SCRAMx: The Story of Continuous Alcohol Monitoring Presenter Name and Date Making a Difference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ignition Interlock Devices: An Overview John M. Priester NHTSA/ABA Judicial Fellow Administrative Law Judge Iowa Dept. of Inspections & Appeals.
Advertisements

TRAFFIC INJURY RESEARCH FOUNDATION A DRIVING FORCE FOR SAFETY Status and Vision of Ignition Interlock Use Robyn Robertson, M.C.A. Traffic Injury Research.
September 25, 2008 PROBATION ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY (PANJ) Separate alcohol from the offender... and your job will get much easier.
Continuous Alcohol Monitoring and the SCRAM System Greater Littleton Youth Initiative September 11, 2009.
 Comprehensive review of DWI administrative license sanctions  Project Goal – Recommend effective sanctions that: › Reduce alcohol-related fatalities.
NOW is the time for Transformation of our Criminal Justice System NOW is the time for 11X15 “The time is always right to do what is right” MLK “The time.
Effectiveness of a Cognitive Therapy for Repeat Drinking and Driving Offenders Kathleen A. Moore, PhD Melissa L. Harrison, MS M. Scott Young, PhD Department.
El Paso County COMMUNITY CUSTODY PROGRAM AN OVERVIEW Originally Presented to EPC Board of County Commissioners November 14, 2002 CCP.
Alabama’s New Ignition Interlock Law Effective September 1, 2012 Patrick Mahaney Montgomery, Alabama.
DUI AMENDMENTS PROPOSED BY ART LUSSE JUNE 30, 2010 LAW & JUSTICE INTERIM COMMITTEE.
By: David Salinas.  Driving while either intoxicated or drunk is dangerous and drivers with high blood alcohol content or concentration (BAC) are at.
DWI COURT Determining the Model Target Population.
ALCOHOL, DRUGS, AND CRIME DUI Trends and Countermeasures  Association for Criminal Justice Research  McClellan, CA  March 17, 2005 Cliff Helander, Chief,
Connecticut Criminal Justice Cross-Training Conference Collaborative Partners Assisting Crime Victims During the Offender Re-entry Process August 20, 2010.
1 The Importance of Successful Reentry to Jail Population Growth Presented by: Allen J. Beck, Chief Corrections Statistics Program Bureau of Justice Statistics.
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change Nov. 10, 2010 Lecture James M. Byrne, Professor.
Effective and Ineffective Laws To Reduce Drunk Driving Richard Roth, PhD Executive Director, Impact DWI Citizen Lobbyist and Research Consultant Supported.
The New Technology of Community Corrections James Byrne Lecture.
1 Hillsborough County Alcohol and Drug Indicator Profile M. Scott Young, Ph.D. Kathleen Moore, Ph.D. Department of Mental Health Law and Policy Louis de.
An approach for the judicial system to reduce the influence of drug and alcohol abuse on crime.
THE 24/7 SOBRIETY PROJECT. Origins Created by South Dakota Created by South Dakota Has existed since 2005 Has existed since 2005 Now in use in 57 of 66.
Chapter 13 Parole Conditions and Revocation. Introduction Parole conditions determine the amount of freedom versus restriction a parolee has Accomplishment.
Austin American Statesman August 21, 2007 Texas leads nation in number of drunken driving deaths WASHINGTON BUREAU Tuesday, August 21, 2007 WASHINGTON.
Roth and Marques2006 RWJ SAPRP Annual Mtg.1 Regaining Control of Revoked DWI Offenders Interlocks As an Alternative To Hard License Revocation Substance.
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change James M. Byrne, Professor March 26,2015.
Elmore County Drug and DUI Court
Driver Education Chapter 7: Driver Privileges and Penalties.
NOW is the time for Transformation of our Criminal Justice System NOW is the time for 11X15 “The time is always right to do what is right” MLK “The time.
Drunk Driving: A Strategy for Reducing Recidivism 12 th Annual Michigan Traffic Safety Summit Tuesday March 13, 2006 Bradley Finegood, MA, LLPC.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions: Between Probation and Incarceration 1.
Drug Courts: Some Answers to Our Burning Questions NADCP May 2008.
1 The MDOC Five Year Plan to Control Prison Growth Phase III: Long Term Policy Options SUMMARY BRIEF SUMMARY BRIEF Preliminary MDOC Proposal Revising Michigan’s.
Classification and Supervision in Probation and Parole
Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
REALIGNMENT RESEARCH UPDATE January 24, Realignment Research Group Charter  Define a Data Governance Processes  Make recommendations for a county-wide.
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
for LAW ENFORCEMENT PROFESSIONALS
Blame it on the ALCOHOL. Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) amount of alcohol in your system based on a test of your breath, blood or urine. illegal to.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 10 – Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Presentation to the Illinois State University April 20, 2006 Dr. Ronald Henson, Ph.D. Ignition Interlock Devices: Should they be Mandated for DUI Offenders?
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Why You Should Not Drink and Drive David Mockus Penn State Hazleton CAS 100A- 07.
Alcohol Interlocks and Continuous Alcohol Monitoring.
Nonresidential Intermediate Sanctions
Justice Alternatives for Wisconsin: Reducing the Costs of the Criminal Justice System Presentation to the Wisconsin Joint Legislative Council May 9, 2007.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
Legal Consequences Illegal Drug Possession And Underage Drinking Presented by Mrs. Noël.
Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.
Task Force on Public Safety OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION OCTOBER 30, 2013.
IGNITION INTERLOCKS How To Use Them Effectively to Reduce Drunk Driving Richard Roth, PhD Santa Fe DWI Planning Council Meeting Thursday September 12.
AAMVA Ignition Interlock Working Group J.T. Griffin Chief Government Affairs Officer MADD Name.
Chapter 6: Driving Under the Influence. What is the number one killer on American roadways? What is the number one killer on American roadways? Alcohol.
California Interlock Evaluation TRB: January, 2005 An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Ignition Interlock in California Report authors: David J., DeYoung,
Corrections Also known as community-based corrections Community corrections: Refers to a wide range of sentences that depend on correctional resources.
Senate Bill 64 Omnibus Crime/Corrections Bill To improve public safety, slow the growth of Alaska’s prison population, and save money. 1.
Fairbanks S.O. Treatment and Management Program (1998-Nov. 2103) Moreen Fried, LCSW # (1998-Nov. 2013)
History and Concepts of Drug Courts
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Biomarker Project – OWI Enhancement Grant
“The time is always right
FY17: Briefing on Jail Bed Contingency Funds
Summit County Probation Services
Misdemeanors Matter.
A MULTI-TRACK DUI COURT SYSTEM FOR REPEAT OFFENDERS
Misdemeanors Matter.
C H A P T E R F I V E.
Good practice exchange on drink driving policies: Finland
Why You Need a DUI Court and How to Get Started
Presentation transcript:

SCRAMx: The Story of Continuous Alcohol Monitoring Presenter Name and Date Making a Difference.

Mission Changing the game to revolutionize alcohol offender management CAM + House Arrest Recidivism rates for alcohol offenders have been virtually unchanged for the last 30 years! AMS delivers an enabling technology and service platform that changes the way the corrections industry can manage alcohol offenders.

Making a Difference. AMS Timeline 1991 Original AMS patent filed 1997 ► AMS formally established as a company, prototype completed 2002 Began 18-month BETA with Michigan DOC 2003 ► SCRAM introduced; AMS creates CAM category; second set of patent applications submitted prior to launch 2006 ► SCRAM adopted by courts in 40 states 2007 ► SCRAM reaches 100 million alcohol-test milestone; used in 44 states; second set of patents granted 2008 ► AMS launches smaller, lighter version of SCRAM bracelet; third set of patent applications submitted 2009 ► SCRAM now in 48 states; more than 120,000 clients monitored 2010 ► AMS launches SCRAMx (CAM + house arrest) 2011 ► SCRAMx increases compliance from 76% to 83%; 220,000 clients monitored; 20M monitored days; 830M tests performed ► ►

Making a Difference. The Problems We Are Solving 40% of all offenders are alcohol involved when arrested 1.4 million DUI arrests every year 80% of domestic violence is alcohol related Jails and prisons are overcrowded The system is overwhelmed Recidivism rates remain unchanged The hardcore drunk driver (HCDD) persists Traditional methods have not produced better results

Making a Difference. Predominately focusing on:  Often drive with a high BAC of  Incur repeated DUI arrests  Are highly resistant to behavioral change  Are 385x more likely to be involved in a fatal crash than non-drinking drivers Sources: Century Council, National Highway Traffic Safety Association (NHSTA), Traffic Injury Research Foundation (TIRF) The Hardcore Drunk Driver... Every state’s problem

Making a Difference. SCRAMx Solution PRODUCT Court-validated, industry-proven technology for 24/7 accountability PROGRAMS Contingency management models that can be adapted to a specific application SERVICES Professional management of turnkey, custom CAM programs by AMS’ channel organization 225,000 monitored in last six years Tailored to federal, state, and local requirements Serving more than 1,800+ jurisdictions nationwide 220,000+ offenders monitored since 2003 Integrating components to deliver the SCRAMx advantage

Making a Difference. SCRAMx Product SCRAMx System Components SCRAMx Bracelet monitors for alcohol and curfew compliance Base Station receives data from bracelet Data transmits – via wireless or analog – from base station to SCRAM NET SCRAM NET is the central database and repository for analysis and reporting Innovation:

Making a Difference. Why CAM? Breathalyzer test 7 AM Offender starts drinking 6 PM Breathalyzer test 5 PM Offender peaks Offender is sober 6 AM Breathalyzer test 7 AM Unless you're lucky, random tests miss most drinking events. Offenders can drink around random breathalyzer tests. Alcohol metabolizes quickly: Random vs. Continuous Testing

Making a Difference. SCRAMx Programs Adaptability:  Prevalent throughout federal, state, and local levels of the criminal justice system  A djustable contingency management enables supervision authorities to ratchet sanctions or incentives up or down based on behavior SCRAMx Applications Parole / Re-entry Treatment / Recovery Probation Sheriffs’ Departments Specialty Courts Pretrial

Making a Difference. Alcohol-related offenses: 2,804,595 (20% of total arrests) DUI Public Order Domestic Violence U.S. Corrections Summary Alcohol-related offenders: 2,737,044 (37% of total corrections) Probation Parole PrisonJail Correctional Supervision Annual Arrests Source: FBI US Crime Stats million supervised

Annual Snapshot: Drunk Driving ‒ 2011 DUI  1.4 million DUI annual arrests*  65% conviction rate*  910,000 convictions  70% fit description of hardcore drunk drivers (HCDDs)*  630,000 HCDDs  Approximately only 23% of HCDDs ordered to monitoring programs* *FBI Crime Statistics, 2011 *National Highway Traffic Safety Association *The Century Council MONITORED UNMONITORED = HUGE opportunity to MAKE A DIFFERENCE through increased monitoring HCDD DUI DUI = 100,000 offenders *Includes CAM (2011), Ignition Interlock (2008), and 24/7 Sobriety (2011) programs HC D KEY: Monitoring Programs Make a Difference.

Making a Difference. AMS HCDD Snapshot ‒ 2011 Targeting the hardcore drunk driver DUI = 100,000 offenders KEY: DUI  Estimated 630,000 HCDD arrests annually nationwide  70% of all DUI arrests  47,405 HCDDs monitored in 2011 (70% of the 67,721 clients who completed SCRAMx programs in 2011)  About 8% of all HCDDs nationwide ordered to SCRAMx in 2011 *The Century Council Targeting the balance HCDD DUI HC D HCDDs Arrested Annually Nationwide (2011) HCDDs Ordered to SCRAMx in 2011

Making a Difference. Lifetime Statistics AMS Lifetime Stats – from 2003 through 3/1/2012 Lifetime% Last 12 Months % Overview Total Clients Monitored: 220,30167,721 Total Readings: 838,113,333261,488,258 Total Monitored Days: 20,433,2255,285,258 Alcohol Compliance* Clients Completed: 205,86953,172 Compliant: 157,85377%44,21383% Noncompliant 48,01623%7,82317% Confirmed Violations 0 157,85339,516 1 – 2 32,7535,748 3 – 5 15,2632,075 Average days on program: 9197 Average daily noncompliance: Average days to first situation: 5362 * Compliance is defined as no drinking or tampering while on the device

Making a Difference. An Interesting Correlation…

Making a Difference. Smart Justice FOR: Smart Supervision Behavioral Risk Monitoring Intensity Cost to Monitor BALANCING:

Making a Difference. Integrated Supervision ALCOHOL MONITORING CONTINUUM Dynamically adjustable mix of continuous, scheduled, and random testing HIGH BEHAVIORAL RISK LOW BEHAVIORAL RISK ▲▲ ▲ MODERATE BEHAVIORAL RISK Jail / Prison $50-75 per day Pharma- Injectable $33 per day SCRAMx $11 per day SCRAM $9.5 per day *Alcohol Biomarkers $8-12 per test $3-4 per day Supervised 2x Breath Random Testing $4-8 per day Ignition Interlock $2.5-3 per day

Making a Difference. Case Study – Noncompliant Offender Repeat DUI or High BAC Conviction Jail – SCRAMx Random/Ignition Interlock TIME by MONTHS RISK Adjusting up for noncompliance Adjusting down for compliance and time served – –––––– – – 12 Time Competed CAM + House Arrest – CAM – Random – SCRAM SCRAMx SCRAM Random/Ignition Interlock ▲ Confirmed alcohol consumption from random test

Making a Difference. Case Study – Compliant Offender Hardcore Drunk Driver Conviction Jail – SCRAMx Random/Ignition Interlock TIME by MONTHS RISK Adjusting up for noncompliance Adjusting down for compliance and time served – –––––– – – 12 Time Competed CAM + House Arrest – CAM – Random – SCRAM

Making a Difference. Offender numbers speak for themselves  88% felt SCRAM helped them stop drinking  87% would recommend SCRAM to others with alcohol problems  80% paid their court fees and fines while on SCRAM  $13.35 was the average daily dollar amount spent on alcohol before SCRAMx SCRAMx Participant Exit Survey Out of 10,000 offenders:

Making a Difference. The Offender Perspective  “The SCRAMx device has proven to me that I can do everyday things in, life no matter what the circumstances... something that AA or other alcohol awareness classes could not make me understand.” “The SCRAMx program saved my life. I was lost in alcohol. SCRAMx should be recommended in every DUI program.” “This was an awakening for me and made me not want to drink − ever. Living is a lot better now. I got my life back!” “Easy choice of go clean or go back to jail. [SCRAMx] does work.” “[With SCRAMx] I didn’t feel like a criminal. The bracelet saved my life and perhaps even someone else’s.” “It kept me from my first drink so I could get back on my feet and make the right choices.” “It allowed me to keep my job, stay with my family, and stay alive.” “The SCRAMx device has proven to me that I can do everyday things in, life no matter what the circumstances... something that AA or other alcohol awareness classes could not make me understand.” The greater good...

Making a Difference. When you know that... ??% 77% 83% No formal daily monitoring SCRAM SCRAMx 83% of your alcohol offenders are fully compliant while on SCRAMx... you can:  Focus on the 17% who require more active supervision  Streamline case management  Lower costs and tax burdens  Improve outcomes  Benefit from “smart justice” strategies

Making a Difference. Alcohol Monitoring Systems, Inc. 86% SCRAMx Hardcore drunk driving Every state’s problem Thank You! Questions and Answers

Making a Difference. Contact Us Presenter name: Scott Cranmore Phone: Cell: TENNESSEE RECOVERY & MONITORING