuclear Fuel Management Regulatory Information Conference U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission March 11, 2009 Steven P. Kraft Senior Director.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
IAEA ANSN RWMTG National Workshop: Application of IAEA Methodology and Tools for the Safety Case and Safety Assessment for Predisposal Management of Radioactive.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
Milestones or Millstones Alex R. Burkart, Deputy Director Office of Nuclear Energy, Safety and Security United States Department of State.
56th Regular Session of the IAEA General Conference
1 Nuclear Energy Division MIT Report on the Future of Nuclear Power in the United-States : review and discussion Eric Proust Director, Industrial Affairs.
Fukushima Lessons Learnt and Follow-up Activities of Rostechnadzor Alexey Ferapontov, Acting Chairman Second European Nuclear Safety Conference
ENERGY FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY the Potential for Nuclear Power Luis Echávarri Director-General, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency IAEA Scientific Forum at the General.
INPRO Assessment of Safety of Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles INPRO Assessment of Safety of Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles Y.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency International Standards, Codes and Guidance for Radiation Safety Regulatory Infrastructure IAEA Advanced Regional.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors W. Kennedy Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation.
Department of Nuclear Energy International Atomic Energy Agency Overall Roadmap Organization NERAC GEN IV Roadmap NERAC Subcommittee (GRNS) Technical Community.
23 January 2016 Gustavo C ARUSO Head, Regulatory Activities Section Division of Nuclear Installations Safety Department of Nuclear Safety and Security.
Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Presenter Name School of Drafting Regulations for Borehole Disposal of DSRS 2016 Vienna, Austria Requirements for.
International Atomic Energy Agency V. Nys Definition and practical application of demonstration of operational and long-term safety for predisposal RWM.
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
Energy Meeting with the NGOs Taipei, 25 September 2013 Christian Kirchsteiger European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy (DG ENER) EU Policy Context.
1.9. Safety assessment “School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety, IAEA - Module 1 Regulatory framework for safety, authorization and inspection.
Use and Conduct of Safety Analysis IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decission Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Lecturer.
The International Project on Innovative Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO): International Cooperation for the next 50 years International Atomic Energy.
DDG Nuclear Energy: Mr Zizamele Mbambo
Nuclear decommissioning: Turning waste into Wealth
IAEA PERSPECTIVE ON THE FUTURE OF NUCLEAR POWER
IAEA International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power – The next Fifty Years Moscow - Obninsk, Russian Federation - June 28, 2004 Nuclear.
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Office of Legal Affairs
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
New build and new countries
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Joint WG on Guidance for an Integrated Transport and Storage Safety Case for Dual Purpose Casks TM TM to Produce Consolidated Drafts of the IAEA’s.
IAEA General Conference Regulatory Cooperation Forum Regulatory Approach Prescriptive vs Performance Based David Senior Executive Director -
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18
Interfaces of Nuclear Safety and Security
Presentation transcript:

THE INTERNATIONAL PROJECT ON INNOVATIVE NUCLEAR REACTORS AND FUEL CYCLES (INPRO) F. Depisch, C.Allan, J. Kupitz (IAEA) WATEC Vienna, 3 rd October 2003

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction Goals of INPRO Results of INPRO Phase 1A in the Area of NP Prospects/Potentials, Economics, Sustainability/Environment, Safety, Proliferation Resistance, Cross Cutting Issues and Methodology Conclusion and Outlook

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Introduction INPRO : International Project on Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles Basis of INPRO : Resolution at the IAEA General Conference in 2000/2001/2002 in Vienna 16 Participants in INPRO (June 2003): 15 INPRO Member States: Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Germany, India, Indonesia, Republic of Korea, Pakistan, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, The Netherlands, Turkey European Commission. Several Observers in INPRO (e.g. Australia, Belgium, Chile, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Japan, UK, USA, OECD/NEA, etc.)

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Goals of INPRO ●INPRO Goals: 1.To help to ensure that nuclear energy is available to contribute in fulfilling energy needs in the 21st century in a sustainable manner. 2.To bring together both technology holders and technology users to consider jointly the actions required to achieve desired innovations in nuclear reactors and fuel cycles. INPRO Time horizon is 50 years into the future. Why Innovative Nuclear Energy Systems? Need for Innovation to turn around current trend regarding Nuclear Power ( ).

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Status of INPRO June 2003: End of INPRO Phase 1A Phase 1A: Definition of Basic Principles, User Requirements and Criteria for Innovative Nuclear Energy Systems in the Area of Economics, Environment, Safety, Proliferation Resistance and Crosscutting Issues, Outline of Methodology Documentation of Results of INPRO Phase1A in IAEA Report TECDOC-1362 July 2003: Start of Phase 1B (Validation of Methodology)

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Results of INPRO in the Area Nuclear Power Prospects and Potentials World Nuclear Electricity Production (GWe) (IPCC) Yellow bars: SRES Scenarios SRES = Special Report on Emission Scenarios of the Intergovernme ntal Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Results of INPRO in the Area Economics INPRO: Selection of 4 Representative Scenarios of the Future out of 40 SRES = Special Report on Emission Scenarios of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) IIASA = International Institute for Applied System Analysis

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Results of INPRO in the Area Economics Potential Global Market for Nuclear Electricity, Hydrogen, Heat and Desalination for A1T Scenario Energy (EJ) Time (yr) SRES Scenario A1T SRES Potential

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Results of INPRO in the Area Economics NTR = Nuclear Technology Review (IAEA) in 2002 S-2000 = SRES input for the year 2000 A1T-N = Costs in A1T with aggressive Learning Rate Ranges for Specific Capital Costs in 2050 for NPP (SRES) A1T = Costs in A1T as defined in SRES 4% 7% 3% 10% 0% 6% 0% 8% IAEAIAEA SRESSRES Upper Bar: Learning Rate SRES Lower Bar: Learning Rate INPRO

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Definition of Selected INPRO Terms Innovative Nuclear Energy System (INS): INS will position NP to make Major Contribution to Energy Supply in the 21 st Century. INS includes Innovative and Evolutionary Designs. Innovative design (= advanced design) incorporating radical conceptual changes in design approaches or system configuration in comparison with existing designs. Evolutionary design (= advanced design) incorporating small to moderate modifications with strong emphasis on maintaining design proveness. INS includes all Components: Mining and Milling, Fuel Production, Enrichment, Fabrication, Production (incl. all types and sizes of reactors), Reprocessing, Materials Management (incl. Transportation and Waste Management), Institutional Measures (e.g. safe guards, etc.), all Phases (e.g. cradle to grave)

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Definition of Selected INPRO Terms Basic Principle: Statement of a general rule providing guidance for the development of INS. User Requirement: Conditions to be met to achieve acceptance of INS by User. Definition of measures to fulfill Basic Principle. User: Has a stake or interest in sectors where INS are applicable, e.g. designers, utilities (electricity, heating, desalination, etc.), regulators, national governments, NGO, press, international organizations and public. Includes countries in development and transition. Criterion: Consists of an Indicator and an Acceptance Limit. Used for Judgement of Potential of INS to fulfil the corresponding User Requirement.

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Definition of Selected INPRO Terms INPRO Hierarchy of Demands on Innovative Nuclear Energy Systems (INS) Basic Principle User Requirement Criterion b b a a a = Derivation b = Fulfilment

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Results of INPRO in the Area Economics Two Basic Principles defined: The cost of energy from INS, taking all costs and credits into account, must be competitive with that of alternative energy sources INS must represent an attractive investment compared with other major investments Five User Requirements and Several Criteria defined

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Results of INPRO in the Area Sustainability / Environment Holistic Approach for Environmental Assessment

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Results of INPRO in the Area Sustainability / Environment  Two Basic Principles defined: 1.Acceptability of Environmental Effects :  The adverse environmental effects of the INS must be well within the performance envelope of current nuclear energy systems. 2.Fitness for Purpose :  The INS must be capable of contributing to the energy needs in the future making efficient use of non-renewable resources.  Four User Requirements (UR) and Six Criteria for INS defined  Four UR for Assessment Method defined

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Fuel Cycle Installations - Control Sub-criticality and Chemistry - Remove Decay Heat from Radio-nuclides - Confine Radioactivity and Shield Radiation - Results of INPRO in the Area Safety of Nuclear Installations Approach to Development of Basic Principles, User Requirements and Criteria for INS in the Area of Safety General Nuclear Safety Objective Fundamental Safety Functions Nuclear Reactors - Control Reactivity - Remove Heat from Core - Confine Radioactivity and Shield Radiation - Defence in Depth - Prevent abnormal operation and failures - Control abnormal operation, detect failures - Control accidents within design basis - Assure low damage frequencies - Contain released radioactive materials Balanced design options and configurations Deterministic & Probabilistic Safety Analysis Increased Emphasis on Inherent Safety Characteristics Passive Systems Active Systems

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Results of INPRO in the Area Safety of Nuclear Installations Five Basic Principles defined : The Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycle Installations shall: Incorporate enhanced defense in depth Be so save that they can be sited in locations similar to other industrial facilities used for similar purpose Incorporate increased emphasis on inherent safety and passive features Include associated RD&D Include holistic life-cycle analysis Twenty-seven User Requirements and Several Criteria defined

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Results of INPRO in the Area Safety of Nuclear Installations Basic Principle 1: Innovative nuclear reactors and fuel cycle installations shall incorporate enhanced defence-in-depth as a part of their fundamental safety approach and the levels of protection in defence-in-depth shall be more independent from each other than in current installations (continued). The innovative nuclear reactors and fuel cycle installations shall not need relocation or evacuation measures outside the plant site, apart from those generic emergency measures developed for any industrial facility. Probability of large release of radioactive materials to the environment. <10 -6 per plant * year, or excluded by design. User Requirement Criteria Indicators Acceptance Limit

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Results of INPRO in the Area Waste Management Nine Basic Principles (from IAEA Safety Series No. 111-F) Secure acceptable level of protection for human health and the environment including effects beyond national borders now and in the future (summary of 4 principles) Avoid undue burdens on future generations Minimize waste generation Consider all interdependencies among all steps of waste generation Assure appropriate national legal framework Assure safety of waste facilities during lifetime Six User Requirements and Several Criteria defined by INPRO

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Results of INPRO in the Area Waste Management User Requirement Criteria IndicatorsAcceptance Limits 5.Reduction of Waste at the Source: The energy system should be designed to minimize the generation of wastes and particularly wastes containing long-lived toxic components that would be mobile in a repository environment. Alpha-emitters and other long-lived radionuclidesALARP Total activity Radiotoxicity ALARP MassALARP VolumeALARP Chemically toxic elements that would become part of the radioactive waste ALARP (as low as reasonable practical, social and economic factors taken into account)

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Results of INPRO in the Area Waste management User Requirement Criteria IndicatorsAcceptance Limits Intermediate steps between generation of the waste and the end state should be taken as early as reasonably practicable. The design of the steps should ensure that all important technical issues (e.g., heat removal, criticality control, confinement of radioactive material) are addressed. The processes should not inhibit or complicate the achievement of the end state. Time to produce the waste form specified for the end state As short as reasonably practicable. T E TTechnical indicators: e.g., l Criticality compliance Heat removal provisions Radioactive emission control measures Shielding specifications Volume / activity reduction measures Radiotoxicity l Criteria as prescribed by regulatory bodies of specific Member States. Process descriptions that encompass the entire waste life cycle. Complete chain of processes from generation to final end state and sufficiently detailed to make evident the feasibility of all steps.

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Results of INPRO in the Area Proliferation Resistance Definition of Proliferation Resistance: Characteristics of nuclear energy system that impedes diversion or undeclared production of nuclear material or misuse of technology Intrinsic Features: Technical design (e.g., core with small reactivity margins) Extrinsic Measures: Control and verification agreements (e.g., IAEA safeguards)

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Results of INPRO in the Area Proliferation Resistance Five Basic Principles defined: Provide proliferation resistant features to minimize the possibilities of misuse of nuclear materials for nuclear weapons. Provide balanced combination of of intrinsic and extrinsic measures (summary of 2 principles) Encourage development of intrinsic features Assessment methods to be developed Five User Requirements and Several Criteria defined

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Results of INPRO in the Area Crosscutting Issues Definition of Desired Changes (recommendations) to Facilitate Deployment of NP in the Area of : Legal and Institutional Infrastructure Economic and Industrial Infrastructure Socio-Political Infrastructure

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Results of INPRO in the Area Crosscutting Issues Recommendations in the area of Legal and Institutional Infrastructure: License for INS should be based on INPRO Requirements and internationally accepted. International or regional nuclear authorities and inspection bodies should be established. Handling of liability and insurance risk should be comparable to other industries.

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Results of INPRO in the Area Methodology for Assessment Top down approach: Development of Basic Principles, User Requirements and Criteria in the Areas of Economics, Environment, Safety, waste management and Proliferation Resistance Compiling of Approaches in INS relevant to different Areas Check of Compliance of Approaches with Basic Principles and User Requirements via Judgment of Potential to fulfill Criteria.

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September Conclusion and Outlook Conclusion: INPRO Phase 1A finished in June 2003 Formulation by INPRO in Phase 1A of Basic Principles, User Requirements and Criteria for Assessment of INS in all Areas Documentation of Results of Phase 1A in an IAEA report (TECDOC-1362) Outlook: INPRO Phase 1B started in July 2003: Application of INPRO Methodology by assessing of INS via  Case Studies to update methodology (Argentina, India, Korea, Russia)  Work Packages  Assessment of complete INS Enhancement of Synergy with other projects (e.g. GIF)

F. DepischIC on Global Environment and advanced NPP, Kyoto, 15 th – 19 th of September INPRO and GIF Both Projects are complementary: INPRO:  Represents technology users and holders  Global perspective including developing countries  Assessment methodology also for users  Holistic approach of nuclear systems  Inclusion of infrastructure aspects GIF  Represents primarily technology holders  Basis for RD&D of 6 chosen technologies