Accelerated Post-Fire Flood Analyses Hydraulics URS Group Inc. 2010 ASFPM National Flood Conference May 19, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Questions concerning the Halloween Flood in Onion Creek Presentation by David R. Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at.
Advertisements

Need For Updating Alluvial Fan Floodplain Delineation Guidelines: An ASFPM Discussion Paper ASFPM National Conference Louisville, Kentucky May 19, 2011.
Scoping the North Carolina Cooperating Technical State Project Ed Curtis, P.E., CFM, North Carolina Division of Emergency Management Jerry Sparks, P.E.,
3-D Flood Risk Visualization Beth Norton December 21, 2011.
1 FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Update FEMA Public Meeting October 22, 2009.
Approximate Floodplain Mapping - Procedures and Approaches to Data Challenges Troy Thielen, CFM Brett Addams, CFM May 18, 2010.
Risk Map Early Demonstration Project Lackawanna County, PA CCO Meeting September 13, 2011.
Application of HEC- HMS for Hydrologic Studies Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering CVEN689 – Applications of GIS in CE Instructor: Dr.
Proven People... Proven Technology... Proven Results Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel Management Module Katherine Hermann, CFM, Dewberry Ken Logsdon,
Utilizing a Basinwide Approach for the North Carolina Flood Mapping Program John Dorman, Program Director, NC CTS Flood Mapping Program Gib Jones, P.E.,
David Knipe Engineering Section Manager Automated Zone A Floodplain Mapping.
Tropical Storm Allison & its impact on Harris County
Changes to FEMA Mapping John Grace, CFM Coastal Engineer - FEMA Region 1 - Boston March 14, 2014 – The Soil and Water Conservation Society – Winter Conference.
Flood Risk Datasets & Products in Greenville County, South Carolina Agenda Greenville Co, SC Overview Process, Examples, Lessons Learned, and Community.
FLOOD STUDY Oswego County, NY FEMA REGION II February 7, 2011.
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and Map Modernization History and Overview Bill Massey and Sam Crampton Dewberry South Florida Water Management.
DICKINSON BAYOU WATERSHED GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS Jason Christian, P.E. National Flood Workshop October 24-26, 2010 – Houston, Texas PROBABILISTIC FLOODPLAIN.
Copyright [insert date set by system] by [CH2M HILL entity] Company Confidential Hydrologic Evaluation of the Little Thompson River Phase 2: Little Thompson.
Advances in Alluvial Fan Floodplain Delineation & Modeling A Call For Action ASFPM Arid Regions Committee May 2010.
North Carolina White Oak River Basin Plan December 19, 2000.
Taming the Alabama River Patrick Dobbs & Clay Campbell AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc Alabama Water Resources Conference.
Ventura County Levee Systems Levee Certification Compliance Efforts Presentation to the Ventura County Watershed Protection District Board of Supervisors.
ASFPM May 19, 2011 by Darryl Hatheway, CFM, AECOM San Diego and Vince Geronimo, CFM, PE, AECOM Oakland.
National Research Council Mapping Science Committee Floodplain Mapping – Sensitivity and Errors Scott K. Edelman, PE Watershed Concepts and Karen Schuckman,
North Carolina Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan Final Scoping Meetings January 30 and 31, 2001.
Assessment of Economic Benefits of the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Hydrologic and Hydraulic Case Studies Adapted from a Presentation to NRC.
Flood Map Modernization and North Dakota Julie Prescott, ND Map Modernization Coordinator North Dakota State Water Commission And Brian Fischer, CFM, GIS.
FEMA’s Risk MAP Coastal Updates – An Overview Jonathan E. Westcott, P.E. ASFPM 2012 National Conference San Antonio, TX Session D.8.
Prepared by: Burnham – Floodplain Study October 23, 2009 Presented by: Marty Spongberg, PhD, PE, PG AMEC Geomatrix, Inc.
Introduction Conservation of water is essential to successful dryland farming in the Palouse region. The Palouse is under the combined stresses of scarcity.
Natural vs. Accelerated Soil Erosion Natural geologic erosion has occurred at a relatively slow rate since the earth was formed. Natural erosion produces.
Analysis of Slide Impacts on the North Fork Stillaguamish River Floodplain For Snohomish County May 5, 2014.
1 Integrating Water Resources Engineering and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) National Weather Service NWSRFS International Workshop October 21-23,
1-Day of 2-D How Are The Results Of Hydraulic Models Used To Manage Floodplain Development Under The NFIP? Eric Simmons, FEMA Region IX.
Seasonal variation in surface- groundwater exchanges in an urban floodplain with active gravel-bar formation Dorothea Lundberg Karen Prestegaard University.
How do humans affect watersheds and the hydrologic cycle ?
[Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis Utilizing Terrain Data] [Barrett Goodwin]
Talavera Floodplain Delineation Study Technical Review Noah’s Ark Group Study Las Cruces, New Mexico September 17, 2008.
Preliminary Engineering Analysis and Design Foxcroft Colony and Mosby Woods Condominiums Prepared for: City Council Work Session November 3, 2015.
Logan River Floodplain Mapping Kedric Curtis, Josh Hogge, Jordan Jarrett, Jared Justensen 4/25/2015 CEE 6190 Photo credit:
Regional to Engineering Scale HUC8 HUC12 Catchment Engineering Hydrology Engineering Hydraulics Personal – a flooded home.
Overview of HAZUS for Flood Loss Estimations
Flood Hazard Area, Flood Insurance and Stormwater Management
North Carolina Lumber River Basin Plan
Colorado Hazard Mapping Phase III Program Overview
Using GIS to Plan for and Mitigate Flooding on Tribal Lands
Map-Based Hydrology and Hydraulics
FEMA and Geospatial Coordination in West Virginia
Some Project Ideas Literature review of particular subjects – what is new since “Applied Hydrology” was originally published? What are the key papers in.
Risk MAP & the Little River Basin
The potential for microbial nutrient cycling processes in urban soils
MON TUE WED THU
GANTT CHARTS Example Text Text Here Text Here Text Here Text Here
January MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
January MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
January Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
January MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
January MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
January MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
January MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
January MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
January MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT SUN
S M T W F S M T W F
2016 | 10 OCT SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Automated Techniques for Hydraulic Modeling Applications
1 January 2018 Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Automated Zone A Floodplain Mapping
Presentation transcript:

Accelerated Post-Fire Flood Analyses Hydraulics URS Group Inc ASFPM National Flood Conference May 19, 2010

Accelerated Post-Fire Flood Analyses Hydraulics 2 Overview  Southern California Wildfires of October 2007  Destruction of buildings -Residential -Industrial & Commercial  Increased flood hazards in burn areas  Analyses prepared for FEMA’s Region IX Office by MAP IX-Mainland, a Joint Venture of -URS -Dewberry -Schaaf & Wheeler -Airborne 1 -TerraPoint

Accelerated Post-Fire Flood Analyses Hydraulics 3 Overview Graphic from FEMA, created by Michael Baker Jr., Inc.

Accelerated Post-Fire Flood Analyses Hydraulics 4 Study Area  Southern California -Orange, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties Approximately stream miles identified for Emergency or Priority study Graphic from FEMA, created by Michael Baker Jr., Inc.

Accelerated Post-Fire Flood Analyses Hydraulics 5 Study Area  Southern California -Orange County affected FIRM panels Graphic from FEMA, created by Michael Baker Jr., Inc.

Accelerated Post-Fire Flood Analyses Hydraulics 6 Needs  Rebuilding effort -Large-scale -High urgency  Reduce risk for future property losses -Existing flood zones invalid due to altered land conditions -Develop revised flood zones before rebuilding  Pre- and Post- burn analyses -Analyses for 1%-annual-chance storm event -Analyses for 20%-annual-chance storm event

Accelerated Post-Fire Flood Analyses Hydraulics Timeline  October 2007 – Wildfires occur,  Through November 19 – Planning and scoping phases are completed  November – Engineering Analyses completed for Emergency & Priority Streams  November 28 – Floodplain boundary shapefiles completed for Emergency & Priority Streams 7 Tues Nov 20 Wed Nov 21 Wed Nov 21 Thurs Nov 22 Fri Nov 23 Fri Nov 23 Sat Nov 24 Sat Nov 24 Sun Nov 25 Mon Nov 26 Tues Nov 27 Tues Nov 27 Wed Nov 28 Wed Nov 28 Thurs Nov 29

Accelerated Post-Fire Flood Analyses Hydraulics 8 Hydrology  Hydrologic analyses were not performed in the URS Gaithersburg office  Presented at the ASFPM 2008 conference  Key concepts -Land cover change – vegetation -Soil change – permeability

Accelerated Post-Fire Flood Analyses Hydraulics 9 Hydraulics - Overview  Physical Changes -Increased peak flows from hydrologic changes Creates higher water surface elevations (WSELs) -Floodplain vegetation reduced Creates lower WSELs due to decreased roughness in overbank flow -In-stream debris Creates higher WSELs due to increased roughness in channel flow

Accelerated Post-Fire Flood Analyses Hydraulics 10 Hydraulics – Determination of overbank roughness  Burn severity -Determined in planning phase -High, medium, low burn -GIS raster (grid) format

Accelerated Post-Fire Flood Analyses Hydraulics 11 Hydraulics – Determination of overbank roughness  Pre-burn roughness coefficients -Determined aerial imagery  Post-burn roughness coefficients -Adjusted from pre-burn roughness values -Decreased by degree of burn severity -Burn severity defined locally, by cross-section Table from the final California Post-Fire Flood Studies report to FEMA, by MAPIX-Mainland

Accelerated Post-Fire Flood Analyses Hydraulics 12 Hydraulics – Debris effects  Post-burn channel roughness coefficients -Pre-burn roughness coefficients increased to account for debris obstructing channel flow -Amount of increase determined by burn severity -Defined locally Table from the final California Post-Fire Flood Studies report to FEMA, by MAPIX-Mainland

Accelerated Post-Fire Flood Analyses Hydraulics 13 Hydraulics – Conclusions  Physical changes due to burn analysis -Partial contribution to decrease in WSELs -Partial contribution to increase in WSELs  Resulting order of magnitude of WSELs Pre-burn 20%-annual-chance event Post-burn 20%-annual-chance event Pre-burn 100%-annual-chance event Post-burn 100%-annual-chance event  Net contribution of post-burn effects to significantly increase WSELs and widen floodplains

Questions?