The Chemistry Eurobachelor An Introduction June 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ECA working group 1: Mutual recognition PARIS, 6 December 2006 Europe in Transition: ACCEPTING & RESPECTING Marianne Cox NARIC/ENIC THE NETHERLANDS.
Advertisements

Joint degrees in Flanders Seminar Joint Degrees 6-7 May 2004 in Stockholm Erwin Malfroy NARIC-Vlaanderen.
Bologna Process at the University of Helsinki University of Helsinki June 2005
Towards 2010 – Common Themes and Approaches across Higher Education and Vocational Education and Training in Europe - New and emerging models in vocational.
1 Dr Ray Wallace School of Biomedical and Natural Sciences Nottingham Trent University, UK.
The Chemistry Eurobachelor ® and Euromaster An Introduction October 2006.
Quality Labels for Interdisciplinary Studies Related to Chemistry European Chemistry Thematic Network Association Evangelia A. Varella president, European.
Quality Labels in Chemistry: Euromaster Terry Mitchell October 2006.
IMPROVING THE RECOGNITION SYSTEM Developments along subject lines and their impact on Recognition December 3rd, University of Latvia, Riga Dr. Julia González,
CHUGD November 2005 The Bologna Process and Geology The Tuning Project
ECTS- the European Credit System Estela Pereira Universidade de Aveiro.
Quality Labels: The Chemistry Eurobachelor ® and Euromaster Brussels, May 4th 2007.
The Chemistry Eurobachelor Introduction and Report on Current Status Peter Gaertner EUPEN´s 8 th General Forum Ghent, Belgium September 2006.
/8 EGF2007 Sant Feliu de Guixols 1 European Framework for Physics Bachelor Degree “EuroBachelor in Physics”
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
External Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area: Challenges and Trends Rolf Heusser, Switzerland TechnoTN Forum, Brussels, 4 May 2007.
Mohammad Alshayeb 19 May Agenda Update on Computer Science Program Assessment/Accreditation Work Update on Software Engineering Program Assessment/Accreditation.
Report Thematic Group 1 part 3 European Framework for Physics Bachelor Degree.
1 Education in Europe: Quality Enhancement and Setting Standards Dr Marie Donaghy Head of School of Health Sciences.
~ Science for Life not for Grades!. Why choose Cambridge IGCSE Co-ordinated Sciences ? IGCSE Co-ordinated Sciences gives you the opportunity to study.
ECTN Working group Developing Independent Learners in Chemistry Report Madrid Meeting March 2006 Nataša Brouwer Universiteit van Amsterdam ECTN Annual.
ECTS definition : Student centred system, Student centred system, Based on student workload required to : Based on student workload required to : Achieve.
Quality Labels in Chemistry: Eurobachelor ® and Euromaster Terry Mitchell Vienna, April 2006.
EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY REGIONAL HIGHER EDUCATION QUALIFCATIONS FRAMEWORK.
Are you thinking about doing chemistry in university? By Tahera Begum.
00 Workshop 2 “Elaboration of educational programmes according to qualifications framework” 16. und 17. February 2011 Georgia, Bakuriani Margret Schermutzki.
Management Committee TUNING methodology and tools for curricula design: II part - Questionnaires Fausta Ludovici.
Experiences in Undergraduate Studies in the University of Zaragoza LEFIS Undergraduate studies Oslo, 19 th -20 th May 2006.
LEFIS W2 Posgraduate Workshop 1 LEFIS, WG 2 Postgraduate studies Meeting, Rotterdam.
Language components included in Tourism courses in European universities -final results- Research conducted by the work group “SLEST” for the “Leonardo-
Management Committee WELCOME TO TUNING 3. Management Committee A SPECIAL WELCOME TO OUR SPEAKERS, GUESTS, NEW MEMBERS AND THEMATIC NETWORK REPRESENTATIVES.
The Structure and Role of QA Bodies at the University and faculty/department levels UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia.
Akkreditierungsrat The German System of Accreditation Franz Börsch Accreditation Council Office SYSTEM OBJECTIVES STANDARDS PROCEDURE.
Learning Learning Outcomes, Qualification Frameworks, Goals, Cycles, Levels, Credit, Workload, Profiles Andy Gibbs Bishkek 2011.
national qualification framework and the learning outcomes based education Petar Bezinović University of Rijeka and Institute for Social Research in Zagreb.
Recognition in Europe: Principles of the Lisbon Recognition Convention, implementation and challenges Prof. Andrejs Rauhvargers, BFUG member Chairman of.
Current developments in the ECTS/DS - Good Practice in Finland Bratislava 22 – 23 February 2008 Matti Isokallio.
ECTS Users’ Guide 2015 Approved at Yerevan Ministers’ Meeting May 2015.
ACE Opening Session 2002 News from the Recognition Field Lesley Wilson Secretary General European University Association (EUA)
European Studies David Kereselidze European Studies Relatively new field, the origin of which was conditioned by the integration processes.
Common features for the subject area report Business and Management LEFIS Continuing education Malta, 8th April 2006.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 I.2 Relevant Documents
Strengths and weaknesses of the implementation of the Bologna Process: Spain Round Table Bratislava,10-12 October Guillermo Bernabeu, University of Alicante.
CURRICULUM DESIGN AND RECOGNITION OF PERIODS OF STUDY ABROAD: ECTS PROCEDURES Maria Sticchi Damiani t.
Learner-Centred and Competence-Based Curricula T. N. Mitchell Čatež, December 15th 2006.
Bob Johnson, ECBE, SEEC 11 Nov Qualification Frameworks and Credit - Articulation with Europe Bob Johnson Commissioner for Credit Rating European.
REGIONAL NETWORK ON QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK FOR SOUTH EAST EUROPE Cetinje, 8-9 July 2008 QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS: ROLE AND IMPORTANCE FROM A REGIONAL.
Curriculum reform Tirana 16th-17th March. A bit about ESIB ESIB-the National Unions of students in Europe is an umbrella organization representing over.
ECTS New developments Professor Luc François Director of Educational Affairs.
Developing Instruments and Methods for Accreditation of Vocational Learning Outcomes in Finland Paper Presentation for Symposium of Vocational Education.
Slide 1 Accounting Education Requirements and Implementation of the EU Directive on Statutory Audit Wim Moleveld Education Subgroup of the Liberalization/Qualification.
New Collaborative Practices in Aligning SCHE in Europe and the USA, two representative cases in Europe Golden Sands 15 June 2009 Ivelina Yoveva, IUC Bulgaria.
The European teaching reform, LEFIS and the Tuning model The LEFIS Model LEFIS Postgraduate studies Rotterdam, 16 th -17 th June 2006.
The Bologna Process at the University of Helsinki University of Helsinki
N ational Q ualifications F ramework N Q F Quality Center National Accreditation Committee.
THE EUROPEAN CHEMISTRY THEMATIC NETWORK ( ECTN) Thematic Networks seek to... Assess curriculum innovation through comparison between curricula Promote.
Common features for the subject area report Law and Policy LEFIS Continuing education Malta, 8th April 2006.
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Erevan, Armenia, 2008 The Three-Cycle System Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis, Bologna.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Education and Culture Life Long Learning: Education and Training policies School Education and Higher education.
Polish Norwegian Paths Katowice 17 – 18 June 2009 Sigrid Ag.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 13-14, 2009 III.1 The accreditation report:
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
EXPERIENCE OF AL-FARABI KAZAKH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN CREDIT TRANSFER SYSTEM: WORKLOAD OF STUDENT AND TEACHER IN THE.
Mobility, Recognition, ECTS Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
The Bologna Process and Tuning Project: Educational Structures in Europe Dag Wiese Schartum.
GENERAL PRESENTATION The Tuning Methodology TUNING PROJECT
Bulgaria Higher Education System
Curriculum in Statistics at the University of Oviedo
Presentation transcript:

The Chemistry Eurobachelor An Introduction June 2005

The „Tuning Project“ is the HE institutions‘ answer to the political decisions underlying the Bologna process. It involves almost 150 HE institutions in 9 subject area groups; apart from chemistry, these are: physics, mathematics, history, earth sciences, business, education sciences, nursing, European studies. The chemistry Eurobachelor is a product of Tuning.

ECTN is a network with over 120 members from 33 countries; apart from universities these include nine national chemical societies (DE, FR, GB, IT, NL, CS, SK, LT, SI). ECTN also exists in the form of an Association under Belgian law. Both the Network and the Association are open; further member institutions, chemical societies or other chemistry-interested organisations are welcome to join us!

: developed by Tuning Chemistry Subject Area Group May 2002: presented at Closing Meeting of Tuning Phase One in Brussels April 2003: adopted by ECTN Association Assembly in Prague October 2003: adopted by FECS (now EuCheMS) General Assembly (…from Cork to Vladivostok) April 2004: ECTN Association decides to offer “Eurobachelor Label” to interested institutions September 2004: application to EU Commission for funding of pilot project for accreditation of the “Chemistry Eurobachelor Label” accepted The Eurobachelor Story So Far

The Eurobachelor is about quality: defining reference points on an international basis. The Eurobachelor is about quality assurance: evaluation and accreditation. The Eurobachelor is about autonomy: not a straitjacket but a framework to be applied as the institution wishes. The Eurobachelor is about flexibility: it can readily be adapted as the needs of the subject change. The Eurobachelor is about transparency: together with the Diploma Supplement it is an easily understood qualification. The Eurobachelor is based on ECTS and its correct application. ww.ectn.netww.ectn.net

The Eurobachelor is about mobility: it makes it possible for the graduate to move easily within Europe, but also almost certainly throughout the world. The Eurobachelor is about recognition: even if the Lisbon convention is in force, institutions need to apply it.

Planned or realised (as of Feb. 2005): Ba = 180 ECTS Ba = 240 ECTS VARIABLE ONE TIER Planned or realised (as of Feb. 2005): Ba = 180 ECTS Ba = 240 ECTS VARIABLE ONE TIER LENGTH OF THE FIRST CYCLE

The Chemistry Eurobachelor - A framework for a European first-cycle degree in chemistry Outcomes Define which competences a programme seeks to develop, or what its graduates should be able to know, to understand, and to do Aid to transparency Aid to the development of better-defined degrees Aid to the development of systems of recognition Aid to employability Chemistry Eurobachelor – defined as a programme of 180 credits based on outcomes, but also applicable to institutions using 240 credits.

Aspects considered in the Chemistry Eurobachelor Learning outcomes (adapted from QAA benchmarks–UK) Modularisation Credit distribution ECTS and student workload Mobility Methods of Teaching and Learning Assessment, Grading Quality Assurance

Credit distribution: At least 150 of the 180 credits should deal with chemistry, physics, biology or mathematics. The course should include EITHER a bachelor thesis of 15 ECTS credits OR an equivalent industry placement.

Credit distribution: Compulsory modules (total of at least 90 credits): Organic chemistry Inorganic chemistry Physical chemistry Analytical chemistry Biological chemistry Physics, Mathematics Semi-optional modules (a minimum of 3 modules - 15 credits) from:  Biology  Computational chemistry  Chemical technology  Macromolecular chemistry  ….and others, depending on the institution

Modularisation We recommend that the chemistry Eurobachelor programme should be modular, with EITHER 5, 10, 15 OR 6, 9, 12, 15 credits per module The learning outcomes for each module should be identified The modules should be of three types:  compulsory  semi-optional  and elective (freedom for the student is important!)

OUTCOMES Subject knowledge Abilities and Skills (a) Chemistry-related cognitive abilities and skills (b) Chemistry-related practical skills (c) Generic/Transferable skills

OUTCOMES – SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE (1) Major aspects of chemical terminology, nomenclature, conventions and units. The major types of chemical reaction and the main characteristics associated with them. The principles and procedures used in chemical analysis and the characterisation of chemical compounds. The characteristics of the different states of matter and the theories used to describe them. The principles of quantum mechanics and their application to the description of the structure and properties of atoms and molecules. The principles of thermodynamics and their applications to chemistry. The kinetics of chemical change, including catalysis; the mechanistic interpretation of chemical reactions.

OUTCOMES – SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE (2) The characteristic properties of elements and their compounds, including group relationships and trends within the Periodic Table The structural features of chemical elements and their compounds, including stereochemistry The properties of aliphatic, aromatic, heterocyclic and organometallic compounds The nature and behaviour of functional groups in organic molecules Major synthetic pathways in organic chemistry, involving functional group interconversions and carbon-carbon and carbon-heteroatom bond formation The relation between bulk properties and the properties of individual atoms and molecules, including macromolecules (both natural and man-made), polymers and other related materials The structure and reactivity of important classes of biomolecules and the chemistry of important biological processes.

Abilities and skills (a) Chemistry-related cognitive abilities and skills Ability to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of essential facts, concepts, principles, and theories relating to the defined subject knowledge Ability to apply such knowledge and understanding to the solution of qualitative and quantitative problems of a familiar nature Skills in the evaluation, interpretation, and synthesis of chemical information and data Ability to recognise and implement good measurement science and practice Skills in presenting scientific material and arguments in writing and orally, to an informed audience Computational and data processing skills, relating to chemical information and data

c) Generic Skills: These are the Key to Employability of the Bachelor! –The capacity to apply knowledge in practice, in particular problem-solving competences, relating to both qualitative and quantitative information. –Numeracy and calculation skills, including such aspects as error analysis, order-of-magnitude estimations, and correct use of units. –Information-management competences, in relation to primary and secondary information sources, including information retrieval through on- line computer searches. –Ability to analyse material and synthesise concepts. –The capacity to adapt to new situations and to make decisions. –Information-technology skills such as word-processing and spreadsheet use, data-logging and storage, subject-related use of the Internet. –Skills in planning and time management. –Interpersonal skills, relating to the ability to interact with other people and to engage in team-working. –Communication competences, covering both written and oral communication, in one of the major European languages (English, German, Italian, French, Spanish) as well as in the language of the home country. –Study competences needed for continuing professional development. These will include in particular the ability to work autonomously. –Ethical commitment

Assessment procedures and performance criteria (1) The assessment of student performance will be based on a combination of the following: Written examinations Oral examinations Laboratory reports Problem-solving exercises Oral presentations The Bachelor Thesis Additional factors which may be taken into account when assessing student performance may be derived from: Literature surveys and evaluations Collaborative work Preparation and displays of posters reporting thesis or other work

Assessment (2) This should involve examinations at the end of each term or semester. “Comprehensive examinations" are possible, but must be given credits. Written examinations will probably predominate over oral examinations. Examinations should not be overlong; 2-3 hour examinations will probably be the norm. Examination papers should if possible be marked anonymously and the student should be provided with maximum feedback, for example in the form of "model answers".

Assessment (3) Examination questions should be problem-based as far as possible; though essay-type questions may be appropriate in some cases, questions involving the reproduction of material simply learned by heart learning should be avoided as far as possible. Questions should be designed to cover the following aspects: The knowledge base Conceptual understanding Problem-solving ability Experimental and related skills Transferable skills

Quality Assurance: the “Eurobachelor Label”

Supported by the European Commission (pilot project) Run by an international “Label Committee” First: “Slimline” self-assessment procedure Second: One-day site visit by 1 national and 2 international experts (at least in the pilot phase) Third: Award recommendation made by Label Committee Final decision taken by Administrative Council of ECTN Association National chemical societies and EuCheMS will play a vital role Valid for 5 years with simple renewal procedure

The Label Committee Terry Mitchell, Dortmund (chair) Raffaella Pagani, Madrid (vice-chair) David Barr, Cambridge (secretary) Pavel Drasar, Prague Peter Gärtner, Vienna Pascal Mimero, Lyon Gino Paolucci, Venice Arne van der Gen, Leiden Evangelia Varella, Thessaloniki Richard Whewell, Glasgow

The Site Visit 2 international experts 1 national expert One-day visit Discussions with institution leaders, programme coordinators, teachers, students Tour of facilities

Applications so far: 11, from 8 institutions Countries so far: Finland, Ireland, Italy First award: University of Helsinki

The Costs No cost to students (but they benefit!) During pilot project (probably until June 2006) total cost to the institution € 2000 After pilot project the institution will have to bear costs for the site visit (an equal flat rate for all institutions) Possible fee reduction for members of ECTN Association (after pilot project)