River Mapping for Endangered Species Habitat and Streambank Erosion Assessment: Case Studies at Fort Benning and Camp Atterbury Paul Ayers, Kelsey Hensley,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Advertisements

1 Nicole Carlozo NOAA Coastal Management Fellow June 7, 2013 Integrating Water Quality and Coastal Resources into Marine Spatial Planning in the Chesapeake.
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
Buffers and Special Water Quality Protections
Yakama Nation Pacific Lamprey Recovery Project Core Data And Monitoring Framework.
Tasks and selected results of the project „Ecosystem approach to marine spatial planning – Polish marine areas and the Natura 2000 network” Department.
A section has been added regarding Stream Restoration Design Criteria: A. Designs for stream restoration try to mimic natural conditions present in stable.
Riparian Zone Habitat Assessment Vegetation and More.
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® AN INTRODUCTION TO HYDROGEOMORPHIC (HGM) FUNCTIONAL STREAM ASSESSMENT Facilitated by LRL HGM Team: Jennifer.
Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment
Natural Riparian Resources Vegetation Landscape/Soil Water.
Watershed System Physical Properties Stream flow (cfs) Stream Channel Pattern Substrate Chemical Properties pH Dissolved Oxygen Temperature Nutrients Turbidity.
Healthy Streams Through Bringing People Together
Towards a Rogue River Estuary Implementation Plan John Gardiner MBE, PhD, PE (Oregon)
Habitat Assessment Developed by Ken Cooke Kentucky Division of Water Watershed Watch Program Coordinator Modified by Mike Kemp Professor of Environmental.
The relationship between riparian areas and biological diversity A comparison of streams in eastern Colorado and southwestern Virginia By Ann Widmer
Common Monitoring Parameters. Step 1 Consider purpose/objectives of monitoring Assess use attainment Characterize watershed Identify pollutants and sources.
Bioassessment 1.0. Stream Visual Assessment Protocol 1. Turbidity 2. Plant growth 3. Channel Condition 4. Channel Flow Alteration 5. Percent Embeddedness.
Watershed Assessment (ENSC 202)
Watersheds Capture, Store And Safely Release Water.
ENSC 202 – 2004 Phase 1 Steps 2-5 Watershed Assessment (ENSC 202) Phase 1 – Steps 2-5 Extracted from Vermont ANR Stream Geomorphic Assessment Protocols.
Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research Program Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
“Habitat Assessment Using the QHEI “ Edward T. Rankin June 6 City of Columbus, Level 3 Training Course Columbus, Ohio Senior ResearchScientist
GIS-based River Habitat Mapping in the Obed Wild and Scenic River Paul Ayers, University of Tennessee Use kayak-mounted underwater videomapping system.
Why collect GPS data How are we going To find this trap???
Ecology and environment, inc. International Specialists in the Environment The McKinstry Creek & Riparian Area NYSDOT Rt. 219 Mitigation Project Analysis.
Habitat Restoration Division Coastal Program Partner For Wildlife Program Schoolyard Habitats Chesapeake Bay Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Stream Measuring & Mapping Training Workshop August 3, 2014.
Interim Headwater Drainage Feature Guideline: Protecting HDFs through Urbanization Laura C.R. Del Giudice, B.Sc., M.F.C., Senior Planning Ecologist.
Habitat Presentation 1 Phil Kaufmann --- USEPA, Corvallis, OR
Emily Shimada, Environmental Science, University of Idaho Research Team B: Watershed Management in the Andean Paramo Faculty Advisors: Dr. Alex Fremier,
Channel Modification Washington Dept. Forestry, 2004, Channel Modification Techniques Katie Halvorson.
1c. Determine Reach Potential 1b. Review Existing Information & Delineate & Stratify Reaches 1a. Identify Assessment Area & Assemble ID Team 1d. Complete.
Lower South ForkClearwater River Lower South Fork Clearwater River Nez Perce Tribe DFRM Watershed Division Mark Johnson-Project Leader
Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – September 2004 Part 2 – Habitat Assessment.
Kentucky’s comprehensive Water Monitoring and Assessment Program addresses water quality management objectives outlined in the Clean Water Act, as well.
 Assigning aquatic life use designations  Determining causes and sources of impairment  Restorability (antidegradation, priority setting, TMDLs)  401.
Dry Creek Fish Habitat Enhancement Feasibility Study Current Conditions Summary.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
To main objectives: Build a seamless, routed stream network across WAM tiles Apply a process based, riparian zone delineation tool Riparian Processes.
Addressing the Sediment Problem in Sonoma Creek Watershed Rebecca Lawton 1, Deanne DiPietro 1, Laurel Collins 2, Arthur Dawson 1 1 Sonoma Ecology Center,
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
SUMMARY. Summary Instructions After the checklist is filled out and rationale documented, the ID Team discusses the responses, reads the category definitions.
Former Channel Habitats of the Sacramento River: Physical and Ecological Processes and Restoration Potential Presented by Ingrid C. Morken By G. M. Kondolf,
State of the Streams Loudoun County: 2005 Loudoun Strategic Watershed Management Planning Conference February 23, 2006 Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun.
Riparian Areas: Functions and Conditions Authors: Gene Surber, MSU Extension Natural Resources Specialist Bob Ehrhart, Research Specialist, RWRP, Univ.
PCWA Study Plan Physical Habitat Characterization Study Plan –Geomorphology Study Plan –Riparian Habitat Mapping Study Plan –Aquatic Habitat Characterization.
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index Bradley Hansen John Nieber Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering For BBE 4535/5535 Fall 2011.
Natural Riparian Resources Water Landscape & SoilVegetation.
Jim Stockinger, Erin Eid, Jennifer Maloney and Mike Trojan
Environmental Flow Instream Flow “Environmental flow” is the term for the amount of water needed in a watercourse to maintain healthy, natural ecosystems.
EVALUATING STREAM COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE: Overcoming the Data Deficit Through Standardized Study Design Kenton L. Sena (EPA VSFS Intern), Joe Morgan,
Outside! The map below shows a meandering river. Points
Source: Stream Corridor Restoration Manual WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.
Using RMMS to Track the Implementation of Watershed-based Plans
CASE STUDY- West Fork Beaver River, West Point, OH. Constructed Sept
Fluvial Geomorphology
Henrico County Stream Assessment / Watershed Management Program
TERMINOLOGY Macrohabitat – water quality and hydrology
Stream Geomorphic Assessment of Allen Brook
Water Testing Project for the North Fork River
Module 10/11 Stream Surveys
Streams Hydrodynamics
Module # 17 Overview of Geomorphic Channel Design Practice
Kastanis- Existing Conditions
Iowa’s River Restoration Toolbox Level 1 / Base Training
Risk Assessment for Lakes
Presentation transcript:

River Mapping for Endangered Species Habitat and Streambank Erosion Assessment: Case Studies at Fort Benning and Camp Atterbury Paul Ayers, Kelsey Hensley, Ken Swinson, Bryan McConkey, Brett Connell Biosystems Engineering, University of Tennessee Heidi Howard, ERDC - CERL Mike Peterkin, Natural Resources Coordinator Camp Atterbury JMTC Hugh Westbury, Watershed Program Manager, Fort Benning

Objectives Use canoe and kayak-mounted underwater videomapping system Develop aquatic habitat maps for the Driftwood River (20 miles) Develop optimum habitat maps for Rayed Bean (Villosa fabalis) mussel - PWTB Snorkel and sneak peek mapping Streambank mapping (erosion) - Legacy Ocean/coral reef aquatic habitat maps

VIDEO CAMERAS LASERS SONAR TRANSDUCER WATERPROOF CASE

Geo-referenced Image Recording Audio Encoder Audio output (GPS output) Audio Input (GPS input) GPS Video input Splash Cam DVD Recorder GPS NMEA Data (ASCII)

Canoeing with Drop-down Camera

Georeferenced Above Water Image

GIS Attributes Defined GPS Position Depth Width Substrate River Characteristic Embeddedness Streambank Erosion (bank height, bank angle, riparian diversity, river sinuosity)

Modified Wentworth Scale SubstrateDescription BedrockUnbroken Rock Surface Fines/Sand< 0.3 cm (0.1 inch) Small Gravel0.3—1.0 cm (0.1—0.4 inch) Large Gravel1.0—10 cm (0.4—4 inch) Cobble10—30 cm (4—12 inch) Small Boulder30—60 cm (12—24 inch) Large Boulder> 60 cm (24 inch)

Using underwater lasers to determine Substrate scale (dot spacing is 7.75 inches)

Substrate Classification

Sand Small Gravel Cobble Small BoulderLarge BoulderBedrock Some Substrate Types

River Surface Characteristics

Driftwood River River Characteristics 20 mile 38,503 Sample Points

Driftwood River Thalweg Depth 20 mile 38,053 Sample Points

Driftwood River Substrate 20 mile 38,053 Sample Points

Species at Risk Habitat Maps Rayed Bean (Villosa fabalis) mussel Develop Optimum Habitat Criteria

Rayed Bean (Villosa fabalis) Habitat Criteria primarily found in small, shallow rivers usually about 4 feet in depth or less in and near riffles/runs usually found deeply buried in sand and gravel substrates often in and around aquatic vegetation Search (Depth <= 4 feet) River Characteristic = riffle/run Substrate = sand or gravel

Rayed Bean (Villosa fabalis) 6.7% Optimum Habitat

Obed Wild and Scenic River

Virtual tour capabilities

Summary - River Habitat Videomapping for Aquatic Species at Risk (SAR) Habitat Cover large reaches (10 miles/day) - continuous Non-intrusive, no access required Determine above and below water features Develop total river habitat suitability index By mapping every foot of the river, the total amount and location of optimum habitat can be determined (development occupancy model) Provides permanent historical video database to evaluate changing habitat conditions

Legacy FY 2015 Proposal Species At-Risk, Species of Concern and Declining Species and Habitat (Natural) Pilot or demonstration efforts of new techniques, methodologies, and management practices, including the implementation of new or innovative monitoring and predictive modeling techniques. Ken Oristaglio – Fort Picket (Nottoway River) –Roanoke Logperch –Atlantic Pigtoe Others?

Snorkel mapping for Species counts Embedded video recorder and GPS on back strap

Georeferenced manual underwater recording video for observing under rocks

Legacy Project (Year 1) GIS-based streambank mapping to identify areas of erosion potential on rivers/streams within military installations (Camp Atterbury and Fort Benning) Mapping Site-specific Streambank Erosion

Streambank Erosion Videomapping Determine erodibility and erosivity Identify areas of restoration needs Cover large areas (10 miles/day) - continuous Non-intrusive, no access required Permanent video database and virtual tour capability Uses EPA Bank Assessment of Non-point source Consequences of Sediment (BANCS) for annual total streambank erosion prediction Used to determine sediment TMDL’s.

THE END -Questions? Paul Ayers, University of Tennessee -