MOSAiC Science Planning Workshop 27-29 June 2012 Boulder, CO, USA Workshop hosts: Ola Persson & Matthew Shupe CIRES, University of Colorado & NOAA-ESRL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The GEOSS Science and Technology Stakeholder Network: A spin-off of the EGIDA Project Hans-Peter Plag, Ian McCallum, Steffen Fritz, Shelley Jules-Plag,
Advertisements

Widening the Research Pipeline Update to NSF/CISE BPC Evaluation Workshop December 7, 2006.
1 Report on the 30 th Session of the Joint Scientific Committee of the World Climate Research Programme 6-9 April 2009, Maryland, USA N. McFarlane, T.
Good morning WORKSHOP : LESSONS FROM THE 2007 ICE MINIMUM Review and Business-of-the-Day Martin Miles, Co-Chair Environmental Systems Analysis Research.
Matthew Shupe – Univ. of Colorado/NOAA On behalf of ARM MOSAiC Team Matthew Shupe, Gijs de Boer, Klaus Dethloff, Elizabeth Hunke, Wieslaw Maslowski, Allison.
10 th COP / 26 th MOP; Paris, France; November, th ORM Meeting Report & Recommendations Report from the 9 th Meeting of the Ozone Research.
Exploring Collaborations: Successful Strategies for Increasing Equity and Access to STEM Strategy Session 1: Overview and Game Plan 1.
David M. Legler U.S. CLIVAR Office U.S. Climate Variability and Predictability Program usclivar.org Strategic Themes for US CLIVAR.
Research and Innovation Research and Innovation Introduction 2013 Sprint to Summit (StoS) Barcelona, 16 April 2013 Alan EDWARDS Earth Observation Sector.
Parameters and instruments A. Proshutinsky, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Science and Education Opportunities for an Arctic Cabled Seafloor Observatory.
 Global Integrated Polar Prediction System (GIPPS)  The WWRP Polar Prediction Project (PPP)  The WCRP Polar Climate Predictability Initiative (PCPI)
Slide: 1 27 th CEOS Plenary |Montréal | November 2013 Agenda Item: 15 Chu ISHIDA(JAXA) on behalf of Rick Lawford, GEO Water CoP leader GEO Water.
Washington, DC - Sunday, 7 February 2010 SAON Board Meeting :: January 2012 :: Tromsø, Norway United States Report to the SAON Board Martin Jeffries.
Update on the NASA/NOAA/DOE Collaboration on the Utilization of ROA/UAV/UAS for Global Climate Change and Weather Research Will Bolton Sandia National.
US CLIVAR Themes. Guided by a set of questions that will be addressed/assessed as a concluding theme action by US CLIVAR Concern a broad topical area.
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites John Bates Chair, Joint CEOS-CGMS Working Group on Climate 3 rd WCRP Data Advisory Committee.
US Climate Change Science Program Incorporating the US Global Change Research Program and the Climate Change Research Initiative U.S. Climate Change Science.
MOSAiC Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate Ad hoc Organizing Committee Matthew Shupe – U. of Colorado Klaus Dethloff.
The U.S. Inter-agency Arctic Research Policy Committee (IARPC) 5-year Research Plan, FY13-FY17 1.Understand sea-ice dynamics, ecosystem processes, ecosystem.
Objectives of the ACE TRIM Joe Casas, ACE Technical and Project Manager 1.
WWRP Polar Prediction Project Thomas Jung Chair of the WWRP Polar Prediction Project Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research.
SEARCH AGU Town Hall Meeting: Community Input on Activities & Directions Hajo Eicken Chair, SEARCH Science Steering Committee.
Planning for Arctic GIS and Geographic Information Infrastructure Sponsored by the Arctic Research Support and Logistics Program 30 October 2003 Seattle,
Grant Writing Strategies for Doctoral Students Scott M. Lanyon Professor and Head, Dept. of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior College of Biological Sciences.
Decadal Climate Variability and Predictability Discussion of CLIVAR Research Focus Pan-CLIVAR Meeting, July 16-18, 2014.
Second GPM Applications Workshop 9-10.June Partners in the GPM Constellation Second GPM Applications Workshop 9-10.June.2015.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
The First Step: Translating Needs to Requirements Many applications require the current and past states of the atmosphere near the surface at high spatial.
1 ARCSS eTown Meeting Friday, 22 April 2005 Tuesday, 26 April 2005.
MOSAiC Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate Matthew Shupe – U. of Colorado Ola Persson – U. of Colorado Michael Tjernström.
Joint Canada-Mexico-USA (North American*) Carbon Program Planning Meeting January 25–26, 2007 *By North America we mean the North American land, adjacent.
FNR Foresight: Evaluating Phase 1 and Prospects for Phase 2 Dr. Michael Keenan PREST, University of Manchester, UK FNR Foresight Workshop Luxembourg, 16.
Climate and Cryosphere (CliC): Legacy for 2013 and Beyond Jeff Key NOAA/NESDIS Chair, CliC Observation and Products Panel (Agenda item )
ST-09-01: Catalyzing Research and Development (R&D) Funding for GEOSS Florence Béroud, EC Jérome Bequignon, ESA Kathy Fontaine, US ST Kick-off Meeting.
Status of SEARCH Study of Environmental Arctic Change A system-scale, cross-disciplinary, long-term arctic research program Peter Schlosser SEARCH SSC.
Module V: Writing Your Sustainability Plan Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24, 2015 © 2011.
How do ocean ecosystems work? Use remote sensing to address fundamental questions Lack of field data on BGC processes, impeding calibration and validation.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
1 EMS Fundamentals An Introduction to the EMS Process Roadmap AASHTO EMS Workshop.
Arctic Research Office May, 2002 Update on SEARCH from the Agency Perspective.
IPY International Polar Year Progress report to STG 2.
Theme 2 Developing MPA networks Particular thanks to: Theme 2 Concurrent Session Rapporteurs, Dan Laffoley, Gilly Llewellyn G E E L O N G A U S T R A L.
CIRES-CDC Institutional Partnership Western Water Assessment Review Randall M. Dole, Director Climate Diagnostics Center September 2001.
Expert Group Meeting on Enabling Measures for an Inclusive Green Economy in Africa September, 2014 Introduction to the breakout sessions.
1 USGEO Strategic Assessment Group Process Kathy Fontaine, US/NASA ST Kick-off Meeting Brussels, Belgium July , 2009.
Ice-Based Observatories network in the Arctic Ocean Andrey Proshutinsky, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution NOAA Arctic Science Priorities Workshop,
WIRING DIAGRAM APPROACH Wiring Diagram in Broader Synthesis Context Example from CHAMP Character/Advantages of Such an Exercise Key Principles and Themes.
Discussion: White Paper/ New Arctic Pollution Initiative Boulder, CO 3-5 FEB, 2015 IASC-IGAC Arctic Air Pollution Workshop.
Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate
The Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory
Welcome NW Atlantic Ocean Climate Change and Impacts February, 2010 Bedford Institute of Oceanography February 10, 2010 Rising harbour sea levels.
Objectives Definition Instructions Mark Melanson 8 January 2012.
ASCL Workshop— Boulder, CO Essential Principals Breakout session: 2E Recorder: Christy Gerrits.
MOSAiC Meeting, ASSW, 13 March 2016, Fairbanks Townhall Meeting 13 March :00 – 17:00 Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic.
Ocean Carbon and Biogeochemistry Scoping Workshop on Terrestrial and Coastal Carbon Fluxes and Exchanges in the Gulf of Mexico May 6-8, 2008 St. Petersburg,
Seasonal-to-Decadal Predictions of Arctic Sea Ice: Challenges and Strategies Sponsors: NASA, ONR, Intelligence Community Report available: October 30,
IASC Mission IASC is a non-governmental organization whose aim is to encourage and facilitate cooperation in all aspects of Arctic research, in all countries.
SEARCH Vision / Goals / Activities SEARCH Vision: “Scientific understanding of arctic environmental change to help society understand and respond to a.
Programme Board 6th Meeting May 2017 Craig Larlee
The Atmosphere during MOSAiC
National Science Foundation (NSF)
SIT Chair Priorities and SIT-33 Objectives
Discussion Virtual Constellations
Charting the Course for Ocean Science in the United States:
Report from the 9th Meeting of the Ozone Research Managers of the Parties to the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer Michael J. Kurylo.
  1-A) How would Arctic science benefit from an improved GIS?
Synoptic Arctic Survey Spring 2019 International Workshop
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
ARCSS All Hands Workshop
Presentation transcript:

MOSAiC Science Planning Workshop June 2012 Boulder, CO, USA Workshop hosts: Ola Persson & Matthew Shupe CIRES, University of Colorado & NOAA-ESRL Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate International Arctic Science Committee

Motivation for MOSAiC  Sea-ice melt and broader Arctic change are clearly important and are finally making it into societal dialog.  On many fundamental levels we lack a system- and process- level understanding of observed changes and often cannot model them  Significant limitations to our understanding of important, interdependent processes and feedbacks in a complex system  There exist few process-level observations of the central Arctic climate system, particularly in the present-day system  A changing Arctic has implications for large-scale circulation, lower-latitude weather/climate, other societal interests. MOSAiC Workshop, June 2012

What is MOSAiC? Multi-disciplinary, process-level, Arctic climate system study based on a constellation of observations drifting with the Arctic ice pack. Critical elements include: 1.Intensive, comprehensive observations (Atmos., Ice, Ocean) at a central facility 2.Distributed networks of observations to provide spatial variability and context (buoys, ships, AUV, UAS, aircraft, satellite) 3.Model studies at multiple scales to integrate and incorporate the observational knowledge 4.Observations comprise a testbed for large-scale model evaluation and development MOSAiC Workshop, June 2012

What is MOSAiC? Preliminary design elements: At least 1 full year; preferably multiple years “Sea-ice Lagrangian” perspective; ice as an integrator of vertical fluxes in the system Transpolar drift track Central observatory is ship-supported icecamp Target mixture of sea-ice types Internationally coordinated and supported MOSAiC Workshop, June 2012

What is MOSAiC? MOSAiC Workshop, June Will this type of drift track be possible and/or desirable?

What is MOSAiC? MOSAiC Workshop, June 2012 Building off previous experiences within the Arctic ice pack: Russian drifting stations SHEBA Shorter-term campaigns Many disciplinary obs. Some inter-disciplinary obs. Each of these has key limitations: Length of time Comprehensiveness Spatial context Not in the “new” Arctic Russian drifting station SHEBA

The Science of MOSAiC MOSAiC Workshop, June 2012 Broad Themes  Changes in circulation patterns and impact on local processes  Understanding sea-ice loss and mass, energy, motion budgets  Transfer of momentum, heat, moisture, gases, particles, etc.  Processes active in the “new” Arctic (1 st year vs. multi-year)  Large-scale vs. local processes We are here to define the science!

MOSAiC Science Planning Workshop MOSAiC Workshop, June 2012 MOSAiC activity is organized and supported by the International Arctic Science Committee (IASC). Strong leadership provided by the atmosphere sub-committee and support from cryosphere and marine sub-committees. Additional workshop support provided by University of Colorado-CIRES and NOAA

Michael Tjernström, IASC statement MOSAiC Workshop, June 2012

How did we get here? Individuals developing and promoting ideas within the community (Dethloff, Tjernström, Persson, Perovich, Shupe, etc.) IASC-atmosphere workshop in Potsdam hosted by Dethloff (Fall 2011) Ideas presented/discussed in multiple venues: IASC meetings in Denver (Fall 2011), Montreal (Spring 2012), CliC-sea ice meeting (Fall 2011), ideas presented to various agencies ( ) Broadly supportive response from some program managers (DOE, NSF, ONR in the U.S.) MOSAiC Workshop, June 2012

How did we get here? MOSAiC Workshop, June 2012 Potsdam, Fall 2011 Arctic Drifting Station Workshop, IASC-Atmosphere working group

Who are we? Broad base of experts on Arctic climate observations and modeling Individual introductions Name Affiliation Area of expertise (~1-2 sentences) MOSAiC Workshop, June 2012

What do we hope to accomplish? Broad objective: Develop science themes, objectives, plans for a drifting observatory campaign Establish broad, overarching themes that can be addressed from a drifting observatory Identify important disciplinary elements Make inter-disciplinary linkages Attempt to prioritize scientific themes Networking for potential participants and leaders MOSAiC Workshop, June 2012

Workshop Structure, Part I: Overview Presentations (Wed > Thur) Presenters will give broad overviews, introduce important themes, suggest important linkages, outline areas in need of focus, outline model deficiencies, etc. These are meant to start the discussion and will not be exhaustive! MOSAiC Workshop, June 2012

Workshop Structure, Part II: Breakout Sessions (Thurs pm) Disciplinary focus to better establish & develop disciplinary themes & priorities Facilitated by discussion leaders and rapporteur Objective: Provide a summary of important science questions/themes/ideas (in slide format) for presentation to the plenary session MOSAiC Workshop, June 2012

Workshop Structure, Part III: Plenary Sessions (Fri) Create linkages between disciplines Develop broad overarching theme(s) – i.e., Processes leading to diminishing sea-ice – i.e., Processes that are changing in “new” Arctic Discuss next steps, reaching out to important communities, developing funding opportunities, coordination of activities MOSAiC Workshop, June 2012

This workshop is not…. Implementation planning (although many of the logistical implementation details will be important throughout). A venue to simply present individual research projects (keep the big picture in mind!) MOSAiC Workshop, June 2012

Charge to Participants Think broadly Engage in the discussions and provide your input: This is critical for a successful workshop. Distinguish between general science needs and those that can be addressed using this drifting perspective. Maintain balance. Give everyone the opportunity to present ideas. MOSAiC Workshop, June 2012

Final Workshop Details Workshop-hosted dinner tonight Wireless is available (Mosaic M0sa1c) Rooms: GB124, GC401, 1D403 Restrooms between GB124 and GC402 Security: Please don’t lose your badge! Stay tuned for fire-related issues Please ask Matthew or Ola if you have questions or concerns. MOSAiC Workshop, June 2012

Broad Process Moving Forward Develop Science Plan (Based on this workshop!) Develop and propose cross-cutting theme within IASC (2012) Establish support within other international structures such as SAON, AOS (ongoing) Implementation Planning (next workshop anticipated for Fall 2012 or Spring 2013, possibly in Finland) Open Science Meeting (2013/2014) Develop funding base (2013+) MOSAiC Workshop, June 2012