Soil structure and C sequestration under no tillage management Gayoung Yoo* and Michelle M. Wander Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sedimentation Test of Soil Texture
Advertisements

Water Budget IV: Soil Water Processes P = Q + ET + G + ΔS.
Soil Erosion Estimation TSM 352 Land and Water Management Systems.
Soil CO 2 production and transport in the drought experiment in Caxiuana National Forest, Para, Brazil. Eleneide Doff Sotta Antonio Carlos Lola Rosiene.
Nitrogen Mineralization Across an Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition Gradient in Southern California Deserts Leela E. Rao 1, David R. Parker 1, Andrzej Bytnerowicz.
Introduction to Irrigation Design Sprinklers – uniform application over entire area – lawns.
Soil C Dynamics Following Addition of 13 C-labeled Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) Residue Paul White and Dr. Charles W. Rice Department of Agronomy Kansas.
Quick Methods for Determining Plant Available Water
Additional Questions, Resources, and Moving Forward Science questions raised in the development of a science assessment Effect of Conservation Tillage.
Soil physics Magnus Persson.
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL
Physical Properties of Soils GES175, Science of Soils.
Chapter 4: Soil Architecture and Physical Properties
Soil-climate impacts on water cycling at the patch level.
Characterization of Soil Shrink-Swell Potential Using the Texas VNIR Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy Library Katrina M. Hutchison, Cristine L.S. Morgan,
Soil Physical Properties Used to Assess Soil Quality Field Exercise.
Overview of Soil Properties for Crop Production By J.G. Mexal Department of Plant & Environmental Sciences New Mexico State University.
Ch. 4 continued Soil Properties.
Convection Convection: transfer of heat by a flowing liquid or gas
Water in Soil. The basis of irrigation Soil Plant Evapotranspiration Plant requirements.
Groundwater Hydraulics Daene C. McKinney
Impact of Soil Health on Crop Production Francisco J. Arriaga Soil Science Specialist Dept. of Soil Science & UW-Extension.
Making sure we can handle the extremes! Carolyn Olson, Ph.D. 90 th Annual Outlook Forum February 20-21, 2014.
Measuring Soil Physical Properties to Assess Soil Quality Charles W. Raczkowski North Carolina A&T State University Presented at the Soil Quality Workshop.
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
Measuring Forest Sustainability: How Forest Harvesting Affects Key Indicators of Soil Quality Alicia L. Kiyvyra FS 533.
Lecture 7 b Soil Water – Part 2
Understanding soil air/water dynamics. No-till soilTilled soil Porosity the soil’s respiratory and circulatory system (Young and Ritz, 2000) White zones.
Lab 9: Building a Soil Moisture Characteristic Curve or Moisture Release Curve A plot of water content, , vs. soil tension, or versus pressure, .
Soil Physics schedule: Overview on hydraulic characteristics
Soil Respiration Unit: Soil Science. Objectives O Define: soil respiration and soil microbes O Explain the role of soil respiration in determining soil.
INFLUENCE OF LANDUSE ON ORGANIC MATTER DISTRIBUTION IN SOIL AGGREGATE SIZE FRACTIONS IN ILE-IFE, SOUTHWESTERN NIGERIA By Oyedele, D.J.; Pini, R.; Sparvolli,
Results of Long-Term Experiments With Conservation Tillage in Austria Introduction On-site and off-site damages of soil erosion cause serious problems.
Soils Genesis and Characterization Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Water Movement Below Surface
Soil Water Tension Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Characterization of Soil Moisture Status and the Movement of Water in Soils.
Variation of Surface Soil Moisture and its Implications Under Changing Climate Conditions 1.
STATISTIC MODELING OF RESULTS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING Częstochowa, 2004.
Ch. 4 continued Soil Properties.
ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY SOUNDING TO STUDY WATER CONTENT DISTRIBUTION IN HETEROGENEOUS SOILS 1 University of Maryland, College Park MD; 2 BA/ANRI/EMSL, USDA-ARS,
Soil Water Processes:Chapter 3 Learn how soil properties influence runoff, infiltration and plant growth. Learn how soil properties influence runoff, infiltration.
Soil Bulk Density Unit: Soil Science. Objectives O Define: ammonification, available water holding capacity, nitrification, bulk density, denitrification,
Soil Structure, Density, and Porosity
Soil Chapter 2 Soil Physical Properties Pages 26 – 60.
Acknowledgements Authors thank the Russian Foundation for Basic Research for financial support of the work (project № ). Thermal diffusivity.
: constants ■ Experimental data Regression Proposed constants  Olesen’s threshold water content model best predicted the tortuosity of three tested soils.
BASIC SOIL PLANT WATER RELATIONS
Photo: David Brazier/IWMI Photo :Tom van Cakenberghe/IWMI Photo: David Brazier/IWMI Water for a food-secure world W. Mekuria, A. Noble, C.T.
Maintenance of soil quality and sustainable production through implementation of Conservation Agriculture Production Systems (CAPS) in rainfed, sloping.
Lecture 7 b Soil Water – Part 2 Source: Dept of Agriculture Bulletin 462, 1960.
Water Budget IV: Soil Water Processes P = Q + ET + G + ΔS.
Protocols for Mapping Soil Salinity at Field Scale: EC a Survey Considerations D.L. Corwin 1 and S.M. Lesch 2 1 USDA-ARS, U.S. Salinity Laboratory Riverside,
Reduced tillage and cover crops as a strategy for mitigating atmospheric CO2 increase through soil organic carbon sequestration in dry Mediterranean agroecosystems.
Soil Physical Properties Used to Assess Soil Quality
Soil Bulk Density/Moisture/Aeration
Winfried E.H. Blum, Georg J. Lair & Jasmin Schiefer
Sardar Patel Institute Of Technology
Soil Make-Up Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum
Department of Agriculture & Environmental Science, Lincoln University
conservation agriculture
Dhurba Neupane1, Juan Solomon2 and Jay Davison3
and No-Tillage under Various Crop Rotations.
C. Kallenbach1. , W. Horwath1, Z. Kabir1, J. Mitchell2, D
Jili Qu Department of Environmental and Architectural College
Physical Properties of Soils
SOIL SCIENCE FACULTY Seasonal dynamics of soil CO2 efflux and soil profile CO2 concentrations in arboretum of Moscow botanical garden Goncharova Olga.
HIERARCHICAL SET OF MODELS TO ESTIMATE SOIL THERMAL DIFFUSIVITY
Modeling nitrogen gas emission under free and controlled drained at St Emmanuel using Root Zone Water Quality Model Qianjing Jiang & Zhiming Qi Department.
soil wets up during rain
Presentation transcript:

Soil structure and C sequestration under no tillage management Gayoung Yoo* and Michelle M. Wander Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences University of Illinois

Variable no tillage influences by sites No tillage (NT) does not always increase C sequestration. – Soils are fine textured and poorly drained where soil erosion is not a major factor or yield under NT is reduced.

Background Wander et al., 1998 No till Conventional till

SOIL STRUCTURE INPUT Crop yield Soil CO 2 efflux OUTPUT Soil erosion microbes SOC Soil water Soil temp. Tillage

Soil structure and SOM dynamic models

Site description DeKalb Poorly drained Drummer silty clay loam Monmouth Somewhat poorly drained Muscatine silt loam Treatments NT : no tillage CT : conventional tillage Randomized complete block design - 3 blocks - Fixed effect: site, till - Random effect: year, date

Objectives Investigate soil CO 2 evolution patterns where tillage practices have had varied influences on SOC Characterize site- and treatment-based differences in soil physical factors that might control C dynamics Determine whether the soil structural quality explains differences in SOC mineralization

Experimental methods Soil CO 2 efflux measurement – Li Cor 6400 (from 2000 to 2002) Environmental variables – Soil temperature, soil moisture, penetration resistance (PR), bulk density, and pore size distribution Statistical method – ANOVA using PROC MIXED – Non-linear regression using PROC NLIN (SAS Institute)

Seasonal mean and specific C mineralization

Soil physical parameters Soil water -----% b 22.86a 24.30a 23.6a Bulk density ---g cm a 1.39b 1.41b 1.31a † Means, estimated with least square means, within site or tillage not followed by the same letter were significantly different at P < Effect Soil temp o C SiteDeKalb18.85a Monmouth18.24a TillageNT18.54a CT18.55a Penetration resistance -- blows m b 58.83a b 59.97a

Correlation coefficients Soil temp Soil water PRBD Specific C min rates Soil temp *** Soil water1-0.19*-0.30*-0.34*** PR BD Specific C min rates 1

Development of Q 10 equation Basic Q10 model with soil temperature and gravimetric water contents – Soil CO 2 evolution = (b + r*SWC)*Q10 (Ts-10)/10 SiteQ 10 brR2R2 DeKalb Monmouth R 2 (validation)

Pore size distribution † Least square means within site not followed by the same letter were significantly different at P < Nissen et al. (unpublished data) Total poreMacropore (> 30 um) Micropore ( < 30 um) ml g -1 soil DeKalbNT0.444 a0.104 a0.334 a CT0.442 a0.109 a0.340 a MonmouthNT0.339 a0.068 a0.271 a CT0.379 b b0.294 a A B A B A B

Least limiting water range (da Silva et al., 1994; Topp et al., 1994) θ fc Field capacity at Mpa (Haise et al., 1955) θ afp Air-filled porosity of 10 % (Grable and Siemer, 1968) θ sr Soil resistance of 2 Mpa (Taylor et al., 1966) θ wp Wilting point at -1.5 Mpa (Richards and Weaver, 1944) Bulk density (g cm -3 ) Volumetric water content (cm 3 cm -3 ) LLWR

The calculation of LLWR: Pedotransfer functions (da Silva and Kay, 1997) LimitsFunctionsData input θ fc SOC, clay, bulk density θ afp bulk density θ wp SOC, clay, bulk density θ sr SOC, clay, bulk density wet dry (1-D b /2.65) – 0.1

Mean LLWRs SiteTillθ fc θ afp cm 3 cm DeKalb NT0.541 c0.379 b CT0.560 d0.412 a Monmouth NT0.427 b0.360 a CT0.411 a0.384 a Wet limit Dry limit θ wp θ sr c0.346 c c0.322 b b0.276 b a0.243 a LLWR a a b c

LLWR and SOC mineralization

Summary and Conclusions Inherently high protective capacity soils – High clay content, high SOC, high macroporosity, low BD, low LLWR – Not likely to be affected much by practices that alter structure Intermediate protective capacity soils – Medium clay content, medium SOC, medium macroporosity, high BD and LLWR – Physical properties can be altered to affect biological activity and C sequestration by tillage practice

Acknowledgement I would also like to thank Todd Nissen, Ver ó nica Rodr í quez, Inigo Virto, and Iosu Garcia for their invaluable assistance in the field. Special thanks to Emily Marriott, Ariane Peralta, and Carmen Ugarte for their helpful discussion, editing, and advice.