Transit Signal Priority Applications New Technologies, New Opportunities Peter Koonce, PE APTA BRT Conference – Seattle, WA Wednesday, May 5, 2009 Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development of Standards for Transit Priority Paul R. Olson, P.E. PTOE FHWA Western Resource Center.
Advertisements

Bus Priority in Portland - Lessons Learned
1. Green Lights Program Objectives Improve Quality of Synchronization in a Short Timeframe Noticeable Improvements to Motorists Appropriate Allocation.
FTA’s Small Starts Program Charlotte, North Carolina October 11, 2007.
1. We can’t promise all green lights… …but we can minimize the number of red lights, stops and delays.
MBTA Key Bus Route Improvement Program Joanne Haracz, AICP responsive client solutions since 1976 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Association April.
WMATA Bus ITS Project Update Transit Signal Priority Briefing to the Traffic Signals and Operations Working Group April 21, 2005.
MTC Technology Transfer Seminar Transit Signal Priority Abbas Mohaddes, President & CEO October 22, 2003.
Transit Signal Priority Work Group Report 7/30/13
A Practical Approach to Bus Rapid Transit (or is it Road Rapid Transit…?) Cliff Henke NABI USA Sales and Marketing.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
Measuring the Effects of Congestion and Request Location on Transit Signal Priority Matt Dorado Erin Qureshi River Hwang Portland State University.
Lecture #11 Signal Coordination: Chapter 22. Objectives Factors affecting coordination Basic theory of signal coordination Application to arterial progression.
TSP Must Fit Within An Overall Agency ITS Plan. Transit Priority Data Needs Vehicle Location –Speed Door & Lift Status –Predictions Passenger Counting.
Advanced Metering Infrastructure
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
San Jose Traffic Signal Communications and Synchronization Project Presented by Ho Nguyen City of San Jose, Department of Transportation May 12, 2009.
Transit Priority Systems (TPS) Chun Wong, P.E. City of Los Angeles, Department of Transportation T3 Webinar.
Reinventing Transit A European Perspective David Bayliss.
2015 Traffic Signals 101 Topic 11 Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) and Railroad (RR) Preemption.
Signalized Intersection Delay Monitoring for Signal Retiming SafeTrip-21 Safe and Efficient Travel through Innovation and Partnership in the 21 st Century.
1 Public Safety Wireless Network – State of Wyoming.
Evolving TSP to meet the needs of the ITS community 1.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Definition - CommuterLink CommuterLink is an interagency transportation management system. What does that mean? Put another way, it is the use of computer.
Envisioned Role for NTI Concerning ITS Deployment in Egypt by Dr. Mahmoud EL-HADIDI Professor of Telecommunications at Cairo U & Consultant at NTI 3 rd.
Transit Signal Prioritization (TSP) and RTS RTS Transit Signal Priority Work Group A Path to Successful Implementation 1 September 18, 2013.
Transit Signal Prioritization (TSP) and RTS RTS Transit Signal Priority Work Group A Path to Successful Implementation 1 July 16, 2013.
Mark Phillips BSDA/Metro Long-Range Planner. The Foundation: Moving Transit Forward.
Overview of Transit Signal Priority Program in King County Prepared by Transit Signal Priority Unit.
Dixie Regional ITS Architecture Project Summary July 31, 2006.
USDOT, RITA RITA: Oversight of USDOT’s R&D programs  University Transportation Centers $100M  UTC Consortia $80M  UTC Multimodal R&D $40M  Intelligent.
Roadway Safety Panel How can ITS assist in bridging vehicle technology with roadway design and function?
Transit Priority Strategies for Multiple Routes under Headway-based Operations Shandong University, China & University of Maryland at College Park, USA.
July 29, 2009 George Saylor, PE ODOT Senior ITS Engineer.
MOTOROLA and the Stylized M Logo are registered in the US Patent and Trademark Office. All other product or service names are the property of their respective.
1 IntelliDrive SM Research, Development and Emerging Technologies National ITS Perspective Panel Joseph I. Peters, Ph.D. Federal Highway Administration.
NESTS Transit Planning Project Facilities and Technology Briefing with CAST of Cornell University and Creighton Manning Engineering, LLP.
Guidelines for the Planning and Deployment of EVP and TSP Presented by: Hesham Rakha Associate Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Director,
Implementation Transit Priority System and Mobile Internet Passenger System in the City of Los Angeles Kang Hu and Chun Wong City of Los Angeles Department.
Roles of TMCs in Incident Management on Managed Lanes INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW MICHAEL TANTILLO VHB.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overcoming Multi-Jurisdictional Challenges Lessons Learned Implementing Bus Signal Priority.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP): Deployment Issues and R&D Needs as Identified by Practitioners Hallie Smith Brendon Hemily.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference Implementing a BRT Project: The Preliminary Steps 8:30 – 9:50 a.m. Frank SpielbergBMI-SG Incoming Chair, TRB.
Line 22 BRT: Summary Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority May 2003.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference The Results of Selected BRT Projects 2:00 – 3:20 p.m. Walt Kulyk Director, FTA Office of Mobility Innovation.
Use of HITL in Bus Priority Design Kevin Balke, Ph.D., P.E. TransLink ® Research Center Director Texas Transportation Institute Hardware-in-the-Loop Symposium.
A Vehicle Manufacturer’s Perspective on VII Christopher Wilson ITS Oregon- Feb 1, 2005 Christopher Wilson.
Transit Signal Priority: Managing Expectations Kevin N. Balke, Ph.D., P.E TransLink ® Research Center Director Texas Transportation Institute Transportation.
Abstract The City of Portland, in collaboration with TriMet (Portland’s regional transit service provider) and the Oregon Department of Transportation,
Express/Rapid Bus Opportunities for Priority Bus Transit in the Washington Region Sponsored by National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Chun.
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.
The Indiana Local Technical Assistance Program Local Agency Perspective Neal Carboneau, PE Research Manager.
Opticom ™ GPS Priority Control System 3M™ Opticom™ GPS Priority Control System Driver Training.
SCATS Congestion Improvement Program. The Scope of the SCATS Congestion Improvement Program.
DSRC and SPaT, SSM, SRM & MAP
There is a lot to talk about if we think of the advantages of a wireless connection, the most important of its aspects is mobility and everything that.
Intelligent and Non-Intelligent Transportation Systems 32 Foundations of Technology Standard 18 Students will develop an understanding of and be able to.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
March 10, 2010 Smart City Award: ITS America. Traffic Signal Systems in Oregon Significant application of adaptive control (100+ signals) Priority for.
Thinking Inside the Box
Intelligent Transportation System
ITSVA Annual Conference and Exposition May 2016
Transit Signal Priority: Evolution
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data
Presentation transcript:

Transit Signal Priority Applications New Technologies, New Opportunities Peter Koonce, PE APTA BRT Conference – Seattle, WA Wednesday, May 5, 2009 Technology Evolution in Transit Signal Priority Applications

Today’s Message Transit signal priority relies on cities, counties, and state transportation agencies that manage infrastructure By seeking mutually beneficial solutions for transit preferential treatments we can build partnerships that deliver quality transit Implementation of TSP is predicated on the policies of these agencies

Traffic Engineer’s Transit definition Light Rail Bus Exclusive Right-of-way Guaranteed priority or preemption Mixed Traffic Limited amenities and preferential treatment

The problem - buses in mixed flow

Exclusive bus lanes are the best option, but mixed flow is the general rule Transit Signal Priority and other improvements can reduce costs and help us meet our objectives

Traffic Signal Timing Traditional signal timing considers traffic moving from intersection to intersection Primary objective is minimizing delay for vehicles Time Distance

Modifies signal timing slightly recognizing buses operate differently then private automobiles Provides an opportunity to reduce bus delay Dwell at Stop Delay at Signal Time Distance Transit Signal Priority

Transit Signal Priority – Red Truncation Opens windows of opportunity for transit vehicles to reduce signal delay Signal controllers have different levels of functionality red truncation With Without

Transit Signal Priority – Green Extension Opens windows of opportunity for transit vehicles to potentially eliminate signal delay –“Borrow or Take” green extension With Without

Transit Signal Priority Application Recognize its not so important how much green for transit, but green at the right time –Shorter cycle lengths typically reduce delay for transit vehicles (passive) –Signal priority also provides greater flexibility

TSP Applied on Time Space Diagram Application of TSP on two intersections Time Distance Red Truncation Green Extension

Standard Approach to TSP Message Assess bus stop location Determine traffic signal capabilities Set detection range in field based on estimate of speed

Vehicle Detection Systems Various technology alternatives based on system architecture –Optical detector –Radio based –WiFi

Bus Detection Technology – Infrared Optical Advantages –Existing equipment on all many intersections –Proven technology –Lower Costs if already installed for Emergency Vehicle Preemption Disadvantages –Line of sight –Limited information transmitted –Proprietary An optical emitter as installed on a bus in Portland, OR. The lens has a polarized cover that allows the infrared signal to be sent to the intersection.

Bus Detection System – Simple Concept

Bus Detection Technology – Radio Based (900 MHz) Disadvantages: –Early products remain proprietary in nature –Limited two-way communication is provided Advantages: – Efficient Vehicle-to- intersection communication – Potential for vehicle-to- external system communication – Reduced implementation costs

Bus Detection Technology – Wireless (2.4/4.9 GHz) Wireless Advantages : –Ability to transmit data packets (not just vehicle ID/class) –Additional shared applications beyond TSP Disadvantages: –Requires coordination with IT staff –Muncipal WiFi experience has been challenging –Higher costs

Future Approach to TSP Messages Assess bus stop location Determine traffic signal capabilities –Measure traffic conditions to affect plan –Measure transit conditions (late, etc?) Set detection range in field based on estimate of speed –Base detection range on actual or anticipated speed –Use estimation of queuing –Update message to confirm arrival

Concept of Operations for an Advanced System Smart Bus System –AVL and schedule is integrated on bus –Bus requests priority at local controller –Priority Granted at local controller and feedback is provided to transit and traffic management center

Existing AVL Criteria

Additional Possible Criteria Is the bus going to stop at a nearside location? –Bus stop requested? –Vehicle diagnostics? What is the current ridership? –Did the bus stop here yesterday? –Does it normally stop? What time of day is it? –Is there traffic congestion? –Are we competing with other buses?

Priority Request Server Information Measure traffic conditions to “update” green time available Accept priority request when bus is in range based on anticipated speed and estimated queue Provide feedback between agencies

Practical Benefits of a TSP System: Building the ITS Network through Shared Goals Decision for TSP (circa 1997) –Helped enable Fire Preemption System and Opticom system (security) upgrades Decision for TSP – Today –Wireless network based –TSP could enable communication to intersections previously unconnected

Summary Partnerships are needed to build the transportation system to meet the goals of tomorrow

Questions Peter Koonce